Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 39 references

High-Temperature Phase Separation and Charge-Magnon Liquid in Kinetic Antiferromagnets

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that in the infinite-U triangular-lattice Hubbard model, magnon-mediated attraction between spin polarons drives high-temperature phase separation and, at higher density, forms a strongly bound charge-magnon liquid with…

desk verdict Solid numerical work, but the phase-separation claim rests on hysteresis that vanishes at the highest expansion order, so the central result is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08489 v1 pith:5P6XAANU submitted 2024-11-13 cond-mat.str-el

Johan Carlström This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords kineticantiferromagnetismspinpolaroncharge-magnonliquidphaseseparationtriangularlatticeHubbardmodeldiagrammaticMonteCarlomoirématerialsmagnon-mediatedattraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that kinetic antiferromagnetism—magnetic order produced by carrier motion rather than super-exchange—can generate strong, high-temperature attraction between charge carriers. In the infinite-U Hubbard model on a triangular lattice in a magnetic field, holes bind with magnons into spin polarons, and these polarons attract one another through magnon exchange. Using strong-coupling diagrammatic Monte Carlo, the author finds that this attraction drives phase separation into charge- and magnon-rich regions separated by polarized Mott-insulating voids at temperatures as high as T/t ≈ 1/13. At higher carrier density the polarons hybridize into a 'charge-magnon liquid' whose spectral weight extends to energies about 1.1t above the band bottom, a much larger binding scale than that of an isolated polaron. If correct, this identifies kinetic magnetism as a pathway to unconventional quantum-ordered states, including pairing, in frustrated moiré materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin polaron—a bound state of a hole and a magnon on a nearly polarized triangular-lattice background—whose isolated binding energy is εcm ≈ 0.4227t. The argument is carried by strong-coupling diagrammatic Monte Carlo (SCDMC), an asymptotically exact expansion in the dressed hopping integral that evaluates the Gutzwiller-projected Green's function directly in the macroscopic limit. Self-consistent iteration of the Dyson-type equation for the dressed hopping yields the equation of state, while simulated annealing extracts the spectral function A(k, ε). Magnon-mediated attraction is read from two signatures: a sharp drop in carrier density over a field interval δB = 0.025t, implying a susceptibility much larger than the polaronic band width can explain, and a polaronic sub-band that broadens from wp ≈ 0.5t at low density to wp > t at higher density, with a high-energy tail at ε ≈ t, signalling hybridization into a charge-magnon liquid.

What would settle it

A calculation that extends the self-consistent expansion to N=10 or higher (or a complementary method such as finite-cluster diagonalization or DMRG on the same model) and checks whether the carrier-density discontinuity and the two-branch coexistence in the equation of state persist; if the branches merge or the discontinuity smooths out, the phase-separation claim fails. Alternatively, a low-temperature magnetization measurement on a MoTe2/WSe2 device tuned near half-filling would distinguish a charge-magnon liquid (finite susceptibility minimum that deepens with doping) from a polaron gas (a genuine magnetization plateau with vanishing susceptibility).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that magnon-mediated attraction between spin polarons in a kinetic antiferromagnet is not a weak residual effect but a dominant interaction that reshapes the macroscopic phase diagram. In the strong-coupling limit of the triangular-lattice Hubbard model under an external field, the carrier density drops sharply as the field increases past B/t ≈ 0.25, and the associated susceptibility grows with decreasing temperature—the signature of phase separation between a charge- and magnon-rich liquid and a polarized Mott-insulating background. The author interprets coexisting solutions of the self-consistent diagrammatic series at expansion orders N = 7 and 8 as hysteresis, placing a phase-separation boundary in the grand-canonical ensemble. Spectral-function analysis then shows that the polaronic sub-band broadens and eventually merges with the continuum as density increases, with a high-energy tail at ε ≈ t compared with a band top at −0.1t; the resulting hybridization energy scale of roughly 1.1t exceeds the isolated polaron binding energy (≈0.42t), so the dense phase is a strongly bound charge-magnon liquid rather than a weakly interacting polaron gas. The paper further argues that the magnetic response of this liquid—a finite susceptibility with a minimum, rather than a magnetization plateau with vanishing susceptibility—matches observations in MoTe2/WSe2 moiré bilayers.

Load-bearing premise

The phase-separation conclusion rests on the assumption that truncating the self-consistent diagrammatic series at orders N=7–9 correctly captures the thermodynamic-limit free-energy landscape, so that the two coexisting solutions seen at N=7–8 are genuine hysteresis rather than truncation artifacts—especially since the appendix reports the solutions agree within error bars at N=9.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase separation into charge- and magnon-rich regions should occur at temperatures as high as about t/13, far above the corresponding scale for attraction in square-lattice doped Mott insulators.
  • The charge-magnon liquid should exhibit a magnetic susceptibility that remains finite with a doping-dependent minimum, rather than the vanishing susceptibility of a magnetization plateau.
  • The hybridization energy of roughly 1.1t implies that multi-polaron bound states, potentially including paired carriers, are energetically accessible in frustrated kinetic magnets.
  • The low-density spectral gap between the polaronic sub-band and the continuum supports a pseudogap-metal description of the polaronic regime.
  • ARPES and quantum gas microscopy should see the predicted strong charge correlations and the ~1.1t hybridization energy scale in moiré materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the demixing is genuine, real moiré devices at low temperature may break into mesoscale charge-rich droplets inside a polarized insulating background, a pattern that quantum gas microscopy could image directly.
  • The strong binding scale suggests exploring other frustrated geometries (for example, kagome lattices) where magnon-mediated attraction could be even larger, making kinetic magnetism a tunable source of pairing.
  • The two-solution structure at N=7–8 is read as hysteresis; a direct test at N≥10 or with a complementary method would show whether the branches persist or merge, which would either confirm or remove the phase-separation claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies the infinite-U triangular-lattice Hubbard model in a magnetic field using strong-coupling diagrammatic Monte Carlo (SCDMC). The central claim is that magnon-mediated attraction between spin polarons drives high-temperature phase separation into charge- and magnon-rich regions, and that at higher carrier density the polarons hybridize into a strongly bound charge-magnon liquid (CML) with a maximal binding energy of about 1.1t. The evidence consists of a sharp density drop in the equation of state (Fig. 3(a)), coexistence of two self-consistent solutions at expansion orders N=7,8 at βt=13, B/t=0.225 (Fig. 3(b)), and spectral functions showing a polaronic sub-band that broadens with doping (Fig. 3(d-g)). The paper connects these results to recent spin-polaron experiments in MoTe2/WSe2 moiré bilayers.

Significance. If established, this would be an important result: kinetic antiferromagnetism would provide a concrete, parameter-light mechanism for high-temperature charge attraction and phase separation in a model directly relevant to TMD moiré materials. The paper is methodologically ambitious: SCDMC is an asymptotically exact series-expansion method in the thermodynamic limit, the equation of state and spectral functions are computed rather than assumed, and I see no equation-level circularity in the central derivation. The spectral signatures, such as a gapped polaronic sub-band at low density and its broadening with doping, are concrete and falsifiable. However, the headline phase-separation claim is currently supported by an unconverged two-solution signal at intermediate expansion order, so the significance of the paper is conditional on additional thermodynamic evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 3(b) and Appendix, Figs. 4-7] The phase-separation claim rests on coexistence of two self-consistent solutions at expansion orders N=7,8 for βt=13, B/t=0.225, but the highest-order data do not show this. The Appendix states that at N=9 "the solutions agree within error bars," while the main text says the first solution appears to become unstable. Because SCDMC is asymptotically exact only in the N→∞ limit, the N=9 result should take precedence, and the two-branch structure at N=7,8 is not by itself evidence of a first-order transition. The paper needs either a demonstration that the hysteresis persists at higher order, a resummation with controlled error, or an independent thermodynamic signature of phase separation.
  2. [Fig. 3(a) and main text around Eq. (5)] The sharp density drop in Fig. 3(a) is suggestive, but in the grand canonical ensemble a first-order transition should appear as a density discontinuity or as hysteresis in a controlled parameter sweep, accompanied by spatial coexistence of the two phases. A large but finite susceptibility χn,B is also compatible with a smooth crossover, and no real-space observable (density histogram, density-density correlations, or explicit free-energy comparison of the two branches) is presented. The abstract's statement that the system separates into "charge- and magnon-rich regions, bordered by polarised Mott insulating voids" therefore goes beyond the evidence actually shown.
  3. [Fig. 3(d-g) and spectral analysis] The spectral functions and the estimate of maximal carrier binding energy, ϵb ∼ 1.1t, are computed at expansion order N=7, and no order-by-order convergence for A(k,ε) or d(ε) is shown. Since this binding-energy estimate is central to the claim of a strongly bound charge-magnon liquid, the paper should provide either convergence checks in the expansion order or an explicit two-body calculation of the polaron-polaron binding energy. Without that, the "strongly bound" characterization is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction and model definition] There are typos in the introductory text: "exmine" should be "examine," and "hoping" should be "hopping" in the discussion of energy scales.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption and main text] The magnetic-field value for panel (d) is given as B/t=0.2818 in the caption but B/t=0.2828 in the main text; please make the two values consistent.
  3. [Appendix, Fig. 6 caption] The caption states "At B/t = 2.25", which should presumably be "B/t = 0.225" to match the main text and the other appendix figures.
  4. [Spectral analysis section] The sentence "Is should be stressed that the gap is not situated at zero energy" should read "It should be stressed..." Also, "appears to becomes unstable" should be "appears to become unstable."
  5. [Fig. 3(b) and Appendix] The color coding of the two initial configurations is described differently in the main text (blue: previous-order solution; red: weaker-field solution) and in the Appendix (red: low-density initial configuration; blue: high-density initial configuration). Please align the descriptions so the reader can interpret the figure without confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the simulation outputs are numerically computed rather than assumed, and self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

The central claims of the paper—a sharp drop in carrier density near B/t ~ 0.25, coexisting self-consistent solutions at low expansion order, and a broad polaronic sub-band at higher doping—are all presented as outputs of strong-coupling diagrammatic Monte Carlo simulations of the Gutzwiller-projected Green's function, not as inputs to the calculation. The phase-separation interpretation is an inference from the computed equation of state and from the coexistence of two SCDMC solutions; the density and spectral functions are not defined in terms of phase separation. The SCDMC formalism is cited to the author's prior work, but the protocol is summarised in the paper and the numerical results are independent of the conclusion being drawn. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's earlier papers. The fact that the two solutions agree within error bars at expansion order N = 9 raises a convergence or robustness concern about the phase-separation evidence, but that is a correctness risk rather than a circularity. The dependence on self-citations is therefore not load-bearing in the sense of reducing the derivation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model has no fitted parameters; B, mu, T, U, and t are physical inputs. The central results depend on the SCDMC numerical framework, on analytic continuation, and on the assumption that the infinite-U Hubbard model represents MoTe2/WSe2. No new particles or mediators are introduced; the charge-magnon liquid is a proposed phase with testable magnetic signatures.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The SCDMC series truncated at order N=7-9 is sufficiently converged or resummable to give the thermodynamic-limit equation of state.
    Invoked throughout the results; the methods section states that the only systematic error is series truncation and that results are obtained directly in the macroscopic limit. The appendix shows order-by-order series that oscillate at low temperature and low field, so convergence is not demonstrated at all parameter sets.
  • domain assumption The Gutzwiller-projected Green's function and its analytic continuation via simulated annealing faithfully represent the single-particle spectrum.
    Used to extract A(k,eps), spectral widths, and the binding energy. The inversion of Eq. (3) is ill-conditioned, and the paper provides no validation of the annealing result against benchmarks.
  • domain assumption The infinite-U Hubbard model captures the essential physics of MoTe2/WSe2 moire bilayers despite long-range Coulomb interactions.
    Eq. (1) is used with U/t going to infinity; the text estimates t/J about 20 for the experiment in Ref. [18] and later concedes Coulomb repulsion is present but argues the signatures persist.
invented entities (1)
  • Charge-magnon liquid (CML) independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed phase of strongly hybridized spin polarons where magnon-mediated attraction produces a strongly bound, liquid-like carrier-rich state; used to explain the sharp equation-of-state drop, broad spectral sub-band, and experimental susceptibility behavior.
    The paper proposes falsifiable handles: a continuum of magnon energies, finite susceptibility with a minimum, and Nm growing with doping. It compares these to Ref. [18] but does not extract material parameters for a quantitative test.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Temperature Phase Separation and Charge-Magnon Liquid in Kinetic Antiferromagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5P6XAANU

@misc{pith2026241108489,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Temperature Phase Separation and Charge-Magnon Liquid in Kinetic Antiferromagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5P6XAANU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08489}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding mechanisms of quantum ordering in strongly correlated systems remains a central challenge in condensed matter physics, with implications for designing novel quantum materials. Here, we investigate kinetic antiferromagnetism on a triangular lattice under an applied magnetic field, where spin-polarons emerge as charge-magnon bound states with mutual attraction. Using large-scale diagrammatic Monte Carlo simulations, we show that this interaction drives high-temperature phase separation into charge- and magnon-rich regions, bordered by polarised Mott insulating voids. Spectral function analysis reveals a substantial energy correction from magnon interactions, indicating that these carrier-rich regions form a strongly bound charge-magnon liquid. These findings shed new light on recent experiments on MoTe2/WSe2 moir\'e bilayers, underscoring kinetic magnetism as a unique pathway for strong inter-carrier attraction and high-temperature quantum ordering, with potential applications in quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08489 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kinetic antiferromagnetism on the triangular lattice. In (a), the two paths lead to the same final position of the carrier. On a polarised background, these paths would interfere destructively, in￾creasing the kinetic energy. However, in this initial configuration, the final states (b) and (c) are not identical, so no interference occurs. When destructive interference occurs, spin anti-correlation can re￾duce the ki… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Strong coupling diagrammatic Monte Carlo proce￾dure. (a) The effective n−particle scattering vertices Vn are com￾puted from the bare local Greens function and the contact interaction U. This computation is conducted in the atomic limit, and can be done exactly and non-perturbatively, even for U → ∞. (b) The polarisation operator of the hopping integral is obtained by from a diagrammatic expansion in VN and the dress… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Results obtained from strong coupling diagrammatic Monte Carlo. (a) Carrier density as a function of the external magnetic field B with µ/t = 3 and inverse temperatures βt = 9, 11, 13, 15. Around B/t ∼ 0.25 the carrier density declines rapidly with the magnetic field, revealing a large susceptibility which we interpret as resulting from phase separation. (b) Equation of state for βt = 13 and B = 0.225t as a function… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Equation of state at βt = 9 in an external magnetic field as a function of expansion order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Equation of state at βt = 11 in an external magnetic field as a function of expansion order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Equation of state at βt = 13 in an external magnetic field as a function of expansion order. At B/t = 2.25, the system exhibits hysteresis at orders 7, 8, as revealed by altering the initial condition (ic) (Red: low carrier density ic. Blue: high carrier density ic). A…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Equation of state at βt = 15 in an external magnetic field as a function of expansion order. At this temperature, we are limited to strong field and low carrier density. The series here appears to be asymptotic, consistent with a pole within the unit circle [PITH_FULL…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Doping a mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductiv- ity,

    Patrick A. Lee, Naoto Nagaosa, and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Doping a mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductiv- ity,” Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17–85 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    Effects of double exchange in magnetic crys- tals,

    P. G. de Gennes, “Effects of double exchange in magnetic crys- tals,” Phys. Rev.118, 141–154 (1960)

    work page 1960

  3. [3]

    Alexandrov and J

    S. Alexandrov and J. T. Devreese, Advances in Polaron Physics (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Structure of vacancies in solid He 3,

    A. F. Andreev, “Structure of vacancies in solid He 3,” Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 24, 564–565 (1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    Structure of va- cancy induced spin polarons in solid 3he,

    G. Montambaux, P. Lederer, and M. Heritier, “Structure of va- cancy induced spin polarons in solid 3he,” J. Physique Lett.40, 499–503 (1979)

    work page 1979

  6. [6]

    Flat bands in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Zhiming Zhang, Yimeng Wang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Keiji Ueno, Emanuel Tutuc, and Brian J. LeRoy, “Flat bands in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature Physics 16, 1093–1096 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Band topology, hubbard model, heisenberg model, and dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in twisted bilayer wse2,

    Haining Pan, Fengcheng Wu, and Sankar Das Sarma, “Band topology, hubbard model, heisenberg model, and dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction in twisted bilayer wse2,” Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033087 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moiré bands,

    Fengcheng Wu, Timothy Lovorn, Emanuel Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, “Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moiré bands,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026402 (2018). 5

    work page 2018

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    A tunable bilayer hubbard model in twisted wse2,

    Yang Xu, Kaifei Kang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kin Fai Mak, and Jie Shan, “A tunable bilayer hubbard model in twisted wse2,” Nature Nanotechnology 17, 934–939 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Ferromagnetism in a narrow, almost half- filled s band,

    Yosuke Nagaoka, “Ferromagnetism in a narrow, almost half- filled s band,” Phys. Rev.147, 392–405 (1966)

    1966

  3. [11]

    Phases of the infinite u hubbard model on square lattices,

    Li Liu, Hong Yao, Erez Berg, Steven R. White, and Steven A. Kivelson, “Phases of the infinite u hubbard model on square lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 126406 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Kinetic antiferromag- netism in the triangular lattice,

    Jan O. Haerter and B. Sriram Shastry, “Kinetic antiferromag- netism in the triangular lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087202 (2005)

    2005

  5. [13]

    In situ controllable magnetic phases in doped twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Johan Carlström, “In situ controllable magnetic phases in doped twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. Research 4, 043126 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Pair- ing from strong repulsion in triangular lattice hubbard model,

    Shang-Shun Zhang, Wei Zhu, and Cristian D. Batista, “Pair- ing from strong repulsion in triangular lattice hubbard model,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 140507 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    High- temperature kinetic magnetism in triangular lattices,

    Ivan Morera, Márton Kanász-Nagy, Tomasz Smolenski, Livio Ciorciaro, Ata ç Imamo ˘glu, and Eugene Demler, “High- temperature kinetic magnetism in triangular lattices,” Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022048 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Pseudogap metal and magnetiza- tion plateau from doping moiré mott insulator,

    Yang Zhang and Liang Fu, “Pseudogap metal and magnetiza- tion plateau from doping moiré mott insulator,” SciPost Physics Core 6 (2023), 10.21468/scipostphyscore.6.2.038

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Attraction from frustration in ladder systems,

    Ivan Morera, Annabelle Bohrdt, Wen Wei Ho, and Eu- gene Demler, “Attraction from frustration in ladder systems,” (2021), arXiv:2106.09600 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Observation of spin polarons in a frustrated moiré hub- bard system,

    Zui Tao, Wenjin Zhao, Bowen Shen, Tingxin Li, Patrick Knüp- pel, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Observation of spin polarons in a frustrated moiré hub- bard system,” Nature Physics (2024), 10.1038/s41567-024- 02434-y

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Kinetic magnetism in triangular moiré ma- terials,

    L. Ciorciaro, T. Smole ´nski, I. Morera, N. Kiper, S. Hiestand, M. Kroner, Y . Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Demler, and A. ˙Imamo˘glu, “Kinetic magnetism in triangular moiré ma- terials,” Nature 623, 509–513 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Observation of nagaoka polarons in a fermi–hubbard quantum simulator,

    Martin Lebrat, Muqing Xu, Lev Haldar Kendrick, Anant Kale, Youqi Gang, Pranav Seetharaman, Ivan Morera, Ehsan Khatami, Eugene Demler, and Markus Greiner, “Observation of nagaoka polarons in a fermi–hubbard quantum simulator,” Nature 629, 317–322 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Directly imag- ing spin polarons in a kinetically frustrated hubbard system,

    Max L. Prichard, Benjamin M. Spar, Ivan Morera, Eugene Demler, Zoe Z. Yan, and Waseem S. Bakr, “Directly imag- ing spin polarons in a kinetically frustrated hubbard system,” Nature 629, 323–328 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Frustration- and doping-induced magnetism in a fermi–hubbard simulator,

    Muqing Xu, Lev Haldar Kendrick, Anant Kale, Youqi Gang, Geoffrey Ji, Richard T. Scalettar, Martin Lebrat, and Markus Greiner, “Frustration- and doping-induced magnetism in a fermi–hubbard simulator,” Nature 620, 971–976 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Simulation of hub- bard model physics in wse2/ws2 moiré superlattices,

    Yanhao Tang, Lizhong Li, Tingxin Li, Yang Xu, Song Liu, Katayun Barmak, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Allan H. MacDonald, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Simulation of hub- bard model physics in wse2/ws2 moiré superlattices,” Nature 579, 353–358 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Diagrammatic monte carlo,

    Kris Van Houcke, Evgeny Kozik, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svis- tunov, “Diagrammatic monte carlo,” Physics Procedia 6, 95– 105 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Determinant diagrammatic monte carlo al- gorithm in the thermodynamic limit,

    Riccardo Rossi, “Determinant diagrammatic monte carlo al- gorithm in the thermodynamic limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 045701 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Feynman diagrams as computational graphs,

    Pengcheng Hou, Tao Wang, Daniel Cerkoney, Xiansheng Cai, Zhiyi Li, Youjin Deng, Lei Wang, and Kun Chen, “Feynman diagrams as computational graphs,” (2024), arXiv:2403.18840 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Partial renormalization of quasiparticle interac- tions,

    Kun Chen, “Partial renormalization of quasiparticle interac- tions,” (2024), arXiv:2404.15844 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Resum- mation of diagrammatic series with zero convergence radius for strongly correlated fermions,

    R. Rossi, T. Ohgoe, K. Van Houcke, and F. Werner, “Resum- mation of diagrammatic series with zero convergence radius for strongly correlated fermions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 130405 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Spin-charge transformation of lattice fermion models: duality approach for diagrammatic simulation of strongly correlated systems,

    Johan Carlström, “Spin-charge transformation of lattice fermion models: duality approach for diagrammatic simulation of strongly correlated systems,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 385602 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Diagrammatic monte carlo procedure for the spin-charge transformed hubbard model,

    Johan Carlström, “Diagrammatic monte carlo procedure for the spin-charge transformed hubbard model,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 075119 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Strong-coupling diagrammatic monte carlo technique for correlated fermions and frustrated spins,

    Johan Carlström, “Strong-coupling diagrammatic monte carlo technique for correlated fermions and frustrated spins,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 195147 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Spectral shift technique for strongly cor- related lattice fermions,

    Johan Carlström, “Spectral shift technique for strongly cor- related lattice fermions,” (2021), arXiv:2111.05877 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Integrating dynamical mean-field theory and diagrammatic monte carlo,

    Johan Carlström, “Integrating dynamical mean-field theory and diagrammatic monte carlo,” (2023), arXiv:2309.00674 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Spectral topology and its relation to fermi arcs in strongly correlated systems,

    Johan Carlström, “Spectral topology and its relation to fermi arcs in strongly correlated systems,” Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033160 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Evidence of attraction between charge carriers in a doped mott insulator,

    Emil Blomquist and Johan Carlström, “Evidence of attraction between charge carriers in a doped mott insulator,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013272 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Exploration of doped quan- tum magnets with ultracold atoms,

    Annabelle Bohrdt, Lukas Homeier, Christian Reinmoser, Eu- gene Demler, and Fabian Grusdt, “Exploration of doped quan- tum magnets with ultracold atoms,” Annals of Physics 435, 168651 (2021), special issue on Philip W. Anderson

    2021

  29. [37]

    Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices,

    Christian Gross and Immanuel Bloch, “Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices,” Science357, 995–1001 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Imaging magnetic po- larons in the doped fermi-hubbard model,

    Joannis Koepsell, Jayadev Vijayan, Pimonpan Sompet, Fabian Grusdt, Timon A. Hilker, Eugene Demler, Guillaume Salomon, Immanuel Bloch, and Christian Gross, “Imaging magnetic po- larons in the doped fermi-hubbard model,” Nature 572, 358– 362 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Microscopic evolution of doped mott in- sulators from polaronic metal to fermi liquid,

    Joannis Koepsell, Dominik Bourgund, Pimonpan Sompet, Sarah Hirthe, Annabelle Bohrdt, Yao Wang, Fabian Grusdt, Eugene Demler, Guillaume Salomon, Christian Gross, and Immanuel Bloch, “Microscopic evolution of doped mott in- sulators from polaronic metal to fermi liquid,” (2020),...

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.