pith. sign in

arxiv: 2408.00596 · v2 · submitted 2024-08-01 · 🧮 math.NT

Strong Hybrid Subconvexity for Twisted Selfdual GL₃ L-Functions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT
keywords hybrid subconvexityGL3 L-functionsspectral reciprocityRankin-Selberg L-functionsDirichlet L-functionsselfdual cusp formsfirst moment methodtwisted L-functions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong hybrid subconvex bounds hold simultaneously in q and t for L-functions of selfdual GL3 cusp forms twisted by primitive Dirichlet characters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes strong hybrid subconvex bounds for L-functions attached to selfdual GL3 cusp forms twisted by primitive Dirichlet characters, holding simultaneously in the conductor q of the character and the spectral parameter t of the form. These bounds represent the natural limit of the first moment method given existing knowledge of the second moment of GL3 L-functions. The argument introduces an explicit spectral reciprocity formula that relates a GL2 moment of GL3 × GL2 Rankin-Selberg L-functions to a GL1 moment of GL4 × GL1 Rankin-Selberg L-functions, and it relies on a Lindelöf-on-average upper bound for the second moment of Dirichlet L-functions restricted to a coset. A reader would care because these sharper bounds on central values give tighter control over the size of L-functions in families than the convexity bound permits.

Core claim

We prove strong hybrid subconvex bounds simultaneously in the q and t aspects for L-functions of selfdual GL3 cusp forms twisted by primitive Dirichlet characters. We additionally prove analogous hybrid subconvex bounds for central values of certain GL3 × GL2 Rankin-Selberg L-functions. The subconvex bounds that we obtain are strong in the sense that, modulo current knowledge on estimates for the second moment of GL3 L-functions, they are the natural limit of the first moment method pioneered by Li and by Blomer. The method of proof relies on an explicit GL3 × GL2 ↔ GL4 × GL1 spectral reciprocity formula, which relates a GL2 moment of GL3 × GL2 Rankin-Selberg L-functions to a GL1 moment of a

What carries the argument

An explicit GL3 × GL2 ↔ GL4 × GL1 spectral reciprocity formula that relates a GL2 moment of GL3 × GL2 Rankin-Selberg L-functions to a GL1 moment of GL4 × GL1 Rankin-Selberg L-functions.

If this is right

  • The twisted selfdual GL3 L-functions satisfy strong hybrid subconvexity simultaneously in the q and t aspects.
  • Central values of certain GL3 × GL2 Rankin-Selberg L-functions satisfy analogous hybrid subconvex bounds.
  • These results achieve the natural limit of the first moment method given current estimates for the second moment of GL3 L-functions.
  • The spectral reciprocity formula supplies a relation between moments at different ranks that can be applied to other hybrid subconvexity problems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The coset second-moment bound for Dirichlet L-functions may have independent applications to estimating character sums or other short-interval problems.
  • If the reciprocity formula can be generalized, it could connect moments involving still higher-rank L-functions.
  • Sharper control on these central values may improve bounds on the distribution of low-lying zeros in the corresponding families.

Load-bearing premise

A Lindelöf-on-average upper bound holds for the second moment of Dirichlet L-functions restricted to a coset.

What would settle it

An explicit computation or asymptotic showing that the second moment of Dirichlet L-functions on some coset exceeds the Lindelöf average bound would falsify the key input and therefore the subconvexity result.

read the original abstract

We prove strong hybrid subconvex bounds simultaneously in the $q$ and $t$ aspects for $L$-functions of selfdual $\mathrm{GL}_3$ cusp forms twisted by primitive Dirichlet characters. We additionally prove analogous hybrid subconvex bounds for central values of certain $\mathrm{GL}_3 \times \mathrm{GL}_2$ Rankin-Selberg $L$-functions. The subconvex bounds that we obtain are strong in the sense that, modulo current knowledge on estimates for the second moment of $\mathrm{GL}_3$ $L$-functions, they are the natural limit of the first moment method pioneered by Li and by Blomer. The method of proof relies on an explicit $\mathrm{GL}_3 \times \mathrm{GL}_2 \leftrightsquigarrow \mathrm{GL}_4 \times \mathrm{GL}_1$ spectral reciprocity formula, which relates a $\mathrm{GL}_2$ moment of $\mathrm{GL}_3 \times \mathrm{GL}_2$ Rankin-Selberg $L$-functions to a $\mathrm{GL}_1$ moment of $\mathrm{GL}_4 \times \mathrm{GL}_1$ Rankin-Selberg $L$-functions. A key additional input is a Lindel\"of-on-average upper bound for the second moment of Dirichlet $L$-functions restricted to a coset, which is of independent interest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves strong hybrid subconvex bounds simultaneously in the q and t aspects for L-functions of selfdual GL_3 cusp forms twisted by primitive Dirichlet characters, as well as analogous bounds for certain GL_3 × GL_2 Rankin-Selberg L-functions. The proof relies on an explicit GL_3 × GL_2 ↔ GL_4 × GL_1 spectral reciprocity formula and a Lindelöf-on-average upper bound for the second moment of Dirichlet L-functions restricted to a coset, which is presented as a key additional input of independent interest. The resulting bounds are described as the natural limit of the first-moment method given current knowledge on GL_3 second moments.

Significance. If the reciprocity formula and the stated moment bound hold, the work achieves the strongest hybrid subconvexity currently attainable by the first-moment method for these families. The explicit spectral reciprocity relating GL_3×GL_2 and GL_4×GL_1 moments, together with the coset-restricted second-moment estimate for Dirichlet L-functions, constitute contributions of independent interest that extend the analytic toolkit for higher-rank L-functions.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract states that the Dirichlet second-moment bound is a 'key additional input'; the introduction should clarify whether this bound is proved in the manuscript or taken from external sources, and if proved, which theorem number records it.
  2. [§1] Notation for the hybrid aspect (q,t) is introduced without an explicit display of the target bound (e.g., the precise exponent saving) until later; an early displayed statement of the main theorem would improve readability.
  3. [§2] The reciprocity formula is described as 'explicit'; a brief comparison table or remark contrasting it with prior reciprocity identities (e.g., those of Li or Blomer) would help situate the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition of the spectral reciprocity formula and the coset-restricted moment bound as contributions of independent interest. The recommendation is for minor revision, but the report lists no major comments. Accordingly, we provide no point-by-point responses below and will incorporate any minor editorial suggestions in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation relies on a newly derived explicit GL₃×GL₂ ↔ GL₄×GL₁ spectral reciprocity formula together with a Lindelöf-on-average upper bound for the second moment of Dirichlet L-functions on a coset, both presented as independent inputs or contributions rather than outputs of the target subconvexity bound. No equation or step reduces the claimed hybrid subconvexity to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the moment bound is explicitly separated as additional input of independent interest, and the reciprocity is constructed directly from the spectral theory without importing the final bound. The argument structure is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proof depends on an averaged second-moment bound for Dirichlet L-functions on cosets (treated as an independent input) and on standard properties of automorphic forms and Rankin-Selberg L-functions. No free parameters or new postulated entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lindelof-on-average upper bound for the second moment of Dirichlet L-functions restricted to a coset
    Explicitly listed as a key additional input required for the hybrid bounds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5803 in / 1278 out tokens · 18715 ms · 2026-05-23T22:35:04.874539+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Keshav Aggarwal, ``A New Subconvex Bound for (3) L -Functions in the t -Aspect'' https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793042121500275, International Journal of Number Theory 17:5 (2021), 1111--1138

  2. [2]

    Nickolas Andersen and Han Wu, ``Hybrid Subconvexity and the Partition Function'' https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2022.07.012, Journal of Number Theory 242 (2023), 154--180

  3. [3]

    Olga Balkanova, John Brian Conrey, and Dmitry Frolenkov, ``An Approximation Formula for the Shifted Cubic Moment of Automorphic L -Functions in the Weight Aspect'' https://doi.org/10.4153/S0008414X23000512, to appear in Canadian Journal of Mathematics (2023), 24 pages

  4. [4]

    Olga Balkanova, Dmitry Frolenkov, and Han Wu, ``On Weyl's Subconvex Bound for Cube-Free Hecke Characters: Totally Real Case'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12283v3, preprint (2021), 73 pages

  5. [5]

    Andr\' a s Bir\' o , ``Triple Product Integrals and Rankin-Selberg L -Functions'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08913v1, preprint (2022), 44 pages

  6. [6]

    Valentin Blomer, ``Subconvexity for Twisted L -Functions on (3) '' https://doi.org/10.1353/ajm.2012.0032, American Journal of Mathematics 134:5 (2012), 1385--1421

  7. [7]

    Valentin Blomer, Peter Humphries, Rizwanur Khan, and Micah B. Milinovich, ``Motohashi's Fourth Moment Identity for Dirichlet L -Functions for Non-Archimedean Test Functions and Applications'' https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X20007101, Compositio Mathematica 156:5 (2020), 1004--1038

  8. [8]

    Valentin Blomer and Rizwanur Khan, ``Twisted Moments of L -Functions and Spectral Reciprocity'' https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2018-0060, Duke Mathematical Journal 168:6 (2019), 1109--1177

  9. [9]

    J. B. Conrey and H. Iwaniec, ``The Cubic Moment of Central Values of Automorphic L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.2307/121132, Annals of Mathematics 151:3 (2000), 1175--1216

  10. [10]

    Young, ``The Second Moment of the GL_3 Standard L -Function on the Critical Line'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06962v1, preprint (2024), 32 pages

    Agniva Dasgupta, Wing Hong Leung, and Matthew P. Young, ``The Second Moment of the GL_3 Standard L -Function on the Critical Line'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06962v1, preprint (2024), 32 pages

  11. [11]

    Alessandro Fazzari, ``A Voronoi Summation Formula for the Shifted Triple Divisor Function'' https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-023-00810-5, The Ramanujan Journal 63:4 (2024), 1179--1198

  12. [12]

    Dmitry Frolenkov, ``The Cubic Moment of Automorphic L -Functions in the Weight Aspect'' https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2019.07.009, Journal of Number Theory 207 (2020), 247--281

  13. [13]

    P. X. Gallagher, ``A Large Sieve Density Estimate Near = 1 '' https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403187, Inventiones Mathematicae 11:4 (1970), 329--339

  14. [14]

    Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2023

    Soumendra Ganguly, Subconvexity for Twisted L -Functions on GL(3) GL(2) and GL(3) https://www.proquest.com/docview/2890171113/, Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2023

  15. [15]

    Asymptotic second moment of Dirichlet $L$-functions along a thin coset

    Bradford Garcia and Matthew P. Young, ``Asymptotic Second Moment of Dirichlet L -Functions Along a Thin Coset'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08482v1, preprint (2023), 18 pages

  16. [16]

    Dorian Goldfeld, Automorphic Forms and L -Functions for the Group (n, ) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542923, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 99, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006

  17. [17]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Eighth Edition https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-64839-5, editors Daniel Zwillinger and Victor Moll, Academic Press, Burlington, 2015

  18. [18]

    Jiandong Guo, ``On the Positivity of the Central Critical Values of Automorphic L -Functions for GL(2) '' https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-96-08307-6, Duke Mathematical Journal 83:1 (1996), 157--190

  19. [19]

    D. R. Heath-Brown, ``Hybrid Bounds for Dirichlet L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01578069, Inventiones Mathematicae 47:2 (1978), 149--170

  20. [20]

    Bingrong Huang, ``Hybrid Subconvexity Bounds for Twisted L -Functions on (3) '' https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-017-9428-6, Science China Mathematics 64:3 (2021), 443--478

  21. [21]

    Bingrong Huang, ``Uniform Bounds for (3) (2) L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474748023000348, to appear in Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu (2023), 44 pages

  22. [22]

    Bingrong Huang and Zhao Xu, ``Hybrid Subconvexity Bounds for Twists of (3) (2) L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.2140/ant.2023.17.1715, Algebra & Number Theory 17:10 (2023), 1715--1752

  23. [23]

    Peter Humphries, ``Density Theorems for Exceptional Eigenvalues for Congruence Subgroups'' https://doi.org/10.2140/ant.2018.12.1581, Algebra & Number Theory 12:7 (2018), 1581--1610

  24. [24]

    Peter Humphries and Rizwanur Khan, `` L^p -Norm Bounds for Automorphic Forms via Spectral Reciprocity'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05613v2, preprint (2022), 60 pages

  25. [25]

    Peter Humphries and Maksym Radziwi , ``Optimal Small Scale Equidistribution of Lattice Points on the Sphere, Heegner Points, and Closed Geodesics'' https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.22076, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 75:9 (2022), 1936--1996

  26. [26]

    Aleksandar Ivi\' c , ``On Sums of Hecke Series in Short Intervals'' https://doi.org/10.5802/jtnb.333, Journal de Th\' e orie des Nombres de Bordeaux 13:2 (2001), 453--468

  27. [27]

    Henryk Iwaniec and Emmanuel Kowalski, Analytic Number Theory https://doi.org/10.1090/coll/053, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications 53, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2004

  28. [28]

    Ikuya Kaneko, ``Motohashi's Formula for the Fourth Moment of Individual Dirichlet L -Functions and Applications'' https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2022.33, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 10:e41 (2022), 1--43

  29. [29]

    Henry H. Kim, ``Functoriality for the Exterior Square of _4 and the Symmetric Fourth of _2 '' https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-02-00410-1, with appendix 1 by Dinakar Ramakrishnan and appendix 2 by Henry H. Kim and Peter Sarnak, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 16:1 (2003), 139--183

  30. [30]

    Young, ``Oscillatory Integrals with Uniformity in Parameters'' https://doi.org/10.5802/jtnb.1072, Journal de th\' e orie des nombres de Bordeaux 31:1 (2019), 145--159

    Eren Mehmet K ral, Ian Petrow, and Matthew P. Young, ``Oscillatory Integrals with Uniformity in Parameters'' https://doi.org/10.5802/jtnb.1072, Journal de th\' e orie des nombres de Bordeaux 31:1 (2019), 145--159

  31. [31]

    Chung-Hang Kwan, ``Spectral Moment Formulae for (3) (2) L -Functions I: The Cuspidal Case'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08568v4, to appear in Algebra & Number Theory (2021), 36 pages

  32. [32]

    Chung-Hang Kwan, ``Spectral Moment Formulae for (3) (2) L -Functions II: The Eisenstein Case'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09419v1, preprint (2023), 36 pages

  33. [33]

    Erez Lapid, ``On the Nonnegativity of Rankin-Selberg L -Functions at the Center of Symmetry'' https://doi.org/10.1155/S1073792803204013, International Mathematics Research Notices 2003:2 (2003), 65--75

  34. [34]

    Xiannan Li, ``Upper Bounds on L -Functions at the Edge of the Critical Strip'' https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnp148, International Mathematics Research Notices 2010:4 (2010), 727--755

  35. [35]

    Xiaoqing Li, ``Bounds for (3) (2) L -Functions and (3) L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2011.173.1.8, Annals of Mathematics 173:1 (2011), 301--336

  36. [36]

    Yongxiao Lin, ``Bounds for Twists of (3) L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1046, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 23:6 (2021), 1899--1924

  37. [37]

    Yongxiao Lin, Ramon Nunes, and Zhi Qi, ``Strong Subconvexity for Self-Dual (3) L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnac153, International Mathematics Research Notices 2023:13 (2023), 11453--11470

  38. [38]

    Sheng-Chi Liu, Riad Masri, and Matthew P. Young, ``Rankin--Selberg L ‑Functions and the Reduction of CM Elliptic Curves'' https://doi.org/10.1186/s40687-015-0040-y, Research in the Mathematical Sciences 2:22 (2015), 23 pages

  39. [39]

    Qing Lu, ``Bounds for the Spectral Mean Value of Central Values of L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2011.12.008, Journal of Number Theory 132:5 (2012), 1016--1037

  40. [40]

    Mark McKee, Haiwei Sun, and Yangbo Ye, ``Improved Subconvexity Bounds for (2) (3) and (3) L -Functions by Weighted Stationary Phase'' https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/7159, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 370:5 (2018), 3745--3769

  41. [41]

    Stephen D. Miller and Wilfried Schmid, ``Automorphic Distributions, L -Functions, and Voronoi Summation for (3) '' https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2006.164.423, Annals of Mathematics 164:2 (2006), 423--488

  42. [42]

    H. L. Montgomery and R. C. Vaughan, ``Hilbert's Inequality'' https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s2-8.1.73, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 8 (1974), 73--82

  43. [43]

    Yoichi Motohashi, Spectral Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511983399, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 127, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

  44. [44]

    Ritabrata Munshi, ``The Circle Method and Bounds for L -Functions---III: t -Aspect Subconvexity for GL(3) L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/843, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 28:4 (2015), 913--938

  45. [45]

    Ritabrata Munshi, ``The Circle Method and Bounds for L -Functions - IV: Subconvexity for Twists of (3) L -Functions'' https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2015.182.2.6, Annals of Mathematics 182:2 (2015), 617--672

  46. [46]

    Ritabrata Munshi, ``Subconvexity for (3) (2) L -Functions in t -Aspect'' https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1131, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 24:5 (2022), 1543--1576

  47. [47]

    Paul D. Nelson, ``Subconvex Equidistribution of Cusp Forms: Reduction to Eisenstein Observables'' https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2019-0005, Duke Mathematical Journal 168:9 (2019), 1665--1722

  48. [48]

    Nelson, ``Eisenstein Series and the Cubic Moment for (2) '' https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.06310v3, preprint (2019), 77 pages

    Paul D. Nelson, ``Eisenstein Series and the Cubic Moment for (2) '' https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.06310v3, preprint (2019), 77 pages

  49. [49]

    Subconvexity for $\rm{GL}(3)$ L-functions

    Ramon M. Nunes, ``On the Subconvexity Estimate for Self-Dual (3) L -Functions in the t -Aspect'' https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04424v1, preprint (2017), 18 pages

  50. [50]

    Sampurna Pal, ``Second Moment of Degree Three L -Functions'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14620v2, preprint (2022), 50 pages

  51. [51]

    Thesis, Princeton University, 2001

    Zhuangzhuang Peng, Zeros and Central Values of Automorphic L -Functions https://www.proquest.com/docview/276446097/, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 2001

  52. [52]

    Ian N. Petrow, ``A Twisted Motohashi Formula and Weyl-Subconvexity for L -Functions of Weight Two Cusp Forms'' https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-014-1166-8, Mathematische Annalen 363:1--2 (2015), 175--216

  53. [53]

    Young, ``A Generalized Cubic Moment and the Petersson Formula for Newforms'' https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-018-1745-1, Mathematische Annalen 373:1--2 (2019), 287--353

    Ian Petrow and Matthew P. Young, ``A Generalized Cubic Moment and the Petersson Formula for Newforms'' https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-018-1745-1, Mathematische Annalen 373:1--2 (2019), 287--353

  54. [54]

    Young, ``The Weyl Bound for Dirichlet L -Functions of Cube-free Conductor'' https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2020.192.2.3, Annals of Mathematics 192:2 (2020), 437--486

    Ian Petrow and Matthew P. Young, ``The Weyl Bound for Dirichlet L -Functions of Cube-free Conductor'' https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2020.192.2.3, Annals of Mathematics 192:2 (2020), 437--486

  55. [55]

    Ian Petrow and Matthew P. Young, ``The Fourth Moment of Dirichlet L -Functions Along a Coset and the Weyl Bound'' https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2022-0069, Duke Mathematical Journal 172:10 (2023), 1879--1960

  56. [56]

    Zhi Qi, ``Subconvexity for Twisted L -Functions on _3 over the Gaussian Number Field'' https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/7892, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 372:12 (2019), 8897--8932

  57. [57]

    Zhi Qi, ``Subconvexity for L -Functions on _3 over Number Fields'' https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/1306, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 26:3 (2024), 1113--1192

  58. [58]

    Haiwei Sun and Yangbo Ye, ``Further Improvement on Bounds for L -Functions Related to (3) '' https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793042119500866, International Journal of Number Theory 15:7 (2019), 1487--1517

  59. [59]

    Han Wu, ``On Motohashi's Formula'' https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8750, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 375:11 (2022), 8033--8081

  60. [60]

    Han Wu, ``On a Generalization of Motohashi's Formula'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08236v2, preprint (2023), 55 pages

  61. [61]

    Han Wu and Ping Xi, ``A Uniform Weyl Bound for L -Functions of Hilbert Modular Forms'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14652v2, preprint (2023), 37 pages

  62. [62]

    Ping Xi, ``A Double Character Sum of Conrey--Iwaniec and Petrow--Young'' https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14681v1, preprint (2023), 5 pages

  63. [63]

    Matthew P. Young, ``Weyl-Type Hybrid Subconvexity Bounds for Twisted L -Functions and Heegner Points on Shrinking Sets'' https://doi.org/10.4171/jems/699, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 19:5 (2017), 1545--1576

  64. [64]

    Young, ``Explicit Calculations with Eisenstein Series'' https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2018.11.007, Journal of Number Theory 199 (2019), 1--48

    Matthew P. Young, ``Explicit Calculations with Eisenstein Series'' https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2018.11.007, Journal of Number Theory 199 (2019), 1--48