Fractional list packing for layered graphs
Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:03 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The fractional list packing number of a graph is at most its pathwidth plus one.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
χ_ℓ^•(G) ≤ pw(G) + 1 for every graph G, where pw denotes pathwidth, with the bound extending to correspondence and local-degree versions of the parameter; the corresponding statement with treewidth in place of pathwidth is false.
What carries the argument
A perfectly balanced probability distribution on proper L-colourings, meaning each colour appears with probability exactly 1/|L(v)| at every vertex v.
If this is right
- Flexible list colouring theorems are strengthened for all Cartesian products and all d-degenerate graphs.
- The same pathwidth-plus-one bound holds for the correspondence and local-degree strengthenings of the fractional list packing number.
- No analogous bound exists when pathwidth is replaced by treewidth in the correspondence setting.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Path decompositions appear to be the structural feature that permits balancing colour probabilities across all vertices simultaneously.
- The failure for treewidth suggests that the balancing condition is sensitive to the linear structure of path decompositions rather than to branchings.
- It would be natural to test whether the bound remains tight on specific families such as grids or series-parallel graphs.
Load-bearing premise
The requirement that the probability distribution over colourings must be perfectly balanced, with each colour at a vertex having equal probability.
What would settle it
A single graph G with pathwidth w whose fractional list packing number exceeds w + 1, or a graph with treewidth w whose correspondence version of the fractional list packing number exceeds w + 1.
Figures
read the original abstract
The fractional list packing number $\chi_{\ell}^{\bullet}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is a graph invariant that has recently arisen from the study of disjoint list-colourings. It measures how large the lists of a list-assignment $L:V(G)\rightarrow 2^{\mathbb{N}}$ need to be to ensure the existence of a `perfectly balanced' probability distribution on proper $L$-colourings, i.e., such that at every vertex $v$, every colour appears with equal probability $1/|L(v)|$. In this work we give various bounds on $\chi_{\ell}^{\bullet}(G)$, which admit strengthenings for correspondence and local-degree versions. As a corollary, we improve theorems on the related notion of flexible list colouring. In particular we study Cartesian products and $d$-degenerate graphs, and we prove that $\chi_{\ell}^{\bullet}(G)$ is bounded from above by the pathwidth of $G$ plus one. The correspondence analogue of the latter is false for treewidth instead of pathwidth.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript defines the fractional list packing number χ_ℓ^•(G) as the minimum k such that some k-list assignment L admits a probability distribution over proper L-colorings in which each color appears with equal probability 1/|L(v)| at every vertex v. It establishes upper bounds on this parameter for Cartesian products, d-degenerate graphs and layered graphs, proves that χ_ℓ^•(G) ≤ pw(G) + 1, and exhibits a counterexample showing that the analogous statement fails when pathwidth is replaced by treewidth in the correspondence-coloring setting. Corollaries improve known results on flexible list colouring.
Significance. If the stated bounds and the pathwidth theorem hold, the work supplies concrete structural upper bounds on a recently introduced invariant that refines ordinary list colouring, distinguishes pathwidth from treewidth in the correspondence model, and yields strengthened theorems on flexible colouring. The explicit use of perfectly balanced distributions is built into the definition and enables the pathwidth result; the counterexample for treewidth is a useful negative result.
minor comments (4)
- [§1] §1: the title emphasises layered graphs, yet the abstract and introduction state results for broader classes; add a sentence clarifying the role of layered graphs in the main theorems.
- [Definition 2.3] Definition 2.3: the notation χ_ℓ^•(G) is introduced without an immediate comparison table to χ_ℓ(G) and χ^•(G); a short comparison would aid readability.
- [Theorem 4.2] Theorem 4.2 (pathwidth bound): the proof sketch in the text is concise; expand the inductive step on the path decomposition to make the construction of the balanced distribution fully explicit.
- [Figure 3] Figure 3 (counterexample for treewidth): the caption does not state the exact list sizes or the correspondence edges used; add these parameters for reproducibility.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its significance, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were provided in the report.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; bounds derived from structural parameters
full rationale
The paper defines χ_ℓ^•(G) explicitly via the minimum k admitting a list assignment with perfectly balanced distributions on proper L-colorings. It then proves χ_ℓ^•(G) ≤ pw(G) + 1 (and related bounds for degenerate graphs and Cartesian products) using path decompositions and probabilistic arguments on the graph structure. These steps rely on the definition but do not reduce the claimed inequality to a tautology or fitted input by construction; the pathwidth bound is obtained from the layered structure rather than being presupposed. The explicit counterexample for treewidth in the correspondence setting further shows the result is not forced by the modeling choice. No self-citations, ansatzes, or renamings are load-bearing in the central derivation.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M. O. Albertson. You can’t paint yourself into a corner. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 73(2):189–194, 1998
work page 1998
-
[2]
M. O. Albertson and E. H. Moore. Extending graph coloring s. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B , 77(1):83– 95, 1999. 16
work page 1999
-
[3]
S. Arnborg and A. Proskurowski. Linear time algorithms f or NP-hard problems restricted to partial k-trees. Discrete Applied Mathematics , 23(1):11–24, 1989
work page 1989
- [4]
-
[5]
A. Bernshteyn. The asymptotic behavior of the correspond ence chromatic number. Discrete Math., 339(11):2680–2692, 2016
work page 2016
-
[6]
A. Bernshteyn and A. Kostochka. On differences between DP- coloring and list coloring. Sib. Adv. Math. , 29:183–189, 2019
work page 2019
-
[7]
M. Borowiecki, S. Jendrol’, D. Král’, and J. Miškuf. List c oloring of cartesian products of graphs. Discrete Mathematics , 306(16):1955–1958, 2006
work page 1955
-
[8]
P. Bradshaw, T. Masařík, and L. Stacho. Flexible list colo rings in graphs with special degeneracy conditions. J. Graph Theory , 101(4):717–745, 2022
work page 2022
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
-
[12]
S. Cambie and R. Hämäläinen. Packing colourings in comp lete bipartite graphs and the in- verse problem for correspondence packing. arXiv e-prints (to appear in JGT) , Mar. 2023. arXiv:2303.01944
- [13]
-
[14]
D. Chakraborti and T. Tran. Approximate packing of inde pendent transversals in locally sparse graphs, 2024. arXiv:2402.02815
- [15]
- [16]
-
[17]
Z. Dvořák and B. Lidický. Fine structure of 4-critical tr iangle-free graphs ii. planar triangle-free graphs with two precolored 4-cycles. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics , 31(2):865–874, 2017
work page 2017
- [18]
-
[19]
K. Edwards and A. G. J. van den Heuvel Ross J. Kang Gregory J. Puleo Jean-Sébastien Sereni. Extension from precoloured sets of edges. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics , 25(3):Paper 3.1, 2018. 17
work page 2018
-
[20]
P. Erdős, A. L. Rubin, and H. Taylor. Choosability in gra phs. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Computing (H umboldt State Univ., Arcata, Calif., 1979) , Congress. Numer., XXVI, pages 125–157. Utilitas Math., Wi nnipeg, Man., 1980
work page 1979
-
[21]
M. R. Fellows, F. V. Fomin, D. Lokshtanov, F. Rosamond, S . Saurabh, S. Szeider, and C. Thomassen. On the complexity of some colorful problems pa rameterized by treewidth. Infor- mation and Computation , 209(2):143–153, 2011
work page 2011
-
[22]
F. Galvin. The List Chromatic Index of a Bipartite Multig raph. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B , 63(1):153–158, Jan. 1995
work page 1995
-
[23]
H. Kaul, R. Mathew, J. A. Mudrock, and M. J. Pelsmajer. Fl exible list colorings: maximizing the number of requests satisfied. J. Graph Theory , 106(4):887–906, 2024
work page 2024
-
[24]
H. Kaul and J. A. Mudrock. Counting packings of list-col orings of graphs. arXiv e-prints , 2024. arXiv:2401.11025
-
[25]
H. Kaul, J. A. Mudrock, G. Sharma, and Q. Stratton. DP-co loring Cartesian products of graphs. J. Graph Theory , 103(2):285–306, 2023
work page 2023
-
[26]
M. Molloy and L. Postle. Asymptotically good edge corre spondence colourings. Journal of Graph Theory, 100(3):559–577, 2022
work page 2022
-
[27]
J. A. Mudrock. A short proof that the list packing number of any graph is well defined. Discrete Mathematics, 346(11):113185, 2023. Special issue in honour of Landon Ra bern
work page 2023
-
[28]
S. D. Noble. Evaluating the Tutte polynomial for graphs of bounded tree-width. Combin. Probab. Comput., 7(3):307–321, 1998
work page 1998
-
[29]
A. Proskurowski. Maximal graphs of path-width k or searching a partial k-cate rpillar. University of Oregon. Department of Computer and Information Science, 1989
work page 1989
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
-
[35]
Z. Tuza. Graph colorings with local constraints—a surv ey. Discuss. Math. Graph Theory , 17(2):161–228, 1997
work page 1997
-
[36]
V. G. Vizing. Coloring the vertices of a graph in prescri bed colors. Diskret. Analiz, (29, Metody Diskret. Anal. v Teorii Kodov i Shem):3–10, 101, 1976
work page 1976
-
[37]
R. Yuster. On factors of independent transversals in k-partite graphs. Electron. J. Combin. , 28(4):Paper No. 4.23, 18, 2021. 18 Appendix A The hypercube Q3 Figure 3: A 2-fold correspondence-cover pH, L q of the hypercube Q3, demonstrating that χ ‚ cpQ3q ą 3. For each vertex v of Q3, its list Lpvq “ t 1v, 2vu is indicated by a grey ellipse surrounding a w...
work page 2021
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.