Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 34 references

The Oscillation in Evolution of Changing-look Blazar OQ 334

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A changing-look blazar keeps oscillating between states, with BL Lac episodes lasting longer.

desk verdict New data on OQ 334's post-2018 state alternation is worth a look, but the evolutionary claim rests on fragile classification thresholds and a weak duration trend. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08313 v1 pith:DV3MQPWA submitted 2024-11-13 astro-ph.HE

S.S. Ren , R.X. Zhou , Y.G. Zheng , S.J. Kang This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords changing-lookblazarevolutiongamma-rayspectralindexBLLacertaeflatspectrumradioquasaraccretionrateenergydistributionOQ334
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Changing-look blazars are active galaxies that flip between two spectral personalities, a quasar-like FSRQ state and a nearly lineless BL Lac state, on timescales of months to years. This paper argues that such flips are not random flickers but a distinct transitional phase in the long-term evolution of blazars. For OQ 334, which had a well-documented state change around 2018–2020, the authors trace nine years of gamma-ray data and find the source still oscillating: five FSRQ states, nine transition states, and four BL Lac states. The BL Lac states grow progressively longer across the sequence, while FSRQ states do not clearly shrink, suggesting a slow but systematic drift toward the BL Lac end-state.

What carries the argument

The gamma-ray photon spectral index $\Gamma_\gamma$ is the classifier that carries the argument: thresholds at 2.2 and 2.0 separate FSRQ, transition, and BL Lac states, based on the established correlation between $\Gamma_\gamma$ and the equivalent width of the Mg II emission line. The one-zone synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton, and external Compton spectral energy distribution model supplies the corroborating quantities—accretion rate and external photon field energy density—that tie each state to a physical accretion mode.

What would settle it

If continued gamma-ray monitoring of OQ 334 over the next several years shows BL Lac-state durations that stop increasing or shrink, or if simultaneous optical spectroscopy during a 'transition' epoch finds the Mg II equivalent width on the wrong side of the 5 Å line for the assigned class, the oscillation pattern and the suggested evolutionary trend would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the oscillation pattern in OQ 334 after its changing-look event provides strong evidence that a changing-look blazar is a special epoch in blazar evolution, not just a transient anomaly. Using the gamma-ray photon spectral index $\Gamma_\gamma$ as a classifier, the authors divide MJD 58678–60387 into five FSRQ states with $\Gamma_\gamma \gtrsim 2.2$, nine transition states with $2.0 < \Gamma_\gamma < 2.2$, and four BL Lac states with $\Gamma_\gamma \lesssim 2.0$. Fitting the multiwavelength spectral energy distributions of these 18 epochs with a one-zone synchrotron plus synchrotron self-Compton plus external Compton model, they find that accretion rates sit above 0.1 in FSRQ and transition states and below 0.1 in BL Lac states, and that the external photon field energy density is higher in FSRQ states. The increasing duration of BL Lac states leads them to conclude that OQ 334 may still be in a changing-look phase and that changing-look blazars represent a transitional stage from FSRQ to BL Lac.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of every epoch into FSRQ, transition, or BL Lac depends on fixed gamma-ray photon index thresholds of 2.0 and 2.2 that were taken from earlier analysis of this same object and from literature averages, rather than derived from an independent physical model or a blind sample.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the trend holds, OQ 334 will eventually remain in the BL Lac state permanently, and the changing-look phase will have been a gradual transition rather than a sudden switch.
  • The gamma-ray index criteria give observers a quick classifier for identifying changing-look states in other blazars from satellite gamma-ray data alone, without waiting for optical spectroscopy.
  • The correlation between state and accretion rate, above or below 0.1, connects the observed spectral flips to a change from a standard thin disk to an advection-dominated accretion flow.
  • The absence of a clear shortening of FSRQ episodes even as BL Lac episodes lengthen implies the evolution is not a simple monotonic process; the oscillation itself is part of the transitional signature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the lengthening BL Lac episodes reflect a real secular trend, continued monitoring for another decade should show the source spending most or all of its time in the BL Lac state, a testable prediction beyond the present data.
  • The 2.0 and 2.2 thresholds were tuned on this source; testing the same classifier on a sample of blazars with simultaneous gamma-ray and optical spectra would tell whether the oscillation pattern is a general changing-look phenomenon or particular to OQ 334.
  • The oscillation could reflect the radiation region moving within the broad-line region, as the paper suggests for a comparable source; measuring correlated changes in line profiles or continuum lags across transitions could test this physical picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the long-term evolution of the changing-look blazar OQ 334 using Fermi-LAT, Swift, and ASAS-SN data from MJD 58678 to 60387. The authors classify 18 epochs into FSRQ, transition, and BL Lac states using gamma-ray photon index thresholds (Gamma_gamma >= 2.2, 2.0 < Gamma_gamma < 2.2, and Gamma_gamma <= 2.0), fit each epoch with a one-zone synchrotron + SSC + EC model to obtain accretion rates and jet powers, and report an oscillation between states with an increasing duration trend in the BL Lac states. They conclude that changing-look blazars represent a special transitional phase in blazar evolution. The central claims rest on the state classification and on the trend in BL Lac durations, both of which are affected by internal inconsistencies and a lack of statistical testing.

Significance. If the oscillation pattern and lengthening BL Lac durations were robust, the paper would provide a valuable contribution to the understanding of changing-look blazars as transitional objects in blazar evolution. The dataset is substantial: a long Fermi-LAT light curve, multiwavelength SEDs for 18 epochs, and a consistent one-zone modeling framework. The paper also builds directly on the authors' earlier work (Ren et al. 2024), which gives the analysis some continuity. However, the significance is currently limited because the main conclusions are not supported by a stable, independently validated classification or by quantitative trend tests. The analysis would need substantial revision to make the claims credible.

major comments (5)
  1. [§4.1, Table 1] The classification is internally inconsistent: epoch T12 has Gamma_gamma = 2.33 +/- 2.10, which by the paper's own criterion (Gamma_gamma >= 2.2 for FSRQ) should be an FSRQ state, but it is labeled as a transition state. Since T12 lies between B6 and F7, reclassifying it as F would break the alternating F-T-B pattern and reduce the number of transition epochs from nine to eight. Additionally, epochs B4, B5, and B6 have Gamma_gamma = 2.00 exactly, which is on the boundary of the transition interval (2.0 < Gamma_gamma < 2.2); the authors should justify why these are assigned to the BL Lac state rather than to the transition state. The state sequence is therefore sensitive to small changes in the thresholds, which is not acceptable for a claim that depends on the oscillation pattern.
  2. [§4.2, Table 2] The 'reliability test' described in Section 4.2 is circular. The state labels are assigned using Gamma_gamma thresholds defined in Section 4.1, and the one-zone SED model is then used to fit the accretion rate m_dot for each epoch. The paper then reports that m_dot is consistent with the state labels (e.g., lower m_dot in BL Lac states), but this consistency is partly built into the modeling, since the same data and the same model are used to define both the states and the physical parameters. To provide an independent test, the authors should classify the epochs using a different observable (such as the Mg II equivalent width from Mishra et al. 2021) or a blind statistical mixture model, and then compare the resulting m_dot values between classes with a formal hypothesis test.
  3. [§5.1, Table 1] The claimed increasing trend in BL Lac durations is not supported by the numbers in Table 1. The durations are approximately: B1 = 2 d, B2 = 12 d (from Ren et al. 2024), B3 = 16 d, B4 = 13 d, B5 = 17 d, and B6 = 11 d. This sequence is not monotonic, and the last value is shorter than the previous one. A statement about a trend requires a statistical measure, such as a Spearman rank correlation coefficient with a p-value, which is not provided. The same applies to the 'oscillation' claim: the paper shows alternation but does not test whether the sequence of states is significantly different from a random ordering. Without such tests, the evolutionary conclusion is not quantitatively supported.
  4. [§4.2, Figure 4] Several epochs (F3, T7, B4, T8, T9, B5, T10) do not have simultaneous Swift observations; for these, X-ray and UVOT data are aggregated from all observations in the full MJD range 58678-60387 and used as 'nonsimultaneous' points in the SED fits. Additionally, the g-band flux errors are discarded because they are 'too discrete.' This means that the SEDs for a large fraction of the epochs are not representative of the specific state that is being modeled, and the quoted chi-square values and parameter uncertainties (Table 2) are therefore not meaningful as measures of fit quality. The authors should either restrict the analysis to epochs with truly simultaneous data or quantify the systematic uncertainty introduced by using average spectra.
  5. [§4.1, Figure 5] The treatment of the T12 epoch is selective: its Gamma_gamma value has an error of +/- 2.10, making it essentially unconstrained, yet the paper excludes T12's errors from the 1-sigma confidence band in Figure 5 without a statistical justification. This makes the apparent separation between state categories look cleaner than it actually is. Either T12 should be included with full errors (which would probably place it in the FSRQ category) or it should be explicitly excluded from the classification and trend analysis, with a discussion of how its inclusion affects the results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1] There is a typo: 'OQ 344' should be 'OQ 334' in the sentence 'we hypothesize that OQ 344 continues in the CL state.'
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'We issue that strong evidence...' is awkward; it should be 'We suggest that strong evidence...' or 'We argue that...' for clarity.
  3. [Table 2] The column headers for the model parameters (e.g., '10 3', '10 16', '10 46') are unclear; please specify the units explicitly (e.g., 'gamma0 (10^3)', 'delta', 'B (G)', 'R (10^16 cm)') so that the table is self-contained.
  4. [§4.2] The justification for discarding the g-band errors ('the flux errors in the g-band data of ASAS-SN being too discrete') is vague; please clarify whether the errors are too large, not Gaussian, or otherwise unreliable, and describe how the fitting accounts for this.
  5. [Figure 6] The horizontal axis is labeled 'log(Time)' with no units; state explicitly that time is in days, and if the vertical axis is a state label, explain the ordering used (e.g., FSRQ on top, BL Lac on bottom).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

State classification and reliability test lean on self-derived thresholds and fitted parameters, but the new-data oscillation has independent content.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2 and Section 5.2.1]
    "Here, we explore the variability across different epochs using the accretion rate as a test parameter... Previous research (Ren et al. 2024) indicates that accretion rates are > 0.1 in both FSRQ and transition states and < 0.1 in the BL Lac state."

    The 'test parameter' m_dot is fitted to the same multiwavelength SEDs whose Fermi-LAT component yields the Gamma_gamma used to define the F/B/T state labels. Comparing the fitted m_dot to those labels is therefore a self-consistency check rather than an independent validation. The expected correlation itself is imported from the authors' own prior paper (Ren et al. 2024) on the same source, so the agreement partly reflects the same data and the same model being used twice.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 4.1]
    "Comparison between FSRQ and BL Lac state reveals a division at Gamma_gamma ~ 2.0, consistent with findings by Abdo et al. (2010b), which distinguish BL Lacs and FSRQs based on the gamma-ray spectral index Gamma_gamma ~ 2.2. Building on these results and theories, we hypothesize that OQ 344 continues in the CL state post MJD 54628-58677. Hence, we define the F epoch as Gamma_gamma >~ 2.2 ... the B epoch as Gamma_gamma <~ 2.0 ... and the T epoch as 2.0 < Gamma_gamma < 2.2."

    The 'results' behind the thresholds are the authors' own Figure 2, which plots Ren et al. (2024) Gamma_gamma against Mishra et al. (2021) EW for this same source. The transition band 2.0-2.2 is not present in the cited Abdo et al. (2010b) work; it is introduced from the authors' prior analysis. Applying this self-calibrated classification to the new OQ 334 light curve then generates the F/T/B oscillation and the BL Lac duration trend that constitute the paper's central evolutionary claim, so the classification scheme is load-bearing and partly self-referential.

full rationale

The paper's central observation is an alternating pattern of hard and soft gamma-ray states read directly from the Fermi-LAT photon index light curve, plus a claimed increasing duration of BL Lac epochs. That pattern is a data description, not a fitted quantity, so the core claim is not wholly circular. However, the state definitions use thresholds (2.0 and 2.2) that were calibrated in the authors' prior analysis of the same source, and the 'reliability test' fits an accretion rate with the same one-zone model and then compares it with the same state labels; this is a self-consistency check, not an independent prediction. An external citation (Abdo et al. 2010b) independently supports the approximate FSRQ/BL Lac spectral-index division, which prevents the self-citation from being the sole basis. Threshold sensitivity is a correctness risk rather than a circularity, and no equation in the paper reduces the oscillation to the model inputs by construction. Overall, the self-referential elements are present but the central claim retains independent empirical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central conclusions depend on hand-set state thresholds and on a heavily parameterized emission model; the accretion-rate test is not independent of the model that defines the states.

free parameters (3)
  • Gamma_gamma thresholds 2.0 and 2.2 = 2.0 and 2.2
    Set by hand in Section 4.1, based on the authors' earlier work (Ren et al. 2024) and Figure 2; these boundaries define the three states.
  • SED model parameters (s, b, gamma0, delta, B, R, r_dis, U_ext) = Table 2 per epoch
    Each epoch's SED is fit with 8 free parameters in a one-zone leptonic model; values are not constrained by independent measurements.
  • Accretion rate m_dot = 0.02 to 0.61
    Obtained from the SED model fit, used to test the state classification; not measured directly.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The one-zone synchrotron plus SSC plus EC emission model describes all observed states
    Used for all SED fits in Section 4.2 and Figure 4; a standard but model-dependent assumption.
  • domain assumption The gamma-ray photon index is a reliable indicator of the CLB state
    Stated in Section 4.1 and justified by correlation with Mg II EW in Figure 2 for a few epochs.
  • standard math Cosmological constants H0 = 73.3, Omega_M = 0.308, Omega_Lambda = 0.692
    Stated in Section 1; standard inputs from Riess et al. 2022.
  • domain assumption The Eddington ratio m_dot can be estimated from fitted disk luminosity
    Used in Section 5.2.1 to argue m_dot > 0.1 for FSRQ and < 0.1 for BL Lac.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Oscillation in Evolution of Changing-look Blazar OQ 334." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DV3MQPWA

@misc{pith2026241108313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Oscillation in Evolution of Changing-look Blazar OQ 334},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DV3MQPWA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08313}
}
abstract

We investigate the evolution of a changing-look blazar (CLB) on long timescales and expect to trace the state change of a CLB. Three morphological types, including a flat spectrum radio quasar (FSRQ) state, transition state, and BL Lacertae (BL Lac) state are classified according to the criteria proposed by analyzing the relationship between the equivalent width of the emission line and the $\gamma$-ray photon spectral index $\Gamma_{\gamma}$. The multiwavelength light curves and spectral energy distributions corresponding to different epochs are obtained. The efforts found that $\Gamma_{\gamma}$ satisfy the relationships with $\Gamma_{\gamma} $ $\gtrsim$ 2.2 for the FSRQ state, $2.0 < \Gamma_{\gamma} < 2.2$ for the transition state, and $\Gamma_{\gamma}$ $\lesssim$ 2.0 for the BL Lac state. We apply the criteria to the photon spectrum evolution of CLB OQ 334 during MJD 58678 - 60387. The evolution is subdivided into five FSRQ states, nine transition states, and four BL Lac states. Moreover, we use the model spectra parameters of each state epoch to test the reliability of subdivided morphological types. The result shows that: (1) the accretion rate parameter is consistent with our earlier research; and (2) there is an increasing trend in the epochs of the BL Lac states, even if there is not an obvious decreasing trend in epochs of the FSRQ states. We issue that strong evidence that a CLB is an especial epoch in the evolution of blazars that could be obtained from the oscillation phenomenon in the CLB evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. γ-ray and X-ray light curve in MJD 54628-60387. The upper panel shows γ-ray data ranging from 0.1 to 300 GeV, while the lower panel displays X-ray data spanning 0.3-10 keV. Labels such as F1 and B1 indicate the first occurrence of OQ 334 in the FSRQ and BL Lac states, respectively. We discarded data points with T S ≥ 15. The corresponding MJD for the epochs B1, F2, and B2 are from Ren et al. (2024). summarized in [… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of γ-ray photon spectral index from Ren et al. (2024) with the equivalent width of Mg II from Mishra et al. (2021). Green triangles, purple prisms, and gray stars represent the BL Lac state, FSRQ state, and transition state, respectively. The dashed red line represents EW = 5˚A, while the two dotted blue lines correspond to = 2.0 and = 2.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fermi-LAT SED for the MJD 54628-60387 epoch. The solid black line represents the best fit from the likelihood analysis over the entire energy range. Blue dots denote γ-ray data points, while green downward arrows indicate the upper energy limits. The purple area represents the 1σ confidence band. The ‘letters + numbers’ in each subgraph correspond to the states listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multi-wavelength SED of the CLB across different states during MJD 54628-60387. The dotted blue, green, red, and purple lines represent Syn, SSC, EC, and EBL absorption components, respectively. The solid black line represents the total fitted spectrum of the SED.Red d…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The accretion rates ˙m, jet radiation power log(Pjet), photon spectral indices Γγ, and equivalent widths (EW) for epochs F, B, and T between MJD 54628 and 60387. In the top panel, the red dotted line indicates ˙m = 0.1. Purple diamonds and green dots represent the FSRQ…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic of the changing-look blazar (CLB) long-term evolution. Green shading indicates the BL Lac state, while purple represents the FSRQ state. The vertical axis represents states, and the horizontal axis denotes the logarithmic values of the timescales for the epoc…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: External photon field energy density versus photon spectral index for epochs F, B, and T during MJD 54628-60387. Green dots and purple prisms correspond to values during the FSRQ (F) and BL Lac (B) epochs, respectively. Gray pentagrams and triangles represent values du…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Ackermann, M., Agudo, I., et al

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Agudo, I., et al. 2010a, ApJ, 716, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/30

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/30

  2. [2]

    A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 710, 1271, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/1271

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/710/2/1271

  3. [3]

    2020, ApJS, 247, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb

    Abdollahi, S., Acero, F., Ackermann, M., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb 2020

  4. [4]

    B., Archer, A., et al

    Acharyya, A., Adams, C. B., Archer, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd2d0

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd2d0 2023

  5. [5]

    1998, MNRAS, 294, 439, doi: 10.1046/j

    Bednarek, W. 1998, MNRAS, 294, 439, doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-8711.1998.01183.x10.1111/j.1365-8711.1998.01183.x

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    D., & Levinson, A

    Blandford, R. D., & Levinson, A. 1995, ApJ, 441, 79, doi: 10.1086/175338

    doi:10.1086/175338 1995

  7. [7]

    1979, ApJ, 228, 939, doi: 10.1086/156922

    Cash, W. 1979, ApJ, 228, 939, doi: 10.1086/156922

    doi:10.1086/156922 1979

  8. [8]

    2002, ApJ, 571, 226, doi: 10.1086/339778

    Cavaliere, A., & D’Elia, V. 2002, ApJ, 571, 226, doi: 10.1086/339778

    doi:10.1086/339778 2002

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    2018, ApJS, 235, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab8fb

    Chen, L. 2018, ApJS, 235, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab8fb

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    D., Schlickeiser, R., & Mastichiadis, A

    Dermer, C. D., Schlickeiser, R., & Mastichiadis, A. 1992, A&A, 256, L27

    1992

  3. [11]

    F., Narayan, R., & Blandford, R

    Gammie, C. F., Narayan, R., & Blandford, R. 1999, ApJ, 516, 177, doi: 10.1086/307089

    1999 doi

  4. [12]

    1996, MNRAS, 280, 67, doi: 10.1093/mnras/280.1.67

    Ghisellini, G., & Madau, P. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 67, doi: 10.1093/mnras/280.1.67

    1996 doi

  5. [13]

    2009, MNRAS, 396, L105, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00673.x

    Ghisellini, G., Maraschi, L., & Tavecchio, F. 2009, MNRAS, 396, L105, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00673.x

    2009

  6. [14]

    2013, MNRAS, 432, L66, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt041

    Tagliaferri, G. 2013, MNRAS, 432, L66, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt041

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    2011, MNRAS, 414, 2674, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18578.x

    Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F., Foschini, L., & Ghirlanda, G. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2674, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18578.x

    2011

  8. [16]

    2010, MNRAS, 402, 497, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15898.x

    Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F., Foschini, L., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 497, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15898.x

    2010

  9. [17]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 3201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2456 14 Ren et al

    Kang, S.-J., Zheng, Y.-G., & Wu, Q. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2456 14 Ren et al. T able 1.Fermi-LAT, Swift, ASAS-SN, and Fermi-LAT SED results in MJD 54628-60387 Epoch State Fermi-LAT Fermi-LAT Γ γ Swift ASAS-SN ... ... MJD year/month/day ... Obsid (X-ray&...

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    S., Shappee, B

    Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa80d9

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    P., Abramowicz, M

    Lasota, J. P., Abramowicz, M. A., Chen, X., et al. 1996, ApJ, 462, 142, doi: 10.1086/177137

    1996 doi

  12. [20]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 227, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5256

    Lyu, B., Wu, Q., Yan, Z., Yu, W., & Liu, H. 2022, ApJ, 927, 227, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5256

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    1992, ApJL, 397, L5, doi: 10.1086/186531

    Maraschi, L., Ghisellini, G., & Celotti, A. 1992, ApJL, 397, L5, doi: 10.1086/186531

    1992 doi

  14. [22]

    P., & Gear, W

    Marscher, A. P., & Gear, W. K. 1985, ApJ, 298, 114, doi: 10.1086/163592

    1985 doi

  15. [23]

    D., Dai, X., Chen, P., et al

    Mishra, H. D., Dai, X., Chen, P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf63d

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    1995, ApJ, 444, 231, doi: 10.1086/175599

    Narayan, R., & Yi, I. 1995, ApJ, 444, 231, doi: 10.1086/175599

    1995 doi

  17. [25]

    S., Zhou, R

    Ren, S. S., Zhou, R. X., Zheng, Y. G., Kang, S. J., & Wu, Q. 2024, A&A, 685, A140, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347312

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    G., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., et al. 2022, ApJL, 934, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Anderson, S

    Ruan, J. J., Anderson, S. F., Plotkin, R. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/19

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    C., & Rees, M

    Sikora, M., Begelman, M. C., & Rees, M. J. 1994, ApJ, 421, 153, doi: 10.1086/173633

    1994 doi

  22. [30]

    T., Morris, S

    Stocke, J. T., Morris, S. L., Gioia, I. M., et al. 1991, ApJS, 76, 813, doi: 10.1086/191582

    1991 doi

  23. [31]

    Urry, C. M. 1998, Advances in Space Research, 21, 89, doi: 10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00619-4

    1998 doi

  24. [32]

    M., & Padovani, P

    Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803, doi: 10.1086/133630

    1995 doi

  25. [33]

    J., & Witzel, A

    Wagner, S. J., & Witzel, A. 1995, ARA&A, 33, 163, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.001115

    1995

  26. [34]

    X., Zheng, Y

    Zhou, R. X., Zheng, Y. G., Zhu, K. R., Kang, S. J., & Li, X. P. 2024, ApJ, 962, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0a66

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.