Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SynDL: A Large-Scale Synthetic Test Collection for Passage Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.16312 v3 pith:LCFPTMFK submitted 2024-08-29 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords testcollectionlarge-scaleretrievalhumanresearchdatasetsinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large-scale test collections play a crucial role in Information Retrieval (IR) research. However, according to the Cranfield paradigm and the research into publicly available datasets, the existing information retrieval research studies are commonly developed on small-scale datasets that rely on human assessors for relevance judgments - a time-intensive and expensive process. Recent studies have shown the strong capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in producing reliable relevance judgments with human accuracy but at a greatly reduced cost. In this paper, to address the missing large-scale ad-hoc document retrieval dataset, we extend the TREC Deep Learning Track (DL) test collection via additional language model synthetic labels to enable researchers to test and evaluate their search systems at a large scale. Specifically, such a test collection includes more than 1,900 test queries from the previous years of tracks. We compare system evaluation with past human labels from past years and find that our synthetically created large-scale test collection can lead to highly correlated system rankings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Limitations of Automatic Relevance Assessments with Large Language Models for Fair and Reliable Retrieval Evaluation

    cs.IR 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated relevance judgments misrank top retrieval systems and produce many false significant differences relative to human judgments.

  2. JudgeBlender: Ensembling Judgments for Automatic Relevance Assessment

    cs.IR 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ensembling small open-source LLMs as relevance judges achieves human-correlation scores competitive with GPT-4-based judges on the LLMJudge benchmark.

Pith tools