REVIEW 1 cited by
PD-Based and SINDy Nonlinear Dynamics Identification of UAVs for MPC Design
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive approach to nonlinear dynamics identification for UAVs using a combination of data-driven techniques and theoretical modeling. Two key methodologies are explored: Proportional-Derivative (PD) approximation and Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy). The UAV dynamics are first modeled using the Euler-Lagrange formulation, providing a set of generalized coordinates. However, platform constraints limit the control inputs to attitude angles, and linear and angular velocities along the z-axis. To accommodate these limitations, thrust and torque inputs are approximated using a PD controller, serving as the foundation for nonlinear system identification. In parallel, SINDy, a data-driven method, is employed to derive a compact and interpretable model of the UAV dynamics from experimental data. Both identified models are then integrated into a Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework for accurate trajectory tracking, where model accuracy, informed by data-driven insights, plays a critical role in optimizing control performance. This fusion of data-driven approaches and theoretical modeling enhances the system's robustness and adaptability in real-world conditions, offering a detailed analysis of the UAV's dynamic behavior.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Adaptive control for multi-scale stochastic dynamical systems with stochastic next generation reservoir computing
A stochastic NG-RC controller with an explicit noise feature vector tracks designed trajectories in noisy Van der Pol systems, but its stability guarantee reuses Mao's theorem without verifying it for the implemented ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.