pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.18198 · v2 · submitted 2024-09-26 · 📊 stat.AP

Estimating soil carbon sequestration potential and approximating optimal management policies

Jacob Spertus , Eric Slessarev , Whendee Silver , Philip Stark This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.AP
keywords soil organic carbonsequestration potentialmanagement policiespotential outcomescompost amendmentsrangelandstreatment effect heterogeneitypolicy optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modeling SOC measurements within each treatment allows approximation of policies that maximize average sequestration potential across plots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework to estimate how much soil organic carbon each plot would store under different management options and then choose the option per plot that raises the overall total. It does this by fitting separate models of SOC to covariates inside each treatment group, using those models to predict potential outcomes, and picking the assignment that maximizes the average prediction. This approach matters because soils vary in how much extra carbon they can hold under a given intervention, so applying one policy everywhere leaves sequestration on the table. In the California rangeland compost data the method shows that targeting amendments to plots with lower baseline SOC raises total storage compared with applying the single best average policy to every plot. Simulations confirm the gain is largest when observed features predict sequestration potential well.

Core claim

An optimal sequestration policy can be approximated by modeling SOC measurements as functions of covariates within each treatment group, using the fitted models to estimate SOC sequestration potential for each plot, and finding the policy that maximizes the average of those estimates. The modeling can use linear regression or other algorithms to learn relationships between features and SOC sequestration potential. In the California rangelands compost study, treatment effects are moderated by baseline SOC, so targeting amendments to plots with lower baseline SOC increases overall SOC sequestration rates. Refined policy estimates sequestered more SOC than uniform application of the single best

What carries the argument

Within-treatment-group regression or machine-learning models that estimate plot-level SOC potential outcomes under each intervention, followed by per-plot policy assignment to maximize the average of those estimates.

If this is right

  • Refined policies that assign interventions according to predicted plot-level potentials sequester more SOC than the single policy with the largest average treatment effect applied uniformly.
  • Baseline SOC moderates the effect of compost amendments, with larger gains on plots that start with lower SOC.
  • The advantage of the refined policy is greater when SOC sequestration potential is predictable from measured covariates.
  • The same within-treatment modeling approach can incorporate cost models or other constraints when they are available.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be extended to observational data if the covariates capture the main drivers of both treatment assignment and outcome.
  • Including intervention costs directly in the objective would shift the optimal policy toward cheaper options on marginal plots.
  • Long-term monitoring would be needed to check whether the short-term sequestration gains persist or reverse.
  • The method could be tested on other interventions such as grazing changes or cover crops where response heterogeneity is also expected.

Load-bearing premise

The models fitted separately inside each treatment group correctly recover the conditional expected SOC given the observed covariates, with no large unmeasured confounding or misspecification that would distort the policy optimization.

What would settle it

A new randomized field trial that applies the approximated optimal policy to some plots and the best uniform policy to others, then measures whether total SOC gain is no higher (or lower) under the refined policy, would falsify the performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.18198 by Eric Slessarev, Jacob Spertus, Philip Stark, Whendee Silver.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An illustration of four idealized population-level potential trajectories (colored lines) in terms of additional SOC sequestered (y-axis) over time (x-axis). From the point a decision is implemented, each course of action leads to a different trajectory of total SOC sequestered across the population. The trajectories are smoothed and do not reflect short-term variation like seasonality. A policy-maker with… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SOC at equilibrium (y-axis) as a function of C inputs from the intervention (x-axis) for various response possibilities (colors). C inputs may be thought of as a single pulse for a point treatment, or a total or average over time for a continuing treatment. The plot assumes all underlying potential trajectories reach equilibrium (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Power (y-axis) of estimators (colors) to detect a range of PATEs (x-axis). The PATE sizes are relative to baseline %SOC (2.34%). The assumed sizes of the balanced RCT appear in the two panels—either 14 or 140 plots—and the numbers of samples per plot—either 5 or 100 samples—appear as the linetypes. Tests were based on checking the lower limit of the 95% Wald confidence intervals for each estimator. The pow… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bias (y-axis; left panels) and 95% confidence interval coverage (y-axis; right panels) of causal (upper panels) and naive (lower panels) estimates of moderator effect βmod of baseline SOC. The number of plots in the study (n) appears on the x-axis, and the number of samples per plot is mapped to the color of the points. alone. Rarely, if ever, is such a design feasible in real-world soil science experiment… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The impact of a management intervention on the soil organic carbon (SOC) stored in a given volume of soil is moderated by features that determine that soil's sequestration potential under that intervention. To maximize total SOC sequestration cost efficiently, interventions should be targeted to soils with the highest responses and lowest intervention costs. We present a framework for estimating SOC sequestration potentials and approximating efficient management policies. We review relevant sources of measurement uncertainty and formalize policy choice using potential outcomes. An optimal sequestration policy can be approximated by modeling SOC measurements as functions of covariates within each treatment group, using the fitted models to estimate SOC sequestration potential for each plot, and finding the policy that maximizes the average of those estimates. The modeling can use linear regression or other algorithms to learn relationships between features and SOC sequestration potential. We demonstrate this method using data from a study of compost amendments applied to California rangelands. We find that the plots exhibit treatment effects moderated by baseline SOC -- so targeting amendments to plots with lower baseline SOC would increase overall SOC sequestration rates. We evaluate these methods further in simulated field experiments. Refined policy estimates sequestered more SOC than uniform application of the single management policy estimated to have the largest average treatment effect, especially when SOC sequestration potential could be predicted from observed features. We conclude by discussing baseline SOC moderation, observational studies, inference, cost models, and broader policy uncertainties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that an optimal sequestration policy can be approximated by modeling SOC measurements as functions of covariates within each treatment group, using the fitted models to estimate SOC sequestration potential for each plot, and finding the policy that maximizes the average of those estimates. Demonstrated on compost amendment data from California rangelands, it reports that targeting low baseline SOC plots increases overall sequestration relative to uniform application of the best single policy; simulations confirm refined policies outperform uniform ones when sequestration potential is predictable from observed features.

Significance. If the within-treatment conditional expectation models are valid, the framework provides a practical, covariate-driven approach to targeting management interventions for cost-efficient SOC sequestration, with direct relevance to rangeland and agricultural policy. The simulation results, which show gains when features predict potential outcomes, constitute a clear strength by demonstrating the method under controlled conditions where the key assumption holds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (policy approximation paragraph): The claim that the argmax policy over estimated potentials improves on the best uniform policy is load-bearing for the real-data conclusion that targeting low-baseline-SOC plots increases sequestration. This step requires the within-treatment models (linear regression or other algorithms) to recover E[SOC(t)|X] without substantial bias from misspecification or unmeasured confounding, yet no sensitivity analysis, cross-validation of the conditional models, or robustness checks to covariate choice are described for the observational rangeland data.
  2. [Conclusion] Conclusion (observational studies paragraph): The paper explicitly flags unmeasured confounding as relevant for observational studies, but provides no quantitative assessment (e.g., via sensitivity parameters or bounding) of how confounding between covariates and SOC would propagate into the estimated potentials or the selected policy. This directly affects the validity of the reported real-data finding.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that relevant sources of measurement uncertainty are reviewed, but the manuscript does not indicate how these uncertainties are propagated through the fitted models into the policy optimization step or the reported sequestration gains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, and we will incorporate revisions to strengthen the robustness analysis for the observational data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (policy approximation paragraph): The claim that the argmax policy over estimated potentials improves on the best uniform policy is load-bearing for the real-data conclusion that targeting low-baseline-SOC plots increases sequestration. This step requires the within-treatment models (linear regression or other algorithms) to recover E[SOC(t)|X] without substantial bias from misspecification or unmeasured confounding, yet no sensitivity analysis, cross-validation of the conditional models, or robustness checks to covariate choice are described for the observational rangeland data.

    Authors: We agree that the policy approximation's validity depends on the within-treatment models accurately recovering the conditional expectations. The manuscript presents this as an approximation framework and uses simulations to illustrate its performance when the key assumptions hold. For the real-data application, we did not include explicit sensitivity analyses or cross-validation of the models. To address this, we will add cross-validation results for the within-treatment regressions and a sensitivity analysis to covariate selection in the revised manuscript. This will provide quantitative support for the robustness of the estimated policy. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Conclusion] Conclusion (observational studies paragraph): The paper explicitly flags unmeasured confounding as relevant for observational studies, but provides no quantitative assessment (e.g., via sensitivity parameters or bounding) of how confounding between covariates and SOC would propagate into the estimated potentials or the selected policy. This directly affects the validity of the reported real-data finding.

    Authors: The conclusion section does highlight unmeasured confounding as a limitation. We acknowledge that a quantitative assessment of its potential impact would be valuable. In the revision, we will include a sensitivity analysis, for example using partial identification bounds or sensitivity parameters, to evaluate how unmeasured confounding could affect the estimated sequestration potentials and the resulting policy recommendation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method is a self-contained proposal using standard conditional modeling

full rationale

The paper's core derivation is a methodological framework: fit within-treatment models (regression or other algorithms) to estimate conditional SOC potentials from covariates, then select the policy maximizing the average of those estimates. This chain does not reduce by the paper's equations to fitted parameters by construction, nor does it rely on self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work. The approach is externally falsifiable via simulation or new data and matches standard potential-outcomes policy learning without self-referential closure. Minor self-citation (if any) is not load-bearing for the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard causal inference assumptions and regression modeling assumptions with no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms introduced beyond those typical for potential outcomes analysis.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Potential outcomes framework applies, with no interference between plots and stable unit treatment value assumption holding for the soil measurements.
    Invoked when formalizing policy choice using potential outcomes.
  • domain assumption Fitted models within each treatment group accurately represent the conditional expectation of SOC given covariates.
    Required for the estimation of sequestration potentials used in policy search.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5776 in / 1399 out tokens · 44670 ms · 2026-05-23T20:41:11.577795+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Amelung and W

    W. Amelung and W. Zech. Minimisation of organic matter disruption during particle-size fractionation of grassland epipedons. Geoderma, 92 0 (1): 0 73--85, September 1999. ISSN 0016-7061. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00023-3. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706199000233

    work page doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(99)00023-3 1999

  2. [2]

    Aronow and J

    P. Aronow and J. Middleton. A class of unbiased estimators of the average treatment effect in randomized experiments. Journal of Causal Inference, 1, 01 2013. doi:10.1515/jci-2012-0009

    work page doi:10.1515/jci-2012-0009 2013

  3. [3]

    Bates and R

    M.A. Bates and R. Glennerster. The generalizability puzzle. http://web.archive.org/web/20080207010024/http://www.808multimedia.com/winnt/kernel.htm, 2017. Accessed: 2024-04-19

    work page arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Begill, A

    N. Begill, A. Don, and C. Poeplau. No detectable upper limit of mineral-associated organic carbon in temperate agricultural soils. Global Change Biology, 29 0 (16): 0 4662--4669, 2023. ISSN 1365-2486. doi:10.1111/gcb.16804. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.16804. \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcb.16804

    work page doi:10.1111/gcb.16804 2023

  5. [5]

    Berk and D.A

    R.A. Berk and D.A. Freedman. Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. Law, Punishment, and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon Messinger, pages 234--254, 2003

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    W. Berry. The Unsettling of America : Culture and Agriculture . Counterpoint, San Francisco, revised edition edition, November 2004. ISBN 978-0-87156-877-9

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Blyth, S

    F. Blyth, S. Perryman, P. Poulton, M. Glendining, and A. Gregory. Highfield ley-arable experiment cropping sequence 1949-2023. Electronic Rothamsted Archive, Rothamsted Research, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.23637/rrn1-HLAcrop4923-01

    work page doi:10.23637/rrn1-hlacrop4923-01 1949

  8. [8]

    Bossio, S.C

    D.A. Bossio, S.C. Cook-Patton, P.W. Ellis, J. Fargione, J. Sanderman, P. Smith, S. Wood, R.J. Zomer, M. von Unger, I.M. Emmer, and B.W. Griscom. The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Sustainability, 3 0 (5): 0 391--398, May 2020. ISSN 2398-9629. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-0491-z. Pu...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z 2020

  9. [9]

    R. Boyle. The Skeptical Chymist. 1661

    work page

  10. [10]

    D.J. Brus. Using regression models in design-based estimation of spatial means of soil properties. European Journal of Soil Science, 51 0 (1): 0 159--172, 2000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00277.x. URL https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00277.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00277.x 2000

  11. [11]

    Caughey, A

    D. Caughey, A. Dafoe, X. Li, and L. Miratrix. Randomisation inference beyond the sharp null: bounded null hypotheses and quantiles of individual treatment effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 85 0 (5): 0 1471--1491, November 2023. ISSN 1369-7412. doi:10.1093/jrsssb/qkad080. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkad080

    work page doi:10.1093/jrsssb/qkad080 2023

  12. [12]

    Chakraborty and S.A

    B. Chakraborty and S.A. Murphy. Dynamic Treatment Regimes . Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 1: 0 447--464, 2014. ISSN 2326-8298. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115553

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-022513-115553 2014

  13. [13]

    Chenu, D.A

    C. Chenu, D.A. Angers, P. Barré, D. Derrien, D. Arrouays, and J. Balesdent. Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: Knowledge gaps and potential innovations. Soil and Tillage Research, 188: 0 41--52, May 2019. ISSN 0167-1987. doi:10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198718303738

    work page doi:10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011 2019

  14. [14]

    W.G. Cochran. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 3rd edition, 1977

    work page 1977

  15. [15]

    Cotrufo, M.G

    M.F. Cotrufo, M.G. Ranalli, M.L. Haddix, J. Six, and E. Lugato. Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Nature Geoscience, 12 0 (12): 0 989--994, December 2019. ISSN 1752-0908. doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-019-0484-6. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6 2019

  16. [16]

    de Gruijter, A.B

    J.J. de Gruijter, A.B. McBratney, B. Minasny, I. Wheeler, B.P. Malone, and U. Stockmann. Farm-scale soil carbon auditing. Geoderma, 265: 0 120--130, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.010 2016

  17. [17]

    Devine, A.T

    S.M. Devine, A.T. O’Geen, H. Liu, Y. Jin, H.E. Dahlke, R.E. Larsen, and R.A. Dahlgren. Terrain attributes and forage productivity predict catchment-scale soil organic carbon stocks. Geoderma, 368: 0 114286, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114286

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114286 2020

  18. [18]

    P. Ding, A. Feller, and L. Miratrix. Randomization inference for treatment effect variation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 78 0 (3): 0 655--671, 2016. ISSN 13697412, 14679868. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/24775356

    work page arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    P. Ding, A. Feller, and L. Miratrix. Decomposing Treatment Effect Variation . Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114 0 (525): 0 304--317, January 2019. ISSN 0162-1459. doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1407322. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1407322. Publisher: Taylor & Francis \_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1407322

    work page doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1407322 2019

  20. [20]

    Dudík, D

    M. Dudík, D. Erhan, J. Langford, and L. Li. Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimization . Statistical Science, 29 0 (4): 0 485--511, 2014. ISSN 0883-4237. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/43288496. Publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statistics

    work page arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Efron and D

    B. Efron and D. Feldman. Compliance as an Explanatory Variable in Clinical Trials . Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86 0 (413): 0 9--17, 1991. ISSN 0162-1459. doi:10.2307/2289707. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/2289707. Publisher: [American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.]

    work page doi:10.2307/2289707 1991

  22. [22]

    Egami and E

    N. Egami and E. Hartman. Elements of External Validity : Framework , Design , and Analysis . American Political Science Review, 117 0 (3): 0 1070--1088, August 2023. ISSN 0003-0554, 1537-5943. doi:10.1017/S0003055422000880. URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/elements-of-external-validity-framework-design-...

    work page doi:10.1017/s0003055422000880 2023

  23. [23]

    R.A. Fisher. Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, 1925

    work page 1925

  24. [24]

    Freedman

    D.A. Freedman. On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments. Annals of Applied Statistics, 2 0 (1): 0 176--196, March 2008 a . ISSN 1932-6157, 1941-7330. doi:10.1214/07-AOAS143. URL https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1206367817. Publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statistics

    work page doi:10.1214/07-aoas143 2008

  25. [25]

    Freedman

    D.A. Freedman. On regression adjustments to experimental data. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 40 0 (2): 0 180--193, February 2008 b . ISSN 0196-8858. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.12.003. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019688580700005X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.12.003 2008

  26. [26]

    Georgiou, R.B

    K. Georgiou, R.B. Jackson, O. Vindušková, R.Z. Abramoff, A. Ahlström, W. Feng, J.W. Harden, A.F.A. Pellegrini, H.W. Polley, J.L. Soong, W.J. Riley, and M.S. Torn. Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon. Nature Communications, 13 0 (1): 0 3797, July 2022. ISSN 2041-1723. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31540-9. URL https://www.nature.c...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31540-9 2022

  27. [27]

    E. Gorham. Northern Peatlands : Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming . Ecological Applications, 1 0 (2): 0 182--195, 1991. ISSN 1939-5582. doi:10.2307/1941811. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/1941811. \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1941811

    work page doi:10.2307/1941811 1991

  28. [28]

    J. Hassink. The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particles. Plant and Soil, 191 0 (1): 0 77--87, April 1997. ISSN 1573-5036. doi:10.1023/A:1004213929699. URL https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004213929699

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1004213929699 1997

  29. [29]

    Holland-Letz and A

    T. Holland-Letz and A. Kopp-Schneider. Optimal experimental designs for dose–response studies with continuous endpoints. Archives of Toxicology, 89 0 (11): 0 2059--2068, 2015. ISSN 0340-5761. doi:10.1007/s00204-014-1335-2. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4655015/

    work page doi:10.1007/s00204-014-1335-2 2059

  30. [30]

    Howard, A

    S.R. Howard, A. Ramdas, J. McAuliffe, and J.S. Sekhon. Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequences. The Annals of Statistics, 49 0 (2), apr 2021. doi:10.1214/20-aos1991. URL https://doi.org/10.1214

    work page doi:10.1214/20-aos1991 2021

  31. [31]

    J. Hsu. Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. Chapman and Hall, London, 1996

    work page 1996

  32. [32]

    Hurlbert

    S.H. Hurlbert. Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments . Ecological Monographs, 54 0 (2): 0 187--211, 1984. ISSN 0012-9615. doi:10.2307/1942661. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/1942661. Publisher: Ecological Society of America

    work page doi:10.2307/1942661 1984

  33. [33]

    Imbens and D.B

    G.W. Imbens and D.B. Rubin. Causal Inference for Statistics , Social , and Biomedical Sciences : An Introduction . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015. ISBN 978-0-521-88588-1. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139025751. URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/causal-inference-for-statistics-social-and-biomedical-sciences/71126BE90C58F1A431FE9B2DD07938AB

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139025751 2015

  34. [34]

    Additionality

    Indigo Agriculture . Additionality. https://www.indigoag.com, 2024. Accessed: 2024-04-19

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Net Zero Roadmap : A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 ° C Goal in Reach – Analysis , September 2023

    International Energy Agency . Net Zero Roadmap : A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 ° C Goal in Reach – Analysis , September 2023. URL https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-roadmap-a-global-pathway-to-keep-the-15-0c-goal-in-reach

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Johnston

    J.F.W. Johnston. Experimental Agriculture : Being The Results Of Past , And Suggestions For Future Experiments In Scientific And Practical Agriculture . William Blackwell and Sons, 1849. ISBN 978-1-4368-4219-8

    work page

  37. [37]

    Karmarkar

    N. Karmarkar. A new polynomial time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica, 4: 0 373--395, 1984

    work page 1984

  38. [38]

    Kasy and A

    M. Kasy and A. Sautmann. Adaptive Treatment Assignment in Experiments for Policy Choice . Econometrica, 89 0 (1): 0 113--132, 2021. ISSN 1468-0262. doi:10.3982/ECTA17527. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3982/ECTA17527. \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3982/ECTA17527

    work page doi:10.3982/ecta17527 2021

  39. [39]

    Kitagawa and A

    T. Kitagawa and A. Tetenov. Who Should Be Treated ? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice . Econometrica, 86 0 (2): 0 591--616, 2018. ISSN 1468-0262. doi:10.3982/ECTA13288. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3982/ECTA13288. \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3982/ECTA13288

    work page doi:10.3982/ecta13288 2018

  40. [40]

    Kravchenko and G.P

    A.N. Kravchenko and G.P. Robertson. Whole-profile soil carbon stocks: The danger of assuming too much from analyses of too little. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75 0 (1): 0 235--240, 2011

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Künzel, J.S

    S.R. Künzel, J.S. Sekhon, P.J. Bickel, and B. Yu. Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 0 (10): 0 4156--4165, March 2019. doi:10.1073/pnas.1804597116. URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1804597116. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy o...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1804597116 2019

  42. [42]

    R. Lal. Regenerative agriculture for food and climate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 75 0 (5): 0 123A--124A, September 2020. ISSN 0022-4561, 1941-3300. doi:10.2489/jswc.2020.0620A. URL https://www.jswconline.org/content/75/5/123A. Publisher: Soil and Water Conservation Society Section: A Section

    work page doi:10.2489/jswc.2020.0620a 2020

  43. [43]

    Le Quéré, R.M

    C. Le Quéré, R.M. Andrew, P. Friedlingstein, S. Sitch, J. Hauck, J. Pongratz, P.A. Pickers, J.I. Korsbakken, G.P. Peters, J.G. Canadell, A. Arneth, V.K. Arora, L. Barbero, A. Bastos, L. Bopp, F. Chevallier, L.P. Chini, P. Ciais, S.C. Doney, T. Gkritzalis, D.S. Goll, I. Harris, V. Haverd, F.M. Hoffman, M. Hoppema, R.A. Houghton, G. Hurtt, T. Ilyina, A.K. J...

    work page doi:10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018 2018

  44. [44]

    Li and P

    X. Li and P. Ding. Rerandomization and Regression Adjustment . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 82 0 (1): 0 241--268, February 2020. ISSN 1369-7412. doi:10.1111/rssb.12353. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12353

    work page doi:10.1111/rssb.12353 2020

  45. [45]

    W. Lin. Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman’s critique . The Annals of Applied Statistics, 7 0 (1): 0 295 -- 318, 2013. doi:10.1214/12-AOAS583. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOAS583

    work page doi:10.1214/12-aoas583 2013

  46. [46]

    Mathers, C.K

    C. Mathers, C.K. Black, B.D. Segal, R.B. Gurung, Y. Zhang, M.J. Easter, S. Williams, M. Motew, E.E. Campbell, C.D. Brummitt, K. Paustian, and A.A. Kumar. Validating DayCent - CR for cropland soil carbon offset reporting at a national scale. Geoderma, 438: 0 116647, October 2023. ISSN 0016-7061. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116647. URL https://www.sciencedi...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116647 2023

  47. [47]

    K. Minami. Methane from rice production. Fertilizer research, 37 0 (3): 0 167--179, October 1994. ISSN 1573-0867. doi:10.1007/BF00748935. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00748935

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00748935 1994

  48. [48]

    Minasny, B.P

    B. Minasny, B.P. Malone, A.B. McBratney, et al. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma, 292: 0 59--86, 2017

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Necpálová, R.P

    M. Necpálová, R.P. Anex, M.N. Fienen, S.J. Del Grosso, M.J. Castellano, J.E. Sawyer, J. Iqbal, J.L. Pantoja, and D.W. Barker. Understanding the DayCent model: Calibration , sensitivity, and identifiability through inverse modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 66: 0 110--130, 2015. ISSN 1364-8152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.011. ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.011 2015

  50. [50]

    J. Neyman. Sur les applications de la th\'eorie des probabilit\'es aux experiences agricoles: Essai des principes. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczki, 10: 0 1--51, 1923

    work page 1923

  51. [51]

    Rusticall chymistry

    J. Niermeier-Dohoney. “ Rusticall chymistry”: Alchemy , saltpeter projects, and experimental fertilizers in seventeenth-century English agriculture. History of Science, 60 0 (4): 0 546--574, December 2022. ISSN 0073-2753. doi:10.1177/00732753211033159. URL https://doi.org/10.1177/00732753211033159. Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    work page doi:10.1177/00732753211033159 2022

  52. [52]

    N. Nitta. Rice farming to restore soil. https://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/articles/entry/rice-farming-to-restore-soil/##, 2022. Accessed: 2024-04-19

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Padarian, B

    J. Padarian, B. Minasny, and A. B. McBratney. Using deep learning to predict soil properties from regional spectral data. Geoderma Regional, 16: 0 e00198, March 2019. ISSN 2352-0094. doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2018.e00198. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009418302785

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2018.e00198 2019

  54. [54]

    Pallmann, A.W

    P. Pallmann, A.W. Bedding, B. Choodari-Oskooei, M. Dimairo, L. Flight, L.V. Hampson, J. Holmes, A.P. Mander, L. Odondi, M.R. Sydes, S.S. Villar, J.M.S. Wason, C.J. Weir, G.M. Wheeler, C. Yap, and T. Jaki. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them. BMC Medicine, 16 0 (1): 0 29, February 2018. ISSN 1741-7015. doi:10.1...

    work page doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1017-7 2018

  55. [55]

    W.J. Parton. The CENTURY model. In David S. Powlson, Pete Smith, and Jo U. Smith, editors, Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models , pages 283--291, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-61094-3. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61094-3_23

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61094-3_23 1996

  56. [56]

    Pilegaard

    K. Pilegaard. Processes regulating nitric oxide emissions from soils. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368 0 (1621): 0 20130126, July 2013. ISSN 0962-8436. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0126. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682746/

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0126 2013

  57. [57]

    Potash, K

    E. Potash, K. Guan, A.J. Margenot, D.K. Lee, A. Boe, M. Douglass, E. Heaton, C. Jang, V. Jin, N. Li, R. Mitchell, N. Namoi, M. Schmer, S. Wang, and C. Zumpf. Multi-site evaluation of stratified and balanced sampling of soil organic carbon stocks in agricultural fields. Geoderma, 438: 0 116587, 2023. ISSN 0016-7061. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116587 2023

  58. [58]

    Ramdas, P

    A. Ramdas, P. Gr \"u nwald, V. Vovk, and G. Shafer. Game-Theoretic Statistics and Safe Anytime-Valid Inference . Statistical Science, 38 0 (4): 0 576 -- 601, 2023. doi:10.1214/23-STS894. URL https://doi.org/10.1214/23-STS894

    work page doi:10.1214/23-sts894 2023

  59. [59]

    Rosenbaum

    P.R. Rosenbaum. Observational Studies . Springer, 2002. URL https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-3692-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3692-2 2002

  60. [60]

    Ryals and W.L

    R. Ryals and W.L. Silver. Effects of organic matter amendments on net primary productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in annual grasslands. Ecological Applications: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America, 23 0 (1): 0 46--59, January 2013. ISSN 1051-0761

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    Sanderman, T

    J. Sanderman, T. Hengl, and G.J. Fiske. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 0 (36): 0 9575--9580, September 2017. doi:10.1073/pnas.1706103114. URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1706103114. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1706103114 2017

  62. [62]

    Sanford, J.L

    G.R. Sanford, J.L. Posner, R.D. Jackson, C.J. Kucharik, J.L. Hedtcke, and T. Lin. Soil carbon lost from Mollisols of the North Central U . S . A . with 20 years of agricultural best management practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 162: 0 68--76, November 2012. ISSN 0167-8809. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.011. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.011 2012

  63. [63]

    J.C. Scott. Seeing like a State : How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed . Yale University Press, New Haven, CT London, 0 edition edition, February 1999. ISBN 978-0-300-07815-2

    work page 1999

  64. [64]

    Silver, S

    W. Silver, S. Vergara, and A. Mayer. Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas mitigation potential of composting and soil amendments on california’s rangelands. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, 2018. URL https://www.energy.ca.gov/media/2059

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    J. Six, S. Doetterl, M. Laub, C.R. Müller, and M. Van de Broek. The six rights of how and when to test for soil C saturation. SOIL, 10 0 (1): 0 275--279, April 2024. ISSN 2199-3971. doi:10.5194/soil-10-275-2024. URL https://soil.copernicus.org/articles/10/275/2024/. Publisher: Copernicus GmbH

    work page doi:10.5194/soil-10-275-2024 2024

  66. [66]

    Slessarev, A

    E.W. Slessarev, A. Mayer, C. Kelly, K. Georgiou, J. Pett-Ridge, and E.E. Nuccio. Initial soil organic carbon stocks govern changes in soil carbon: Reality or artifact? Global Change Biology, 29 0 (5): 0 1239--1247, 2023. ISSN 1365-2486. doi:10.1111/gcb.16491. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.16491. \_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wi...

    work page doi:10.1111/gcb.16491 2023

  67. [67]

    Slivkins

    A. Slivkins. Introduction to Multi - Armed Bandits , April 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07272. arXiv:1904.07272 [cs, stat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    P. Smith. An overview of the permanence of soil organic carbon stocks: influence of direct human-induced, indirect and natural effects. European Journal of Soil Science, 56 0 (5): 0 673--680, 2005. ISSN 1365-2389. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00708.x. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00708.x. \_eprint: https://onlinelib...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00708.x 2005

  69. [69]

    J.V. Spertus. Optimal sampling and assay for estimating soil organic carbon. Open Journal of Soil Science, 11: 0 93--121, 2021. doi:10.4236/ojss.2021.112006

    work page doi:10.4236/ojss.2021.112006 2021

  70. [70]

    Growing climate solutions, October 2021

    Stanford University . Growing climate solutions, October 2021. URL https://news.stanford.edu/2021/10/12/growing-climate-solutions/. Section: Science & Technology

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Stanley, J.V

    P. Stanley, J.V. Spertus, J. Chiartas, P.B. Stark, and T. Bowles. Valid inferences about soil carbon in heterogeneous landscapes. Geoderma, 430: 0 116323, February 2023. ISSN 0016-7061. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116323. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706122006309

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116323 2023

  72. [72]

    Stewart, K

    C.E. Stewart, K. Paustian, R.T. Conant, A.F. Plante, and J. Six. Soil carbon saturation: concept, evidence and evaluation. Biogeochemistry, 86 0 (1): 0 19--31, October 2007. ISSN 1573-515X. doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9140-0 2007

  73. [73]

    Sutton and A.G

    R.S. Sutton and A.G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning : An Introduction . Bradford Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts, first edition edition, March 1998. ISBN 978-0-262-19398-6

    work page 1998

  74. [74]

    Särndal, B

    C.E. Särndal, B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. Model Assisted Survey Sampling . Springer Series in Statistics . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992. ISBN 978-0-387-40620-6. URL https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387406206

    work page arXiv 1992

  75. [75]

    Thamo and D.J

    T. Thamo and D.J. Pannell. Challenges in developing effective policy for soil carbon sequestration: perspectives on additionality, leakage, and permanence. Climate Policy, 16 0 (8): 0 973--992, November 2016. ISSN 1469-3062. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1075372. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1075372. Publisher: Taylor & Francis \_eprint: https://...

    work page doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1075372 2016

  76. [76]

    Viscarra Rossel , D.J

    R.A. Viscarra Rossel , D.J. Brus, C. Lobsey, Z. Shi, and G. McLachlan. Baseline estimates of soil organic carbon by proximal sensing: Comparing design-based, model-assisted and model-based inference. Geoderma, 265: 0 152--163, 2016. ISSN 0016-7061. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.016. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.016 2016

  77. [77]

    Viscarra Rossel, R

    R.A. Viscarra Rossel, R. Webster, M. Zhang, Z. Shen, K. Dixon, Y.-P. Wang, and L. Walden. How much organic carbon could the soil store? The carbon sequestration potential of Australian soil. Global Change Biology, 30 0 (1): 0 e17053, 2024. ISSN 1365-2486. doi:10.1111/gcb.17053. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.17053. \_eprint: https...

    work page doi:10.1111/gcb.17053 2024

  78. [78]

    Waudby-Smith, L

    I. Waudby-Smith, L. Wu, A. Ramdas, N. Karampatziakis, and P. Mineiro. Anytime-valid off-policy inference for contextual bandits. ACM / IMS Journal of Data Science, January 2024. doi:10.1145/3643693. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643693

    work page doi:10.1145/3643693 2024

  79. [79]

    Wendt and S

    J.W. Wendt and S. Hauser. An equivalent soil mass procedure for monitoring soil organic carbon in multiple soil layers. European Journal of Soil Science, 64 0 (1): 0 58--65, 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12002. URL https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejss.12002

    work page doi:10.1111/ejss.12002 2013

  80. [80]

    W. J. Westlake. Statistical Aspects of Comparative Bioavailability Trials . Biometrics, 35 0 (1): 0 273--280, 1979. ISSN 0006-341X. doi:10.2307/2529949. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/2529949. Publisher: [Wiley, International Biometric Society]

    work page doi:10.2307/2529949 1979

Showing first 80 references.