REVIEW 2 cited by
Semantic Navigation for AI-assisted Ideation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a novel AI-based ideation assistant and evaluate it in a user study with a group of innovators. The key contribution of our work is twofold: we propose a method of idea exploration in a constrained domain by means of LLM-supported semantic navigation of problem and solution spaces, and employ novel automated data input filtering to improve generations. We found that semantic exploration is preferred to the traditional prompt-output interactions, measured both in explicit survey rankings, and in terms of innovation assistant engagement, where 2.1x more generations were performed using semantic exploration. We also show that filtering input data with metrics such as relevancy, coherence and human alignment leads to improved generations in the same metrics as well as enhanced quality of experience among innovators.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DeepResearch$^{\text{Eco}}$: A Recursive Agentic Workflow for Complex Scientific Question Answering in Ecology
A recursive agentic pipeline for literature synthesis showing a 21-fold source increase and 14.9-fold density gain when depth and breadth are raised.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Research: Systems, Methodologies, and Applications
A survey of 80+ Deep Research systems that proposes a four-layer taxonomy (foundation models, tool use, planning, synthesis) and compares commercial and open-source implementations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.