Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Co-Designing with Algorithms: Unpacking the Complex Role of GenAI in Interactive System Design Education

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14048 v2 pith:3ALGIW6S submitted 2024-10-17 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords genaidesigneducationbenefitsco-designduringinteractivephases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education and technology design, yet its impact remains poorly understood. This study explores how graduate students in an applied HCI course used GenAI tools during interactive device design. Despite no encouragement, all groups integrated GenAI into their workflows. Through 12 post-class group interviews, we identified how GenAI co-design behaviors present both benefits, such as enhanced creativity and faster design iterations, and risks, including shallow learning and reflection. Benefits were most evident during the execution phases, while the discovery and reflection phases showed limited gains. A taxonomy of usage patterns revealed that students' outcomes depended more on how they used GenAI than the specific tasks performed. These findings highlight the need for HCI education to adapt to GenAI's role and offer recommendations for curricula to better prepare future designers for effective creative co-design.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Citation of AI Sources in Student-AI Collaboration within HCI Design Education

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Undergraduate design students mostly cite AI tools informally (51% general mention without version or date), and the paper argues this variability reveals the need for reflective, process-aware citation models in HCI ...

Pith tools