REVIEW 1 cited by
Quantifying uncertainty in climate projections with conformal ensembles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Ensembles of General Circulation Models (GCMs) are the primary tools for investigating climate sensitivity, projecting future climate states, and quantifying uncertainty. GCM ensembles are subject to substantial uncertainty due to model inadequacies, resolution limits, internal variability, and inter-model variability, meaning rigorous climate risk assessments and informed decision-making require reliable and accurate uncertainty quantification (UQ). We introduce conformal ensembles (CE), a new approach to climate UQ that quantifies and constrains projection uncertainty with conformal prediction sets and observational data. CE seamlessly integrates climate model ensembles and observational data across a range of scales to generate statistically rigorous, easy-to-interpret uncertainty estimates. CE can be applied to any climatic variable using any ensemble analysis method and outperforms existing inter-model variability methods in uncertainty quantification across all time horizons and most spatial locations under SSP2-4.5. CE is also computationally efficient, requires minimal assumptions, and is highly robust to the conformity measure. Experiments show that it is effective when conditioning future projections on historical reanalysis data compared with standard ensemble averaging approaches, yielding more physically consistent projections.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Locally Adaptive Conformal Inference for Operator Models
LSCI constructs function-valued, locally adaptive conformal prediction sets for operator models by weighting a functional depth score around the test input, with a coverage-gap bound under local exchangeability.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.