Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A triaxial vectorization technique for a single-beam zero-field atomic magnetometer to suppress cross-axis projection error

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12994 v1 pith:EKUAEW4U submitted 2024-08-23 physics.atom-ph

classification physics.atom-ph
keywords axestechniqueacrossmagnetictriaxialzero-fielderrorsstatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Zero-field optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have emerged as an important technology for biomagnetism due to their ulta-sensitive performance, contained within a non-cryogenic small-scale sensor-head. The compactness of such OPMs is often achieved through simplified detection schemes, which typically provide only single-axis magnetic field information. However, multi-axis static magnetic fields on non-measurement axes cause a systematic error that manifests as amplitude and phase errors across the measurement axis. Here we present a triaxial operational technique for a compact zero-field OPM which suppresses multi-axis systematic errors through simultaneous measurement and closed-loop active control of the static magnetic fields across all axes. The demonstrated technique requires magnetic modulation across two axes while providing static field information for all three axes. We demonstrate this technique on a rubidium laboratory-based zero-field magnetometer, achieving a bandwidth of 380 Hz with sensitivities of $<25$ fT/$\sqrt{\rm{Hz}}$ across both transverse axes and $65$ fT/$\sqrt{\rm{Hz}}$ along the beam axis. Using the proposed triaxial technique, we demonstrate precise tracking of a 2 Hz triaxial vector test signal and suppression of systematic cross-axis projection errors over an extended period, $\simeq20$~min.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools