Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Enhanced sensitivity of sub-THz thermomechanical bolometers exploiting vibrational nonlinearity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By engineering steeper resonance slopes through Duffing nonlinearity instead of raising the Q-factor, this paper demonstrates a room-temperature sub-THz thermomechanical bolometer with about 30 pW/√Hz NEP under all-electrical readout.

desk verdict A credible but unverified NEP claim: steep-slope transduction is genuinely new for thermomechanical bolometers, but the headline 30 pW/√Hz is inferred from dark noise and the reported 117x reduction sits uneasily with the 5.6x slope asymmetry. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09071 v3 pith:VTASZNLH submitted 2024-11-13 physics.optics

L. Alborghetti , B. Bertoni , L. Vicarelli , S. Zanotto , S. Roddaro , A. Tredicucci , M. Cautero , L. Gregorat
show 5 more authors
G. Cautero M. Cojocari G. Fedorov P. Kuzhir A. Pitanti
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 07.57.Kp
keywords thermomechanicalbolometersub-THzdetectionDuffingnonlinearitynoiseequivalentpowertrampolineresonatorFanoresonancepyroliticcarbonabsorberall-electricalreadout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes an alternative to high-Q resonators for sensitive transduction: instead of making the resonance line narrower, make its sides steeper by combining Fano interference with Duffing nonlinearity while keeping dissipation constant. The test case is a silicon-nitride trampoline bolometer for 140 GHz radiation, read out electrically. Operating the detector at the frequency of maximum slope of the distorted resonance reduces the noise equivalent power to about 30 pW/√Hz, roughly three times better than the authors' earlier 100 pW/√Hz device that used optical readout. The same nonlinearity can be pushed past a bifurcation to make a threshold detector, at the cost of a narrow dynamic range.

What carries the argument

The central object is the transduction operating point: the detector is read out at a fixed drive/demodulation frequency fD, and the signal is the first derivative of the resonance amplitude, through ΔVLI ~ Ad(fD) - Ad(fD+δf) ~ (dAd/df) δf. The slope is amplified by two coexisting line-shaping effects: Fano interference, which makes the bare resonance asymmetric, and the Duffing (cubic) mechanical nonlinearity, which hardens the resonance and steepens one edge at higher drive amplitudes. The noise-equivalent power is NEP(fM,fD) = σAD√(2τ)/R, so the figure of merit is the ratio of the measured Allan-deviation noise floor to the dynamic responsivity at the chosen frequency.

What would settle it

Operate the PyC device at fD = 524.26 kHz with a 90 mV drive, illuminate with a calibrated amplitude-modulated 140 GHz source, and measure the signal-to-noise ratio end-to-end; if the resulting NEP exceeds 30 pW/√Hz, the dark-noise assumption is violated and the claimed value is optimistic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors demonstrate experimentally that transduction sensitivity is governed by the local slope dAd/df of the mechanical resonance, and that this slope can be engineered by driving the resonator into the Duffing nonlinear regime, where the already asymmetric Fano lineshape develops a much steeper edge. By choosing the transduction frequency fD at the steepest point, they obtain a noise-equivalent power of about 30 pW/√Hz for a pyrolitic-carbon-coated device under 140 GHz illumination at room temperature with all-electrical inductive readout, compared with about 100 pW/√Hz for their earlier optical-readout device. The improvement tracks the derivative enhancement (factors of roughly 117 and 37.5 for the two devices), and the absorber choice matters: the pyrolitic-carbon layer's ~40% sub-THz absorbance gives about a seven-fold better static responsivity than a thin Cr/Au layer. Past the bifurcation point, the derivative becomes delta-like, which precludes intensity detection but suggests a threshold-sensor operating mode.

Load-bearing premise

The sensitivity claim assumes the detector's noise floor measured in the dark is unchanged when light shines on it at the steepest-response frequency, so that sensitivity can be computed as dark noise divided by response strength rather than measured directly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At its best operating point, the PyC device reaches about 30 pW/√Hz at 140 GHz with all-electrical readout, roughly three times better than the earlier 100 pW/√Hz optical-readout version.
  • Within the same device, moving the transduction frequency from a flat region to the steepest slope reduces the NEP by factors of roughly 117 (PyC) and 37.5 (Au), with no change to dissipation or fabrication.
  • The steep-slope regime has a derivative linewidth of about 50 Hz, limiting linear detection to signals below roughly 100 nW; lower drive amplitudes restore a broader dynamic range at higher NEP.
  • Increasing the drive past the bifurcation point produces a delta-like derivative, which is unsuited to intensity measurement but opens a threshold-detection mode for events such as light pulses or mass loading.
  • All-electrical readout at a 20 Hz operating speed makes the device competitive with commercial sub-THz detectors that achieve NEP around 10 pW/√Hz, while remaining above the thermal-fluctuation fundamental limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the steep-slope effect is a property of the resonance lineshape rather than of bolometry, the operating-point strategy should transfer to other nonlinear resonant sensors, such as mass or gas detectors, whenever a Duffing nonlinearity is available.
  • A direct test of the absolute sensitivity claim would be to measure the noise floor with the 140 GHz source on, at the same transduction frequency and drive amplitude, and compare it with the dark Allan-deviation floor; if the bright floor is higher, the true NEP exceeds 30 pW/√Hz.
  • The inferred roughly 10% absorbance of the granular Cr/Au film suggests that engineering grain morphology in ultra-thin metal coatings is a practical lever for impedance matching, potentially bringing metal absorbers closer to the 188 Ω sheet-resistance ideal.
  • At drive amplitudes past the bifurcation, the readout becomes a binary jump rather than an analog slope, which could be developed into a click-style threshold detector for individual THz pulses if the thermal time constant is short enough.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes to improve the noise-equivalent power (NEP) of thermomechanical bolometers by operating the resonator on a steep slope of a nonlinear (Duffing) resonance, thereby increasing transduction responsivity without changing the dissipation rate. The authors characterize two Si3N4 trampoline devices with different absorbing layers (Cr/Au and pyrolitic carbon) at 140 GHz, measure dark and bright spectra, extract a dynamic responsivity from the spectral slope, combine it with dark Allan deviation noise to compute NEP as a function of drive frequency and modulation frequency, and report a best NEP of about 30 pW/Hz^(1/2) for the PyC device. They also discuss operation in the multistable regime for threshold detection.

Significance. The idea of using nonlinearity to steepen the transduction slope is physically motivated and could offer a practical alternative to high-Q engineering; the all-electrical readout is an advance over earlier optical-readout thermomechanical bolometers. The manuscript includes careful spectral characterization, a comparison of two absorber materials, and a clear discussion of dynamic-range limitations. However, the central quantitative claims—the slope-induced NEP reduction and the absolute 30 pW/Hz^(1/2) value—rest on assumptions about the noise floor that are not directly verified, and there is an internal inconsistency between the reported NEP reduction and the measured slope asymmetry. If these points are resolved, the work would constitute a meaningful contribution to room-temperature sub-THz detection.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (3) and Fig. 3] The reported NEP reduction factor of 117 for the PyC device is inconsistent with the measured slope asymmetry of about 5.6 in Fig. 3(b). According to Eq. (3), for a noise level sigma_AD independent of fD, the NEP ratio between the maximum and minimum slope operating points should equal the inverse of the slope ratio, i.e., about 5.6, not 117. The observed factor of 117 implies that sigma_AD at the steep-slope frequency is roughly 20 times smaller than at the shallow-slope frequency, but the manuscript neither reports sigma_AD as a function of fD nor offers any mechanism for such a strong variation. This point must be addressed before the NEP reduction can be attributed to the engineered slope.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (3)] The NEP calculation combines a dark Allan deviation sigma_AD (in volts) with a responsivity R that is proportional to dV/df. If the dominant noise at the operating point is frequency noise rather than additive voltage noise, then sigma_AD itself scales with dV/df and the NEP becomes independent of the slope. The paper does not identify which noise source dominates or demonstrate that sigma_AD is independent of fD; the observed NEP reduction therefore does not by itself prove that transduction along the slope improves the signal-to-noise ratio. A direct measurement of NEP under calibrated modulated illumination at fD, or an explicit characterization of sigma_AD(fD), is needed.
  3. [Section III and Fig. 2] The absolute NEP of about 30 pW/Hz^(1/2) is inferred from dark Allan deviation measurements divided by a dynamic responsivity derived from a rigid-shift model of the bright spectrum. The assumptions that the noise under 140 GHz illumination at fD is identical to the dark noise, and that the bright spectrum is a simple frequency shift of the dark one, are not experimentally verified. If illumination changes the mechanical dissipation or the operating point on the nonlinear response, the true NEP could be significantly higher. An end-to-end measurement with a calibrated modulated power source would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Section III, Fig. 3(e)] No error bars or uncertainty analysis are provided for the NEP values. Since the absolute NEP depends on several calibrations (Golay cell power, COC window transmission of about 50%, assumed absorbing area of 60 um x 85 um), the reported 30 pW/Hz^(1/2) should be accompanied by an uncertainty estimate.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III, p. 5] The phrase 'the PyC devicenegative derivative peak' contains a missing space; it should read 'the PyC device negative derivative peak'.
  2. [Figure 3(e)] The axis labels and tick marks for fM are difficult to read; please increase the font and ensure the axis range is clear.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 3(e) vs Fig. 2(b)] The statement that 'All NEP curves remain relatively constant as a function of fM' is surprising given the 20 Hz cut-off in the Bode response shown in Fig. 2(b); a brief explanation of why the NEP does not degrade at modulation frequencies above the thermal cut-off would improve clarity.
  4. [Section II.A] The assumption that both devices have the same vibrational amplitude at bifurcation, used to choose comparable driving voltages, is not justified; a sentence explaining why different absorber layers do not affect the bifurcation amplitude would be helpful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The reported NEP reduction at steep-slope frequencies is a rearrangement of Eqs. (2)-(3) (NEP is inversely proportional to the measured derivative), so the 117x/37.5x 'enhancement' is partly self-definitional; the absolute 30 pW/√Hz value rests on an unverified dark-noise-under-illumination assumption.

  1. self definitional [Section III, after Fig. 3; Eqs. (2) and (3)]
    "As expected from Eqs. (3) and (2), the NEP is inversely proportional to the derivative, resulting in net reductions of about a factor of 117 and 37.5, respectively, in good agreement with what one would expect from the results of Fig. 3 (b) and (d)."

    Equation (3) defines NEP = σ_AD sqrt(2τ)/R, while Eq. (2) defines the static responsivity as Rs(fD) ∝ dV_LI/df at fD. Therefore any quoted NEP reduction between two transduction frequencies is, by construction, the inverse of the measured derivative ratio, provided the noise σ_AD and the Bode factor are held fixed. The 'good agreement' is thus a mathematical consequence of the same spectra used to compute both the derivatives and the NEP, not an independent verification that nonlinearity improves detection. The non-trivial physical content is the measured steepening of the Duffing/Fano lineshape; the 'enhanced sensitivity' claim itself is baked into the NEP metric.

full rationale

The paper contains one genuinely self-definitional element: the central NEP-reduction claim is obtained by combining Eq. (3) (NEP = noise/responsivity) with Eq. (2) (responsivity ∝ spectral derivative), so the reduction factor is essentially the inverse derivative ratio. This is not a fitted-input-called-prediction or a self-citation chain; the slope, responsivity, and Allan deviation are all measured. However, the absolute NEP of ~30 pW/√Hz additionally depends on two unverified assumptions: (i) the dark Allan deviation σ_AD used in Eq. (3) equals the noise under 140 GHz illumination at the steep-slope operating point, and (ii) the bright spectrum is a rigid shift of the dark spectrum (Eq. (1)). The paper measures noise only in dark conditions while claiming the NEP is 'evaluated under an illuminating 140 GHz source'; this is a validation gap rather than a circular reduction. Self-citations [32], [36], and [49] are present but not load-bearing: [49] is an independent prior absorbance measurement, and [32]/[36] provide context and modeling. Overall, the derivation is not fully circular because the measured slope and noise floor carry independent empirical content, but the headline enhancement factor is largely imposed by the NEP definition, giving a partial-circularity score of 5.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central NEP claim is an experimental characterization, not a fitted model, and no new physical entities are introduced. The main uncharged inputs are the rigid-shift transduction approximation, the dark-noise-as-bright-noise assumption, the absorber-area power normalization, and the bifurcation-based cross-device normalization.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The bright (illuminated) spectrum is a rigid frequency shift of the dark spectrum for weak signals (Eq. 1), with no change in lineshape, damping, or nonlinear coefficient.
    Used to write ΔVLI as dAd/df times δf and to extract static responsivity from dark/bright spectra; radiation-induced changes to the Fano or Duffing parameters would break the derivative relation.
  • domain assumption The noise floor measured in the dark via Allan deviation equals the noise floor during illuminated operation at the steep-slope point.
    NEP in Eq. (3) combines dark σAD with bright-condition dynamic responsivity; no bright-state noise measurement is reported.
  • domain assumption Incident power Pi is computed over the absorber layer area (60 µm x 85 µm) using a calibrated beam profile and a measured COC window transmission of about 50%.
    Absolute NEP and static responsivity scale inversely with Pi; choosing the full membrane area or the diffraction-limited area would change the reported values.
  • domain assumption PyC film absorbance is about 40-43% at sub-THz as measured in ref. [49], and the Cr/Au absorbance is inferred from NEP and static-responsivity comparisons.
    The device-to-device absorption enhancement factor (7.94 vs 6.85) relies on these external and inferred absorptance values.
  • ad hoc to paper The two devices can be fairly compared by driving both at the same relative distance from bifurcation, assuming equal vibrational amplitude at bifurcation despite different absorber layers and assembly.
    Used to justify the 118 mV Au drive versus the 112 mV PyC drive; if the bifurcation amplitudes differ, the cross-device slope and NEP comparison is not properly normalized.
  • standard math Small-signal Taylor expansion and linear frequency-shift scaling with power hold over the operating range used for NEP extraction.
    Eq. (1) and the statement that the frequency shift scales linearly with intensity; the dynamic-range limits are acknowledged only qualitatively.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced sensitivity of sub-THz thermomechanical bolometers exploiting vibrational nonlinearity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VTASZNLH

@misc{pith2026241109071,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced sensitivity of sub-THz thermomechanical bolometers exploiting vibrational nonlinearity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VTASZNLH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09071}
}
abstract

A common approach to detecting weak signals or minute quantities involves leveraging the localized spectral features of resonant modes, whose sharper lines (i.e. high Q-factors) enhance transduction sensitivity. However, maximizing the Q-factor often introduces technical challenges in fabrication and design. In this work, we propose an alternative strategy to achieve sharper spectral features by using interference and nonlinearity, all while maintaining a constant dissipation rate. Using far-infrared thermomechanical detectors as a test case, we demonstrate that signal transduction along an engineered response curve slope effectively reduces the detector's noise equivalent power (NEP), achieving $\mathrm{\sim 30 \, pW/\sqrt{Hz}}$ NEP for electrical read-out, sub-THz detectors with an optimized absorbing layer.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09071 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a): Sketch of the experimental setup along with a SEM micrograph of one typical TMB. The device sits on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a): typical ON/OFF spectra for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Normalized vibrational spectrum (a) and its first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Normalized vibrational spectrum (a) of the PyC de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ikehara, J

    T. Ikehara, J. Lu, M. Konno, R. Maeda, and T. Mi- hara, A high quality-factor silicon cantilever for a low detection-limit resonant mass sensor operated in air, J. Micromech. Microeng. 17, 2491 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Y. Yang, S. Saurabh, J. M. Ward, and S. Nic Chormaic, High-q, ultrathin-walled microbubble resonator for aero- static pressure sensing, Optics express 24, 294 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    T. Chen, Z. Han, J. Liu, and Z. Hong, Terahertz gas sens- ing based on a simple one-dimensional photonic crystal cavity with high-quality factors, Appl. Opt., AO53, 3454 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    S´ anchez-Pastor, P

    J. S´ anchez-Pastor, P. Kad˘ era, M. Sakaki, R. Jakoby, J. Lacik, N. Benson, and A. Jim´ enez-S´ aez, A wireless w-band 3d-printed temperature sensor based on a three- dimensional photonic crystal operating beyond 1000 ° c, Communications Engineering 3, 137 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Zanotto, A

    S. Zanotto, A. Tredicucci, D. Navarro-Urrios, M. Cec- chini, G. Biasiol, D. Mencarelli, L. Pierantoni, and A. Pi- tanti, Optomechanics of chiral dielectric metasurfaces, Advanced Optical Materials 8, 1901507 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    D. Yang, H. Tian, and Y. Ji, High-Q and high-sensitivity width-modulated photonic crystal single nanobeam air- mode cavity for refractive index sensing, Appl. Opt., AO 54, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    D. Høj, F. Wang, W. Gao, U. B. Hoff, O. Sigmund, and U. L. Andersen, Ultra-coherent nanomechanical res- onators based on inverse design, Nature communications 12, 5766 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Tsaturyan, A

    Y. Tsaturyan, A. Barg, E. S. Polzik, and A. Schliesser, Ultracoherent nanomechanical resonators via soft clamp- ing and dissipation dilution, Nature nanotechnology 12, 776 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    N. J. Engelsen, A. Beccari, and T. J. Kippenberg, Ultrahigh-quality-factor micro-and nanomechanical res- onators using dissipation dilution, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy , 1 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Cupertino, D

    A. Cupertino, D. Shin, L. Guo, P. G. Steeneken, M. A. Bessa, and R. A. Norte, Centimeter-scale nanomechani- cal resonators with low dissipation, Nature Communica- tions 15, 4255 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    S. E. Zaki and M. A. Basyooni, Ultra-sensitive gas sen- sor based fano resonance modes in periodic and fibonacci quasi-periodic Pt/PtS2 structures, Sci Rep 12, 9759 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    S. M. Sherif and M. A. Swillam, Silicon-based mid in- frared on-chip gas sensor using Fano resonance of coupled plasmonic microcavities, Sci Rep 13, 12311 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    S. E. Zaki, A. Mehaney, H. M. Hassanein, and A. H. Aly, Fano resonance based defected 1D phononic crystal for highly sensitive gas sensing applications, Sci Rep 10, 17979 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Zhu and C

    J. Zhu and C. Wu, Optical refractive index sensor with Fano resonance based on original MIM waveguide struc- ture, Results in Physics 21, 103858 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Y. Tang, Z. Zhang, R. Wang, Z. Hai, C. Xue, W. Zhang, and S. Yan, Refractive index sensor based on fano reso- nances in metal-insulator-metal waveguides coupled with resonators, Sensors 17, 784 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Y. Kong, Q. Wei, C. Liu, and S. Wang, Nanoscale temperature sensor based on Fano resonance in metal– insulator–metal waveguide, Optics Communications384, 85 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in photonics, Nature photonics 11, 543 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    J. Yang, S. Rajasekar, and M. A. Sanju´ an, Vibrational resonance: A review, Physics Reports 1067, 1 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    V.-T. Pham, S. Vaidyanathan, and T. Kapitaniak, Com- plexity, dynamics, control, and applications of nonlinear systems with multistability, Complexity 2020 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Esmaeil Zadeh, J

    I. Esmaeil Zadeh, J. Chang, J. W. Los, S. Gyger, A. W. Elshaari, S. Steinhauer, S. N. Dorenbos, and V. Zwiller, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future devel- opments, and applications, Applied Physics Letters 118 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Pfenning, S

    A. Pfenning, S. Kr¨ uger, F. Jabeen, L. Worschech, F. Hartmann, and S. H¨ ofling, Single-photon counting with semiconductor resonant tunneling devices, Nanoma- terials 12, 2358 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Blakesley, P

    J. Blakesley, P. See, A. Shields, B. Kardyna l, P. Atkinson, I. Farrer, and D. Ritchie, Efficient single photon detec- tion by quantum dot resonant tunneling diodes, Physical review letters 94, 067401 (2005)

    2005

  15. [23]

    M. D. Dai, K. Eom, and C.-W. Kim, Nanomechani- cal mass detection using nonlinear oscillations, Applied Physics Letters 95, 203104 (2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    M. D. Dai, C.-W. Kim, and K. Eom, Nonlinear vibration behavior of graphene resonators and their applications in sensitive mass detection, Nanoscale research letters 7, 1 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Kumar, Y

    V. Kumar, Y. Yang, J. W. Boley, G. T.-C. Chiu, and J. F. Rhoads, Modeling, analysis, and experimental validation of a bifurcation-based microsensor, Journal of microelec- tromechanical systems 21, 549 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Yuksel, E

    M. Yuksel, E. Orhan, C. Yanik, A. B. Ari, A. Demir, and M. S. Hanay, Nonlinear nanomechanical mass spectrome- try at the single-nanoparticle level, Nano letters 19, 3583 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    M. S. Al-Ghamdi, M. E. Khater, K. M. E. Stewart, A. Al- neamy, E. M. Abdel-Rahman, and A. Penlidis, Dynamic bifurcation MEMS gas sensors, J. Micromech. Microeng. 29, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Y. S. Shama, S. Rahmanian, H. Mouharrar, R. Abdelrah- man, A. Elhady, and E. M. Abdel-Rahman, Unraveling the nature of sensing in electrostatic mems gas sensors, Microsystems & Nanoengineering 10, 56 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Zhang, L

    M.-N. Zhang, L. Dong, L.-F. Wang, and Q.-A. Huang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in silicon microme- chanical resonators, Microsystems & Nanoengineering 10, 12 (2024). 8

    2024

  22. [30]

    Blaikie, D

    A. Blaikie, D. Miller, and B. J. Alem´ an, A fast and sensitive room-temperature graphene nanomechanical bolometer, Nature communications 10, 4726 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Hosono, N. Nagai, and K. Song S.-H., Hi- rakawa, Fast and sensitive bolometric terahertz detection at room temperature through thermomechanical trans- duction, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 151602 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Vicarelli, A

    L. Vicarelli, A. Tredicucci, and A. Pitanti, Micromechani- cal Bolometers for Subterahertz Detection at Room Tem- perature, ACS Photonics 9, 360 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Piller, J

    M. Piller, J. Hiesberger, E. Wistrela, P. Martini, N. Luh- mann, and S. Schmid, Thermal ir detection with nano- electromechanical silicon nitride trampoline resonators, IEEE Sensors Journal 23, 1066 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Zhang, E

    C. Zhang, E. K. Yalavarthi, M. Giroux, W. Cui, M. Stephan, A. Maleki, A. Weck, J.-M. M´ enard, and R. St-Gelais, High detectivity terahertz radiation sens- ing using frequency-noise-optimized nanomechanical res- onators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16503 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Duraffourg, L

    L. Duraffourg, L. Laurent, J.-S. Moulet, J. Arcamone, and J.-J. Yon, Array of resonant electromechanical nanosystems: A technological breakthrough for uncooled infrared imaging, Micromachines 9, 401 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Gregorat, M

    L. Gregorat, M. Cautero, L. Vicarelli, D. Giuressi, A. Bagolini, A. Tredicucci, G. Cautero, and A. Pitanti, Highly dispersive multiplexed micromechanical device array for spatially resolved sensing and actuation, Mi- crosyst. Nanoeng. (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    C. Li, Y. Zhang, and K. Hirakawa, Terahertz Detectors Using Microelectromechanical System Resonators, Sen- sors 23, 5938 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Schmid, L

    S. Schmid, L. G. Villanueva, and M. L. Roukes, Funda- mentals of nanomechanical resonators, Vol. 49 (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    H. G. Schuster, Reviews of nonlinear dynamics and com- plexity (Wiley Online Library, 2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Kanellopulos, F

    K. Kanellopulos, F. Ladinig, S. Emminger, P. Martini, R. G. West, and S. Schmid, Comparative analysis of nanomechanical resonators: Sensitivity, response time, and practical considerations in photothermal sensing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03295 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    R. A. Norte, J. P. Moura, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Mechan- ical resonators for quantum optomechanics experiments at room temperature, Physical review letters116, 147202 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Reinhardt, T

    C. Reinhardt, T. M¨ uller, A. Bourassa, and J. C. Sankey, Ultralow-noise sin trampoline resonators for sensing and optomechanics, Physical Review X 6, 021001 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Venstra, H

    W. Venstra, H. Westra, K. B. Gavan, and H. Van Der Zant, Magnetomotive drive and detection of clamped-clamped mechanical resonators in water, Ap- plied Physics Letters 95 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    Chien, J

    M.-H. Chien, J. Steurer, P. Sadeghi, N. Cazier, and S. Schmid, Nanoelectromechanical position-sensitive de- tector with picometer resolution, ACS photonics 7, 2197 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    M. L. Mura, P. Lamberti, V. Tucci, J. Jorudas, M. Co- jocari, G. Fedorov, and P. Kuzhir, Exploring the Im- pact of Absorber Material on the Performance of a Ter- ahertz Microbolometer by Finite Element Analysis, in 2023 IEEE Nanotechnology Materials and Devices Con- ference (N...

    2023

  38. [46]

    M. Haddadi. M, B. Das, J. Jeong, S. Kim, and D.-S. Kim, Near-maximum microwave absorption in a thin metal film at the pseudo-free-standing limit, Scientific Reports 12, 18386 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Kaplas and P

    T. Kaplas and P. Kuzhir, Ultra-Thin Pyrocarbon Films as a Versatile Coating Material, Nanoscale Res Lett 12, 121 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Kaplas and Y

    T. Kaplas and Y. P. Svirko, Direct deposition of semi- transparent conducting pyrolytic carbon films, JNP 6, 061703 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Jorudas, H

    J. Jorudas, H. Rehman, M. Cojocari, D. Pashnev, A. Ur- banowicz, I. Kaˇ salynas, B. Bertoni, L. Vicarelli, A. Pi- tanti, S. Malykhin, Y. Svirko, P. Kuzhir, and G. Fe- dorov, Ultra-broadband absorbance of nanometer-thin pyrolyzed-carbon film on silicon nitride membrane, Nan- ot...

    2024

  42. [50]

    Martini, K

    P. Martini, K. Kanellopulos, S. Emminger, N. Luhmann, M. Piller, R. G. West, and S. Schmid, Uncooled thermal infrared detection near the fundamental limit using a sil- icon nitride nanomechanical resonator with a broadband absorber, Commun. Phys. 8, 1 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    M. A. Ordal, L. Long, R. J. Bell, S. Bell, R. Bell, R. W. Alexander, and C. Ward, Optical properties of the metals al, co, cu, au, fe, pb, ni, pd, pt, ag, ti, and w in the infrared and far infrared, Applied optics 22, 1099 (1983)

    1983

  44. [52]

    Rogalski, Infrared Detectors, 2nd ed

    A. Rogalski, Infrared Detectors, 2nd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    Virginia diodes detectors, https://www.vadiodes.com/ en/products/detectors

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.