Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Front-end & Back-end of Human Automation Interaction Applications \Delta-EVAL A Hypothetical Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.18953 v3 pith:Y4YZ3NPY submitted 2024-07-12 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords benchmarkfront-endsystemsback-endcognitivemetricsapplicationsattempt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human Factors, Cognitive Engineering, and Human-Automation Interaction (HAI) form a trifecta, where users and technological systems of ever increasing autonomous control occupy a centre position. But with great autonomy comes great responsibility. It is in this context that we propose metrics and a benchmark framework based on known regimes in Artificial Intelligence (AI). A benchmark is a set of tests and metrics or measurements conducted on those tests or tasks. We hypothesise about possible tasks designed to assess operator-system interactions and both the front-end and back-end components of HAI applications. Here, front-end pertains to the user interface and direct interactions the user has with a system, while the back-end is composed of the underlying processes and mechanisms that support the front-end experience. By evaluating HAI systems through the proposed metrics, based on Cognitive Engineering studies of judgment and prediction, we attempt to unify many known taxonomies and design guidelines for HAI systems in a benchmark. This is facilitated by providing a structured approach to quantifying the efficacy and reliability of these systems in a formal way inspired by the recent fast developments in AI benchmarking techniques, thus, we attempt to guide designing principles towards a testable benchmark capable of reproducible results that is future-proof, general, and insightful both in the cognitive and technological stacks of any HAI application.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Paradox of Stochasticity: Limited Creativity and Computational Decoupling in Temperature-Varied LLM Outputs of Structured Fictional Data

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In three LLMs generating fictional names and birthdates, model choice dominates processing time and default name archetypes persist across temperature, while rare names appear mainly at mid-range temperatures.

Pith tools