REVIEW 7 cited by
OpenResearcher: Unleashing AI for Accelerated Scientific Research
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The rapid growth of scientific literature imposes significant challenges for researchers endeavoring to stay updated with the latest advancements in their fields and delve into new areas. We introduce OpenResearcher, an innovative platform that leverages Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to accelerate the research process by answering diverse questions from researchers. OpenResearcher is built based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to integrate Large Language Models (LLMs) with up-to-date, domain-specific knowledge. Moreover, we develop various tools for OpenResearcher to understand researchers' queries, search from the scientific literature, filter retrieved information, provide accurate and comprehensive answers, and self-refine these answers. OpenResearcher can flexibly use these tools to balance efficiency and effectiveness. As a result, OpenResearcher enables researchers to save time and increase their potential to discover new insights and drive scientific breakthroughs. Demo, video, and code are available at: https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Chain-of-Agents: End-to-End Agent Foundation Models via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RL
A single LLM is trained with multi-agent distilled trajectories plus agentic RL, and the resulting Chain-of-Agents models set state-of-the-art Pass@1 scores among tool-integrated reasoning methods on GAIA, BrowseComp,...
-
ResearcherBench: Evaluating Deep AI Research Systems on the Frontiers of Scientific Inquiry
A new benchmark evaluates AI deep research systems on 65 frontier AI questions, finding OpenAI and Gemini lead on rubric coverage while all systems cite accurately but leave much content unsupported.
-
Atom-Searcher: Enhancing Agentic Deep Research via Fine-Grained Atomic Thought Reward
A new RL framework that rewards fine-grained reasoning steps, called Atomic Thoughts, claims better agentic deep research on seven benchmarks.
-
Agent-as-Tool: A Study on the Hierarchical Decision Making with Reinforcement Learning
A two-level agent that separates planning from tool execution, fine-tuned with GRPO on 180 samples, beats a modified Search-R1 on the Bamboogle QA benchmark.
-
EvolveSearch: An Iterative Self-Evolving Search Agent
An iterative loop of RL and filtered SFT on the agent's own rollouts improves a 7B web-search agent by a few accuracy points on multi-hop QA benchmarks.
-
Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap
A survey that organizes LLM-powered deep research agents into static versus dynamic workflows and single versus multi agent architectures, and reviews their benchmarks and open challenges.
-
AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability
AI scientist systems can propose ideas but cannot reliably implement and verify experiments, making the implementation gap, not idea generation, the current bottleneck.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.