Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Long time well-posedness for the 3D Prandtl boundary layer equations with a special structure

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The 3D Prandtl boundary layer equations are solvable on any time interval [0,T] under a monotonicity condition plus a special secondary-flow structure, provided the initial perturbation around a shear flow is exponentially small.

desk verdict The special structure v=Ku degenerates: Burgers equation forces K constant, so the theorem is a 2D result with a parameter, not a genuine 3D extension. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10052 v3 pith:5IXBDMW3 submitted 2024-11-15 math.AP

Yuming Qin , Junchen Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35M1335Q3576D1076D0376N20
keywords 3DPrandtlequationslong-timewell-posednessenergymethodspecialstructuremonotonicshearflowweightedSobolevspaceparabolicregularizationlifespan
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the three-dimensional Prandtl boundary layer equations — the viscous-flow equations describing the thin layer of fluid near a solid wall — admit unique smooth solutions on any prescribed time interval $[0,T]$, not merely on a short local existence time. The hypotheses are the standard monotonicity condition $\partial_z u > 0$ together with a special structural assumption: the second tangential velocity is a fixed multiple of the first, $v = K u$ (equivalently $\partial_z(v/u) \equiv 0$), where the multiplier $K(x,y)$ solves the two-dimensional Burgers equation $\partial_x K + K\partial_y K = 0$. Under these assumptions the full 3D system collapses to a single scalar equation, and an energy method in polynomially weighted Sobolev spaces closes; the price is that the initial perturbation around a monotone shear flow must be exponentially small, of size $e^{-T}$. A sympathetic reader would care because in general 3D the Prandtl system is ill-posed in Sobolev spaces even under monotonicity, so this is the first construction showing that the long-time behaviour known in 2D survives in three dimensions within a natural solution class.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the linearly-good unknown $g_n = \big(\partial^n_{xy}\tilde{u}/(u^s_z + \tilde{u}_z)\big)_z$, the vertical derivative of the ratio of a tangential derivative of the perturbation to the total shear rate; this is the 3D analogue of the quantity that cancels the loss of one tangential derivative in the 2D theory. Around it, the paper sets up a parabolic regularization (adding $\epsilon(\partial_x^2 + \partial_y^2)$ and a corrector), derives the vorticity equation (3.8) for $\varphi = \partial_z \tilde{u}$, and then performs the formal transformation (4.1) so that the highest-order tangential-derivative estimates on $\varphi$ become weighted $L^2$ estimates on the $g_n$'s that are independent of $\epsilon$. Three further ingredients carry the argument: the structural assumption $v = Ku$ with $\partial_x K + K\partial_y K = 0$, which collapses the 3D system to the scalar equation (1.5); the shear-flow profile $u^s(t,z)$ whose monotone gradient decays polynomially ($\partial_z u^s \sim \langle z\rangle^{-k}$), supplying the coercivity of the weighted norms; and a reconstruction argument that computes the high-order boundary values of the approximate solutions, which are needed because integration by parts in $z$ produces boundary terms that the equations alone do not determine.

What would settle it

Take monotone initial data that are small around the same shear profile but violate the structural assumption, so that $\partial_z(v/u)$ is not identically zero; the linearized system for $(\partial_z u, \partial_z v)$ then contains the terms $(\partial_z v)\partial_y u - (\partial_z u)\partial_y v$ that the paper's assumption removes. If an energy calculation or numerical experiment shows such data also stay smooth for arbitrarily long times, the structural assumption is unnecessary and the theorem is not sharp; if exponentially growing modes appear instead — as the 3D ill-posedness analysis this paper cites indicates — then the assumption is genuinely load-bearing. A second, softer check is whether the lifespan bound $T \sim \ln(1/\delta)$ holds quantitatively by comparing maximal existence times for data of size $\delta$ and $2\delta$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is Theorem 1.1: for the reduced system (1.5), obtained from the 3D Prandtl equations by imposing the structure $v = Ku$, with the outer flow normalized to $U = 1$ and $K$ a time-independent solution of the Burgers equation, any initial datum $u_0 = u_0^s + \tilde{u}_0$ that is a sufficiently small perturbation of a monotone shear profile satisfying the decay conditions (1.6) and the compatibility conditions admits a unique solution $(u,w)$ on $[0,T]$ with $u - u^s \in L^\infty([0,T]; H^m_{k+\nu-\delta'})$ and $w \in L^\infty([0,T]; H^\infty(\mathbb{R}_+; H^{m-1}(\mathbb{R}^2)))$, and the solution is stable with respect to the initial data. The quantitative heart is the lifespan statement: any large $T$ can be reached provided the initial perturbation is smaller than $e^{-T}$, the exact 3D analogue of the 2D long-time theorem this paper extends. The proof works because the structural assumption removes the secondary-flow terms that make the general 3D problem ill-posed in Sobolev spaces even under monotonicity, leaving a single scalar equation whose remaining derivative loss is controlled through a new linearly-good unknown and a boundary-data reconstruction that supplies the missing high-order boundary conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on the structural assumption that the second tangential velocity is a fixed multiple of the first ($v = Ku$, with $K$ time-independent and solving the Burgers equation, and outer flow $U = 1$), which reduces the 3D system to a single scalar equation; nothing in the paper justifies this structure physically, and without it the general 3D problem is known to be ill-posed in Sobolev spaces even under monotonicity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any prescribed horizon $T$ becomes reachable: taking the initial perturbation smaller than $e^{-T}$ yields a solution on all of $[0,T]$, so the local existence theorem of the predecessors is truly extended in time rather than merely re-proved.
  • Stability with continuity in the data follows: two initial data differing by a small amount produce solutions that stay close in $H^{m-3}_{k+\nu-\delta'}$, and uniqueness of the solution for each datum is the case of identical data.
  • The 3D result now stands on the same Sobolev footing as the 2D long-time theory, with the same polynomial weight structure and the same loss $\delta'$ in the decay exponent, so the two-dimensional barrier that previously stopped at local time is removed in the special-structure class.
  • The normal velocity inherits full horizontal regularity ($w \in L^\infty([0,T]; H^\infty(\mathbb{R}_+; H^{m-1}(\mathbb{R}^2)))$), so the reconstructed $w$ is not merely a byproduct but part of the well-posedness statement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The structural assumption $\partial_z(v/u) \equiv 0$ means the ratio of the two tangential velocities is a function of $(t,x,y)$ alone, so the solution class is essentially a family of tilted two-dimensional boundary layers; a natural relaxation the paper does not treat is $v = K(t,x,y)u$ with slowly time-varying $K$, where the proof's use of $\partial_t K = 0$ and the Burgers equation would need
  • The lifespan law $T \sim \ln(1/\delta)$ is stated through the smallness condition of size $e^{-T}$, but the paper does not ask whether it is optimal; a numerical study in the 2D model, where the method originated, could test whether larger or more structured data buy a longer lifespan.
  • Because the outer flow is normalized to $U = 1$, the theorem avoids the pressure term entirely; extending the argument to non-uniform outer flows ($\partial_x P \neq 0$) would be the direct test of how much of the structure is truly needed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims long-time well-posedness for the 3D Prandtl system (1.5) under the monotonicity condition and a special structural assumption v=Ku, where K satisfies the Burgers equation ∂xK+K∂yK=0 in R² with U=1 (condition H). The proof regularizes the system, derives weighted Sobolev estimates for the vorticity, introduces linearly-good unknowns g_n, and then asserts existence, uniqueness, and stability for small perturbations of a monotone shear flow on an arbitrary time interval [0,T]. The abstract further claims a lifespan of order e^T for initial data of size e^{-T}.

Significance. If condition H admitted genuinely three-dimensional nonconstant functions K, the result would be a significant extension of the 2D long-time theory of Xu and Zhang to 3D. The manuscript contains substantial technical work: detailed compatibility conditions, boundary reductions in Appendix B, weighted energy estimates for the regularized vorticity, and the formal g_n transformation in Appendix C. However, the central structural assumption is much weaker than advertised: every admissible K under the stated global regularity is constant, so the system reduces by a coordinate change to the 2D Prandtl equation with the transverse variable as a parameter. The claimed new 3D content is therefore not established. In addition, the two lemmas that carry the stability and uniqueness proof are only outlined, leaving a central part of the proof unverifiable. The paper is honest about these omissions but they are load-bearing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, condition H, and Theorem 1.1] Condition H forces K to be constant, so the 'special structure' does not yield genuinely three-dimensional flows. Indeed, differentiating ∂xK+K∂yK=0 in y gives ∂xq+K∂yq+q²=0 for q=∂yK. Along the characteristics dx/ds=1, dy/ds=K, one has q(s)=q(0)/(1+q(0)s). Since K∈W^{m+1,∞}(R²) is globally bounded, q must vanish identically; otherwise q blows up in finite time either forward (if q(0)<0) or backward (if q(0)>0). Hence K is independent of y, and then ∂xK=0, so K(x,y)=c. Substituting K=c into (1.5) and setting X=x, Y=y−cx gives ∂tu+u∂Xu+w∂zu=∂zzu and ∂Xu+∂zw=0, which is exactly the 2D Prandtl system with Y as a parameter. Thus Theorem 1.1 is a parameter-dependent 2D result, not a long-time well-posedness result for a genuinely three-dimensional structure as claimed in the title and abstract.
  2. [Section 6, Lemmas 6.1 and 6.2] The stability and uniqueness part of Theorem 1.1 rests on Lemma 6.1 and Lemma 6.2, but neither is actually proved. Lemma 6.1 is labeled 'Outline of Proof' and ends with 'we will omit some details here', while Lemma 6.2 says its proof 'can be recovered by the standard process as what we did in Lemma 4.3'. Since these estimates control the difference of two solutions and are the only mechanism proving uniqueness, this is a load-bearing gap. The brief discussion after (6.4) does not show how the difficult terms, especially those involving ∂yK and the loss of tangential derivatives, are closed; a complete proof is required.
  3. [Abstract and Section 5] The abstract states that the lifespan can be extended to any large T provided the initial perturbation has size e^{-T}, but Theorem 1.1 contains no such quantification: it only asserts the existence of some δ0 for a fixed T, with no explicit dependence of δ0 on T. The proof in Section 5 does not derive the e^{-T} relation. Moreover, the limiting passage from approximate solutions to solutions is sketched: after obtaining convergence in C^0([0,T1];C^{2,δ'}_{loc}), the manuscript asserts the convergence of w and the validity of the nonlinear system in (5.6)-(5.7) without a careful justification of the uniform estimates needed to pass to the limit in the terms w∂z(us+ũ) and ∂y(K(us+ũ)). These points need to be made precise for the existence claim to be verified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Lemma 4.2] The statement has mismatched notation: the left side is ∥g_m(0)∥_{H^2_{\ell'}} while the right side is C∥\tilde w_0∥_{H^{m+2}_{k+\ell''}}, and the proof uses ∂^n_{xy}φ_0. Please correct the norms, indices, and variables to match the definition of g_n.
  2. [Section 5, Eq. (5.6)] The displayed regularity of w, 'L∞(R_+,z); (H^m(R²)H^{-1}(R_x) ∪ H^m(R²)H^{-1}(R_y))', seems to be a typographical artifact; the conclusion should be stated cleanly as w∈L∞([0,T1];L∞(R_+;H^{m-1}(R²))).
  3. [Theorem 5.1] The hypotheses refer to 'compatibility conditions (2.3)-(2.4)', but (2.3) is the shear-flow decay bound from Proposition 2.1; the intended references are the compatibility conditions (2.4)-(2.5).
  4. [General notation and typos] There are numerous typos, including 'well-posdness' in the running header, 'initial date' instead of 'initial data', 'local-posedness', 'by virture', 'recurence', and an extra '+' in the inequality before (4.10). The paper would benefit from a careful proofreading pass.
  5. [Section 4, Lemma 4.3] In the display following (4.8), the inequality contains a double plus sign before the ε terms; this should be cleaned up so that the dissipation terms are written correctly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Condition (H) forces K to be constant, so the '3D special structure' reduces system (1.5) to the 2D Prandtl equation; the claimed 3D long-time result renames the known Xu–Zhang result.

  1. renaming known result [Section 1, condition (H), H1 and system (1.5); Theorem 1.1]
    "H1: the function K only depends on ( x, y) and satisfies the Burgers equation in R2 ∂xK + K∂ yK = 0."

    Under the theorem's own regularity assumption ∥K∥_{W^{m+1,∞}(R²)}<∞, H1 admits only constants: with q=∂yK, the y-derivative of H1 is ∂xq+K∂yq+q²=0; along global characteristics q(s)=q0/(1+q0s), so q0≠0 blows up at finite s. Hence ∂yK=0, and then ∂xK=0, so K≡c. With K=c, system (1.5) becomes ∂tu+u∂xu+cu∂yu+w∂zu=∂zzu and ∂xu+c∂yu+∂zw=0, which is the 2D Prandtl equation in coordinates X=x+cy (Y is a harmless parameter). The long-time proof is the Xu–Zhang 2D energy method with an extra parameter; no genuinely 3D flow remains, so the advertised 3D extension is a coordinate rename of a known 2D result.

full rationale

No fitted parameters or data-driven prediction are involved, and the local-existence citations [26,36] are not load-bearing because the existence part is proved by self-contained a priori estimates (Theorem 3.5 and Section 5). The circularity-relevant defect is structural: condition (H) is so restrictive that the '3D special structure' contains only constant K on the whole R². Consistently, the proofs never use the Burgers equation ∂xK+K∂yK=0; they only use ∥K∥_{W^{m+1,∞}}, which is trivial for constants. With constant K, system (1.5) reduces by the linear change X=x+cy to the 2D Prandtl system with y as a parameter, whose long-time well-posedness is precisely the Xu–Zhang [42] theorem that the paper claims to extend. Thus the central novelty, 'long-time well-posedness of the 3D Prandtl equation under the special structure', is by construction the existing 2D result in new coordinates rather than a genuinely 3D extension. This is a renaming/trivialization of the input assumption, scored as partial circularity (6) rather than full equivalence, because the theorem statement remains syntactically true for the only admissible (constant) K.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theorem rests on the special structure v=Ku and the monotone shear profile; these are explicit assumptions, not derived. The proof uses standard hard analysis tools. No new physical entities are introduced and no constants are fit to data.

free parameters (2)
  • delta0 = small enough (not quantified)
    Smallness threshold for initial perturbation ||tilde{u}_0||_{H^{m+1}_{k+nu}} <= delta0 in Theorem 1.1; chosen in proof to close energy estimates, not fitted to data.
  • delta' = satisfies nu+1/2 < delta' < nu+1 and k+nu-delta' > 1/2
    Weight-loss parameter in the solution space H^m_{k+nu-delta'}; arbitrary in an interval, not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Hardy inequalities (A.1), (A.2), Sobolev embedding (A.3), trace theorem (A.3), interpolation (A.4)-(A.6)
    Used throughout Sections 3-6 to control weighted norms of products and boundary traces.
  • domain assumption Monotone shear flow with polynomial decay: c1<z>^{-k} <= partial_z u0^s <= c2<z>^{-k} and derivative bounds (1.6)
    Needed for Lemma 4.1 to get lower bound on u_sz + u_z and to define the good unknown g_n; also in Proposition 2.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Special structure v = K u with partial_x K + K partial_y K = 0 and U = 1 (condition H)
    Reduces 3D Prandtl to scalar equation (1.5); without it the problem is outside the monotone Sobolev framework.
  • domain assumption Compatibility conditions up to order m+3 (Proposition 2.3, Appendix B)
    Required to control boundary traces of high-order z-derivatives; not derived but imposed on initial data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long time well-posedness for the 3D Prandtl boundary layer equations with a special structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5IXBDMW3

@misc{pith2026241110052,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long time well-posedness for the 3D Prandtl boundary layer equations with a special structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5IXBDMW3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10052}
}
abstract

This paper is concerned with existence, uniqueness and stability of the solution for the 3D Prandtl equation in a polynomial weighted Sobolev space. The main novelty of this paper is to directly prove the long time well-posedness to 3D Prandtl equation under monotonicity condition $\partial_{z} u >0$ and a special structural assumption $v=Ku$ $\big(\partial_{z}\big(\frac{v}{u}\big) \equiv 0\big)$ by the energy method. Moreover, the solution's lifespan can be extended to any large $T$, provided that the initial data with a perturbation lie in the monotonic shear profile of small size $e^{-T}$. This result extends the local well-posedness results established by Liu-Wang-Yang \cite{Liu-Wang-Yang-1-2017} (Adv. Math. 308 (2017) 1074-1126) and Qin-Wang \cite{Qin-Wang-2024} (J. Math. Pure. Appl. 194 (2025) 103670) for the 3D Prandtl equations to long-time well-posedness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alexandre, Y

    R. Alexandre, Y. Wang, C.J. Xu, T. Yang, Well-posedness of the Prandtl equation in Sobolev spaces, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 28 (2015), 745-784

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Cannone, M.C

    M. Cannone, M.C. Lombardo, M. Sammartino, Existence and uniqueness for the Prandtl equations, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math., 332 (2001), 277-282

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Cannone, M.C

    M. Cannone, M.C. Lombardo, M. Sammartino, Well-posedness of Prandtl equations with non-compatible data, Nonlinearity, 26 (2013), 3077-3100

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Chen, L.Z

    Y.F. Chen, L.Z. Ruan, A. Yang, The local well-posedness of analytic solution to the boundary layer system for compressible flow in three dimensions, J. Differ. Equ., 429 (2025), 716-746

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    D. Chen, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Well-posedness of the Prandtl equation with monotonicity in Sobolev spaces, J. Differential Equations, 264(2018), 5870-5893

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    D. Chen, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Well-posedness of the linearized Prandtl equation around a non-monotonic shear flow, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 35 (2018), 1119-1142

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Dalibard, H

    A.-L. Dalibard, H. Dietert, D. G´ erard-Varet, F. Marbach, High frequency analysis of the unsteady interactive boundary layer model, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 50(4)(2018), 4203-4245

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Dietert, D

    H. Dietert, D. G´ erard-Varet, Well-posedness of the Prandtl equations without any structural assumption, Ann. PDE, 5(1)(2019), Paper No. 8, 51

    work page 2019

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    W. E, B. Engquist, Blow up of solutions of the unsteady Prandtl’s equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 50 (1997), 1287-1293

    1997

  2. [10]

    Fan, L.Z

    L. Fan, L.Z. Ruan, A. Yang, Local well-posedness of solutions to the boundary layer equations for 2D com- pressible flow, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 493(2)(2021), 124565

    2021

  3. [11]

    G´ erard-Varet, E

    D. G´ erard-Varet, E. Dormy, On the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 23 (2010), 591-609

    2010

  4. [12]

    G´ erard-Varet, N

    D. G´ erard-Varet, N. Masmoudi, Well-posedness for the Prandtl system without analyticity or monotonicity, Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er., 48 (2015), 1273-1325

    2015

  5. [13]

    G´ erard-Varet and T

    D. G´ erard-Varet and T. Nguyen, Remarks on the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equation, Asymptot. Anal., 77 (2012), 71-88

    2012

  6. [14]

    Grenier, On the nonlinear instability of Euler and Prandtl equations, Comm

    E. Grenier, On the nonlinear instability of Euler and Prandtl equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 53 (2000), 1067-1091

    2000

  7. [15]

    Y. Guo, T. Nguyen, A note on the Prandtl boundary layers, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 64 (2011), 1416-1438

    2011

  8. [16]

    L. Hong, J. K. Hunter, Singularity formation and instability in the unsteady inviscid and viscous Prandtl equations, Commun. Math. Sci., 1 (2003), 293-316

    2003

  9. [17]

    Igntova, V

    M. Igntova, V. Vicol, Almost global existence for the Prandtl boundary layer equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 220 (2016), 809-848. 38 Long time well-posdness of 3D Prandtl equations

    2016

  10. [18]

    Kukavica, V

    I. Kukavica, V. Vicol, On the local existence of analytic solutions to the Prandtl boundary layer equations, Commun. Math. Sci., 11(1)(2013), 269-292

    2013

  11. [19]

    Kukavica, N

    I. Kukavica, N. Masmoudi, V. Vicol, T.K. Wong, On the local well-posedness of the Prandtl and the hydrostatic Euler equations with multiple monotonicity regions, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 46(6)(2014), 3865-3890

    2014

  12. [20]

    W.X. Li, R. Xu, Gevrey well-posedness of the hyperbolic Prandtl equations, Preprint, 2021. arXiv:2112.10450 [math.AP]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    W.X. Li, N. Masmoudi, T. Yang, Well-posedness in Gevrey function space for 3D Prandtl equations without structural assumption, Commun. Pur. Appl. Math., 75(8)(2022), 1755-1797

    2022

  14. [22]

    W. X. Li, T. Yang, Well-posedness in Gevrey function spaces for the Prandtl equations with non-degenerate critical points, J. Eur. Math. Soc., 22 (2020), 717-775

    2020

  15. [23]

    X.Y. Lin, T. Zhang, Almost global existence for the 3D Prandtl boundary layer equations, Acta Appl. Math., 169 (2020), 383-410

    2020

  16. [24]

    Liu, Y.G

    C.J. Liu, Y.G. Wang, T. Yang, Global existence of weak solutions to the three-dimensional Prandtl equations with a special structure, Discrete Cont. Dyn-S., 9(6)(2016), 2011-2029

    2016

  17. [25]

    Liu, Y.G

    C.J. Liu, Y.G. Wang, T. Yang, On the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equations in three space dimensions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 220(1)(2016), 83-108

    2016

  18. [26]

    Liu, Y.G

    C.J. Liu, Y.G. Wang, T. Yang, A well-posedness theory for the Prandtl equations in three space variables, Adv. Math., 308 (2017), 1074-1126

    2017

  19. [27]

    C.J. Liu, T. Yang, Ill-posedness of the Prandtl equations in Sobolev spaces around a shear flow with general decay, J. Math. Pures Appl., 108(2017), 150-162

    2017

  20. [28]

    Lombardo, M

    M.C. Lombardo, M. Cannone, M. Sammartino, Well-posedness of the boundary layer equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 35 (2003), 987-1004

    2003

  21. [29]

    Masmoudi, T.K

    N. Masmoudi, T.K. Wong, Local-in-time existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Prandtl equations by energy methods, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 68(10)(2015), 1683-1741

    2015

  22. [30]

    O. A. Oleinik, On the system of Prandtl equations in boundary-layer theory, Prikl. Mat. Meh., 30, 801-821 (Russian); translated as J. Appl. Math. Mech., 30(1966), 951-974

    1966

  23. [31]

    O. A. Oleinik, V. N. Samokhin, Mathematical Models in Boundary Layer Theory, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Computation, 15. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1999

    1999

  24. [32]

    Paicu, P

    M. Paicu, P. Zhang, Global existence and the decay of solutions to the Prandtl system with small analytic data, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 241 (2021), 403-446

    2021

  25. [33]

    Pan, C.J

    X.H. Pan, C.J. Xu, Long-time existence of Gevrey-2 solutions to the 3D Prandtl boundary layer equations, Preprint, 2022. arXiv:1708.08217 [math.AP]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Pan, C.J

    X.H. Pan, C.J. Xu, Global tangentially analytical solutions of the 3D axially symmetric Prandtl equations, Chinese Ann. Math. B., 45 (2024), 573-596

    2024

  27. [35]

    Qin, X.L

    Y.M. Qin, X.L. Dong, Local existence of solutions to 2D Prandtl equations in a weighted Sobolev space, Anal. Math. Phys., 12(1)(2021), 1-26

    2021

  28. [36]

    Qin, X.Q

    Y.M. Qin, X.Q. Wang, Local existence of solutions to 3D Prandtl equations with a special structure, J. Math. Pure. Appl., 194 (2025), 103670

    2025

  29. [37]

    Sammartino, R.E

    M. Sammartino, R.E. Caflisch, Zero viscosity limit for analytic solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations on a half-space, I. Existence for Euler and Prandtl equations, Comm. Math. Phys., 192(2)(1998), 433-461. 39 Y.M.Qin, J.C.Liu

    1998

  30. [38]

    Sammartino, R.E

    M. Sammartino, R.E. Caflisch, Zero viscosity limit for analytic solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations on a half-space, II. Construction of the Navier-Stokes solution, Comm. Math. Phys., 192(2)(1998), 463-491

    1998

  31. [39]

    C. Wang, Y. Wang, P. Zhang, On the global small solution of 2-D Prandtl system with initial data in the optimal Gevrey class, Adv. Math., 440 (2024), 109517

    2024

  32. [40]

    Y.G. Wang, F. Xie, T. Yang, Local well-posedness of Prandtl equations for compressible flow in two space variables, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47(1)(2015), 321-346

    2015

  33. [41]

    Xin, L.Q

    Z.P. Xin, L.Q. Zhang, On the global existence of solutions to the Prandtl’s system, Adv. Math., 181 (2004), 88-133

    2004

  34. [42]

    C.J. Xu, X. Zhang, Long time well-posedness of Prandtl equations in Sobolev space, J. Differential Equations, 263(12)(2017), 8749-8803

    2017

  35. [43]

    Zhang, Z.F

    P. Zhang, Z.F. Zhang, Long time well-posedness of Prandtl system with small and analytic initial data, J. Funct. Anal., 270(1)(2016), 2591-2615. 40

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.