REVIEW 1 cited by
Externally Valid Selection of Experimental Sites via the k-Median Problem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present a decision-theoretic justification for viewing the question of how to best choose where to experiment in order to optimize external validity as a $k$-median problem, a popular problem in computer science and operations research. We present conditions under which minimizing the worst-case, welfare-based regret among all nonrandom schemes that select $k$ sites to experiment is approximately equal - and sometimes exactly equal - to finding the k most central vectors of baseline site-level covariates. The k-median problem can be formulated as a linear integer program. Two empirical applications illustrate the theoretical and computational benefits of the suggested procedure.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning What to Learn: Experimental Design when Combining Experimental with Observational Evidence
Designing experiments that will be combined with observational evidence reduces to balancing a normalized variance regret against a normalized bias regret.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.