Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

EMERS: Energy Meter for Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15060 v1 pith:HE7OQCZ5 submitted 2024-09-23 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords energyrecommendersystemsconsumptionemersexperimentssimplifiesadvancements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to recent advancements in machine learning, recommender systems use increasingly more energy for training, evaluation, and deployment. However, the recommender systems community often does not report the energy consumption of their experiments. In today's research landscape, no tools exist to easily measure the energy consumption of recommender systems experiments. To bridge this gap, we introduce EMERS, the first software library that simplifies measuring, monitoring, recording, and sharing the energy consumption of recommender systems experiments. EMERS measures energy consumption with smart power plugs and offers a user interface to monitor and compare the energy consumption of recommender systems experiments. Thereby, EMERS improves sustainability awareness and simplifies self-reporting energy consumption for recommender systems practitioners and researchers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. e-Fold Cross-Validation for Recommender-System Evaluation

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A simulation finds that e-fold cross-validation, which stops folding when the confidence interval of the mean stabilizes, uses 41.5% of the energy of 10-fold cross-validation with an average 1.81% difference in results.

Pith tools