pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.15835 · v1 · submitted 2024-09-24 · 🧬 q-bio.OT

Measures and Models of Brain-Heart Interactions

Diego Candia-Rivera , Luca Faes , Fabrizio De Vico Fallani , Mario Chavez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 21:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.OT
keywords brain-heart interactionssignal processingbiomarkersneural disruptionsneurological disorderspsychiatric disordersphysiological state
0
0 comments X

The pith

Signal processing methods position brain-heart interactions as biomarkers for nervous system state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review examines techniques that quantify interactions between brain activity and heart signals across different experimental setups. The methods include tracking brain responses tied to single heartbeats and analyzing broader patterns where heart inputs influence brain organization. If accurate, these approaches would allow brain-heart coupling to function as a measurable indicator of overall nervous system condition. The authors state that existing tools already demonstrate how disruptions in neural activity alter these interactions, opening routes to better evaluation in clinical contexts. Progress requires addressing specific measurement hurdles before wider application in disorders affecting the nervous system.

Core claim

Current methodologies have deepened our understanding of the impact of neural disruptions on brain-heart interactions, solidifying it as a biomarker for evaluation of the physiological state of the nervous system and holding immense potential for disease stratification, with particular outlook in neurological and psychiatric disorders.

What carries the argument

Signal processing strategies ranging from estimation of brain responses to individual heartbeats to higher-order dynamics linking cardiac inputs to changes in brain organization.

If this is right

  • Brain-heart interactions become usable indicators for assessing the physiological state of the nervous system.
  • The interactions gain potential for stratifying diseases in neurological and psychiatric conditions.
  • Further methodological advances will yield insights into how peripheral neurons and bodily inputs shape brain function.
  • The techniques support applications in affective computing, human-computer interfaces, and sensorimotor evaluation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These measures could be combined with existing clinical tests to improve early detection in conditions where standard scans are inconclusive.
  • Validation across larger patient cohorts might reveal whether heart-brain coupling tracks treatment response over time.
  • Integration into wearable devices could enable continuous monitoring of nervous system health outside laboratory settings.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that the signal processing strategies it selects represent the most notable ones in the field and that the highlighted challenges are the primary barriers to future progress.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison in which brain-heart measures show no reliable difference between healthy subjects and patients with documented neural disruptions, or fail to predict disease progression, would undermine the biomarker claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.15835 by Diego Candia-Rivera, Fabrizio De Vico Fallani, Luca Faes, Mario Chavez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pathways of the brain-heart connection. These pathways, which facilitate direct or indirect interactions between the brain and heart, encompass various physiological systems beyond the commonly discussed vagus nerve and sympathetic nerves of the autonomic nervous system. Additional pathways involve hormonal mechanisms within the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis, and immune mechanisms primarily linked to… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measures of brain-heart interaction based on changes in behavioral responses and brain activity with respect to the cardiac cycle. (a) Cardiac phase methods aim at contrasting responses occurring in the systole and diastole phases of the cardiac cycle. (b) Heartbeat-evoked responses aim at providing a signature of the evoked brain responses to individual heartbeats by averaging brain epoch with respect a d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Central autonomic network components, based on meta-analysis of autonomic correlates [66]: parietal lobe substructures, including the precuneus, angular gyrus, and supramarginal gyrus; anterior and posterior insular cortices; subgenual, pregenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices; posterior cingulate cortex; and subcortical structures, including the thalamus, amygdala and hippocampus. insular cortices… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Modeling of bidirectional brain-heart interaction through block diagrams of the coupled heartbeat and brain signal generation systems. The heartbeats’ generation in the sinoatrial node is modeled as an integrate-and-fire model (red block), namely integral pulse frequency modulation model, which receives as an input the sum of sympathetic and parasympathetic inputs and the baseline heart rate (HR). The mode… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Frameworks that relate to higher-order brain-heart interaction. (a) Brain-heart interactions can be accounted as complex systems’ analysis with multi￾node interplay. (b) Cardiac-brain network dynamics aims at quantifying the relationship of network measures, such as integration and segregation, and parallel changes in cardiac dynamics. (c) Cardiac-brain connectivity dynamics aims at quantifying the relatio… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The exploration of brain-heart interactions within various paradigms, including affective computing, human-computer interfaces, and sensorimotor evaluation, stands as a significant milestone in biomarker development and neuroscientific research. A range of techniques, spanning from molecular to behavioral approaches, has been proposed to measure these interactions. Different frameworks use signal processing techniques, from the estimation of brain responses to individual heartbeats to higher-order dynamics linking cardiac inputs to changes in brain organization. This review provides an overview to the most notable signal processing strategies currently used for measuring and modeling brain-heart interactions. It discusses their usability and highlights the main challenges that need to be addressed for future methodological developments. Current methodologies have deepened our understanding of the impact of neural disruptions on brain-heart interactions, solidifying it as a biomarker for evaluation of the physiological state of the nervous system and holding immense potential for disease stratification. The vast outlook of these methods becomes apparent specially in neurological and psychiatric disorders. As we tackle new methodological challenges, gaining a more profound understanding of how these interactions operate, we anticipate further insights into the role of peripheral neurons and the environmental input from the rest of the body in shaping brain functioning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a narrative review that surveys signal-processing approaches to brain-heart interactions (BHI), ranging from heartbeat-evoked potentials to higher-order dynamical models. It discusses the usability of selected methods, identifies methodological challenges, and concludes that existing techniques have established BHI as a biomarker of nervous-system state with substantial potential for disease stratification, particularly in neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Significance. A balanced and accurate synthesis of BHI signal-processing literature could serve as a useful entry point for researchers entering the area and could help prioritize future methodological work. The review does not itself derive new methods, prove parameter-free relations, or supply machine-checked results, so its value is entirely contingent on the fidelity and representativeness of the cited literature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The central claim that current methodologies have 'solidified' BHI as a biomarker with 'immense potential for disease stratification' rests on the representativeness of the chosen methods and challenges. No explicit selection criteria, search strategy, or quantitative evidence of coverage (e.g., citation counts or systematic inclusion table) is supplied, leaving open the possibility that the narrative over- or under-weights particular approaches.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the review covers 'the most notable signal processing strategies' without defining 'notable'; a short methods paragraph stating inclusion criteria would improve transparency.
  2. [Introduction] Several technical terms (e.g., 'higher-order dynamics linking cardiac inputs to changes in brain organization') are introduced without a brief parenthetical definition or reference on first use, which may hinder readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and constructive comment. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Introduction] The central claim that current methodologies have 'solidified' BHI as a biomarker with 'immense potential for disease stratification' rests on the representativeness of the chosen methods and challenges. No explicit selection criteria, search strategy, or quantitative evidence of coverage (e.g., citation counts or systematic inclusion table) is supplied, leaving open the possibility that the narrative over- or under-weights particular approaches.

    Authors: We acknowledge this observation. The review is explicitly narrative in scope, with methods selected according to their prominence in the BHI signal-processing literature and demonstrated relevance to biomarker development in neurological and psychiatric conditions. To address the concern, the revised manuscript will include a new paragraph in the Introduction that states the selection rationale, cites key foundational papers used to identify representative approaches, and notes the absence of a formal systematic search. This addition will clarify scope without converting the review into a systematic one. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: narrative review with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review article that summarizes existing signal-processing methods for brain-heart interactions from the literature. It presents no new equations, models, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains of its own. The central claim about BHI as a biomarker rests on citation of prior work rather than any internal reduction to self-defined inputs or self-citations. No load-bearing steps match any of the enumerated circularity patterns; the content is self-contained as a survey without quantitative claims that could reduce by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper with no new mathematical models, parameters, or entities introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 981 out tokens · 22947 ms · 2026-05-23T21:08:04.947065+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

192 extracted references · 192 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Über Ekg.-Veränderungen bei Hirntumorkranken,

    R. Aschenbrenner and G. Bodechtel, “Über Ekg.-Veränderungen bei Hirntumorkranken,” Klin Wochenschr, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 298–302, Feb. 1938, doi: 10.1007/BF01778563

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01778563 1938

  2. [2]

    Brain-heart interactions: physiology and clinical implications,

    A. Silvani, G. Calandra-Buonaura, R. A. L. Dampney, and P. Cortelli, “Brain-heart interactions: physiology and clinical implications,” Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, vol. 374, no. 2067, May 2016, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0181

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0181 2067

  3. [3]

    The paraventricular nucleus and heart failure,

    S. Pyner, “The paraventricular nucleus and heart failure,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 332–339, 2014, doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.072678. 12

    work page doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2013.072678 2014

  4. [4]

    The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self,

    W. G. Chen et al., “The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–16, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.007 2021

  5. [5]

    Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self,

    K. S. Quigley, S. Kanoski, W. M. Grill, L. F. Barrett, and M. Tsakiris, “Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 29–38, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.008 2021

  6. [6]

    Visceral influences on brain and behavior,

    H. D. Critchley and N. A. Harrison, “Visceral influences on brain and behavior,” Neuron, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 624–638, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.008 2013

  7. [7]

    The Brain–Heart Connection,

    M. A. Samuels, “The Brain–Heart Connection,” Circulation, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 77–84, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678995

    work page doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.678995 2007

  8. [8]

    A structural heart-brain axis mediates the association between cardiovascular risk and cognitive function,

    A. Jaggi et al., “A structural heart-brain axis mediates the association between cardiovascular risk and cognitive function,” Imaging Neuroscience, vol. 2, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00063

    work page doi:10.1162/imag_a_00063 2024

  9. [9]

    Heart-brain connections: Phenotypic and genetic insights from magnetic resonance images,

    B. Zhao et al., “Heart-brain connections: Phenotypic and genetic insights from magnetic resonance images,” Science, vol. 380, no. 6648, p. abn6598, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1126/science.abn6598

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abn6598 2023

  10. [10]

    Sex-Specific Association Between Genetic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders and Cardiovascular Diseases,

    J.-C. Jiang, K. Singh, L. K. Davis, N. R. Wray, and S. Shah, “Sex-Specific Association Between Genetic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders and Cardiovascular Diseases,” Sep. 26, 2023, medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.10.08.22280805

    work page doi:10.1101/2022.10.08.22280805 2023

  11. [11]

    Extracellular vesicle-mediated bidirectional communication between heart and other organs,

    K. Gabisonia, M. Khan, and F. A. Recchia, “Extracellular vesicle-mediated bidirectional communication between heart and other organs,” Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, vol. 322, no. 5, pp. H769–H784, May 2022, doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00659.2021

    work page doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00659.2021 2022

  12. [12]

    Cellular Microparticles as a Marker for Cerebral Vasospasm in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage,

    P. Lackner et al., “Cellular Microparticles as a Marker for Cerebral Vasospasm in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2353–2357, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584995

    work page doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.584995 2010

  13. [13]

    Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Acute and Chronic Cerebrovascular Disease,

    Y. Yang and G. A. Rosenberg, “Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown in Acute and Chronic Cerebrovascular Disease,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3323–3328, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608257

    work page doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.608257 2011

  14. [14]

    Brain–Heart Interaction,

    Z. Chen, P. Venkat, D. Seyfried, M. Chopp, T. Yan, and J. Chen, “Brain–Heart Interaction,” Circulation Research, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 451–468, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311170

    work page doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.311170 2017

  15. [15]

    Circulating miR-30a, miR-126 and let-7b as biomarker for ischemic stroke in humans,

    G. Long et al., “Circulating miR-30a, miR-126 and let-7b as biomarker for ischemic stroke in humans,” BMC Neurology, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 178, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-178

    work page doi:10.1186/1471-2377-13-178 2013

  16. [16]

    Microvesicles: potential markers and mediators of endothelial dysfunction,

    M.-L. Liu and K. J. Williams, “Microvesicles: potential markers and mediators of endothelial dysfunction,” Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 121–127, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32835057e9

    work page doi:10.1097/med.0b013e32835057e9 2012

  17. [17]

    Biological significance of miR-126 expression in atrial fibrillation and heart failure,

    X. J. Wei et al., “Biological significance of miR-126 expression in atrial fibrillation and heart failure,” Braz J Med Biol Res, vol. 48, pp. 983–989, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154590

    work page doi:10.1590/1414-431x20154590 2015

  18. [18]

    Blood pressure pulsations modulate central neuronal activity via mechanosensitive ion channels,

    L. Jammal Salameh, S. H. Bitzenhofer, I. L. Hanganu-Opatz, M. Dutschmann, and V. Egger, “Blood pressure pulsations modulate central neuronal activity via mechanosensitive ion channels,” Science, vol. 383, no. 6682, p. eadk8511, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1126/science.adk8511

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adk8511 2024

  19. [19]

    PIEZOs mediate neuronal sensing of blood pressure and the baroreceptor reflex,

    W.-Z. Zeng et al., “PIEZOs mediate neuronal sensing of blood pressure and the baroreceptor reflex,” Science, vol. 362, no. 6413, pp. 464–467, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aau6324

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aau6324 2018

  20. [20]

    Cardiac field effects on the EEG,

    G. Dirlich, L. Vogl, M. Plaschke, and F. Strian, “Cardiac field effects on the EEG,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 307–315, Apr. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(96)96506-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(96)96506-2 1997

  21. [21]

    How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body,

    A. D. Craig, “How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 655–666, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1038/nrn894

    work page doi:10.1038/nrn894 2002

  22. [22]

    The functional role of cardiac activity in perception and action,

    L. I. Skora, J. J. A. Livermore, and K. Roelofs, “The functional role of cardiac activity in perception and action,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 137, p. 104655, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104655

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104655 2022

  23. [23]

    Visceral Signals Shape Brain Dynamics and Cognition,

    D. Azzalini, I. Rebollo, and C. Tallon-Baudry, “Visceral Signals Shape Brain Dynamics and Cognition,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 488–509, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.007 2019

  24. [24]

    Information dynamics of brain–heart physiological networks during sleep,

    L. Faes, G. Nollo, F. Jurysta, and D. Marinazzo, “Information dynamics of brain–heart physiological networks during sleep,” New J. Phys., vol. 16, no. 10, p. 105005, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/105005

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/105005 2014

  25. [25]

    Schiecke, A

    K. Schiecke, A. Schumann, F. Benninger, M. Feucht, K.-J. Baer, and P. Schlattmann, “Brain-heart interactions considering complex physiological data: processing schemes for time-variant, frequency-dependent, topographical and statistical examination of directed interactions by convergent cross mapping,” Physiol Meas, vol. 40, no. 11, p. 114001, Dec. 2019, ...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ab5050 2019

  26. [26]

    Altered Causal Coupling Pathways within the Central-Autonomic-Network in Patients Suffering from Schizophrenia,

    S. Schulz, J. Haueisen, K.-J. Bär, and A. Voss, “Altered Causal Coupling Pathways within the Central-Autonomic-Network in Patients Suffering from Schizophrenia,” Entropy, vol. 21, no. 8, Art. no. 8, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.3390/e21080733

    work page doi:10.3390/e21080733 2019

  27. [27]

    Combining electroencephalographic activity and instantaneous heart rate for assessing brain–heart dynamics during visual emotional elicitation in healthy subjects,

    G. Valenza et al., “Combining electroencephalographic activity and instantaneous heart rate for assessing brain–heart dynamics during visual emotional elicitation in healthy subjects,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 374, no. 2067, p. 20150176, May 2016, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0176

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0176 2067

  28. [28]

    Linear and non-linear brain-heart and brain-brain interactions during sleep,

    L. Faes, D. Marinazzo, F. Jurysta, and G. Nollo, “Linear and non-linear brain-heart and brain-brain interactions during sleep,” Physiol Meas, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 683–698, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/4/683

    work page doi:10.1088/0967-3334/36/4/683 2015

  29. [29]

    Time-Resolved Directional Brain-Heart Interplay Measurement Through Synthetic Data Generation Models,

    V. Catrambone, A. Greco, N. Vanello, E. P. Scilingo, and G. Valenza, “Time-Resolved Directional Brain-Heart Interplay Measurement Through Synthetic Data Generation Models,” Ann Biomed Eng, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1479–1489, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02251-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02251-y 2019

  30. [30]

    Functional assessment of bidirectional cortical and peripheral neural control on heartbeat dynamics: a brain-heart study on thermal stress,

    D. Candia-Rivera, V. Catrambone, R. Barbieri, and G. Valenza, “Functional assessment of bidirectional cortical and peripheral neural control on heartbeat dynamics: a brain-heart study on thermal stress,” NeuroImage, vol. 251, p. 119023, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119023 2022

  31. [31]

    The insula mediates access to awareness of visual stimuli presented synchronously to the heartbeat,

    R. Salomon et al., “The insula mediates access to awareness of visual stimuli presented synchronously to the heartbeat,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 18, pp. 5115–5127, 2016, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4262-15.2016

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4262-15.2016 2016

  32. [32]

    Cardiac cycle phases affect auditory-evoked potentials, startle eye blink and pre-motor reaction times in response to acoustic startle stimuli,

    A. Schulz et al., “Cardiac cycle phases affect auditory-evoked potentials, startle eye blink and pre-motor reaction times in response to acoustic startle stimuli,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 157, pp. 70–81, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.08.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.08.005 2020

  33. [33]

    Sensory detection thresholds are modulated across the cardiac cycle: Evidence that cutaneous sensibility is greatest for systolic stimulation,

    L. Edwards, C. Ring, D. McIntyre, J. B. Winer, and U. Martin, “Sensory detection thresholds are modulated across the cardiac cycle: Evidence that cutaneous sensibility is greatest for systolic stimulation,” Psychophysiology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 252–256, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00769.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00769.x 2009

  34. [34]

    Interactions between cardiac activity and conscious somatosensory perception,

    P. Motyka, M. Grund, N. Forschack, E. Al, A. Villringer, and M. Gaebler, “Interactions between cardiac activity and conscious somatosensory perception,” Psychophysiology, vol. 56, no. 10, p. e13424, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1111/psyp.13424

    work page doi:10.1111/psyp.13424 2019

  35. [35]

    Active sampling in visual search is coupled to the cardiac cycle,

    A. Galvez-Pol, R. McConnell, and J. M. Kilner, “Active sampling in visual search is coupled to the cardiac cycle,” Cognition, vol. 196, p. 104149, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104149

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104149 2020

  36. [36]

    Microsaccades Are Coupled to Heartbeat,

    S. Ohl, C. Wohltat, R. Kliegl, O. Pollatos, and R. Engbert, “Microsaccades Are Coupled to Heartbeat,” J. Neurosci., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1237–1241, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2211-15.2016

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2211-15.2016 2016

  37. [37]

    Cardiac cycle time effects on selection efficiency in vision,

    L. Pramme, M. F. Larra, H. Schächinger, and C. Frings, “Cardiac cycle time effects on selection efficiency in vision,” Psychophysiology, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1702–1711, 2016, doi: 10.1111/psyp.12728

    work page doi:10.1111/psyp.12728 2016

  38. [38]

    Cardiac cycle time effects on mask inhibition,

    L. Pramme, M. F. Larra, H. Schächinger, and C. Frings, “Cardiac cycle time effects on mask inhibition,” Biological Psychology, vol. 100, pp. 115–121, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.05.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.05.008 2014

  39. [39]

    Active information sampling varies across the cardiac cycle,

    S. Kunzendorf, F. Klotzsche, M. Akbal, A. Villringer, S. Ohl, and M. Gaebler, “Active information sampling varies across the cardiac cycle,” Psychophysiology, vol. 56, no. 5, p. e13322, 2019, doi: 10.1111/psyp.13322

    work page doi:10.1111/psyp.13322 2019

  40. [40]

    Active tactile discrimination is coupled with and modulated by the cardiac cycle,

    A. Galvez-Pol, P. Virdee, J. Villacampa, and J. Kilner, “Active tactile discrimination is coupled with and modulated by the cardiac cycle,” eLife, vol. 11, p. e78126, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.7554/eLife.78126

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.78126 2022

  41. [41]

    Disentangling sensorimotor and cognitive cardioafferent effects: A cardiac-cycle-time study on spatial stimulus-response compatibility,

    M. F. Larra, J. B. Finke, E. Wascher, and H. Schächinger, “Disentangling sensorimotor and cognitive cardioafferent effects: A cardiac-cycle-time study on spatial stimulus-response compatibility,” Sci Rep, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61068-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61068-1 2020

  42. [42]

    Relationship between cardiac cycle and the timing of actions during action execution and observation,

    E. R. Palser, J. Glass, A. Fotopoulou, and J. M. Kilner, “Relationship between cardiac cycle and the timing of actions during action execution and observation,” Cognition, vol. 217, p. 104907, Diciembre 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104907

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104907 2021

  43. [43]

    Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction,

    C. L. Rae et al., “Response inhibition on the stop signal task improves during cardiac contraction,” Sci Rep, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27513-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27513-y 2018

  44. [44]

    Response inhibition is disrupted by interoceptive processing at cardiac systole,

    Q. Ren, A. C. Marshall, J. Kaiser, and S. Schütz-Bosbach, “Response inhibition is disrupted by interoceptive processing at cardiac systole,” Biological Psychology, vol. 170, p. 108323, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108323

    work page doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108323 2022

  45. [45]

    Cardiac activity impacts cortical motor excitability,

    E. Al, T. Stephani, M. Engelhardt, S. Haegens, A. Villringer, and V. V. 13 Nikulin, “Cardiac activity impacts cortical motor excitability,” PLOS Biology, vol. 21, no. 11, p. e3002393, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002393

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002393 2023

  46. [46]

    Heart–brain interactions shape somatosensory perception and evoked potentials,

    E. Al et al., “Heart–brain interactions shape somatosensory perception and evoked potentials,” PNAS, vol. 117, no. 19, pp. 10575–10584, May 2020, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915629117

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1915629117 2020

  47. [47]

    Cuspis: A MATLAB Suite for Tasks Investigating Heart-Brain Interactions during fMRI,

    V. Villani and M. Tsakiris, “Cuspis: A MATLAB Suite for Tasks Investigating Heart-Brain Interactions during fMRI,” Journal of Open Research Software, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.5334/jors.476

    work page doi:10.5334/jors.476 2023

  48. [48]

    Heartbeat-evoked cortical responses: Underlying mechanisms, functional roles, and methodological considerations,

    H.-D. Park and O. Blanke, “Heartbeat-evoked cortical responses: Underlying mechanisms, functional roles, and methodological considerations,” NeuroImage, vol. 197, pp. 502–511, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.081

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.081 2019

  49. [49]

    Dynamic neurocognitive changes in interoception after heart transplant,

    P. C. Salamone et al., “Dynamic neurocognitive changes in interoception after heart transplant,” Brain Communications, vol. 2, no. 2, p. fcaa095, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa095

    work page doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaa095 2020

  50. [50]

    Attenuation of the Heartbeat-Evoked Potential in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation,

    D. Kumral et al., “Attenuation of the Heartbeat-Evoked Potential in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation,” JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1219–1230, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.06.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2022.06.019 2022

  51. [51]

    Neural Responses to Heartbeats Detect Residual Signs of Consciousness during Resting State in Postcomatose Patients,

    D. Candia-Rivera et al., “Neural Responses to Heartbeats Detect Residual Signs of Consciousness during Resting State in Postcomatose Patients,” J. Neurosci., vol. 41, no. 24, pp. 5251–5262, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1740-20.2021

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1740-20.2021 2021

  52. [52]

    Altered neural signatures of interoception in multiple sclerosis,

    P. C. Salamone et al., “Altered neural signatures of interoception in multiple sclerosis,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 4743–4754, 2018, doi: 10.1002/hbm.24319

    work page doi:10.1002/hbm.24319 2018

  53. [53]

    Interoception Primes Emotional Processing: Multimodal Evidence from Neurodegeneration,

    P. C. Salamone et al., “Interoception Primes Emotional Processing: Multimodal Evidence from Neurodegeneration,” J. Neurosci., vol. 41, no. 19, pp. 4276–4292, May 2021, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2578-20.2021

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2578-20.2021 2021

  54. [54]

    A multidimensional and multi-feature framework for cardiac interoception,

    S. Fittipaldi et al., “A multidimensional and multi-feature framework for cardiac interoception,” NeuroImage, vol. 212, p. 116677, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116677

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116677 2020

  55. [55]

    Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception,

    M.-P. Coll, H. Hobson, G. Bird, and J. Murphy, “Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 122, pp. 190–200, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.012 2021

  56. [56]

    Local and global measures of information storage for the assessment of heartbeat-evoked cortical responses,

    C. Barà et al., “Local and global measures of information storage for the assessment of heartbeat-evoked cortical responses,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 86, p. 105315, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105315

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105315 2023

  57. [57]

    Heartbeat Induces a Cortical Theta-Synchronized Network in the Resting State,

    J. Kim and B. Jeong, “Heartbeat Induces a Cortical Theta-Synchronized Network in the Resting State,” eNeuro, vol. 6, no. 4, p. ENEURO.0200-19.2019, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0200-19.2019

    work page doi:10.1523/eneuro.0200-19.2019 2019

  58. [58]

    CARE-rCortex: A Matlab toolbox for the analysis of CArdio-REspiratory-related activity in the Cortex,

    F. Grosselin, X. Navarro-Sune, M. Raux, T. Similowski, and M. Chavez, “CARE-rCortex: A Matlab toolbox for the analysis of CArdio-REspiratory-related activity in the Cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 308, pp. 309–316, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.08.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.08.011 2018

  59. [59]

    Heartbeat-related spectral perturbation of electroencephalogram reflects dynamic interoceptive attention states in the trial-by-trial classification analysis,

    W. Lee, E. Kim, J. Park, J. Eo, B. Jeong, and H.-J. Park, “Heartbeat-related spectral perturbation of electroencephalogram reflects dynamic interoceptive attention states in the trial-by-trial classification analysis,” NeuroImage, p. 120797, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120797

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120797 2024

  60. [60]

    Multidimensional assessment of heartbeat-evoked responses in disorders of consciousness,

    D. Candia-Rivera and C. Machado, “Multidimensional assessment of heartbeat-evoked responses in disorders of consciousness,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 3098–3110, 2023, doi: 10.1111/ejn.16079

    work page doi:10.1111/ejn.16079 2023

  61. [61]

    On the formal arc space of a reductive monoid , JOURNAL =

    M. Babo-Rebelo, N. Wolpert, C. Adam, D. Hasboun, and C. Tallon-Baudry, “Is the cardiac monitoring function related to the self in both the default network and right anterior insula?,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., vol. 371, no. 1708, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0004

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0004 2016

  62. [62]

    Neural Sources and Underlying Mechanisms of Neural Responses to Heartbeats, and their Role in Bodily Self-consciousness: An Intracranial EEG Study,

    H.-D. Park et al., “Neural Sources and Underlying Mechanisms of Neural Responses to Heartbeats, and their Role in Bodily Self-consciousness: An Intracranial EEG Study,” Cereb Cortex, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 2351–2364, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx136

    work page doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx136 2018

  63. [63]

    Heart rate variability: a review,

    U. R. Acharya, K. Paul Joseph, N. Kannathal, C. M. Lim, and J. S. Suri, “Heart rate variability: a review,” Med Biol Eng Comput, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1031–1051, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11517-006-0119-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11517-006-0119-0 2006

  64. [64]

    Spectrum of a series of point events, generated by the integral pulse frequency modulation model,

    R. W. de Boer, J. M. Karemaker, and J. Strackee, “Spectrum of a series of point events, generated by the integral pulse frequency modulation model,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 138– 142, Mar. 1985, doi: 10.1007/BF02456750

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02456750 1985

  65. [65]

    The autonomic brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function,

    F. Beissner, K. Meissner, K.-J. Bär, and V. Napadow, “The autonomic brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function,” J. Neurosci., vol. 33, no. 25, pp. 10503–10511, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1103-13.2013

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1103-13.2013 2013

  66. [66]

    A brainstem map for visceral sensations,

    C. Ran, J. C. Boettcher, J. A. Kaye, C. E. Gallori, and S. D. Liberles, “A brainstem map for visceral sensations,” Nature, pp. 1–7, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05139-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05139-5 2022

  67. [67]

    The central autonomic system revisited – Convergent evidence for a regulatory role of the insular and midcingulate cortex from neuroimaging meta-analyses,

    S. Ferraro et al., “The central autonomic system revisited – Convergent evidence for a regulatory role of the insular and midcingulate cortex from neuroimaging meta-analyses,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 142, p. 104915, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104915

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104915 2022

  68. [68]

    Central control of cardiac activity as assessed by intra-cerebral recordings and stimulations,

    L. Mazzola, F. Mauguière, and F. Chouchou, “Central control of cardiac activity as assessed by intra-cerebral recordings and stimulations,” Neurophysiologie Clinique, vol. 53, no. 2, p. 102849, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102849

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102849 2023

  69. [69]

    Uncovering complex central autonomic networks at rest: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on complex cardiovascular oscillations,

    G. Valenza, L. Passamonti, A. Duggento, N. Toschi, and R. Barbieri, “Uncovering complex central autonomic networks at rest: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on complex cardiovascular oscillations,” Journal of The Royal Society Interface, vol. 17, no. 164, p. 20190878, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0878

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2019.0878 2020

  70. [70]

    The central autonomic network at rest: Uncovering functional MRI correlates of time-varying autonomic outflow,

    G. Valenza et al., “The central autonomic network at rest: Uncovering functional MRI correlates of time-varying autonomic outflow,” NeuroImage, vol. 197, pp. 383–390, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.075

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.075 2019

  71. [71]

    A. Duggento et al., “Globally conditioned Granger causality in brain–brain and brain–heart interactions: a combined heart rate variability/ultra-high-field (7 T) functional magnetic resonance imaging study,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 374, no. 2067, p. 20150185, May 2016, doi: 1...

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0185 2067

  72. [72]

    Network physiology reveals relations between network topology and physiological function,

    A. Bashan, R. P. Bartsch, J. W. Kantelhardt, S. Havlin, and P. C. Ivanov, “Network physiology reveals relations between network topology and physiological function,” Nature Communications, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1038/ncomms1705

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1705 2012

  73. [73]

    Multivariate Correlation Measures Reveal Structure and Strength of Brain–Body Physiological Networks at Rest and During Mental Stress,

    R. Pernice et al., “Multivariate Correlation Measures Reveal Structure and Strength of Brain–Body Physiological Networks at Rest and During Mental Stress,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 14, p. 1427, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.602584

    work page doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.602584 2021

  74. [74]

    Correlation between electroencephalography and heart rate variability during sleep,

    M. Ako et al., “Correlation between electroencephalography and heart rate variability during sleep,” Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 59–65, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01080.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01080.x 2003

  75. [75]

    Information decomposition in the frequency domain: a new framework to study cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory oscillations,

    L. Faes et al., “Information decomposition in the frequency domain: a new framework to study cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory oscillations,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 379, no. 2212, p. 20200250, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0250

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0250 2021

  76. [76]

    Spectral decomposition of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular interactions in patients prone to postural syncope and healthy controls,

    R. Pernice et al., “Spectral decomposition of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular interactions in patients prone to postural syncope and healthy controls,” Autonomic Neuroscience, vol. 242, p. 103021, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103021 2022

  77. [77]

    Detecting Novel Associations in Large Datasets,

    D. N. Reshef et al., “Detecting Novel Associations in Large Datasets,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6062, pp. 1518–1524, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1126/science.1205438

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1205438 2011

  78. [78]

    Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets,

    C. J. Stam and B. W. van Dijk, “Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 236–251, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(01)00386-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(01)00386-4 2002

  79. [79]

    Interdependency between heart rate variability and sleep EEG: linear/non-linear?,

    M. Dumont, F. Jurysta, J.-P. Lanquart, P.-F. Migeotte, P. van de Borne, and P. Linkowski, “Interdependency between heart rate variability and sleep EEG: linear/non-linear?,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 2031–2040, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.007 2031

  80. [80]

    Intracortical brain-heart interplay: An EEG model source study of sympathovagal changes,

    V. Catrambone, D. Candia-Rivera, and G. Valenza, “Intracortical brain-heart interplay: An EEG model source study of sympathovagal changes,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 45, no. 6, p. e26677, 2024, doi: 10.1002/hbm.26677

    work page doi:10.1002/hbm.26677 2024

Showing first 80 references.