REVIEW 1 cited by
HST Proper Motion of Andromeda III: Another Satellite Co-orbiting The M31 Satellite Plane
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We measure the absolute proper motion of Andromeda III using ACS/WFC and WFPC2 exposures spanning an unprecedented 22-year time baseline. The WFPC2 exposures have been processed using a deep-learning centering procedure recently developed as well as an improved astrometric calibration of the camera. The absolute proper motion zero point is given by 98 galaxies and 16 Gaia EDR3 stars. The resulting proper motion is $(\mu_{\alpha} , \mu_{\delta}) = (-10.5\pm12.5, 47.5\pm12.5)~\mu$as yr$^{-1}$. We perform an orbit analysis of And III using two estimates of M31's mass and proper motion. We find that And III's orbit is consistent with dynamical membership to the Great Plane of Andromeda system of satellites although with some looser alignment compared to the previous two satellites NGC 147 and NGC 185. And III is bound to M31 if M31's mass is $M_{\mathrm{vir}}\geq 1.5\times10^{12}\,M_{\odot}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The effect of measurement uncertainties on the inferred stability of planes of satellite galaxies
Measurement errors in proper motions and distances can make an intrinsically stable plane of satellite galaxies appear to widen and destabilize when orbits are backward integrated.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.