Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 14 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2410.03225.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-09T05:32:24.938897Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-03T15:38:33.520795Z
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Observation de35d2ad-a344-45fa-8198-e4ca84011687 · inbound
Can LLMs Hack Enterprise Networks? Autonomous Assumed Breach Penetration-Testing Active Directory Networks AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 12
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4abde3c0-a8d4-4c57-a7a8-53308416d707 · inbound
A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysis AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 161
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ff71ded2-2ba4-4491-bc5e-b6dc976527d6 · inbound
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Research: Systems, Methodologies, and Applications AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 85
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4d7d9d3d-5ce4-418b-a742-22dd271fc41d · inbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 28
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 27bacd1b-08dd-410b-a165-3744a2b61ff2 · inbound
Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 174
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.
Observation d76c0297-a11c-4260-9d24-07155462fd0b · inbound
PoCo: Agentic Proof-of-Concept Exploit Generation for Smart Contracts AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 13
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ccc1f7da-0c8b-46ed-82fe-805fde92620c · inbound
From Rookie to Expert: Manipulating LLMs for Automated Vulnerability Exploitation in Enterprise Software AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 10
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.
Observation a0829395-8fbf-40f8-b2ff-564d4ff23ae3 · inbound
Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.
Observation 7f0784d0-b838-488b-92e8-25ab5b550474 · inbound
From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-World AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 10
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.
Observation 9710babd-2c8b-4b92-8776-7d7167ff2f8c · inbound
From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-World AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 6b1e73b4-ee16-48fd-86f7-6f2e67d87f44 · inbound
CyberEvolver: Structured Self-Evolution for Cybersecurity Agents On the Fly AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 16
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.
Observation ba9e09b6-a8cc-4093-ad41-4631de23ceca · inbound
How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 6
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.
Observation e90b2f68-dd9b-43ea-924c-728df9a05bfa · inbound
The Emergence of Autonomous Penetration Capabilities in Large Language Model-Powered AI Systems AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 7
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.
Observation f5fb2b92-04b1-4909-b1c4-7251da9723c6 · inbound
The Emergence of Autonomous Penetration Capabilities in Large Language Model-Powered AI Systems AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.