REVIEW 1 cited by
EviRerank: Adaptive Evidence Construction for Long-Document LLM Reranking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Decoder-only LLM rerankers struggle with long documents: inference is costly and relevance signals can be diluted by irrelevant context. Motivated by a diagnostic attention analysis suggesting that appended irrelevant context can weaken query-focused interactions, we propose EviRerank, an evidence-based long-document reranking framework for decoder-only LLMs. EviRerank first scores document blocks with a lightweight selector, such as BM25, a bi-encoder, or a cross-encoder. It then constructs a compact reranking context under a hard token cap by dynamically budgeting evidence blocks with Adaptive Evidence Budgeting (AEB) and adding a compact global cue via Summary Augmentation (SA). Finally, the compact evidence context is reranked with a decoder-only LLM. Across TREC DL'19, DL'22, DL'23, and MLDR-zh, EviRerank consistently outperforms full-document LLM reranking and strong block-selection baselines while reducing input length. RankZephyr-7B validation further confirms transfer to listwise reranking. On TREC DL'19, EviRerank reaches up to 0.744 nDCG@10 and 0.307 MAP, improving over RankLLaMA while using a compact evidence context.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CoRank: LLM-Based Compact Reranking with Document Features for Scientific Retrieval
CoRank reranks scientific documents by first scoring 200 candidates from compact LLM-extracted features and then refining the top 20 with full text, improving average nDCG@10 from 50.6 to 55.5.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.