Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Opinion dynamics on dense dynamic random graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14618 v2 pith:P3KFXPTY submitted 2024-10-18 math.PR

classification math.PR
keywords graphsopinionsco-evolutionarydensedynamicfeedbackmodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider two-opinion voter models on dense dynamic random graphs. Our goal is to understand and describe the occurrence of consensus versus polarisation over long periods of time. The former means that all vertices have the same opinion, the latter means that the vertices split into two communities with different opinions and few disagreeing edges. We consider three models for the joint dynamics of opinions and graphs: one with a one-way feedback and two which are co-evolutionary, i.e., with a two-way feedback. In the first model only coexistence is attainable, meaning that both opinions survive, but with the presence of many disagreeing edges. In the second model only consensus prevails, while in the third model polarisation is possible. Our main results are functional laws of large numbers for the densities of the two opinions, functional laws of large numbers for the dynamic random graphs in the space of graphons, and a characterisation of the limiting densities in terms of Beta-distributions. Our results are supported by simulations. To prove our results we develop a novel method that involves coupling the co-evolutionary process to a mimicking process with one-way feedback. We expect that this method can be extended to other dense co-evolutionary models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A model of opinion dynamics evolving via a preferential attachment mechanism involving multiple extractions

    math.PR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a two-opinion preferential-attachment network with multiple sampling and general reinforcement, the normalized opinion count, influence capital and activity converge almost surely to invariant sets of a mean-field...

  2. Voter model on heterogeneous directed networks

    math.PR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper conjectures that the expected consensus time on Pareto-directed configuration models scales as H(u) times a degree-sequence preconstant times n, for every tail exponent alpha>0.

Pith tools