REVIEW 2 cited by
Constraining $f(Q, L_m)$ gravity with bulk viscosity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We investigate the influence of bulk viscosity on late-time cosmic acceleration within an extended $f(Q, L_m)$ gravity framework, where the non-metricity $Q$ is non-minimally coupled with the matter Lagrangian $L_m$. Analyzing the function $f(Q, L_m) = \alpha Q + \beta L_m$, we derive exact solutions under non-relativistic matter domination. Using observational datasets ($H(z)$, Pantheon supernovae, and their combination), we constrain the model parameters $H_0$, $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\zeta$. The deceleration parameter transitions from positive to negative values around redshifts $z_t \approx 0.80$ to $0.99 $, indicating current accelerated expansion. Moreover, the effective equation of state parameter, $\omega_{eff}$, resembles quintessence dark energy ($-1 < \omega_{eff} < -\frac{1}{3}$), with corresponding values from respective datasets. Finally, we use the $Om(z)$ diagnostic, which confirms that our model demonstrates quintessence-like behavior. Our findings underscore the significant role of bulk viscosity in understanding accelerated expansion in the universe within alternative gravity theories.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Testing the viability of $f(T, \mathcal{T})$ gravity models via effective equation of state constraints
An f(T,T) gravity model with a fitted equation of state matches cosmic expansion data, giving H0=68.04, beta=0.14, gamma=0.96 and an accelerating late universe.
-
Bulk viscous matter in $f(T)$ gravity: A path to cosmic acceleration
Bulk viscous matter in a linear f(T) gravity model is fitted to cosmic data, but the velocity-dependent viscosity case is built on an incorrect Hubble parameter solution.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.