Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 27 references

On Regular H\'enon-like Renormalization

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dissipative Hénon-like maps renormalize to the same universal attractor as one-dimensional unimodal maps.

desk verdict Serious, ambitious conditional renormalization theory; the advertised non-perturbative applications are not yet certified because the finite-time check is non-effective and Example 3.2 has a real gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08317 v1 pith:NBELQZ4J submitted 2024-11-13 math.DS

Jonguk Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DS MSC 37E2037D2537E05
keywords Hénon-likemapsrenormalizationunimodalboundedtypeaprioriboundsnon-uniformhyperbolicityregularunicriticalityattractor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a renormalization theory for dissipative Hénon-like maps, the natural two-dimensional analogue of unimodal maps, at parameter ranges where the perturbation from one dimension is not small but the dynamics is strongly contracting. Its central claim is that if a Hénon-like map has infinitely many nested regular returns with bounded-type combinatorics, then its renormalizations converge super-exponentially fast to the space of one-dimensional systems, and its one-dimensional profiles converge exponentially to the same universal renormalization attractor as for unimodal maps. The proof adds quantitative non-uniform hyperbolicity estimates to the renormalization method, making the small-scale geometry of returns controllable in the higher-dimensional setting. A second main claim is that this infinite regularity is a finite-time checkable condition, and a third is that the resulting renormalization limit set is regularly unicritical: it has a unique quadratic critical orbit, with uniform partial hyperbolicity outside slow-exponentially shrinking neighborhoods of that orbit. If correct, these results place non-perturbative two-dimensional dynamics in the same universality class as the one-dimensional quadratic family.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the regular Hénon-like return: a return map together with a straightening chart such that every point in the domain is forward-regular along the vertical direction, every point in the image is backward-regular along the horizontal direction, and the two directions are uniformly transversal. The method couples this with quantitative non-uniform hyperbolicity estimates, which provide quasi-linearizing charts along regular orbits and uniform control on distortion of the return maps. This machinery turns the absence of non-uniformity at arbitrarily small scales into quantitative estimates that propagate through renormalization depths, yielding the a priori bounds, uniform C^r bounds, and geometric control on which all main theorems rest.

What would settle it

For the Hénon family, evaluate the constants in conditions (3.4) and (3.5); if for some Jacobian below the claimed threshold there is no parameter value with the required finitely many regular returns, then the existence assertion of Example 3.2 would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper proves that, under the assumption of infinite nested regular Hénon-like returns with bounded-type combinatorics, the renormalizations of a dissipative Hénon-like map asymptotically become one-dimensional: the centered straightening charts converge super-exponentially, the maps become super-exponentially thin, and for smoothness at least four the one-dimensional profiles converge exponentially to the 1D renormalization attractor of unimodal maps. In addition, the paper shows that infinite regular renormalizability is finite-time checkable: once a sufficiently deep regular return exists and certain quantitative inequalities hold, all further topological renormalizations are automatically regular Hénon-like returns, and any bounded-type combinatorial type is realized. Finally, it proves that every such map is regularly unicritical on its renormalization limit set, meaning there is exactly one regular quadratic critical orbit and outside slowly shrinking neighborhoods of it the system is uniformly partially hyperbolic.

Load-bearing premise

The theorems all assume that the map already has infinitely many nested, quantitatively regular Hénon-like returns with bounded-type combinatorics, and the paper does not prove such maps exist for large Jacobian; it only reduces the infinite check to a finite one with constants that are stated but not evaluated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Infinite regular renormalizability with bounded-type combinatorics forces the renormalized maps to become super-exponentially thin, so their dynamics becomes effectively one-dimensional at small scales.
  • For smoothness at least four, the one-dimensional profiles converge exponentially to the universal 1D renormalization attractor, so two-dimensional systems inherit the universal scaling ratios of one-dimensional unimodal maps.
  • Infinite regular Hénon-like renormalizability is equivalent to a condition that can in principle be checked after finitely many returns, making the existence of such maps accessible to finite verification.
  • Every such map has a unique regular quadratic critical orbit; outside slow-exponentially shrinking neighborhoods of this orbit, the dynamics is uniformly partially hyperbolic.
  • The renormalization limit set has Hausdorff dimension less than one, hence is totally disconnected and minimal.
  • The intersection of all renormalization domains is a single point whose orbit is the unique critical orbit, giving a precise two-dimensional analogue of the critical value of a unimodal map.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the non-explicit constants in the finite-check theorem are ever made explicit, the same criterion would give an explicit Jacobian threshold for the existence of infinitely renormalizable Hénon maps with prescribed bounded-type combinatorics.
  • Editorial inference: the regular-unicriticality picture suggests that the renormalization limit set is a one-dimensional Cantor set with a single quadratic 'pinch', which may serve as a model for non-uniformly hyperbolic behavior in higher-dimensional dissipative maps.
  • Editorial inference: a direct numerical test, verifying for moderate Jacobian that the first finitely many returns are regular and that the stated inequalities hold, would turn the paper's existence criterion into a constructive algorithm.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a renormalization theory for dissipative Hénon-like maps under the hypothesis that the map has infinite nested regular Hénon-like returns with bounded-type combinatorics (Definition 2.6 and Section 2.7). Theorem A asserts super-exponential convergence of the centered straightening charts and of the renormalized maps to the space of one-dimensional systems, with exponential convergence of the 1D profiles to the 1D renormalization attractor when r >= 4. Theorems B and C claim that infinite regular renormalizability is finite-time checkable and give a realization criterion in parameter families. Theorem D states that the renormalization limit set has Hausdorff dimension less than 1 and is minimal and uniquely ergodic. Theorem E states that the map is regularly unicritical on the renormalization limit set, with a unique regular quadratic critical orbit and uniform partial hyperbolicity away from slowly shrinking neighborhoods of it. The arguments combine quantitative Pesin theory summarized from [CLPY2] with a priori bounds imported from [CLPY3]; Sections 4 through 14 are devoted to applications of those estimates.

Significance. If correct, these results would be a substantial step toward extending one-dimensional Feigenbaum-Coullet-Tresser renormalization to genuinely two-dimensional dissipative systems, and the regular unicriticality theorem would be a new structural result going beyond uniform partial hyperbolicity. The paper is honest about its main external input: the critical a priori bounds are quoted from the companion preprint [CLPY3], and Remark 3.1 explicitly admits that the finite-time constants are not computed. The organizational separation between the a priori estimates and their applications is a strength, as is the detailed treatment of the 1D-like combinatorial structure at deep renormalization levels. However, the advertised non-perturbative realization of infinitely regularly renormalizable Hénon maps is not currently certified. The proof labeled 'Proof of Theorem E' in Section 10 actually addresses Theorem C, but it starts from a stronger hypothesis than Theorem C states, and Example 3.2 uses the vacuous n1 = 0 case. Consequently, the existence of any non-perturbative map satisfying the hypotheses of Theorems A, D, and E remains unproved in this manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 10 and Theorem C/Example 3.2] The proof labeled 'Proof of Theorem E' in Section 10 is evidently intended to prove Theorem C, but it assumes that every F_a has n0 nested regular Hénon-like returns with n0 sufficiently large so that (8.4) and (10.1) hold. Theorem C as stated assumes only n1 nested regular returns with n1 given by (3.5), and Example 3.2 applies the theorem with n1 = 0. No argument is provided that conditions (3.3)-(3.5) imply (8.4) and (10.1), nor that n0 regular returns exist. With n1 = 0 the hypothesis is vacuous and does not provide the base case needed to start the induction using Proposition 10.2 and Theorem 9.4. Therefore the existence assertion in Example 3.2, namely that for every lambda in (0, lambda_0) there is a parameter a*(lambda) such that F_{a*(lambda),lambda} is infinitely regularly Hénon-like renormalizable, is not established by the manuscript as written.
  2. [Section 12 and Theorem B] Section 12 begins by taking F to be the infinitely regularly renormalizable Hénon-like map considered in Section 11 and proves Theorem 12.3, after which it states that 'Theorem B is an immediate consequence of Theorem 12.3.' Theorem B, however, is a finite-depth statement that starts from n1 nested regular returns and allows N to be finite. The manuscript does not explain how the exponential-small-pieces estimate for infinite regular renormalizations is transferred to the finite-depth hypotheses of Theorem B, nor does it address the 'except possibly the last two if N < infini' clause or the role of n1 in that reduction. A precise reduction or a separate finite-depth proof is needed.
  3. [Theorems 7.4, 4.1, 4.3 and Appendix A] The central a priori bounds are imported from [CLPY3]: Theorem 7.4, Propositions 4.1 and 4.3, and Theorem 4.4 are quoted results, and the estimates in Appendix A are summarized from [CLPY2]. Since Theorems A, B, D, and E all rely on these bounds, the present paper does not by itself contain a proof of the a priori bounds. This dependency is acceptable only if the companion papers are available and correct, but the manuscript should state this dependence explicitly in the theorem statements or in a dedicated assumptions section. As submitted, a reader cannot verify the main results from the submitted text alone.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 14] The heading 'Proof of Theorem C' at the end of Section 14 is a mislabel: the proof refers to Statements i)-v), which are the parts of Theorem A, not Theorem C.
  2. [Section 2.3] The sentence 'Let tilde Phi : tilde B -> tilde B be another chart with tilde B subset B. We define the following relations between Phi and tilde Phi' is repeated verbatim.
  3. [Section 5 heading] The section title 'A voiding the Critical Value' contains a typo and should read 'Avoiding the Critical Value'.
  4. [Example 2.2] Example 2.2 refers to 'See Proposition 10.2' for the perturbative beta-thin claim, but Proposition 10.2 states a different result about extending a renormalization when the 1D renormalized map has an eta_1-gap; the cross-reference should be corrected or replaced.
  5. [Definition 2.4] In Definition 2.4 the notation 'Dv-n(t lambda epsilon n)' should be D_{v_{-n}}(t lambda_mu^{epsilon n}) and similarly for the exponent; the current typesetting is ambiguous.
  6. [Theorem C] The conclusion of Theorem C says that R^{n1}(F_{a*}) 'realizes this type', but the finite-depth notion of realizing a b-bounded infinite renormalization type is not defined before the theorem statement; please define it explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: Theorems A, D, and E are conditional on the paper's stated regularity assumptions and on a priori bounds imported from the authors' companion preprints, which are independent inputs rather than renamings of the conclusions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense of this review. The main theorems assume infinite nested (L, epsilon, lambda)-regular Hénon-like returns (Definition 2.6) and then derive renormalization convergence, finite-time checkability, and regular unicriticality; the regularity assumption is a hypothesis, not a restatement of these conclusions. No parameter is fitted to data and renamed as a prediction: the constants in (3.3)-(3.5) are uniform bounds, not fitted values, and the 1D profiles are compared with the external 1D renormalization attractor via a shadowing lemma and known hyperbolicity of 1D renormalization, not by construction. The load-bearing a priori bounds (Theorem 7.4, Propositions 4.1/4.3, Theorem 4.4) are quoted from the authors' companion preprint [CLPY3] with stated assumptions that do not include the target results; under the review rules this is real evidence, so self-citation alone does not raise the circularity score. The finite-time checkability argument (Theorem B) is an induction using topological renormalizability plus a priori bounds; it does not assume the regularity it proves. Caveats are flagged as correctness or effectivity concerns, not circularity: Remark 3.1 admits that d, C, and K are never computed; Section 10 is headed 'Proof of Theorem E' while the context requires Theorem C, and the induction base n0 satisfying (8.4)/(10.1) is not shown to be implied by n1 in (3.5); Example 3.2 therefore does not yet certify a non-perturbative instance. These gaps do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs; they make it conditional and partly non-effective.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; L, epsilon, lambda, b are input hypotheses, not fitted numbers. No new physical entities are postulated. New mathematical structures are defined and their existence is proved under the assumptions, not assumed.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption F is dissipative: ||Jac F|| <= lambda < 1
    Stated at the start of Section 3; the convergence-to-1D heuristic uses this to show renormalizations become thin.
  • domain assumption Nested regular Hénon-like returns with uniform L, epsilon, lambda and b-bounded combinatorics exist
    Definition 2.6 and Section 3 hypotheses for Theorems A, D, E; regularity includes forward/backward exponential bounds and uniform transversality.
  • domain assumption A priori bounds and quantitative invariant manifold estimates from [CLPY2] and [CLPY3]
    Theorems 4.4 and 7.4 and Appendix A are imported from companion preprints by the same group; they are load-bearing for all applications.
  • standard math 1D renormalization operator has a hyperbolic attractor
    Used in Lemma 14.2 for Theorem A(v) exponential convergence to the 1D attractor; relies on Lyubich and de Faria-de Melo-Pinto.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Regular H\'enon-like Renormalization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NBELQZ4J

@misc{pith2026241108317,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Regular H\'enon-like Renormalization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NBELQZ4J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08317}
}
abstract

We develop a renormalization theory of non-perturbative dissipative H\'enon-like maps with combinatorics of bounded type. The main novelty of our approach is the incorporation of Pesin theoretic ideas to the renormalization method, which enables us to control the small-scale geometry of dynamics in the higher-dimensional setting. In a prequel to this paper, it is shown that, under certain regularity conditions on the return maps, renormalizations of H\'enon-like maps have $\textit{a priori}$ bounds. The current paper is devoted to the applications of this critical estimate. First, we prove that H\'enon-like maps converge under renormalization to the same renormalization attractor as for 1D unimodal maps. Second, we show that the necessary and sufficient conditions for renormalization convergence are finite-time checkable. Lastly, we show that every infinitely renormalizable H\'enon-like map is $\textit{regularly unicritical}$: there exists a unique orbit of tangencies between strong-stable and center manifolds, and outside a slow-exponentially shrinking neighborhood of this orbit, the dynamics behaves as a uniformly partially hyperbolic system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08317 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. H´enon-like mapping. The H´enon-like map F is (H´enon-like) renormalizable if for some integer R ≥ 2, there is an R-periodic subdomain B 1 ⋐ D, and the return map F R|B1 is again H´enon￾like after a smooth change-of-coordinates Φ : B 1 → D1 . In this case, the map Φ and the pair (F R, Φ) are referred to as a straightening chart and a H´enon-like return respectively. We define the (H´enon-like) renormalization R(F) o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. H´enon-like renormalization. A key novelty of our approach is the incorporation of Pesin theoretic ideas to the renormalization method. This involves keeping track of the regularity of points, which can then be used to control the geometry of dynamics in the higher-dimensional setting (see Appendix A). We give loose definitions of these notions below. For the precise definitions, see Subsection 2.5. Let p be a point… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The critical value v0 of an infinitely regularly H´enon-like renormalizable map F. of F near Ocrit (which is fundamentally non-linear in nature). See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Regular quadratic critical orbit Ocrit = {vm}m∈Z contained in critical tunnels {T−n} ∞ n=1 and valuable crescents {Tn} ∞ n=0. For m ∈ Z, the strong-stable and center manifolds of vm are indicated as red and blue curves respectively. The tunnel/crescent Tm is the pinche…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Geometry near the critical value v0 and the critical point v−1 (if N = ∞). For n ≥ n0, we have v0 ∈ Bˆn 0 ⊂ B0 and v−1 ∈ Bˆn Rn−1 ⊂ B−1. There exist charts Φ0 : B0 → B0 and Φ−1 : B−1 → B−1 such that Φ0 ◦ F ◦ Φ−1 is H´enon-like (see (4.4)). The charts Ψn converges to Φ0…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Projections P n 0 : Bˆn 0 → In 0 and P n −1 : Bˆn Rn−1 → In Rn−1 near the critical value v0 and critical point v−1 respectively. On any horizontal curve Γ0 ⊂ Bˆn 0 , the iterate F Rn−1 commutes with these projections. 5. Avoiding the Critical Value For some N ∈ N ∪ {∞}…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The combinatorial structure of the nth renormalization of F for n ≥ n0 (for rn := Rn+1/Rn = 3). The Rn+1-periodic domains Bˆn,1 0 , Bˆn,1 Rn and Bˆn,1 2Rn containing v0, vRn and v2Rn respectively are ver￾tically proper and pairwise disjoint in Bˆn 0 . Moreover, F Rn (B…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of the map H n0 i for 0 ≤ i < Rn0+1 acting on the horizontal curve I n0+1 0 ⊂ In0 0 (for rn0 := Rn0+1/Rn0 = 3). The orbit of I n0+1 0 makes returns to B n0 0 ∋ v0 under F kRn for 0 ≤ k < rn0 . At these moments, the projection map P n0 0 is applied to I n0…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Arcs J n i := Hˆ i(I n 0 ) with 0 ≤ i < Rn that are contained in I m 0 for some m < n. For 0 ≤ k < rm+1, we have J n kRm+1 ⊂ Im+1 0 . For 2 ≤ l < rm, we have J n kRm+1+lRm = P m 0 ◦ F Rm(J n kRm+1 ). Let i ≥ 2Rn0 be a number given by i = [0, . . . , 0, am, am+1, . . . …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On the dynamics of the renormalization operator

    Avila, A., de Melo, W., Martens, M. On the dynamics of the renormalization operator . Global analysis of dynamical systems, Inst. Phys., Bristol, 449-460 (2001)

    2001

  2. [2]

    Benedicks, L

    M. Benedicks, L. Carleson. On dynamics of the H\'enon map , Ann. Math. 133:73-169 (1991)

    1991

  3. [3]

    Benedicks, M

    M. Benedicks, M. Martens, L. Palmisano. Newhouse Laminations , (2018), arXiv:1811.00617

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Berger, Strong regularity

    P. Berger, Strong regularity. Abundance of non-uniformly hyperbolic H\'enon-like endomorphisms. Asterisk 410, 53 - 177

  5. [5]

    J. P. Boro\'nski, S. S timac. The pruning front conjecture, folding patterns and classification of H\'enon maps in the presence of strange attractors , (2023), arXiv:2302.12568

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Crovisier, M

    S. Crovisier, M. Lyubich, E. Pujals, J. Yang. Renormalization of Unicritical Diffeomorphisms of the Disk , (2024), arXiv:2401.13559

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Crovisier, M

    S. Crovisier, M. Lyubich, E. Pujals, J. Yang. Quantitative Estimates on Invariant Manifolds For Surface Diffeomorphisms , (2024), Preprint available at https://user.math.uzh.ch/yang/

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Crovisier, M

    S. Crovisier, M. Lyubich, E. Pujals, J. Yang. A Priori Bounds for H\'enon-like Renormalization , (2024), Preprint available at https://user.math.uzh.ch/yang/

    2024

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Crovisier, E

    S. Crovisier, E. Pujals, C. Tresser. Mildly dissipative diffeomorphisms of the disk with zero entropy , (2020), arXiv:2005.14278

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Collet, J

    P. Collet, J. -P. Eckmann, H. Koch. Period doubling bifurcations for families of maps on ^n . J. Stat. Phys. (1980)

    1980

  3. [11]

    Coullet, C

    P. Coullet, C. Tresser. It\'erations d'endomorphismes et groupe de renormalisation . J. Phys. Colloque C 539, C5-25 (1978)

    1978

  4. [12]

    De Carvalho, M

    A. De Carvalho, M. Lyubich, M. Martens, Renormalization in the H\'enon Family, I: Universality but Non-Rigidity , J. Stat. Phys. (2006) 121 5/6, 611-669

    2006

  5. [13]

    de Faria, W

    E. de Faria, W. de Melo, A. Pinto. Global Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C^r Unimodal Mappings . Ann. of Math., 164 (2006), 731-824

    2006

  6. [14]

    de Melo, S

    W. de Melo, S. J. Van Strien, One-Dimensional Dynamics , Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, (1993)

    1993

  7. [15]

    M. J. Feigenbaum. Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations , J. Statist. Phys. 19 (1978), 25–52

    1978

  8. [16]

    Gambaudo, C

    J.-M. Gambaudo, C. Tresser. (1991). How Horseshoes are Created , In: Tirapegui, E., Zeller, W. (eds) Instabilities and Nonequilibrium Structures III. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol 64. Springer

    1991

  9. [17]

    Gambaudo, S

    J.-M. Gambaudo, S. van Strien, C. Tresser. H\'enon-like maps with strange attractors: There exist C^ Kupka-Smale diffeomorphisms on S^2 with neither sinks nor sources , Nonlinearity 2:287-304 (1989)

    1989

  10. [18]

    P. E. Hazard, H\'enon-like maps with arbitrary stationary combinatorics , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 31 (2011), no. 5, 1391-1443

    2011

  11. [19]

    M. H\'enon. A two dimensional mapping with a strange attractor , Comm. Math. Phys. 50 (1976), 69-77

    1976

  12. [20]

    M. Lyubich. Feigenbaum-Coullet-Tresser universality and Milnor's hairiness conjecture , Ann. of Math. 149 (1999), 319-420

    1999

  13. [21]

    M. Lyubich. The quadratic family as a qualitatively solvable model of chaos , Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 47(9):1042–1052, 2000

    2000

  14. [22]

    McMullen

    C. McMullen. Renormalization and 3-Manifolds Which Fiber over the Circle (AM-142). Princeton University Press, 1996

    1996

  15. [23]

    Milnor, W

    J. Milnor, W. Thurston. On iterated maps of the interval . In Dynamical systems (College Park, MD, 1986–87), volume 1342 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 465–563. Springer, Berlin, 1988

    1986

  16. [24]

    Palis and J.C

    J. Palis and J.C. Yoccoz. Non-uniformly hyperbolic horseshoes arising from bifurcations of Poincar\'e heteroclinic cycles. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci., (110):1-217, 2009

    2009

  17. [25]

    C. Pugh, M. Shub. Ergodic Attractors . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 312, No. 1 (Mar., 1989), pp. 1-54

    1989

  18. [26]

    Sullivan, Bounds, quadratic differentials, and renormalization conjectures , AMS Centennial Publications II, Mathematics into Twenty-first Century, 417-466, 1992

    D. Sullivan, Bounds, quadratic differentials, and renormalization conjectures , AMS Centennial Publications II, Mathematics into Twenty-first Century, 417-466, 1992

    1992

  19. [27]

    Wang,and L-S

    Q. Wang,and L-S. Young, Toward a theory of rank one attractors. Ann. of Math. (2) 167 (2008), no.2, 349–480

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.