Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Agentic LLM Workflows for Generating Patient-Friendly Medical Reports

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.01112 v2 pith:E4XBPKEN submitted 2024-08-02 cs.MA

classification cs.MA
keywords reportsaccuracymedicalzero-shotagenticapproachcasecompared
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in healthcare is expanding rapidly, with one potential use case being the translation of formal medical reports into patient-legible equivalents. Currently, LLM outputs often need to be edited and evaluated by a human to ensure both factual accuracy and comprehensibility, and this is true for the above use case. We aim to minimize this step by proposing an agentic workflow with the Reflexion framework, which uses iterative self-reflection to correct outputs from an LLM. This pipeline was tested and compared to zero-shot prompting on 16 randomized radiology reports. In our multi-agent approach, reports had an accuracy rate of 94.94% when looking at verification of ICD-10 codes, compared to zero-shot prompted reports, which had an accuracy rate of 68.23%. Additionally, 81.25% of the final reflected reports required no corrections for accuracy or readability, while only 25% of zero-shot prompted reports met these criteria without needing modifications. These results indicate that our approach presents a feasible method for communicating clinical findings to patients in a quick, efficient and coherent manner whilst also retaining medical accuracy. The codebase is available for viewing at http://github.com/malavikhasudarshan/Multi-Agent-Patient-Letter-Generation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedSentry: Understanding and Mitigating Safety Risks in Medical LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 5,000-prompt medical safety benchmark reveals that decentralized LLM multi-agent teams resist a malicious insider agent better than shared-pool teams, and a personality-screening defense partially restores safety.

  2. FALCON: Transforming Cyber Threat Intelligence into Deployable IDS Rules with Self-Reflection

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FALCON automates the generation of Snort and YARA intrusion detection rules from cyber threat intelligence using an LLM agent pipeline with a contrastively trained CTI-rule semantic scorer as a ground-truth-free validator.

  3. MAARTA:Multi-Agentic Adaptive Radiology Teaching Assistant

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MAARTA, a multi-agent LLM framework comparing expert and student gaze graphs, reports higher accuracy than single-agent baselines on simulated perceptual errors in chest X-ray interpretation.

Pith tools