Recognition: unknown
The case for super-Eddington accretion in JWST broad-line AGN during the first billion years
read the original abstract
A multitude of JWST studies reveal a surprising over-abundance of over-massive accreting super-massive black holes (SMBHs) -- leading to a deepening tension between theory and observation in the first billion years of cosmic time. Across X-ray to infrared wavelengths, models built off of pre-JWST predictions fail to easily reproduce observed AGN signatures (or lack thereof), driving uncertainty around the true nature of these sources. Using a sample of JWST AGN identified via their broadened H$\alpha$ emission and covered by the deepest X-ray surveys, we find neither any measurable X-ray emission nor any detection of high-ionization emission lines frequently associated with accreting SMBHs. We propose that these sources are accreting at or beyond the Eddington limit, which reduces the need for efficient production of heavy SMBH seeds at cosmic dawn. Using a theoretical model of super-Eddington accretion, we can produce the observed relative dearth of both X-ray and ultraviolet emission, as well as the high Balmer decrements, without the need for significant dust attenuation. This work indicates that super-Eddington accretion is easily achieved through-out the early Universe, and further study is required to determine what environments are required to trigger this mode of black hole growth.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The GlimmIr: Spectroscopic Variability in a z~7 LRD Indicates Rapid Changes in Both the Narrow and Broad Line Regions
First spectroscopic variability in a z~7 LRD shows rapid changes in both narrow and broad line regions, implying direct ionization from the central source to surrounding nebular gas.
- The Missing Hard Photons of Little Red Dots: Their Incident Ionizing Spectra Resemble Massive Stars
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Matthee, J.et al.Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys.Astrophys. J.963, 129 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[2]
Maiolino, R.et al.JADES: The diverse population of infant black holes at 4<z<11: Merging, tiny, poor, but mighty.Astron. Astrophys.691, A145 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[3]
Harikane, Y.et al.A JWST/NIRSpec First Census of Broad-line AGNs at z = 4-7: Detection of 10 Faint AGNs with M BH 106-108 M ⊙ and Their Host Galaxy Properties.Astrophys. J.959, 39 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[4]
Kocevski, D. D.et al.Hidden Little Monsters: Spectroscopic Identification of Low-mass, Broad-line AGNs at z>5 with CEERS.Astrophys. J. Lett.954, L4 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[5]
Larson, R. L.et al.A CEERS Discovery of an Accreting Supermassive Black Hole 570 Myr after the Big Bang: Identifying a Progenitor of Massive z>6 Quasars.Astrophys. J. Lett.953, L29 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[6]
Barro, G.et al.Extremely Red Galaxies at z = 5–9 with MIRI and NIRSpec: Dusty Galaxies or Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei?Astrophys. J.963, 128 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[7]
Furtak, L. J.et al.A high black-hole-to-host mass ratio in a lensed AGN in the early Universe.Nature628, 57–61 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[8]
Greene, J. E.et al.UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z>5.Astrophys. J.964, 39 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[9]
Kokorev, V.et al.UNCOVER: A NIRSpec Identification of a Broad-line AGN at z = 8.50.Astrophys. J. Lett.957, L7 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[10]
Kocevski, D. D.et al.The Rise of Faint, Red Active Galactic Nuclei at z ¿ 4: A Sample of Little Red Dots in the JWST Extragalactic Legacy Fields.Astrophys. J.986, 126 (2025). 10
work page 2025
- [11]
-
[12]
Akins, H. B.et al.COSMOS-Web: The Overabundance and Physical Nature of “Little Red Dots”– Implications for Early Galaxy and SMBH Assembly.Astrophys. J.991, 37 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[13]
Liu, H.-Y.et al.A Comprehensive and Uniform Sample of Broad-line Active Galactic Nuclei from the SDSS DR7.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.243, 21 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[14]
Maiolino, R.et al.JWST meets Chandra: a large population of Compton thick, feedback-free, and intrinsically X-ray weak AGN, with a sprinkle of SNe.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.538, 1921–1943 (2025)
work page 1921
-
[15]
Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P. & Hickox, R. C. X-Ray View of Little Red Dots: Do They Host Supermassive Black Holes?Astrophys. J. Lett.969, L18 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[16]
Yue, M.et al.Stacking X-Ray Observations of “Little Red Dots”: Implications for Their Active Galactic Nucleus Properties.Astrophys. J. Lett.974, L26 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[17]
Williams, C. C.et al.The Galaxies Missed by Hubble and ALMA: The Contribution of Extremely Red Galaxies to the Cosmic Census at 3<z<8.Astrophys. J.968, 34 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[18]
Wang, B.et al.RUBIES: JWST/NIRSpec Confirmation of an Infrared-luminous, Broad-line Little Red Dot with an Ionized Outflow.Astrophys. J.984, 121 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[19]
B.et al.Tentative Detection of Neutral Gas in a Little Red Dot at z = 4.46.Astrophys
Akins, H. B.et al.Tentative Detection of Neutral Gas in a Little Red Dot at z = 4.46.Astrophys. J.997, 218 (2026)
work page 2026
-
[20]
M.et al.Dust in Little Red Dots.Astrophys
Casey, C. M.et al.Dust in Little Red Dots.Astrophys. J. Lett.975, L4 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[21]
The black hole masses of high-redshift QSOs.Mon
King, A. The black hole masses of high-redshift QSOs.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.531, 550–553 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[22]
Pacucci, F. & Narayan, R. Mildly Super-Eddington Accretion onto Slowly Spinning Black Holes Explains the X-Ray Weakness of the Little Red Dots.Astrophys. J.976, 96 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[23]
Baggen, J. F. W.et al.The Small Sizes and High Implied Densities of “Little Red Dots” with Balmer Breaks Could Explain Their Broad Emission Lines without an Active Galactic Nucleus.Astrophys. J. Lett.977, L13 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[24]
Reines, A. E. & Volonteri, M. Relations between Central Black Hole Mass and Total Galaxy Stellar Mass in the Local Universe.Astrophys. J.813, 82 (2015)
work page 2015
- [25]
-
[26]
Natarajan, P.et al.First Detection of an Overmassive Black Hole Galaxy UHZ1: Evidence for Heavy Black Hole Seed Formation from Direct Collapse.Astrophys. J. Lett.960, L1 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[27]
Chisholm, J.et al.[Ne v] emission from a faint epoch of reionization-era galaxy: evidence for a narrow-line intermediate-mass black hole.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.534, 2633–2652 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[28]
Schneider, R.et al.Are we surprised to find SMBHs with JWST at z≥9?Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526, 3250–3261 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[29]
Signorini, M.et al.Quasars as standard candles. IV. Analysis of the X-ray and UV indicators of the disc-corona relation.Astron. Astrophys.676, A143 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[30]
Lusso, E. & Risaliti, G. Quasars as standard candles. I. The physical relation between disc and coronal emission.Astron. Astrophys.602, A79 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[31]
Bisogni, S.et al.The Chandra view of the relation between X-ray and UV emission in quasars.Astron. 11 Astrophys.655, A109 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[32]
Bertemes, C.et al.JWST ERS Program Q3D: The pitfalls of virial black hole mass constraints shown for a z∼3 quasar with an ultramassive host.Astron. Astrophys.693, A176 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[33]
Lupi, A., Trinca, A., Volonteri, M., Dotti, M. & Mazzucchelli, C. Size matters: are we witnessing super- Eddington accretion in high-redshift black holes from JWST?Astron. Astrophys.689, A128 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[34]
Volonteri, M.et al.Exploring active galactic nuclei and little red dots with the Obelisk simulation.Astron. Astrophys.695, A33 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[35]
Brightman, M.et al.A statistical relation between the X-ray spectral index and Eddington ratio of active galactic nuclei in deep surveys.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.433, 2485–2496 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[36]
Trakhtenbrot, B.et al.BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey (BASS) - VI. The Γ X-L/LEdd relation.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.470, 800–814 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[37]
Liu, H.et al.On the Observational Difference between the Accretion Disk-Corona Connections among Super- and Sub-Eddington Accreting Active Galactic Nuclei.Astrophys. J.910, 103 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[38]
Laurenti, M.et al.X-ray spectroscopic survey of highly accreting AGN.Astron. Astrophys.657, A57 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[39]
Leighly, K. M., Halpern, J. P., Jenkins, E. B. & Casebeer, D. The Intrinsically X-Ray-weak Quasar PHL
-
[40]
Optical and UV Spectra and Analysis.Astrophys
II. Optical and UV Spectra and Analysis.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.173, 1–36 (2007)
work page 2007
-
[41]
Stark, D. P. Galaxies in the First Billion Years After the Big Bang.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 761–803 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[42]
Mingozzi, M.et al.CLASSY IV. Exploring UV Diagnostics of the Interstellar Medium in Local High-z Analogs at the Dawn of the JWST Era.Astrophys. J.939, 110 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[43]
Roberts-Borsani, G.et al.Between the Extremes: A JWST Spectroscopic Benchmark for High-redshift Galaxies Using∼500 Confirmed Sources at z≥5.Astrophys. J.976, 193 (2024)
work page 2024
- [44]
-
[45]
Wu, J.et al.A Population of X-Ray Weak Quasars: PHL 1811 Analogs at High Redshift.Astrophys. J.736, 28 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[46]
A weak-line Seyfert linking to the weak-line quasar.Mon
Jin, C.et al.The extreme super-eddington NLS1 RX J0134.2-4258 - II. A weak-line Seyfert linking to the weak-line quasar.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.518, 6065–6082 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[47]
M.et al.High-redshift SDSS Quasars with Weak Emission Lines.Astrophys
Diamond-Stanic, A. M.et al.High-redshift SDSS Quasars with Weak Emission Lines.Astrophys. J.699, 782–799 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[48]
Andika, I. T.et al.Probing the Nature of High-redshift Weak Emission Line Quasars: A Young Quasar with a Starburst Host Galaxy.Astrophys. J.903, 34 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[49]
Luo, B.et al.X-ray Insights into the Nature of PHL 1811 Analogs and Weak Emission-line Quasars: Unification with a Geometrically Thick Accretion Disk?Astrophys. J.805, 122 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[50]
Ni, Q.et al.Connecting the X-ray properties of weak-line and typical quasars: testing for a geometrically thick accretion disk.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.480, 5184–5202 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[51]
Pu, X.et al.On the Fraction of X-Ray-weak Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.Astrophys. J.900, 141 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[52]
Lupi, A.et al.Growing massive black holes through supercritical accretion of stellar-mass seeds.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.456, 2993–3003 (2016). 12
work page 2016
-
[53]
Pezzulli, E., Valiante, R. & Schneider, R. Super-Eddington growth of the first black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.458, 3047–3059 (2016)
work page 2016
- [54]
-
[55]
A.et al.Super-Eddington accretion and feedback from the first massive seed black holes.Mon
Regan, J. A.et al.Super-Eddington accretion and feedback from the first massive seed black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.486, 3892–3906 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[56]
Massonneau, W., Volonteri, M., Dubois, Y. & Beckmann, R. S. How the super-Eddington regime regulates black hole growth in high-redshift galaxies.Astron. Astrophys.670, A180 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[57]
Lupi, A., Quadri, G., Volonteri, M., Colpi, M. & Regan, J. A. Sustained super-Eddington accretion in high-redshift quasars.Astron. Astrophys.686, A256 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[58]
Shi, Y., Kremer, K. & Hopkins, P. F. From Seeds to Supermassive Black Holes: Capture, Growth, Migration, and Pairing in Dense Protobulge Environments.Astrophys. J. Lett.969, L31 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[59]
Begelman, M. C. Can a spherically accreting black hole radiate very near the Eddington limit?Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.187, 237–251 (1979)
work page 1979
-
[60]
Abramowicz, M. A., Czerny, B., Lasota, J. P. & Szuszkiewicz, E. Slim Accretion Disks.Astrophys. J.332, 646 (1988)
work page 1988
- [61]
- [62]
-
[63]
Slim Accretion Disks: Theory and Observational Consequences.Universe5, 131 (2019)
Czerny, B. Slim Accretion Disks: Theory and Observational Consequences.Universe5, 131 (2019)
work page 2019
- [64]
-
[65]
Shen, X.et al.The bolometric quasar luminosity function at z = 0-7.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.495, 3252–3275 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[66]
Inayoshi, K. & Ichikawa, K. Birth of Rapidly Spinning, Overmassive Black Holes in the Early Universe. Astrophys. J. Lett.973, L49 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[67]
J.et al.The 2017 Release Cloudy.Rev
Ferland, G. J.et al.The 2017 Release Cloudy.Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis.53, 385–438 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[68]
Calzetti, D.et al.The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies.Astrophys. J.533, 682–695 (2000)
work page 2000
-
[69]
Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U. & Wolff, M. J. A Quantitative Comparison of the Small Magellanic Cloud, Large Magellanic Cloud, and Milky Way Ultraviolet to Near-Infrared Extinction Curves.Astrophys. J.594, 279–293 (2003)
work page 2003
-
[70]
Baron, D., Stern, J., Poznanski, D. & Netzer, H. Evidence That Most Type-1 AGNs are Reddened by Dust in the Host ISM.Astrophys. J.832, 8 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[71]
Netzer, H.The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei(Cambridge University Press, 2013)
work page 2013
- [72]
-
[73]
Bouwens, R. J.et al.New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z = 9 to 2 Show a Remarkable Consistency with Halo Growth and a Constant Star Formation Efficiency.Astron. J.162, 47 (2021). 13
work page 2021
- [74]
-
[75]
Bunker, A. J.et al.JADES NIRSpec initial data release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Redshifts and line fluxes of distant galaxies from the deepest JWST Cycle 1 NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy.Astron. Astrophys.690, A288 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[76]
J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al
Eisenstein, D. J.et al.Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES).arXiv e-prints arXiv:2306.02465 (2023)
-
[77]
D’Eugenio, F.et al.JADES Data Release 3: NIRSpec/Microshutter Assembly Spectroscopy for 4000 Galaxies in the GOODS Fields.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.277, 4 (2025)
work page 2025
-
[78]
Oesch, P. A.et al.The JWST FRESCO survey: legacy NIRCam/grism spectroscopy and imaging in the two GOODS fields.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.525, 2864–2874 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[79]
Q.et al.The Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: 4 Ms Source Catalogs.Astrophys
Xue, Y. Q.et al.The Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: 4 Ms Source Catalogs.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 195, 10 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[80]
Luo, B.et al.The Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: 7 Ms Source Catalogs.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.228, 2 (2017)
work page 2017
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.