REVIEW 3 cited by
On odd covers of cliques and disjoint unions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Babai and Frankl posed the ``odd cover problem" of finding the minimum cardinality of a collection of complete bipartite graphs such that every edge of the complete graph of order $n$ is covered an odd number of times. In a previous paper with O'Neill, some of the authors proved that this value is always $\lceil n / 2 \rceil$ or $\lceil n / 2 \rceil + 1$ and that it is the former whenever $n$ is a multiple of $8$. In this paper, we determine this value to be $\lceil n / 2 \rceil$ whenever $n$ is odd or equivalent to $18$ modulo $24$. We also further the study of odd covers of graphs which are not complete, wherein edges are covered an odd number of times and nonedges an even number of times by the complete bipartite graphs in the collection. Among various results on disjoint unions, we find the minimum cardinality of an odd cover of a union of odd cliques and of a union of cycles.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Odd covers for complete graphs and complete 3-graphs
The paper determines b_2(n) for all n, confirming a conjecture of Buchanan et al., and proves b_3(n+1)=b_2(n), resolving a question of Leader and Tan.
-
Improved Decomposition Bounds for Partition Polytopes and Odd-Covers
Improved upper bounds: diameter of partition polytopes ≤ κ1+⌈κ2/2⌉, and path/cycle odd-covers of Eulerian graphs ≤ ⌈3Δ/4⌉.
-
New bounds on the Graham-Pollak theorem for hypergraphs
For every odd r ≥ 85, the minimum number of complete r-partite r-graphs needed to partition the edges of the complete r-uniform hypergraph is at most c_r times binomial(n, floor(r/2)) with c_r < 1; previously this was...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.