REVIEW 2 cited by
PolicyCraft: Supporting Collaborative and Participatory Policy Design through Case-Grounded Deliberation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Community and organizational policies are typically designed in a top-down, centralized fashion, with limited input from impacted stakeholders. This can result in policies that are misaligned with community needs or perceived as illegitimate. How can we support more collaborative, participatory approaches to policy design? In this paper, we present PolicyCraft, a system that structures collaborative policy design through case-grounded deliberation. Building on past research that highlights the value of concrete cases in establishing common ground, PolicyCraft supports users in collaboratively proposing, critiquing, and revising policies through discussion and voting on cases. A field study across two university courses showed that students using PolicyCraft reached greater consensus and developed better-supported course policies, compared with those using a baseline system that did not scaffold their use of concrete cases. Reflecting on our findings, we discuss opportunities for future HCI systems to help groups more effectively bridge between abstract policies and concrete cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Why (not) use AI? Analyzing People's Reasoning and Conditions for AI Acceptability
A 197-person survey finds AI acceptability varies by use case and demographic background, and that rule-based reasoning is associated with lower acceptance and more disagreement.
-
Gig2Gether: Data-sharing to Empower, Unify and Demystify Gig Work
A 7-day field study with 14 gig workers found that a cross-platform data-sharing tool supports mutual support, financial reflection, and worker willingness to share data with policymakers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.