pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.04104 · v1 · submitted 2024-10-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Gapped magnetic ground state in the spin-liquid candidate kappa-(BEDT-TTF)₂Ag₂(CN)₃ suggested by magnetic spectroscopy

Sudip Pal , Bj\"orn Miksch , Hans-Albrecht Krug von Nidda , Anastasia Bauernfeind , Marc Scheffler , Yukihoro Yoshida , Gunzi Saito , Atsushi Kawamoto
show 5 more authors
C\'ecile M\'ezi\`ere Narcis Avarvari John A. Schlueter Andrej Pustogow Martin Dressel
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantum spin liquidtriangular latticeESR spectroscopyspin gapsinglet formationBEDT-TTFmagnetic susceptibilityHeisenberg antiferromagnet
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic spectroscopy indicates singlet formation with an inhomogeneous spin gap at low temperatures in the triangular-lattice spin-liquid candidate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports multifrequency ESR measurements on κ-(BEDT-TTF)₂Ag₂(CN)₃, a candidate quantum spin liquid with S=1/2 spins on a triangular lattice. High-temperature data follow the Heisenberg antiferromagnet with exchange J/k_B ≈ 175 K. Below a pairing scale T*, the static spin susceptibility drops rapidly while the ESR linewidth decreases monotonically; the authors interpret this as the development of singlet correlations and a spin gap. A weak Curie-like tail is attributed to impurities, while angular dependence of the linewidth is consistent with this picture.

Core claim

The authors propose that strong singlet correlations develop below T* accompanied by a spin gap, leading to the gradual formation of spin singlets with an inhomogeneous spin gap at low temperatures rather than a gapless quantum spin liquid ground state.

What carries the argument

Multifrequency electron spin resonance (ESR) tracking the temperature dependence of static spin susceptibility and linewidth, together with their angular dependence, to separate intrinsic singlet physics from impurity contributions.

If this is right

  • The magnetic ground state is gapped rather than gapless.
  • Singlet formation occurs gradually with spatial inhomogeneity in the gap size.
  • Impurity spins contribute a separate Curie-like susceptibility that must be subtracted to isolate the intrinsic behavior.
  • The pairing energy scale T* sets the temperature below which the system deviates from the high-T Heisenberg model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar ESR signatures could be sought in other triangular-lattice organics to test whether inhomogeneous gaps are generic to this geometry.
  • If the gap is inhomogeneous, low-temperature specific-heat or thermal-conductivity measurements should show a broad distribution of excitation energies rather than a sharp threshold.
  • The separation of intrinsic and impurity signals suggests that future doping or pressure studies could tune the singlet scale while monitoring impurity density.

Load-bearing premise

The rapid drop in static spin susceptibility below T* arises from singlet pairing and a spin gap, rather than from structural transitions, impurity freezing, or g-factor changes.

What would settle it

Direct observation of a structural phase transition coinciding with T* or a temperature-independent g-factor shift that fully accounts for the susceptibility drop would undermine the singlet-gap interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.04104 by Anastasia Bauernfeind, Andrej Pustogow, Atsushi Kawamoto, Bj\"orn Miksch, C\'ecile M\'ezi\`ere, Gunzi Saito, Hans-Albrecht Krug von Nidda, John A. Schlueter, Marc Scheffler, Martin Dressel, Narcis Avarvari, Sudip Pal, Yukihoro Yoshida.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Crystal structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of (a) linewidth and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Low-temperature ESR investigations on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Angular dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nature of the magnetic ground state of highly frustrated systems remained puzzling to this day. Here, we have performed multifrequency electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements on a putative quantum spin liquid compound $\kappa$-(BEDT-TTF)$_2$Ag$_2$(CN)$_3$, which is a rare example of $S = 1/2$ spins on a triangular lattice. At high temperatures, the spin susceptibility exhibits a weak temperature dependence which can be described by the Heisenberg model with an antiferromagnetic exchange interaction of strength $J/k_B \approx 175$ K. At low temperatures, however, the rapid drop of the static spin susceptibility, together with monotonic decrease of the ESR linewidth indicates that strong singlet correlations develop below a pairing energy scale $T^*$ accompanied by a spin gap. On the other hand, a weak Curie-like spin susceptibility and the angular dependence of the linewidth suggest additional contribution from impurity spins. We propose the gradual formation of spin singlets with an inhomogeneous spin gap at low temperatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports multifrequency ESR measurements on the triangular-lattice organic compound κ-(BEDT-TTF)₂Ag₂(CN)₃. High-temperature spin susceptibility is described by the S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet with J/k_B ≈ 175 K. Below a characteristic temperature T*, a rapid drop in static susceptibility together with a monotonic decrease in ESR linewidth is interpreted as evidence for gradual formation of spin singlets accompanied by an inhomogeneous spin gap; a weak Curie-like term and angular-dependent linewidth are assigned to impurities.

Significance. If the low-temperature interpretation is secured, the work supplies spectroscopic evidence distinguishing a gapped singlet ground state from a gapless quantum spin liquid in this frustrated S=1/2 triangular system, complementing existing thermodynamic and NMR data on the same material.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and susceptibility analysis] The central claim that the rapid low-T drop in static spin susceptibility reflects intrinsic singlet formation and an inhomogeneous spin gap requires that the acknowledged weak Curie-like impurity contribution be quantitatively removed. No explicit decomposition, temperature-dependent subtraction, or before/after comparison of χ(T) is provided to demonstrate that the residual intrinsic susceptibility is gapped rather than flat or impurity-dominated (see abstract and main-text susceptibility discussion).
minor comments (2)
  1. The temperature T* is introduced without a numerical estimate, uncertainty, or explicit definition from the data.
  2. Error bars or fit uncertainties on the high-T Heisenberg parameter J/k_B ≈ 175 K are not reported.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting the need to strengthen the presentation of the susceptibility analysis. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and susceptibility analysis] The central claim that the rapid low-T drop in static spin susceptibility reflects intrinsic singlet formation and an inhomogeneous spin gap requires that the acknowledged weak Curie-like impurity contribution be quantitatively removed. No explicit decomposition, temperature-dependent subtraction, or before/after comparison of χ(T) is provided to demonstrate that the residual intrinsic susceptibility is gapped rather than flat or impurity-dominated (see abstract and main-text susceptibility discussion).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, quantitative decomposition is required to make the intrinsic gapped behavior fully transparent. In the revised manuscript we will add (i) a clear decomposition of the measured χ(T) into a Heisenberg-model intrinsic term plus a weak Curie impurity term, (ii) the resulting impurity-subtracted intrinsic susceptibility plotted versus temperature, and (iii) a direct before/after comparison that demonstrates the residual susceptibility drops to zero below T* rather than remaining flat. These additions will appear both in the abstract discussion and in the main-text susceptibility section, together with the fitting parameters used for the subtraction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental data interpretation relies on standard models without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper reports multifrequency ESR measurements on a triangular-lattice spin system and interprets the high-T susceptibility via the standard Heisenberg antiferromagnet (J/kB ≈ 175 K) and the low-T drop via singlet formation. No equations, fits, or claims reduce by construction to their own inputs; the central proposal is a physical interpretation of measured quantities rather than a derivation. No self-citations, ansatze, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a load-bearing manner. The chain is self-contained against external benchmarks (established spin models and direct spectroscopy).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on fitting the high-temperature susceptibility to the Heisenberg model on a triangular lattice (one free parameter J) and on the domain assumption that the observed low-T drop is due to singlet formation rather than other effects.

free parameters (1)
  • J/k_B = 175 K
    Exchange constant fitted to high-T spin susceptibility using the Heisenberg antiferromagnet model.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The magnetic interactions are well described by the isotropic Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a triangular lattice at high temperature.
    Invoked to extract J from the weak temperature dependence of susceptibility.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5796 in / 1330 out tokens · 19868 ms · 2026-05-23T20:22:31.390458+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    8National Science Foundation, Alexandria, V A 22314, U.S.A

    Physikalisches Institut, Universit¨ at Stuttgart, Pfaffe nwaldring 57, 70569 Stuttgart Germany 2Experimental Physics V, Center for Electronic Correlation s and Magnetism, Universit¨ at Augsburg, Universit¨ atsstraße 1, 86159 Augsburg, Germany 3Faculty of Agriculture, Meijo University, Nagoya, 468-850 2, Japan 4Division of Chemistry, Graduate School of Scie...

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    The title compound κ- AgCN however does not show a similar behavior: from Fig

    and α-RuCl3 monolayers [45], which is proposed to be driven by lattice distortion. The title compound κ- AgCN however does not show a similar behavior: from Fig. 2(a) we see that the anisotropy of the g-factor re- mains throughout the entire temperature range. This can be explained by the similar g-factor anisotropy of spins that cause the enhancement of ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    coincident with low-entropy signatures below this /s48 /s57/s48 /s49/s56/s48 /s50/s55/s48 /s51/s54/s48 /s48 /s50 /s52 /s54 /s56 /s48 /s57/s48 /s49/s56/s48 /s50/s55/s48 /s51/s54/s48 /s51/s51/s55/s46/s50 /s51/s51/s55/s46/s51 /s51/s51/s55/s46/s52 /s51/s51/s55/s46/s53 /s51/s51/s55/s46/s54 /s51/s51/s55/s46/s55 /s48 /s57/s48 /s49/s56/s48 /s50/s55/s48 /s51/s54/s...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Quantum spin liquid states, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science 367, eaay0668 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater

    P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater. Res. Bull. 8, 153 (1973); P. Fazekas and P. W. Anderson, On the ground state properties of the anisotropic triangular antiferromagnet, Phil. Mag. 30, 423 (1974)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in La 2CuO4 and superconductivity, Science 235, 1196 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    A. O. Scheie, E. A. Ghioldi, J. Xing, J. A. M. Paddison, N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. Lee, A. J. Woods, D. Abernathy, D. M. Pajerowski, T. J. Williams, S.-S. Zhang, L. O. Manuel, A. E. Trumper, C. D. Pem- maraju, A. S. Sefat, D. S. Parker, T. P. Devereaux, R. Movshovich, J. E. Moore, C. D. Batista, and D. A. Tennant, Proximate spin liquid ...

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Shirata, H

    Y. Shirata, H. Tanaka, A. Matsuo, and K. Kindo, Experi- mental realization of a spin-1 /2 triangular-lattice heisen- berg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 057205 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Susuki, N

    T. Susuki, N. Kurita, T. Tanaka, H. Nojiri, A. Mat- suo, K. Kindo, and H. Tanaka, Magnetization process and collective excitations in the s=1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet Ba 3CoSb2O9, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 267201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Khuntia, M

    P. Khuntia, M. Velazquez, Q. Barth´ elemy, F. Bert, E. Kermarrec, A. Legros, B. Bernu, L. Messio, A. Zorko, and P. Mendels, Gapless ground state in the archetypal quantum kagome antiferromagnet ZnCu 3(OH)6Cl2, Nat. Phys. 16, 469 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Shimizu, K

    Y. Shimizu, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, M. Maesato, and G. Saito, Spin liquid state in an organic Mott insulator with a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 107001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    T. Itou, A. Oyamada, S. Maegawa, and R. Kato, Insta- bility of a quantum spin liquid in an organic triangular- lattice antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 6, 673 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Shimizu, T

    Y. Shimizu, T. Hiramatsu, M. Maesato, A. Otsuka, H. Yamochi, A. Ono, M. Itoh, M. Yoshida, M. Takigawa, Y. Yoshida, and G. Saito, Pressure-tuned exchange cou- pling of a quantum spin liquid in the molecular triangular lattice κ-(ET)2Ag2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 107203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Dressel and S

    M. Dressel and S. Tomi´ c, Molecular quantum mate- rials: electronic phases and charge dynamics in two- dimensional organic solids, Adv. Phys. 69, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    R. S. Manna, M. de Souza, A. Br¨ uhl, J. A. Schlueter, and M. Lang, Lattice effects and entropy release at the low-temperature phase transition in the spin-liquid can- didate κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 016403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Poirier, M

    M. Poirier, M. de Lafontaine, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, and Y. Shimizu, Ultrasonic investigation of the tran- sition at 6 K in the spin-liquid candidate κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. B 89, 045138 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    K. G. Padmalekha, M. Blankenhorn, T. Ivek, L. Bogani, J. A. Schlueter, and M. Dressel, ESR studies on the spin- liquid candidate κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3: Anomalous response below T = 8 K, Physica B 460, 211 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Miksch, A

    B. Miksch, A. Pustogow, M. Javaheri Rahim, A. A. Bardin, K. Kanoda, J. A. Schlueter, R. H¨ ubner, M. Scheffler, and M. Dressel, Gapped magnetic ground state in quantum spin liquid candidate κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, Science 372, 276 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Pustogow, Thirty-year anniversary of κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu2(CN)3: Reconciling the spin gap in a spin- liquid candidate, Solids 3, 93 (2022)

    A. Pustogow, Thirty-year anniversary of κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu2(CN)3: Reconciling the spin gap in a spin- liquid candidate, Solids 3, 93 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Pustogow, M

    A. Pustogow, M. Bories, A. L¨ ohle, R. R¨ osslhuber, E. Zhukova, B. Gorshunov, S. Tomi´ c, J. A. Schlueter, R. H¨ ubner, T. Hiramatsu, Y. Yoshida, G. Saito, R. Kato, T.-H. Lee, V. Dobrosavljevi´ c, S. Fratini, and M. Dressel, Quantum spin liquids unveil the genuine Mott state, Nat. Mater. 17, 773 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Pustogow, Y

    A. Pustogow, Y. Kawasugi, H. Sakurakoji, and N. Tajima, Chasing the spin gap through the phase dia- gram of a frustrated Mott insulator, Nat. Commun. 14, 1960 (2023)

    work page 1960

  23. [23]

    Kawasugi, S

    Y. Kawasugi, S. Yamazaki, A. Pustogow, and N. Tajima, Negative magnetoresistance near the mott metal–insulator transition in the quantum spin liquid candidate κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 065001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Riedl, R

    K. Riedl, R. Valent ´ ı, and S. M. Winter, Critical spin li q- uid versus valence-bond glass in a triangular-lattice or- ganic antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 10, 2561 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Matsuura, T

    M. Matsuura, T. Sasaki, M. Naka, J. M¨ uller, O. Stock- ert, A. Piovano, N. Yoneyama, and M. Lang, Phonon 6 renormalization effects accompanying the 6 K anomaly in the quantum spin liquid candidate κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042047 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Riedl, E

    K. Riedl, E. Gati, and R. Valent’i, Ingredients for gene r- alized models of κ-phase organic charge-transfer salts: A review, Crystals 12, 1689 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Liebman, K

    J. Liebman, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, and N. Drichko, Novel dipole-lattice coupling in the quantum-spin- liquid material κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3 (2024), arXiv:2403.02676

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    H. C. Kandpal, I. Opahle, Y.-Z. Zhang, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valent ´ ı, Revision of model parameters for κ-type charge transfer salts: An ab initio study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 67004 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Foury-Leylekian, V

    P. Foury-Leylekian, V. Ilakovac, P. Fertey, V. Bale- dent, O. Milat, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, T. Hira- matsu, Y. Yoshida, G. Saito, P. Alemany, E. Canadell, S. Tomic, and J.-P. Pouget, New insights into the struc- tural properties of κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Ag2(CN)3 spin liq- uid, Acta Cryst. B 76, 581 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Hartmann, E

    S. Hartmann, E. Gati, Y. Yoshida, G. Saito, and M. Lang, Thermal expansion studies on the spin-liquid- candidate system κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Ag2(CN)3, phys. stat. sol. (b) 256, 1800640 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Hiramatsu, Y

    T. Hiramatsu, Y. Yoshida, G. Saito, A. Otsuka, H. Yamochi, M. Maesato, Y. Shimizu, H. Ito, Y. Naka- mura, H. Kishida, M. Watanabe, and R. Kumai, Design and preparation of a quantum spin liquid candidate κ- (ET)2Ag2(CN)3 having a nearby superconductivity, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 90, 1073 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    R¨ osslhuber, R

    R. R¨ osslhuber, R. H¨ ubner, M. Dressel, and A. Pustogow, Pressure-dependent dielectric response of the frustrated Mott insulator κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Ag2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075113 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Els¨ asser, D

    S. Els¨ asser, D. Wu, M. Dressel, and J. A. Schlueter, Power-law dependence of the optical conductivity ob- served in the quantum spin-liquid compound κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. B 86, 155150 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    In addition to the raw date, the sample to sample variation is discussed, as well as the angular dependence

    Details on the measurement technique are given in the Supplemental Materials. In addition to the raw date, the sample to sample variation is discussed, as well as the angular dependence

    work page

  35. [35]

    Pinteri´ c, P

    M. Pinteri´ c, P. Lazi´ c, A. Pustogow, T. Ivek, M. Kuveˇ zdi´ c, O. Milat, B. Gumhalter, M. Basleti´ c, M. ˇCulo, B. Korin- Hamzi´ c, A. L¨ ohle, R. H¨ ubner, M. Sanz Alonso, T. Hira- matsu, Y. Yoshida, G. Saito, M. Dressel, and S. Tomi´ c, Anion effects on electronic structure and electrody- namic properties of the Mott insulator κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Ag2(CN)3, ...

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Elstner, R

    N. Elstner, R. R. P. Singh, and A. P. Young, Finite tem- perature properties of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antifer- romagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1629 (1993)

    work page 1993

  37. [37]

    Pohle and L

    R. Pohle and L. D. C. Jaubert, Curie-law crossover in spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 108, 024411 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Furukawa, K

    T. Furukawa, K. Miyagawa, T. Itou, M. Ito, H. Taniguchi, M. Saito, S. Iguchi, T. Sasaki, and K. Kan- oda, Quantum spin liquid emerging from antiferromag- netic order by introducing disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 077001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Kimchi, A

    I. Kimchi, A. Nahum, and T. Senthil, Valence bonds in random quantum magnets: Theory and application to YbMgGaO4, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031028 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    S. Pal, K. Kumar, R. Sharma, A. Banerjee, S. B. Roy, J.-G. Park, A. K. Nigam, and S.-W. Cheong, Possible glass-like random singlet magnetic state in 1T-TaS 2, J. of Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 035601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Pal and S

    S. Pal and S. Roy, Understanding the magnetic response of the quantum spin liquid compound 1T-TaS 2, Physica B 643, 414121 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    J. Wang, W. Yuan, P. M. Singer, R. W. Smaha, W. He, J. Wen, Y. S. Lee, and T. Imai, Emergence of spin singlets with inhomogeneous gaps in the kagome lattice Heisen- berg antiferromagnets Zn-barlowite and herbertsmithite, Nat. Phys. 17, 1109 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Chabre, A

    F. Chabre, A. M. Ghorayeb, P. Millet, V. A. Pashchenko, and A. Stepanov, Low-temperature behavior of the ESR linewidth in a system with a spin gap: η-Na1.286V2O5, Phys. Rev. B 72, 012415 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Deisenhofer, R

    J. Deisenhofer, R. M. Eremina, A. Pimenov, T. Gavrilova, H. Berger, M. Johnsson, P. Lem- mens, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, A. Loidl, K.-S. Lee, and M.-H. Whangbo, Structural and magnetic dimers in the spin-gapped system CuTe 2O5, Phys. Rev. B 74, 174421 (2006)

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    A. N. Vasiliev, O. S. Volkova, E. A. Zvereva, A. V. Koshelev, V. S. Urusov, D. A. Chareev, V. I. Petkov, M. V. Sukhanov, B. Rahaman, and T. Saha-Dasgupta, Valence-bond solid as the quantum ground state in hon- eycomb layered urusovite CuAl(AsO 4)O, Phys. Rev. B 91, 144406 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Pustogow, T

    A. Pustogow, T. Le, H.-H. Wang, Y. Luo, E. Gati, H. Schubert, M. Lang, and S. E. Brown, Impurity mo- ments conceal low-energy relaxation of quantum spin liq- uids, Phys. Rev. B 101, 140401(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Zorko, M

    A. Zorko, M. Herak, M. Gomilˇ sek, J. van Tol, M. Vel´ azquez, P. Khuntia, F. Bert, and P. Mendels, Sym- metry reduction in the quantum kagome antiferromagnet herbertsmithite, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 017202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    B. Yang, Y. M. Goh, S. H. Sung, G. Ye, S. Biswas, D. A. S. Kaib, R. Dhakal, S. Yan, C. Li, S. Jiang, F. Chen, H. Lei, R. He, R. Valent ´ ı, S. M. Winter, R. Hovden, and A. W. Tsen, Magnetic anisotropy rever- sal driven by structural symmetry-breaking in monolayer α-RuCl3, Nat. Mater. 22, 50–57 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Jiang and H.-C

    Y.-F. Jiang and H.-C. Jiang, Nature of quantum spin liquids of the s = 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice: A parallel DMRG study, Phys. Rev. B 107, L140411 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, and J. E. Moore, Spectral function of the J1 − J2 Heisenberg model on the trian- gular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 107, 165146 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Szasz, J

    A. Szasz, J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, and J. E. Moore, Chiral spin liquid phase of the triangular lattice Hubbard model: A density matrix renormalization group study, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021042 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Szasz and J

    A. Szasz and J. Motruk, Phase diagram of the anisotropic triangular lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235132 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Iqbal, W.-J

    Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the Heisenberg J1 − J2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144411 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Shirakawa, T

    T. Shirakawa, T. Tohyama, J. Kokalj, S. Sota, and S. Yunoki, Ground-state phase diagram of the triangular lattice Hubbard model by the density-matrix renormal- ization group method, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205130 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    S. Hu, W. Zhu, S. Eggert, and Y.-C. He, Dirac spin liquid 7 on the spin-1 /2 triangular Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 207203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Zhu and S

    Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin liquid phase of the s = 1 2 J1−J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 92, 041105 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    Hu, S.-S

    W.-J. Hu, S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Com- peting spin-liquid states in the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 92, 140403 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    B.-B. Chen, Z. Chen, S.-S. Gong, D. N. Sheng, W. Li, and A. Weichselbaum, Quantum spin liquid with emergent chiral order in the triangular-lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094420 (2022)

    work page 2022