Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Computer Audition: From Task-Specific Machine Learning to Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.15672 v2 pith:XIJEUDBU submitted 2024-07-22 cs.SD eess.AS

classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords modelsaudiofoundationtasksauditioncommunitycomputermultiple
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Foundation models (FMs) are increasingly spearheading recent advances on a variety of tasks that fall under the purview of computer audition -- the use of machines to understand sounds. They feature several advantages over traditional pipelines: among others, the ability to consolidate multiple tasks in a single model, the option to leverage knowledge from other modalities, and the readily-available interaction with human users. Naturally, these promises have created substantial excitement in the audio community, and have led to a wave of early attempts to build new, general-purpose foundation models for audio. In the present contribution, we give an overview of computational audio analysis as it transitions from traditional pipelines towards auditory foundation models. Our work highlights the key operating principles that underpin those models, and showcases how they can accommodate multiple tasks that the audio community previously tackled separately.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Charting 15 years of progress in deep learning for speech emotion recognition: A replication study

    cs.SD 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Newer, larger deep learning models show no consistent gains over older architectures for speech emotion recognition across two naturalistic benchmarks, with results sensitive to model selection and hyperparameters.

Pith tools