REVIEW 2 cited by
Inference with Many Weak Instruments and Heterogeneity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper considers inference in a linear instrumental variable regression model with many potentially weak instruments, in the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects. I first show that existing test procedures, including those that are robust to either weak instruments or heterogeneous treatment effects, can be arbitrarily oversized. I propose a novel and valid test based on a score statistic and a ``leave-three-out" variance estimator. In the presence of heterogeneity and within the class of tests that are functions of the leave-one-out analog of a maximal invariant, this test is asymptotically the uniformly most powerful unbiased test. In two applications to judge and quarter-of-birth instruments, the proposed inference procedure also yields a bounded confidence set while some existing methods yield unbounded or empty confidence sets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Wild Bootstrap Inference for Linear Regressions with Many Covariates
A scaled wild bootstrap is proven asymptotically valid for inference on a regression coefficient when the number of covariates is of the same order as the sample size and errors are heteroskedastic.
-
Robust Inference with High-Dimensional Instruments
A self-normalized, random-matrix-based test for the structural parameter in IV regressions with K proportional to N and general error dependence, with the central proof deferred to the authors' prior unpublished work.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.