Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Simulating and analyzing a sparse order book: an application to intraday electricity markets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.06839 v1 pith:O2RP45JP submitted 2024-10-09 q-fin.TR q-fin.CP

classification q-fin.TRq-fin.CP
keywords marketelectricityorderilliquidintradaymarketssparsetrading
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a novel model for simulating and analyzing sparse limit order books (LOBs), with a specific application to the European intraday electricity market. In illiquid markets, characterized by significant gaps between order levels due to sparse trading volumes, traditional LOB models often fall short. Our approach utilizes an inhomogeneous Poisson process to accurately capture the sporadic nature of order arrivals and cancellations on both the bid and ask sides of the book. By applying this model to the intraday electricity market, we gain insights into the unique microstructural behaviors and challenges of this dynamic trading environment. The results offer valuable implications for market participants, enhancing their understanding of LOB dynamics in illiquid markets. This work contributes to the broader field of market microstructure by providing a robust framework adaptable to various illiquid market settings beyond electricity trading.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Competition and Incentives in a Shared Order Book

    q-fin.TR 2025-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a two-exchange shared order book model, incentive provision by one exchange improves liquidity for both, creating a free-rider problem that the paper claims can eliminate incentives entirely.

Pith tools