Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Red giants evolutionary status determination: the complete Kepler catalog

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03101 v1 pith:GV44VWMH submitted 2024-11-05 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords starsstatusevolutionarydifferentdistinguishingdistinguishgiantskepler
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evolved cool stars have three distinct evolutionary status: shell Hydrogen-burning (RGB), core Helium and shell Hydrogen burning (RC), and double shell burning (AGB). Asteroseismology can distinguish between the RC and the other status, but distinguishing RGB and AGB has been difficult seismically and spectroscopically. The precise boundaries of different status in the HR diagram have also been difficult to establish. In this article, we present a comprehensive catalog of asteroseismic evolutionary status, RGB and RC, for evolved red giants in the Kepler field. We carefully examine boundary cases to define the lower edge of the RC phase in radius and surface gravity. We also test different published asteroseisemic methods claiming to distinguish AGB and RGB stars against a sample where AGB candidates were selected using a spectrocopic identification method. We used six different seismic techniques to distinguish RC and RGB stars, and tested two proposed methods for distinguishing AGB and RGB stars. These status were compared with those inferred from spectroscopy. We present consensus evolutionary status for 18,784 stars out of the 30,337 red giants present in the Kepler data, including 11,516 stars with APOGEE spectra available. The agreement between seismic and spectroscopic classification is excellent for distinguishing RC stars, agreeing at the 94% level. Most disagreements can be traced to uncertainties in spectroscopic parameters, but some are caused by blends with background stars. We find a sharp lower boundary in surface gravity at log(g) = 2.99+/-0.01 for the RC and discuss the implications. We demonstrate that asteroseismic tools for distinguishing AGB and RGB stars are consistent with spectroscopic evolutionary status at near the RC but that the agreement between the different methods decreases rapidly as the star evolves.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing the Breakdown of the Asteroseismic Scaling Relations in Luminous Red Giants

    astro-ph.SR 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In luminous red giants, the large frequency separation scaling relation contributes more than the frequency of maximum power relation to the observed breakdown of asteroseismic radii, and theoretical correction factor...

  2. SDSS-V Milky Way Mapper (MWM): ASPCAP Stellar Parameters and Abundances in SDSS-V Data Release 19

    astro-ph.SR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    DR19 provides ASPCAP stellar parameters and abundances for 964,989 stars, with validated precision of 50-100 K in Teff, 0.07-0.09 dex in log g, and 0.02-0.04 dex for several elements.

Pith tools