Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Soliton Dynamics over a Disordered Topography

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports experiments showing that KdV solitons over a random underwater topography are exponentially attenuated, with a decay length that matches linear shallow-water theory for weak amplitudes and shrinks as nonlinearity grows.

desk verdict A genuine first experiment on soliton propagation over random bathymetry, with a clean weak-amplitude localization result, but the nonlinearity-enhancement claim is not yet separated from radiative losses and dissipation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10376 v1 pith:6W6LKDAS submitted 2024-11-15 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.dis-nnnlin.PS

Guillaume Ricard , Eric Falcon This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.dis-nnnlin.PS
keywords AndersonlocalizationKdVsolitonshallowwaterwavesrandombathymetrynonlinearitysurfacegravityfissionwaveattenuation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first experimental observation of Anderson localization of a KdV soliton: a solitary water wave launched along a 4-m canal with a random bottom topography loses amplitude exponentially in space, $\eta_{\max}(x)=\eta_0 \exp(-x/\xi)$. For weak solitons the measured localization length $\xi$ agrees quantitatively with a linear shallow-water theory, while stronger nonlinearity (larger amplitude) shortens $\xi$, meaning nonlinearity enhances localization. The full space-time wavefield also reveals that a periodic lattice fissions the soliton into slower nondispersive pulses, whereas a random lattice scatters it into dispersive waves. A sympathetic reader would care because it provides the first fluid experiment bearing on a long-debated question about whether Anderson localization survives for nonlinear pulses, and because it suggests that engineered random bathymetries could attenuate tsunami-like solitary waves.

What carries the argument

The central object is the KdV soliton, a solitary surface wave whose width $l=\sqrt{4h^3/(3A_0)}$ and speed $c=c_0(1+A_0/(2h))$ are set by its amplitude $A_0$. The experiment generates such pulses with a piston wave maker and measures $\eta(x,t)$ with five synchronized cameras along the 4-m canal. The load-bearing comparison is between the fitted exponential decay length $\xi$ from $\eta_{\max}=\eta_0 \exp(-x/\xi)$ and the theoretical localization length $\xi_{\mathrm{th}}$ from Eq. (2), a linear shallow-water result for solitary waves over an obstacle lattice. The required scale hierarchy is $l \lesssim L \ll L_{\mathrm{nl}}, L_{\mathrm{dis}} \lesssim \xi < L_x \ll l_d$, which is satisfied for most tested amplitudes and defines the regime in which a soliton can localize before dissipation acts.

What would settle it

A direct check is to measure $\eta_{\max}(x)$ for a random bar arrangement in a lower-viscosity canal, or after independently subtracting the flat-bottom dissipative decay, and compare the extracted $\xi$ with Eq. (2): if the exponential decay persists over a flat bottom, or if $\xi$ fails to follow Eq. (2) when $L$ or $h/h_1$ changes, the Anderson-localization interpretation collapses. Shuffling the bar positions while keeping all other parameters fixed and verifying that $\xi$ is unchanged would further isolate disorder-induced localization from deterministic scattering.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is that the peak amplitude of a KdV soliton propagating through a random array of submerged bars decays as $\eta_{\max}(x)=\eta_0 \exp(-x/\xi)$, with the linear-shallow-water prediction $\xi_{\mathrm{th}} = L/\ln\left[ (1+\sqrt{h/h_1})^2/(4\sqrt{h/h_1}) \right] = 2.4$ m for the experimental geometry ($h=5.5$ cm, $h_1=1.5$ cm, $L=25$ cm). This prediction matches the data for dimensionless amplitudes $\epsilon=A_0/h$ between about 0.1 and 0.2; for larger $\epsilon$ the decay is steeper, which the authors attribute to nonlinearity-enhanced Anderson localization. The interpretation is supported by a flat-bottom dissipative length $l_d\approx 12$ m, much longer than the 4-m canal, so viscosity alone cannot explain the observed decay. The paper also shows that a periodic lattice produces nondispersive backward and forward pulses at each lattice step, while the random lattice produces waves that follow the linear dispersion relation $\omega^2 = g k \tanh(k h)$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire interpretation rests on assuming that the measured exponential decay is caused by multiple scattering off the random bars rather than by viscous dissipation or radiative loss, yet the flat-bottom dissipative length is only about three times the canal length and no explicit correction is applied before extracting $\xi$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For weak solitons ($\epsilon \approx 0.1$ to $0.2$), the localization length is predictable from the bathymetry alone via Eq. (2), with no adjustable parameter.
  • Increasing soliton amplitude decreases $\xi$, so nonlinearity enhances rather than destroys Anderson localization for KdV solitons.
  • A periodic lattice converts the incident soliton into a train of slower nondispersive pulses moving at a mean-depth velocity $c_*=\sqrt{g h_*}$, whereas a random lattice converts it into dispersive waves obeying $\omega^2=gk\tanh(kh)$.
  • The scale separation $l\lesssim L\ll L_{\mathrm{nl}},L_{\mathrm{dis}}\lesssim \xi < L_x \ll l_d$ provides a practical criterion for when soliton localization dominates over dissipation and nonlinear length effects.
  • If the mechanism extends to larger scales, a random or periodic bathymetry could act as a passive coastal defense that exponentially reduces the amplitude of tsunami-like solitary waves over a few localization lengths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because viscous decay over the 4-m path is estimated at roughly 28% and is not subtracted before fitting $\xi$, the reported localization lengths may be biased short; repeating the measurement in a lower-viscosity fluid or after a careful flat-bottom calibration would separate disorder-induced attenuation from dissipation.
  • The periodic-versus-random contrast suggests that a one-parameter family of lattices ($\kappa$ from 0 to 1) should show a crossover from Bragg/fission-dominated attenuation to Anderson-localization-dominated attenuation; measuring $\xi(\kappa)$ in a longer canal would test whether the transition is continuous.
  • If nonlinearity-enhanced localization is generic, natural random seabeds may attenuate large-amplitude waves more strongly than linear coastal models predict, which could alter design rules for tsunami defenses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports controlled experiments on KdV-elevation solitons propagating along a 4-m canal with a flat, periodic, or random bottom made of N=9 rectangular bars. Full space-time wavefields are measured by five synchronized cameras. For the random bathymetry, the maximum amplitude of the leading soliton decays approximately exponentially with distance; the extracted localization length ξ decreases with initial amplitude/nonlinearity ε. For weak nonlinearity (ε≈0.1–0.2), ξ is reported in agreement with the value ξ_th = 2.4 m from a linear shallow-water formula, Eq. (2). The authors also document qualitatively different trailing-wave dynamics: coherent backward/forward pulses for the periodic lattice versus dispersive waves for the random lattice. They interpret the results as the first experimental observation of Anderson localization of fluid-surface solitons and its enhancement by nonlinearity.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, this is an important first experimental demonstration of Anderson localization of nonlinear solitary waves, with implications for the long-standing debate on nonlinearity and localization and for coastal-protection applications. The experiment is carefully instrumented with full space-time resolution, and the clear contrast between periodic and random spectra is a valuable qualitative result. The main quantitative claims, however, rest on an exponential-decay fit that is not separated from viscous and nonlinear radiative losses, on a single disorder realization, and on a theory comparison whose applicability to the random case is not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Anderson localization and solitons (Eq. (1), flat-bottom discussion)] The statement that ld ≈ 12 ± 3 m is 'much longer than the canal length Lx' is misleading: exp(−Lx/ld) ≈ 0.72, so viscous losses alone remove ~28% of the amplitude over the measurement path. This is a substantial systematic effect relative to the measured localization decay (for ξ ≈ 2.4 m, exp(−4/2.4) ≈ 0.19). The authors extract ξ from the raw ηmax(x) without any correction for the flat-bottom decay and without propagating the ±25% uncertainty in ld into ξ; a quantitative estimate of the induced bias in ξ is required before the claimed agreement with Eq. (2) can be assessed.
  2. [Anderson localization and solitons (Fig. 2(e), 2(f), Fig. 4)] The attribution of the amplitude decay to Anderson localization is not uniquely supported because the random case also generates dispersive waves (Fig. 2(f)) and the periodic case generates fission products (Fig. 2(e)); these are amplitude-dependent channels that remove energy from the leading soliton. Since ξ is extracted from the leading-soliton amplitude alone, the decrease of ξ with ε in Fig. 4 could be caused partly by increased radiative or fission losses at larger amplitude rather than by enhanced localization. A quantitative energy budget (e.g., integration of the wavefield energy in the leading soliton versus the radiated field, or a numerical simulation that switches off nonlinearity) is needed to separate these channels.
  3. [Experimental setup and soliton generation; Fig. 4] All random-bathymetry data come from one realization of the disorder (one set of nine bar positions). For a system with only N = 9 scatterers, realization-to-realization fluctuations of the localization length are expected to be significant, and the error bars in Fig. 4 include only exponential-fit uncertainties. The quantitative agreement with ξ_th at ε ≈ 0.1–0.2 and the monotonic trend in Fig. 4 could change substantially for another realization; the authors should provide at least a few independent realizations (e.g., by rearranging the bars) or a numerical ensemble estimate.
  4. [Anderson localization and solitons (Eq. (2))] Eq. (2) is attributed to Ref. [24], whose title concerns 'periodic topography.' The manuscript gives no justification for using a formula derived for a periodic lattice to interpret the random-lattice experiments. If the same expression is known to hold for the random case, that should be stated and cited; otherwise the theoretical reference line in Figs. 3 and 4 is not the appropriate null model for the random measurements.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Space-time evolution and wave spectrum (h* discussion)] The text states that h* = 0.65h + 0.35h1 because 65% of the bathymetry has depth h and 35% depth h1, but the bars occupy d/L = 8/25 = 32% of the lattice period; the weights should be 0.68 and 0.32, giving h* ≈ 4.2 cm rather than 4.1 cm.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption / fitting discussion] Please specify the fitting interval used for the exponential fits of ηmax(x) in Fig. 3; the red fits appear to include regions outside the random lattice (before the first bar and after the last bar), which could bias the extracted ξ.
  3. [Anderson localization and solitons (ld independence)] The claim that ld is independent of ε is based on only two flat-bottom measurements; additional flat-bottom decays at intermediate amplitudes would strengthen this assertion.
  4. [Space-time evolution and wave spectrum (spectra notation)] The notation δη(x,t) = η(x+dx) − η(x) and the use of 'dx' are not defined explicitly; please clarify the spatial derivative employed in computing the spectra.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'for the first time experimentally' should be qualified in light of Ref. [25] (Hopkins et al.), which reports a related nonlinear-pulse-in-disorder experiment; the text should explicitly state what is new compared with that work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured localization length comes from independent exponential fits and is compared with an external parameter-free theory.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) generate KdV-like solitons with amplitude A0 fixed by paddle parameters; (ii) measure eta_max(x) along a random bathymetry; (iii) fit exponential decay to extract xi (Eq. 1); (iv) compare xi with xi_th from Eq. (2), taken from Nakoulima et al. (Ref. [24]), an external source. No fitted parameter is fed back into the theory: xi_th = L / ln(...) depends only on L and h/h1, and is evaluated as 2.4 m from the geometry. The flat-bottom dissipative length ld is measured independently and used only to argue viscous losses are comparatively small; it is not subtracted or used as an input to xi_th. The reference to the authors' earlier monochromatic-wave experiment (Ref. [14]) is comparative ('as for the initially monochromatic wave case [14]') rather than evidential for the soliton result, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The absence of a corrected energy budget separating radiative/fission losses from Anderson-localization attenuation is a scientific concern about attribution of the decay, but it is not a circularity: the exponential decay length is still a measurement of a quantity, not a derived restatement of the theory. Overall, no circular step is exhibited; the paper is largely self-contained against an external benchmark.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation relies on standard shallow-water and KdV soliton theory, with the localization length itself being a fitted quantity. No new physical entities are introduced. The main caveats are the use of a single finite disorder realization and the incomplete separation of dissipation from localization.

free parameters (2)
  • Localization length ξ = Reported to decrease from about 2.4 m at weak nonlinearity to smaller values at higher amplitude
    Obtained by fitting Eq. (1) to the measured soliton amplitude decay along the random bathymetry. The central claim that localization is enhanced by nonlinearity depends directly on these fitted values.
  • Dissipative length l_d = 12 ± 3 m
    Fitted from flat-bottom exponential decay of soliton amplitude. Used to argue that dissipation is negligible, although the 4-m canal length is not negligible compared to 12 m.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The pulse generated by the paddle is accurately described by a KdV soliton with no adjustable parameter once A0 is fixed.
    The paper verifies this in the Supplemental Material for the flat-bottom case, but notes it is not fully true for the smallest amplitudes because a cavity is generated behind the leading pulse.
  • domain assumption Anderson localization theory, specifically the linear shallow-water result of Eq. (2), applies to a single finite disordered realization with N = 9 bars.
    The exponential decay is fitted to one random arrangement of bars, and the theory of Nakoulima et al. is used without ensemble averaging or a disorder-average calculation.
  • domain assumption Viscous dissipation is negligible compared to localization over the 4-m canal length.
    The flat-bottom dissipative length is 12 m, so over 4 m the amplitude reduction from dissipation is about 28%; this is treated as negligible rather than explicitly subtracted from the random-bottom measurements.
  • domain assumption The short-obstacle validity conditions l ≲ L ≪ L_nl, L_dis hold for the experiments included in the quantitative comparison.
    The agreement with Eq. (2) is restricted to the intermediate nonlinearity range ε ∈ [0.1, 0.2]; the smallest and largest solitons are excluded because these conditions are violated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Soliton Dynamics over a Disordered Topography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6W6LKDAS

@misc{pith2026241110376,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Soliton Dynamics over a Disordered Topography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6W6LKDAS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10376}
}
read the original abstract

We report on the dynamics of a soliton propagating on the surface of a fluid in a 4-m-long canal with a random or periodic bottom topography. Using a full space-and-time resolved wavefield measurement, we evidence, for the first time experimentally, how the soliton is affected by the disorder, in the context of Anderson localization, and how localization depends on nonlinearity. For weak soliton amplitudes, the localization length is found in quantitative agreement with a linear shallow-water theory. For higher amplitudes, this spatial attenuation of the soliton amplitude is found to be enhanced. Behind the leading soliton slowed down by the topography, different experimentally unreported dynamics occur: Fission into backward and forward nondispersive pulses for the periodic case, and scattering into dispersive waves for the random case. Our findings open doors to potential applications regarding ocean coastal protection against large-amplitude waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.10376 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Experimental setup to study soliton propagation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Space-time evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Evolution of the soliton maximum amplitude along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Nakoulima, N

    O. Nakoulima, N. Zahibo, E. Pelinovsky, T. Talipova, and A. Kurkin, Solitary wave dynamics in shallow water over periodic topography, Chaos 15, 037107 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [1]

    W. H. Bragg and W. L. Bragg, The reflection of X-rays by crystals, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 88, 428 (1913)

    work page 1913

  3. [2]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  4. [3]

    Lagendijk, B

    A. Lagendijk, B. V. Tiggelen, and D. S. Wiersma, Fifty years of Anderson localization, Phys. Today 62, 24 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. d’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose-Einstein condensate, Nature 453, 895 (2008); F. Jendrzejewski, A. Bernard, K. M¨ uller, P. Cheinet, V. Josse, M. Piraud, L. Pezz´ e, L. Sanchez-Palencia, A. Aspect, and P. Bouyer, Three-dimensional l...

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Hodges, Confinement of vibration by structural irreg- ularity, J

    C. Hodges, Confinement of vibration by structural irreg- ularity, J. Sound Vib. 82, 411 (1982); C. E. Bradley, Acoustic Bloch wave propagation in a periodic waveg- uide, Technical report (1991); H. Hu, A. Strybulevych, J. Page, S. E. Skipetrov, and B. A. Van Tiggelen, Localiza- tion of ultrasound in a three-dimensional elastic network, Nature Phys. 4, 945 (2008)

    work page 1982

  7. [6]

    St¨ orzer, P

    M. St¨ orzer, P. Gross, C. M. Aegerter, and G. Maret, Ob- servation of the critical regime near Anderson localization of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 063904 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [7]

    Pertsch, U

    T. Pertsch, U. Peschel, J. Kobelke, K. Schuster, H. Bartelt, S. Nolte, A. T¨ unnermann, and F. Lederer, Non- linearity and Disorder in Fiber Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 053901 (2004)

    work page 2004

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Lahini, A

    Y. Lahini, A. Avidan, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Morandotti, D. N. Christodoulides, and Y. Silberberg, Anderson Lo- calization and Nonlinearity in One-Dimensional Disor- dered Photonic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013906 (2008)

    2008

  2. [9]

    Akkermans and R

    E. Akkermans and R. Maynard, Chains of random impedances, J. Phys. France 45, 1549 (1984)

    1984

  3. [10]

    I. Z. Rothstein, Gravitational Anderson Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 011601 (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    Sharabi, E

    Y. Sharabi, E. Lustig, and M. Segev, Disordered Pho- tonic Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 163902 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Apffel, S

    B. Apffel, S. Wildeman, A. Eddi, and E. Fort, Exper- imental Implementation of Wave Propagation in Disor- dered Time-Varying Media, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 094503 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Belzons, P

    M. Belzons, P. Devillard, F. Dunlop, E. Guazzelli, O. Parodi, and B. Souillard, Localization of surface waves on a rough bottom: Theories and experiments, Europhys. Lett. (EPL) 4, 409 (1987)

    1987

  7. [14]

    Ricard, F

    G. Ricard, F. Novkoski, and E. Falcon, Effects of nonlin- earity on Anderson localization of surface gravity waves, Nature Commun. 15, 5726 (2024)

    2024

  8. [15]

    A. G. Davies and A. D. Heathershaw, Surface-wave prop- agation over sinusoidally varying topography, J. Fluid Mech. 144, 419 (1984)

    1984

  9. [16]

    Guazzelli, V

    E. Guazzelli, V. Rey, and M. Belzons, Higher-order Bragg reflection of gravity surface waves by periodic beds, J. Fluid Mech. 245, 301 (1992)

    1992

  10. [17]

    M. J. McKenna, R. L. Stanley, and J. D. Maynard, Ef- fects of Nonlinearity on Anderson Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1807 (1992)

    1992

  11. [18]

    Fr¨ ohlich, T

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, T. Spencer, and C. E. Wayne, Localization in disordered, nonlinear dynamical systems, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 247 (1986); C. Albanese and J. Fr¨ ohlich, Periodic so- lutions of some infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems associated with non-linear partial differenc...

    1986

  12. [19]

    Yu. S. Kivshar, S. A. Gredeskul, A. S´ anchez, and L. V´ azquez, Localization Decay Induced by Strong Nonlin- earity in Disordered Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1693 (1990)

    1990

  13. [20]

    A. S. Pikovsky and D. L. Shepelyansky, Destruction of Anderson Localization by a Weak Nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 094101 (2008); A. V. Milovanov, and A. Iomin, Localization-delocalization transition on a separa- trix system of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with dis-...

    2008

  14. [21]

    M. V. Ivanchenko, T. V. Laptyeva, and S. Flach, An- derson Localization or Nonlinear Waves: A Matter of Probability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240602 (2011)

    2011

  15. [22]

    Q. Li, C. M. Soukoulis, St. Pnevmatikos, and E. N. Economou, Scattering properties of solitons in nonlinear disordered chains, Phys. Rev. B 38, 11888 (1988)

    1988

  16. [23]

    Bourbonnais and R

    R. Bourbonnais and R. Maynard, Energy transport in one- and two-dimensional anharmonic lattices with iso- topic disorder Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1397 (1990)

    1990

  17. [25]

    V. A. Hopkins, J. Keat, G. D. Meegan, T. Zhang, and J. D. Maynard, Observation of the Predicted Behavior of Nonlinear Pulse Propagation in Disordered Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1102 (1996)

    1996

  18. [26]

    R. R. Rosales and G. C. Papanicolaou, Gravity waves in a channel with a rough bottom, Stud. App. Math. 68, 89 (1983)

    1983

  19. [27]

    Nachbin and K

    A. Nachbin and K. Sølna, Apparent diffusion due to to- pographic microstructure in shallow water, Phys. Fluids 15, 66 (2003)

    2003

  20. [28]

    C. C. Mei and Y. Li, Evolution of solitons over a ran- domly rough seabed, Phys. Rev. E 70, 016302 (2004)

    2004

  21. [29]

    Garnier, J

    J. Garnier, J. C. Mu˜ noz Grajales, and A. Nachbin, Effec- tive behavior of solitary waves over random topography, SIAM Multiscale Model. Simul. 6, 995 (2007). 6

    2007

  22. [30]

    I. J. Losada, M. D. Patterson, M. A. Losada, Harmonic generation past a submerged porous step, Coast. Engi. 31, 281 (1997)

    1997

  23. [31]

    Chao, C.-C

    W.-T. Chao, C.-C. Young, and C.-L. Ting, Solitary wave propagation over a submerged step: reflection, transmis- sion, energy dissipation, and soliton fission, Proc. 24th Int. Ocean and Polar Engi. Conf. (2014); W.-T. Chao, S.-Y. Liang, C.-C. Young, and C.-L. Ting, Interactions...

    2014

  24. [32]

    Q. Fu, A. Kurganov, M. Na, and V. Zeitlin, Birth, in- teractions, and evolution over topography of solitons in Serre-Green-Naghdi model, ArXiv:2405.07182 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    F. J. Seabra-Santos, D. P. Renouard, and A. M. Tem- perville, Numerical and experimental study of the trans- formation of a solitary wave over a shelf or isolated ob- stacle, J. Fluid. Mech. 176, 117 (1987)

    1987

  26. [34]

    Wu, S.-C

    Y.-T. Wu, S.-C. Hsiao, Z.-C. Huang, and K.-S. Hwang, Propagation of solitary waves over a bottom-mounted barrier, Coast. Engi. 62, 31 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Pelinovsky, B

    E. Pelinovsky, B. H. Choi, T. Talipova, S. B. Woo, and D. C. Kim, Solitary wave transformation on the underwa- ter step: Asymptotic theory and numerical experiments, App. Math. Comp. 217, 1704 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    M. A. Losada, C. Vidal, and R. Medina, Experimental study of the evolution of a solitary wave at an abrupt junction, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 14557 (1989)

    1989

  29. [37]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Shao, Y. Zhong, S. Zhang, and Z. Zhao, Band gaps and localization of surface water waves over large-scale sand waves with random fluctuations, Phys. Rev. E 85, 066319 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    Pelinovsky, Hydrodynamics of Tsunami Waves, Chap

    E. Pelinovsky, Hydrodynamics of Tsunami Waves, Chap. in J. Grue and K. Trulsen (eds), Waves in Geophys- ical Fluids , CISM Intern. Cent. Mech. Sci., Vol. 489 (Springer, Vienna, 2006); S. Tadepalli and C. E. Syn- olakis, Model for the Leading Waves of Tsunamis, Phys. Rev. Lett....

    1996

  31. [39]

    Guizien and E

    K. Guizien and E. Barth´ el´ emy, Accuracy of solitary wave generation by a piston wave maker, J. Hydraulic Res.40, 321 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    D. J. Korteweg and G. De Vries, On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves, Phil. Mag. 5, 422 (1895)

  33. [41]

    Remoissenet, Waves called solitons: Concepts and experiments (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994); M

    M. Remoissenet, Waves called solitons: Concepts and experiments (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994); M. Peyrard and T. Dauxois, Physique des solitons (EDP Sciences, CNRS Editions, Paris, 2004)

    1994

  34. [42]

    Falcon, C

    E. Falcon, C. Laroche, and S. Fauve, Observation of De- pression Solitary Surface Waves on a Thin Fluid Layer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 204501 (2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for (i) movies of a soliton over different bathymetries, and (ii) experimental soliton profiles and details of the KdV soliton solution

  36. [44]

    Redor, E

    I. Redor, E. Barth´ el´ emy, N. Mordant, and H. Michallet, Analysis of soliton gas with large-scale video-based wave measurements, Exp. Fluids 61, 216 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, Method for Solving the Korteweg-deVries Equa- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967)

    1967

  38. [46]

    Chen and D

    W. Chen and D. L. Mills, Gap Solitons and the Nonlin- ear Optical Response of Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 160 (1987); O. Morsch and M. Oberthaler, Dynamics of Bose-Einstein Condensates in Optical Lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 179 (2006)

    1987

  39. [47]

    Suret, S

    P. Suret, S. Randoux, A. Gelash, D. Agafontsev, B. Doyon, and G. El, Soliton gas: Theory, numerics, and experiments, Phys. Rev. E 109, 061001 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    C. C. Mei and M. J. Hancock, Weakly nonlinear surface waves over a random seabed, J. Fluid Mech. 475, 247 (2003); J. H. Pihl, C. C. Mei, and M. J. Hancock, Surface gravity waves over a two-dimensional random seabed, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016611 (2002); V. M. Lashkin, Dynam- ics of ...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.