Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets
As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2410.07991.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-08T16:28:18.836738Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-01T13:55:46.417286Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation dde38688-e47a-4a1a-9b5e-efd796457bec · inbound
Is LLM an Overconfident Judge? Unveiling the Capabilities of LLMs in Detecting Offensive Language with Annotation Disagreement cites this paper.
Is LLM an Overconfident Judge? Unveiling the Capabilities of LLMs in Detecting Offensive Language with Annotation Disagreement Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets
Reference 17
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-08T16:28:18.836738Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2b02863d-5263-42b6-8999-d83640697296 · inbound
Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks cites this paper.
Arbiters of Ambivalence: Challenges of Using LLMs in No-Consensus Tasks Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets
Reference 2023
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T13:23:51.382539Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d6e7d2a2-cb0d-4fd1-8c28-e5f16105dfdf · inbound
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science cites this paper.
Two Wrongs, No Right: Auditing Social-Desirability Bias in LLM Annotators for Computational Social Science Human and LLM Biases in Hate Speech Annotations: A Socio-Demographic Analysis of Annotators and Targets
Reference 4
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-01T13:55:46.418900Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.