Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Indication of p + 11B Reaction in Laser Induced Nanofusion Experiment

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports experimental evidence that protons accelerated by laser-driven nanoplasmonic antennas can trigger proton-boron fusion in a solid polymer target.

desk verdict New nanoplasmonic p-11B target geometry with a load-bearing claim that fails a simple quantitative consistency check; the paper overreaches its own data. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09796 v1 pith:SF3Z7PIM submitted 2024-11-14 physics.plasm-ph

N. Kroó , L.P. Csernai , I. Papp , M.A. Kedves , M. Aladi , A. Bonyár , M. Szalóki , K. Osvay
show 2 more authors
P. Varmazyar T.S. Biró (for the NAPLIFE Collaboration)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords p-11Bfusionaneutroniclaser-inducednanoplasmonicsgoldnanorodsprotonaccelerationCR-39trackdetectorsboronnitride
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports experimental evidence that protons accelerated by laser-driven nanoplasmonic antennas can trigger proton-boron fusion (p + 11B -> 3 alpha) in a solid polymer target. The key signature is a sharp, roughly 70% drop in the number of backward-emitted protons when the laser pulse duration reaches the point where the accelerated protons hit the 150 keV resonance energy of the p+11B cross section. A second peak in CR-39 track diameters, attributed to alpha particles, supports the fusion interpretation. If correct, this would show that a tabletop-scale femtosecond laser, with absorption regulated by embedded gold nanorods, can initiate aneutronic fusion in a cheap, non-radioactive solid target. The authors frame this as a step toward a fusion scheme in which ignition happens simultaneously throughout the target volume rather than through hot-spot compression.

What carries the argument

Three elements carry the argument: (1) gold nanorod antennas (85 nm by 25 nm) embedded in the target, which resonate with the laser field and accelerate protons via a laser-wakefield-like mechanism, with protons gaining energy over successive ~2.65 fs laser periods; (2) the 150 keV resonance in the p+11B cross section, with a width of about 25 keV, which absorbs protons in that energy window and converts them into three alpha particles; and (3) CR-39 plastic track detectors, whose track diameters distinguish alpha particles from lighter ions. The logic is that once protons reach 150 keV, the boron resonance depletes them from the backward-emitted proton population, and the simultaneous appearance of alpha tracks confirms that the depletion is due to fusion.

What would settle it

Measure the alpha-particle energy spectrum with a calibrated silicon detector at pulse durations near 120 fs: the p+11B reaction at 150 keV produces alpha particles with well-defined energies, and failing to see these characteristic alpha energies at the pulse durations where the proton dip occurs would falsify the fusion interpretation. A second decisive check is to repeat the proton-count measurement at 120 fs with boron-free targets under identical shot statistics; if the dip persists, it is a plasma artifact rather than resonance absorption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a small but significant number of p+11B fusion reactions occur when protons accelerated to about 150 keV by resonant gold nanorod antennas in a UDMA-TEGDMA copolymer target meet boron-11 nuclei introduced as boron-nitride nanoparticles. The evidence is a drop in the backward proton signal by roughly a factor of three (from about 11 million to 4 million counts) at laser pulse durations of about 100 to 180 fs, which corresponds to the energy window where the p+11B cross section peaks; the same drop is absent in targets without boron nitride. Supporting this, CR-39 track detectors show a distinct track-diameter peak attributed to alpha particles, the fusion products.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the sharp drop in backward proton counts at pulse durations of 100 to 180 fs is caused by protons near 150 keV being absorbed by boron-11 in fusion reactions, rather than by ordinary shot-to-shot variation in laser-plasma conditions or target damage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Proton energies from 100 to 225 keV can be produced in a thick polymer target by tuning laser pulse duration, making fusion-relevant energies accessible without ultrathin foils.
  • The sharp resonance dip provides an in-situ diagnostic for the onset of p+11B fusion in laser-plasma experiments.
  • Increasing laser pulse energy from 25 mJ toward the 2 to 20 J range, as the authors plan, should raise the fusion yield if the acceleration mechanism holds.
  • Two-sided irradiation of the flat target could enable simultaneous volume ignition, simplifying the geometry compared to conventional inertial confinement fusion.
  • Because the fuel is aneutronic and non-radioactive, a working scheme would avoid neutron damage and radioactive waste.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 150 keV dip is confirmed with higher statistics, the same resonance could serve as a calibrated proton-energy marker for laser-plasma acceleration, since the dip position is set by nuclear physics rather than by detector calibration.
  • The authors' explanation implies that varying the boron-11 density should change the size of the dip; a measurement of the dip as a function of BN concentration would provide a direct quantitative test that is not present in the current data.
  • The alpha-track peak could be checked against CR-39 response functions, and detecting the characteristic energies of the three alpha branches would distinguish p+11B reactions from competing reactions such as p+14N or background carbon reactions.
  • If the mechanism scales, it suggests a path to compact, high-repetition-rate neutron-free fusion sources for materials testing and medical isotope production, although net energy gain remains far out of reach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments in which 25 mJ, 12–360 fs laser pulses irradiate UDMA-TEGDMA copolymer targets containing resonant gold nanorods and, in some cases, BN nanoparticles. The authors observe a decrease in backward-directed proton counts at pulse durations around 100–180 fs and interpret this as depletion of 150 keV protons by the p + 11B fusion resonance. They also report a second peak in CR-39 track diameters, attributed to alpha particles, and conclude that a small but significant number of fusion reactions have taken place.

Significance. If validated, the result would be a notable step toward compact aneutronic fusion using nanostructured targets, and the paper deserves credit for reporting shot counts, target composition, and a clear experimental protocol. However, the central claim is not quantitatively supported: the fusion probability implied by the paper's own parameters is orders of magnitude too small to account for the observed proton-count drop, and the supporting alpha-particle evidence lacks calibration. The paper's strengths are its explicit data-availability statement and the reproducibility of its target preparation, but the evidence as presented does not meet the standard for a fusion-reaction claim.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results, pB Fusion and Fig. 3] The proton energy scale, including the statement that protons reach 150–225 keV, is based on the collaboration's own EPOCH PIC simulations [21] and previous reports [37,46,54], rather than on direct measurement. The Thomson parabola is calibrated only at low proton energies [44], and the maximum proton energy values in Fig. 3 lack experimental error bars. The alignment of the observed proton-count dip with the 150 keV resonance is therefore contingent on unverified simulation input, which weakens the central identification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, Fig. 2 text] The text says the drop is 'approximately 70% loss' between 100 and 180 fs, but the stated values of 11 to 4 million counts correspond to about a 64% drop; these numbers should be reconciled.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] In the caption, 'Tomson' should be 'Thomson' to match the detector name used elsewhere.
  3. [Summary] The phrase 'C39 emulsion' should be 'CR-39', and CR-39 is a plastic track detector, not an emulsion.
  4. [Results, pB Fusion] The sentence 'This clearly indicates that reaction (1) took place' is too strong in the absence of error bars and significance tests; a more cautious wording such as 'is consistent with' would better match the evidence presented.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] The term 'proton pixel signal' is undefined; the ordinate should be described explicitly (e.g., 'integrated proton count on the detector').

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fusion claim rests on direct proton-count and CR-39 observations plus external cross-section data, with self-citations serving only as supporting context.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is experimental rather than definitional. The load-bearing observations are the BN-dependent drop in the integrated backward proton signal at 100-180 fs pulse durations (Fig. 2), the Thomson-parabola maximum-proton-energy measurements (Fig. 3), and the CR-39 track-diameter histogram with a second peak attributed to alpha particles (Fig. 4). The 150 keV resonance energy and the p+11B cross-section are taken from external nuclear-physics references [47-49], not from the present data. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then renamed as a prediction; the paper performs no numerical fitting at all. The self-citations [20,21,37,46,54] support the plasmonic acceleration mechanism, crater formation, and earlier deuterium observations, but the present fusion interpretation also relies on the measured proton energy data and on the external cross-section, so these self-cited results are not the sole load-bearing input. A reviewer may legitimately question whether a ~64% proton-count drop is quantitatively consistent with the standard 100 mb resonance cross-section given the estimated boron density and target thickness, and may ask for error-bar and control-shot statistics, but that is a quantitative-consistency and correctness concern, not circularity. Likewise, the identification of the second CR-39 peak as alpha tracks is an interpretation needing calibration, but it is not defined in terms of the fusion conclusion. No equation in the paper reduces the conclusion to its own inputs, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors. Under the stated hard rules, the correct finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the known p+B resonance (external literature), the authors' own simulation of proton acceleration, and an uncalibrated CR-39 track assignment. No new entities are introduced; the nanorod antennas are physical elements from prior NAPLIFE work. The most fragile input is the assumption that the proton-count dip is caused by fusion rather than by experimental variability.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The p+11B cross section has a resonance at ER=150 keV with width ~25 keV and peak ~100 mb.
    Taken from Refs [47-49]; used to predict the pulse durations where proton depletion should appear.
  • domain assumption The laser-plasmonic mechanism accelerates protons to energies reaching 150-225 keV over 100-250 fs pulse durations.
    Based on the collaboration's own EPOCH PIC simulations [21]; no independent measurement of the proton energy spectrum inside the target is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The measured backward proton count is directly depleted by fusion reactions at the resonance energy, and the drop is not caused by laser or target variability.
    The paper asserts this interpretation around Fig. 2 but provides no statistical test or systematic variation to exclude other causes; this is the core interpretive assumption.
  • domain assumption CR-39 track diameter around 12 micrometres identifies alpha particles.
    The paper assigns the second peak in the track-diameter histogram to alphas without showing a calibration of CR-39 response for mixed ion fields at these energies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Indication of p + 11B Reaction in Laser Induced Nanofusion Experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SF3Z7PIM

@misc{pith2026241109796,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Indication of p + 11B Reaction in Laser Induced Nanofusion Experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SF3Z7PIM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09796}
}
read the original abstract

The NanoPlasmonic Laser Induced Fusion Energy (NAPLIFE) project proposed fusion by regulating the laser light absorption via resonant nanorod antennas implanted into hydrogen rich urethane acrylate methacrylate (UDMA) and triethylene glycol dimethylacrylate (TEGDMA) copolymer targets. In part of the tests, boron-nitride (BN) was added to the polymer. Our experiments with resonant nanoantennas accelerated protons up to 225 keV energy. Some of these protons then led to p + 11B fusion, indicated by the sharp drop of observed backward proton emission numbers at the 150 keV resonance energy of the reaction. The generation of alpha particles was verified by CR-39 (Columbia Resin #39) nuclear plastic track detectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09796 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The integral number of proton signals in a backward direction, measured at ELI-ALPS SEA laser with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Maximum proton energy detected in the backward 45-degree direction with respect to the laser beam for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Number of impact traces versus the diameter of the trace spot in µm in CR-39 detections with boron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [44]

    Varmazyar, P.K

    P. Varmazyar, P.K. Singh, Z. Elekes, Z. Halász, B. Nagy, J.-G. Son, J. Csontos, A. Mohácsi, K. Nelissen, T. Somoskői, R. E. Szabo, Sz. Toth, S. Ter-Avetisyan, K. Osvay, Calibration of a micro- channel plate detector in a Thomson ion spectrometer for protons and carbon ions below 1 MeV, Review of Scientific Instruments 93, 073301, (2022). https://doi.org/1...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0086747 2022

  2. [21]

    Mishustin, Anton Motornenko, Péter Rácz, Leonid M

    István Papp, Larissa Bravina, Mária Csete, Archana Kumari, Igor N. Mishustin, Anton Motornenko, Péter Rácz, Leonid M. Satarov, Horst Stöcker, András Szenes, Dávid Vass, Tamás S. Biró, László P. Csernai, Norbert Kroó, on behalf of NAPLIFE Collaboration, PIC simulations of laser-induced proton acceleration by resonant nanoantennas for fusion, arXiv:2306.134...

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.13445

  3. [1]

    L. P. Csernai, M. Csete, I. N. Mishustin, A. Motornenko, I. Papp, L. M. Satarov, H. Stöcker, N. Kroó (NAPLIFE Collaboration), Radiation dominated implosion with flat target, arXiv:1903.10896, Physics of Wave Phenomena, 28 (3), 187-199 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1541308X20030048

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  4. [2]

    Nanoscale ultradense Z - pinch formation from laser-irradiated nanowire arrays,

    V. Kaymak, A. Pukhov, V. N. Shlyaptsev, J.J. Rocca, “Nanoscale ultradense Z - pinch formation from laser-irradiated nanowire arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 035004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [3]

    46 (4) 327-331 (2016)

    Kaymak, V; Pukhov, A; Shlyaptsev, VN; Rocca, JJ, Strong ionization in carbon nanowires, Quantum Electronics, Vol. 46 (4) 327-331 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [4]

    and Methods in Physics Research A, 985, 164680 (2021)

    Peter Rubovič, Aldo Bonasera, Petr Burian, Zheng Xuan Cao, Changbo Fu, Defeng Kong, Haoyang Lan, Yao Lou, Wen Luo, Chong Lv, Yugang Mah, Wenjun Mae, Zhiguo, Ma, Lukáš Meduna, Zhusong Mei, Yesid Mora, Zhuo Pan, Yinren Shou, Rudolf Sýkora, Martin Veselský, Pengjie Wang, Wenzhao Wang, Xueqing Yan, Guoqiang Zhang, Jiarui, Zhao, Yanying Zhao, Jan Žemlička, Mea...

    work page 2021

  7. [5]

    Csernai, Detonation on a time-like front for relativistic systems, Zh

    L.P. Csernai, Detonation on a time-like front for relativistic systems, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 92, 379- 386 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [6]

    Csernai and D.D

    L.P. Csernai and D.D. Strottman, Volume ignition via time-like detonation in pellet fusion, Laser and Particle Beams, 33, 279-282 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 54 references
  1. [7]

    Csernai, N

    L.P. Csernai, N. Kroo, and I. Papp, Radiation dominated implosion with nano-plasmonics, Laser and Particle Beams, 36 (2), 171-178 (2018)

    2018

  2. [8]

    Phys.: Conf

    Picosecond-petawatt laser-block ignition for avalanche fusion of boron by ultrahigh acceleration and ultrahigh magnetic fields, H Hora, P Lalousis, L Giuffrida, D Margarone, G Korn, S Eliezer, G H Miley, S Moustaizis, G Mourou and C P J Barty, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 717 012024 (...

    2016 doi

  3. [9]

    In-Target Proton–Boron Nuclear Fusion Using a PW-Class Laser Daniele Margarone, Julien Bonvalet, Lorenzo Giuffrida, Alessio Morace, Vasiliki Kantarelou, Marco Tosca, Didier Raffestin, Philippe Nicolai, Antonino 10 Picciotto, Yuki Abe, Yasunobu Arikawa,Shinsuke Fujioka, Yuji Fu...

    2022 doi

  4. [10]

    N. Kroó, S. Varró, P. Rácz, and P. Dombi, Surface plasmons, a strong alliance of electrons and light, Physica Scripta, 91(5), 053010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/91/5/053010

    2016 doi

  5. [11]

    Stockman, S.V

    M.J. Stockman, S.V. Foleev, D.J. Bergman, Localization versus Delocalization of Surface Plasmons in Nanosystems: Can One State Have Both Characteristics? Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167401 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167401

    2001 doi

  6. [12]

    Stockman, M.E

    M.J. Stockman, M.E. Kling, U. Kleinberg, F. Krausz, Attosecond nanoplasmonic-field microscope, Nature Photon 1, 539 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.169

    2007 doi

  7. [13]

    Varró, N

    S. Varró, N. Kroó, Nonlinear photoelectron emission from metal surfaces induced by short laser pulses: the effects of field enhancement by surface plasmons, Applied Physics B 105, 509 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4582-4

    2011 doi

  8. [14]

    N. Kroó, P. Rácz, J. Tüttő, Plasmonic dynamic screening in gold film by intense femtosecond light, EPL 115, 27010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/115/27010

    2016 doi

  9. [15]

    Wong and P.J

    A.J. Wong and P.J. Cheung, Three-Dimensional Self-Collapse of Langmuir Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1222 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1222

    1984 doi

  10. [16]

    Lee, L.C

    K.H. Lee, L.C. Lee and A.Y. Wong, Acceleration of ions and neutrals by a traveling wave, Physics of Plasmas 25, 023113 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5013075

    2018 doi

  11. [17]

    Guffay and A.J

    M.J. Guffay and A.J. Wong, Ponderomotive Screening of Nuclear Fusion Reactions Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance, arxiv: 2106.08127v1 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.08127

    doi arXiv

  12. [18]

    Dodonov, E.V

    V.V. Dodonov, E.V. Kurmyshev and V.I. Manko, Generalized uncertainty relation and correlated coherent states, Phys. Lett. A 79 (2,3), 150 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(80)90231-5

    1980 doi

  13. [19]

    Bartalucci, V.I

    S. Bartalucci, V.I. Vysotskii, M.V. Vysotskii, Correlated states and nuclear reactions: An experimental test with low energy beams, Phys. Rev. Accelerators & Beams 22 054513 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.054503

    2019 doi

  14. [20]

    Mishustin, Dénes Molnár, Anton Motornenko, Péter Rácz, Leonid M

    István Papp, Larissa Bravina, Mária Csete, Archana Kumari, Igor N. Mishustin, Dénes Molnár, Anton Motornenko, Péter Rácz, Leonid M. Satarov, Horst Stöcker, Daniel D. Strottman, András Szenes, Dávid Vass, Tamás S. Biró, László P. Csernai, and Norbert Kroó, (NAPLIFE Collaboratio...

    2022 doi

  15. [22]

    Double-cone ignition scheme for inertial confinement fusion,

    J. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Yang, D. Wu, Y. Ma, J. Jiao, Z. Zhang, F. Wu, X. Yuan, Y. Li, and J. Zhu, 11 “Double-cone ignition scheme for inertial confinement fusion,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 378 (2184), 20200015 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0015

    2020

  16. [23]

    Efficient energy transition from kinetic to internal energy in supersonic collision of high-density plasma jets from conical implosions,

    Z. Zhang, X. Yuan, Y. Zhang, H. Liu, K. Fang, C. Zhang, Z. Liu, X. Zhao, Q. Dong, G. Liu, Y. Dai, H. Gu, Y. Li, J. Zheng, J. Zhong, and J. Zhang, “Efficient energy transition from kinetic to internal energy in supersonic collision of high-density plasma jets from conical implo...

    2022 doi

  17. [24]

    Machine-learning guided optimization of laser pulses for direct-drive implosions,

    F.Y. Wu, X. Yang, Y. Ma, Q. Zhang, Z. Zhang, X. Yuan, H. Liu, Z. Liu, J. Zhong, J. Zheng, Y. Li, and J. Zhang, “Machine-learning guided optimization of laser pulses for direct-drive implosions,” High Power Laser Sci. 10, e12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/hpl.2022.4

    2022 doi

  18. [25]

    Two-dimensional radiation hydrodynamic simulations of high-speed head-on collisions between high- density plasma jets,

    M. Yang, F. Wu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, Z. Chen, Z. Fang, R. Rafael, and J. Zhang, “Two-dimensional radiation hydrodynamic simulations of high-speed head-on collisions between high- density plasma jets,” Acta Phys. Sin. 71 (22), 198–206 (2022). https://doi.org/10...

    2022 doi

  19. [26]

    Zhang, M

    G. Zhang, M. Huang, A. Bonasera, Y.G. Ma, B.F. Shen, H.W. Wang, J.C. Xu, G.T. Fan, H.J. Fu, H. Xue, H. Zheng, L.X. Liu, S. Zhang, W.J. Li, X.G. Cao, X.G. Deng, X.Y. Li, Y.C. Liu, Y. Yu, Y. Zhang, C.B. Fu, and X.P. Zhang, Nuclear probes of an out-of-equilibrium plasma at the hi...

    2019 doi

  20. [27]

    and Methods in Physics Research A, 985, 164680 (2021)

    Peter Rubovic, Aldo Bonasera, Petr Burian, Zheng Xuan Cao, Changbo Fu, Defeng Kong, Haoyang Lan, Yao Lou, Wen Luo, Chong Lv, Yugang Mah, Wenjun Mae, Zhiguo Ma, Lukáˇs Meduna, Zhusong Mei, Yesid Mora, Zhuo Pan, Yinren Shou, Rudolf S´ykora, Martin Veselsk´y, Pengjie Wang, Wenzha...

    2021

  21. [28]

    https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120845

    Defeng Kong, Guoqiang Zhang, Yinren Shou, Shirui Xu, Zhusong Mei, Zhengxuan Cao, Zhuo Pan, Pengjie Wang, Guijun Qi, Yao Lou, Zhiguo Ma, Haoyang Lan, Wenzha Wang, Yunhui Li, Peter Rubovic, Martin Veselsky, Aldo Bonasera, Jiarui Zhao, Yixing Geng, Yanying Zhao, Changbo Fu, Wen L...

    2022 doi

  22. [29]

    Extremes 2, 177–189 (2017)

    Heinrich Hora; Shalom Eliezer; Noaz Nissim; Paraskevas Lalousis, Non-thermal laser driven plasma- blocks for proton boron avalanche fusion as direct drive option, Matter Radiat. Extremes 2, 177–189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mre.2017.05.001

    2017 doi

  23. [30]

    Labaune, C

    C. Labaune, C. Baccou, S. Depierreux, C. Goyon, G. Loisel, V. Yahia & J. Rafelski, Fusion reactions initiated by laser-accelerated particle beams in a laser-produced plasma, Nature Communications 4, 2506 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3506

    2013 doi

  24. [31]

    H. Hora, Extreme CPA Laser Pulses for Igniting Nuclear Fusion of Hydrogen with Boron-11 by Non- thermal Pressures for Avoiding Ultrahigh Temperatures, Journal of Energy and Power Engineering 14, 12 156-177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-8975/2020.05.003

    2020 doi

  25. [32]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00496-8

    Hongwei Zang, Helong Li, Wei Zhang, Yao Fu, Shanming Chen, Huailiang Xu & Ruxin Li Robust and ultralow-energy-threshold ignition of a lean mixture by an ultrashort-pulsed laser in the filamentation regime, Nature Light: Science & Applications, 10, 49 (2021). https://doi.org/10...

    2021 doi

  26. [33]

    Mehlhorn, T.A

    Warren McKenzie, Dimitri Batani, Thomas A. Mehlhorn, T.A. Daniele Margarone, Fabio Belloni, E. Michael Campbell, Simon Woodruff, Jan Kirchhoff, Adrian Paterson, Sergey Pikuz, Heinrich Hora, HB11—Understanding Hydrogen-Boron Fusion as a New Clean Energy Source, J Fusion Energy ...

    2023 doi

  27. [34]

    Plasmas 25, 020701 (2018)

    Fabio Belloni, Daniele Margarone, Antonio Picciotto, Francesco Schilaci, Lorenzo Giuffrida, On the enhancement of p + 11 B fusion reaction rate in laser-driven plasma by α → collisional energy transfer Phys. Plasmas 25, 020701 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007923

    2018 doi

  28. [35]

    Hua-sheng Xie, Xue-yun Wang, On the Upper Bound of Non-Thermal Fusion Reactivity with Fixed Total Energy, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 66, 065009 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad3f4b

    2024 doi

  29. [36]

    Lattuada, M

    D. Lattuada, M. Barbarino, A. Bonasera, W. Bang, H. J. Quevedo, M. Warren, F. Consoli,R. De Angelis, P. Andreoli, S. Kimura, G. Dyer, A. C. Bernstein, K. Hagel, M. Barbui, K. Schmidt, E. Gaul, M. E. Donovan, J. B. Natowitz, and T. Ditmire, Model-independent determination of th...

    2016 doi

  30. [37]

    Monitoring of nanoplasmonics assisted deuterium production in a polymer seeded with resonant Au nanorods using in situ femtosecond laser induced breakdown spectroscopy

    N. Kroó, M. Aladi, M. Kedves, B. Ráczkevi, A. Kumari, P. Rácz, M. Veres, G. Galbács, L.P. Csernai, T.S. Biró, (for the NAPLIFE Collaboration), “Monitoring of nanoplasmonics assisted deuterium production in a polymer seeded with resonant Au nanorods using in situ femtosecond la...

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Sz. Toth, T. Stanislauskas, I. Balciunas, R. Budriunas, J. Adamonis, R. Danilevicius, K. Viskontas, D. Lengvinas, G. Veitas, D. Gadonas, A. Varanavicius, J. Csontos, T. Somoskoi,L. Toth, A. Borzsonyi, K. Osvay, SYLOS lasers -the frontier of few-cycle, multi-TW, kHz lasers for ...

    2020 doi

  32. [39]

    Ter-Avetisyan, P

    S. Ter-Avetisyan, P. Varmazyar, P.K. Singh, J-G. Son, M. Fule, V. Y. Bychenkov, B. Farkas, K. Nelissen, S. Mondal, D. Papp, A. Borzsonyi, J. Csontos, Zs. Lecz, T. Somoskoi, L. Toth, Sz. Toth, V. Andriy, D. Margarone, A. Necas, G. Mourou, G. Szabo, K. Osvay, Ion acceleration wi...

    2023 doi

  33. [40]

    Cecchetti, Sandrine A

    Patrizio Antici, Julien Fuchs, Emmanuel d’Humi`eres, Erik Lefebvre, Marco Borghesi, Erik Brambrink, Carlo A. Cecchetti, Sandrine A. Gaillard, Lorenzo Romagnani, Yasuhiko Sentoku, Toma Toncian, Patrick Audebert, and Henri Pépin,” Generation of MeV-Range Protons From 30–100 nm S...

    2008

  34. [41]

    Afshari, J

    M. Afshari, J. Hornung, A. Kleinschmidt, P. Neumayer, D. Bertini, V. Bagnoud,” Proton acceleration via the TNSA mechanism using a smoothed laser focus”, AIP Advances 10, 035023 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117236

    2020 doi

  35. [42]

    R. A. Simpson, D. A. Mariscal, J. Kim, G. G. Scott, G. J. Williams, E. Grace, C. McGuffey, S. Wilks, A. Kemp, N. Lemos, B. Z. Djordjevic, E. Folsom, D. Kalantar, R. Zacharias, B. Pollock, J. Moody, F. Beg, A. Morace, N. Iwata, Y. Sentoku, M. J-E. Manuel, M. Mauldin, M. Quinn, ...

    2021

  36. [43]

    Costa and L

    G. Costa and L. Torrisi,” Dependence of high-energy proton acceleration in TNSA regime by fs laser on the laser pulse shape”, Journal of Instrumentation, 15, C06030 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/06/C06030

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    Aladi, M

    M. Aladi, M. Kedves, B. Ráczkevi, NAPLIFE experiments at ELI-ALPS, In preparation (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Biró, László P

    Agnes Nagyné Szokol, Judit Kámán, Roman Holomb, Márk Aladi, Miklós Kedves, Béla Ráczkevi, Péter Rácz, Attila Bonyár, Alexandra Borók, Shereen Zangana, Melinda Szalóki, István Papp, Gábor Galbács, Tamás S. Biró, László P. Csernai, Norbert Kroó, Miklós Veres, NAPLIFE Collaborati...

    doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fabio Belloni and Katarzyna Batani,” Multiplication Processes in High-Density H-11B Fusion Fuel”, Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 2022, e11 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3952779

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Sikora and H.R

    M.H. Sikora and H.R. Weller,” A New Evaluation of the 11B (p, α) αα Reaction Rates”, Journal of Fusion Energy, 35 (3), 538–543, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-016-0069-y

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    Becker, C

    H.W. Becker, C. Rolfs, C. and H.P. Trautvetter,” Low-energy cross sections for 11B(p, 3α)”, Zeitschrift für Physik A Atomic Nuclei, 327 (3), 341–355 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284459

    1987 doi

  42. [50]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.06.008

    Salvatore Simone Perrotta, Aldo Bonasera, Fusion hindrance effects in laser-induced non-neutral plasmas, Nuclear Physics A 989, Pages 168-186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.06.008

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    A. M. Stefanini, G. Montagnoli, M. Del Fabbro, L. Corradi, E. Fioretto & S. Szilner, The slopes of sub- barrier heavy-ion fusion excitation functions shed light on the dynamics of quantum tunnelling, 14 Scientific Reports 14, Article number: 12849 (2024). https://doi.org/10.10...

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    Hagino, N

    K. Hagino, N. Takigawa, Subbarrier fusion reactions and many-particle quantum tunneling, Prog. Theor. Phys. 128, 1061-1106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.128.1061

    2012 doi

  45. [53]

    Batista, Tunneling through Coulombic barriers: quantum control of nuclear fusion, Molecular Physics, 110 (9-10), 995-999 (2012)

    Rajdeep Saha, Andreas Markmann & Victor S. Batista, Tunneling through Coulombic barriers: quantum control of nuclear fusion, Molecular Physics, 110 (9-10), 995-999 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2012.679635

    2012

  46. [54]

    Csernai, Igor N

    László P. Csernai, Igor N. Mishustin, Leonid M. Satarov, Horst Stoecker, Larissa Bravina, Mária Csete, Judit Kámán, Archana Kumari, Anton Motornenko, István Papp, Peter Rácz, Daniel D. Strottman, András Szenes, Agnes Szokol, Dávid Vass, Miklós Veres, Tamás S. Biró, Norbert Kro...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.