REVIEW 2 cited by
CrowdGenUI: Aligning LLM-Based UI Generation with Crowdsourced User Preferences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential across various design domains, including user interface (UI) generation. However, current LLMs for UI generation tend to offer generic solutions that lack a nuanced understanding of task context and user preferences. We present CrowdGenUI, a framework that enhances LLM-based UI generation with crowdsourced user preferences. This framework addresses the limitations by guiding LLM reasoning with real user preferences, enabling the generation of UI widgets that reflect user needs and task-specific requirements. We evaluate our framework in the image editing domain by collecting a library of 720 user preferences from 50 participants, covering preferences such as predictability, efficiency, and explorability of various UI widgets. A user study (N=78) demonstrates that UIs generated with our preference-guided framework can better match user intentions compared to those generated by LLMs alone, highlighting the effectiveness of our proposed framework. We further discuss the study findings and present insights for future research on LLM-based user-centered UI generation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Non-programmers Assessing AI-Generated Code: A Case Study of Business Users Analyzing Data
Non-programmer business users often fail to spot critical mistakes in AI-generated data analyses, even when explicitly warned and incentivized.
-
Designing Scaffolded Interfaces for Enhanced Learning and Performance in Professional Software
ScaffoldUI's task-aware Blender panels reduced beginners' perceived workload and improved self-reported task performance and learning in a 40-person user study.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.