Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Integer Programming for Generalized Causal Bootstrap Designs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.21464 v3 pith:2EIEGISF submitted 2024-10-28 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords uncertaintybootstrapcausaldesignuseddesignsestimatorsexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In experimental causal inference, we distinguish between two sources of uncertainty: design uncertainty, due to the treatment assignment mechanism, and sampling uncertainty, when the sample is drawn from a super-population. This distinction matters in settings with small fixed samples and heterogeneous treatment effects, as in geographical experiments. The standard bootstrap procedure most often used by practitioners primarily estimates sampling uncertainty, and the causal bootstrap procedure, which accounts for design uncertainty, was developed for the completely randomized design and the difference-in-means estimator, whereas non-standard designs and estimators are often used in these low-power regimes. We address this gap by proposing an integer program which computes numerically the worst-case copula used as an input to the causal bootstrap method, in a wide range of settings. Specifically, we prove the asymptotic validity of our approach for unconfounded, conditionally unconfounded, and and individualistic with bounded confoundedness assignments, as well as generalizing to any linear-in-treatment and quadratic-in-treatment estimators. We demonstrate the refined confidence intervals achieved through simulations of small geographical experiments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Individual Treatment Effect: Prediction Intervals and Sharp Bounds

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Valid prediction intervals for individual treatment effects from large RCTs are trivial unless response rates are extreme, and sharp pmf bounds are given by sums of Fréchet cell bounds.

Pith tools