Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 66 references

Nonresonant nonlinear magnonics in an antiferromagnet

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Below-gap circularly polarized mid-infrared light launches antiferromagnetic magnons at least two orders of magnitude more efficiently than above-gap light, without exciting electrons.

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of efficient below-gap, helicity-dependent magnon generation in Sr2IrO4, but the mechanism is borrowed from the authors' own theory and the advertised efficiency gain is quantitatively overstated. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10579 v1 pith:JSOH63LZ submitted 2024-11-15 cond-mat.str-el

Gu-Feng Zhang , Sheikh Rubaiat Ul Haque , Kelson J. Kaj , Xiang Chen , Urban F. P. Seifert , Jingdi Zhang , Kevin A. Cremin , Leon Balents
show 2 more authors
Stephen D. Wilson Richard D. Averitt
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Sr2IrO4antiferromagneticmagnonsinverseFaradayeffecttwo-magnoncouplingnonresonantphotoexcitationtime-resolvedmagneto-opticalKerrultrafastmagnetismnonlinearmagnonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that in the layered antiferromagnet Sr$_2$IrO$_4$, circularly polarized 9 $\mu$m pump pulses (138 meV, below the 0.5 eV electronic gap and above the highest optical phonon) coherently excite a 0.5 THz $B_{2g}$ magnon. The below-gap response is helicity-dependent: reversing the pump helicity flips the phase of the magnon oscillation, the signature of the inverse Faraday effect, whereas above-gap 1.3 $\mu$m pumping is helicity-independent. The magnon amplitude scales linearly with fluence at low fluence and quadratically at high fluence, and accounting for penetration depth the below-gap pump generates comparable magnon oscillations with an energy density two orders of magnitude lower than above-gap pumping. The authors attribute this to a one-photon two-magnon coupling in which the pump creates virtual pairs of high-energy magnons through spin-dependent electric polarization, and anharmonic magnon-magnon scattering funnels them into the weakly gapped mode at $(\pi,\pi)$. If correct, this offers a nonthermal, purely magnonic route to ultrafast control of antiferromagnetic order.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the pair of effective magnetic fields $h_u$ and $h_m$ in the coupled equations of motion $\partial_t u = \chi^{-1} m - u/\tau_u - h_m$ and $\partial_t m = -\kappa u - m/\tau_m + h_u$, where $m$ is the out-of-plane magnetization and $u$ is the linearized deviation of the in-plane Neel order parameter. For an ultrashort pulse, $h_m$ gives the magnetization an initial velocity while $h_u$ gives it an initial amplitude, so either field can launch the coherent 0.5 THz oscillation. The fields are generated by the pump electric field coupling to spin bilinears $S_i \cdot S_j$ through the spin-dependent electric polarization, and their strength is set by the two-magnon density of states; the paper takes the explicit fields from the quantum inverse-Faraday theory of [61] and uses the coupled-oscillator equations to show how they produce the observed impulsive magnon drive.

What would settle it

Tune the mid-IR pump photon energy across and outside the two-magnon density of states while monitoring the 0.5 THz magnon amplitude: the proposed mechanism predicts the amplitude follows the two-magnon density of states, peaking near the Brillouin-zone edge and vanishing below the two-magnon band edge, whereas phonon-mediated or direct electronic mechanisms would show a different spectral profile.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that below-gap mid-infrared excitation of Sr$_2$IrO$_4$ generates coherent magnons by a purely magnetic, nonresonant nonlinear mechanism, not by photoexciting electrons. Specifically, circularly polarized 9 $\mu$m light produces a coherent $B_{2g}$ magnon at 0.5 THz whose amplitude depends on pump helicity, whose phase reverses with helicity, and whose fluence dependence is linear at low fluence and quadratic at higher fluence. Above-gap 1.3 $\mu$m pumping excites the same magnon but without helicity dependence, with a different fluence behavior, and with a much lower efficiency: after dividing by penetration depth, 9 $\mu$m pumping creates comparable magnon oscillations at two orders of magnitude lower energy density. The paper argues that the below-gap channel is the inverse Faraday effect mediated by one-photon, two-magnon coupling, with effective fields supplied by a quantum theory of spin-dependent polarization, and that the fast decay of high-energy virtual magnons into the low-energy mode at $(\pi,\pi)$ acts as the impulsive drive for the observed precession.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the quantum theory of the inverse Faraday effect used for the effective fields is correct and that the 9 $\mu$m pump is genuinely nonresonant with any dipole-allowed electronic or phonon transition; if either assumption fails, the observed helicity-dependent efficiency requires another explanation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nonresonant below-gap excitation can generate coherent magnons with at least two orders of magnitude higher efficiency than charge-resonant pumping, making it a practical route to ultrafast antiferromagnetic control.
  • Because no electrons are photoexcited, the mechanism bypasses carrier-relaxation and heating channels, so magnetic order can be driven nonthermally with moderate mid-IR fluences.
  • Tuning the pump toward the maximum of the two-magnon density of states, near the Brillouin-zone edge, should strengthen the effective fields and improve magnon generation further.
  • Time-resolved MOKE with below-gap pumping becomes a general probe of spin dynamics and magnetoelastic coupling in quantum magnets, including 2D van der Waals magnets.
  • Efficient nonthermal magnon generation of this kind could benefit antiferromagnetic spintronics and studies of topologically nontrivial magnon bands.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit is that any easy-plane antiferromagnet with spin-dependent electric polarization and a two-magnon continuum should show the same helicity-dependent below-gap magnon launching; surveying a family of such materials would test the generality of the mechanism.
  • The linear-to-quadratic fluence crossover may encode the onset of anharmonic magnon-magnon scattering, so fluence-dependent amplitude measurements could be used to extract effective magnon interaction strengths.
  • A testable extension is to scan the pump wavelength across the two-magnon density of states: the effective-field theory predicts the magnon amplitude follows that density of states, peaking near the zone edge, whereas phonon-mediated or direct electronic mechanisms would not.
  • If the mechanism is confirmed, combining below-gap pumping with cavity or plasmonic field enhancement could push nonlinear magnonics to much lower pulse energies than currently used.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements on the antiferromagnetic Mott insulator Sr2IrO4, comparing circularly polarized above-gap 1.3 um excitation with below-gap 9 um excitation. In both cases a coherent 0.5 THz B2g magnon is observed. The 9 um response is helicity-dependent (opposite helicities give oscillations 180 degrees out of phase), while the 1.3 um response is not. The 9 um magnon amplitude is reported to scale linearly with fluence at low fluence and quadratically at higher fluence, and comparable magnon amplitudes are generated at much lower fluence and lower volumetric energy density than with 1.3 um excitation. The authors attribute the below-gap helicity-dependent response to a one-photon two-magnon coupling mechanism (inverse Faraday effect) proposed in ref. [61], involving virtual high-energy magnon pairs that relax to the low-energy B2g magnon at the zone boundary.

Significance. If the mechanistic claim holds, the paper demonstrates nonresonant, below-gap optical control of antiferromagnetic order with an efficiency substantially exceeding above-gap excitation, which would be significant for ultrafast magnonics and spintronics. The experimental core is a clear strength: the B2g magnon assignment is supported by the oscillation frequency, temperature dependence, magnetic-field redshift, and comparison with prior Raman work; the helicity contrast is directly shown; and the fluence-dependent data provide a useful phenomenological benchmark. The manuscript is weakened, however, by two quantitative gaps: the quadratic high-fluence branch of the magnon amplitude is not explained by the linear-in-intensity effective field of the cited theory, and the claimed 'two orders of magnitude' efficiency enhancement is not supported by the paper's own stated numbers. The mechanism attribution also relies on a theory paper by two co-authors without in-paper recalculation of the effective fields. These issues are fixable and do not invalidate the experimental observations, but they must be addressed before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Microscopic mechanisms, Fig. 4a] The paper's central mechanistic claim is not fully supported by its own fluence-dependent data. The text states that the calculation of ref. [61] gives effective fields linear in pump intensity (quadratic in pump electric field), which corresponds to magnon amplitude proportional to fluence. However, Fig. 4a shows a distinct quadratic-in-fluence branch at high fluence, and no theoretical treatment or higher-order term is presented for that branch. Since the abstract and conclusions advertise the linear-to-quadratic crossover as part of the below-gap nonlinear response, the authors should either provide a derivation of the quadratic branch or explicitly state that this branch is an empirical observation not yet accounted for by the cited mechanism. As written, the statement that the theory is 'consistent with the experimental observations in Fig. 4a' is misleading.
  2. [Microscopic mechanisms, efficiency comparison] The claim of 'at least two orders of magnitude' higher generation efficiency is not supported by the stated numbers. For comparable magnon amplitude, the fluences are 0.92 mJ/cm2 (9 um) and 5.7 mJ/cm2 (1.3 um), with penetration depths 1217 nm and 141 nm, respectively. The volumetric energy-density ratio is therefore (5.7/141)/(0.92/1217) = 53, i.e., about 1.7 orders of magnitude, not 2. Using the 1.3 um data at 11.5 mJ/cm2 would give a ratio near two orders, but Fig. 4a shows the 1.3 um magnon amplitude is already suppressed at that fluence, so it is not a valid point for an efficiency comparison. The 'two orders' statement in the abstract and main text should be revised to the actual calculated factor, with the assumptions (surface energy density, reflectivity, penetration depth, probe depth, and the choice of comparable-amplitude points) stated explicitly.
  3. [Methods: Effective fields acting on low-energy magnons] The mechanism attribution rests on the effective fields h_u and h_m, but their magnitudes, frequency dependence, and helicity dependence are not computed in this manuscript. The Methods section presents only a generic driven-oscillator model and refers to ref. [61] for the field strengths. Since ref. [61] is authored by two co-authors of this paper, this is not independent confirmation, and a reader cannot verify that a 138 meV photon couples to virtual magnon pairs with the claimed helicity-dependent strength. I request that the authors include at least the explicit expressions or a numerical estimate of h_u and h_m for Sr2IrO4 at 9 um, or clearly separate the measured phenomenology from the theoretical interpretation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 4a] The phrase 'linear (quadratic) scaling of the coherent magnon amplitude with excitation fluence (electric field)' is confusing because Fig. 4a shows linear scaling with fluence at low fluence and quadratic scaling with fluence at high fluence. Please rephrase to describe the crossover explicitly.
  2. [Fig. 3c] The fit of the magnon frequency to |1-T/TN|^{2eta} yields beta = 0.134, stated as 'close to 1/8'. Please provide the uncertainty in TN and the fit residuals, since the closeness to 1/8 depends on the fit range and on the choice of critical exponent for the in-plane correlation length.
  3. [Methods and captions] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected: 'we first write write the equation' in the Methods, 'chooped' in the experimental setup, 'detercted' in Extended Data Fig. 4 caption, and 'at at (pi,pi)' near the mechanism description. A careful proofread is needed.
  4. [Fig. 4b] The lifetime increase for 1.3 um pumping is attributed to noise affecting the fit accuracy. Since Fig. 4b is used to support a difference in fluence dependence, please show the fit uncertainties or confidence intervals, or explicitly remove this trend from the mechanistic discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental results are measured, and the cited mechanism in ref. [61] is prior independent theory that is used as a consistency check rather than as an input.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental facts — helicity-dependent phase reversal for 9 um pumping, absence for 1.3 um pumping, and the fluence dependence of the magnon amplitude — are extracted directly from the time-resolved MOKE data and are not constructed from any theory. The assignment of the 0.5 THz mode to the B2g magnon is anchored to independent Raman, RIXS, and neutron references, not to the authors' prior work. The theoretical mechanism is attributed to ref. [61], which is a prior, published derivation by two co-authors; however, that work does not use the present data, and the paper uses it as an explanation and consistency check rather than fitting the theory to the data. The Methods oscillator equations are generic and the effective fields hu and hm are not fitted parameters: no equation is shown to be equivalent to another by construction, and no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction. The high-fluence quadratic branch and the 'two orders of magnitude' efficiency estimate are quantitative support-level concerns that a referee could raise, but they are not circular reductions: the theory being incomplete for the quadratic branch is the opposite of circularity. The self-citation of ref. [61] is real but does not reduce the load-bearing claim to its own input, because the cited result is an independent prior calculation with stated assumptions and external falsifiability.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's genuinely new content is the experimental data and the efficiency comparison. The spin Hamiltonian, the inverse-Faraday quantum theory, and the oscillator model are imported from prior work, notably ref. [61] authored by two co-authors, so the mechanism section is not self-contained. The free parameters are limited to phenomenological fits, not to constants that steer a derivation.

free parameters (3)
  • Critical exponent beta for magnon frequency temperature scaling = 0.134
    Fitted to the temperature dependence of fmagnon in Fig. 3c; close to 1/8 for a 2D Heisenberg model but not derived from first principles.
  • Low/high fluence regime boundary for 9 um scaling = approximately 0.5 mJ/cm2 (shaded region in Fig. 4a)
    Chosen by inspection to separate the linear and quadratic scaling regions; no a priori criterion is given for the boundary.
  • Phenomenological relaxation times tau_m and tau_u = not quantified
    Relaxation times in Eqs. (2)-(3) are phenomenological parameters used in the damped oscillator fits to extract magnon amplitude and lifetime; their values are not reported.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The magnetic Hamiltonian for Sr2IrO4 with parameters from ref. [45] (J1=57 meV, J2=-16.5 meV, J3=12.4 meV, etc.) correctly describes the spin spectrum.
    Used in the SpinW calculation of the spin spectrum in Methods and Extended Data Fig. 3; the parameter values are taken from prior work, not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The quantum theory of the inverse Faraday effect for Sr2IrO4 in ref. [61] is correct and applies to the 9 um excitation.
    The mechanism section relies on this theory for the effective fields hu and hm and for the one-photon two-magnon coupling; it is cited but not re-derived or independently verified in the present work.
  • domain assumption The 9 um photon (138 meV) is nonresonant, i.e., it does not couple to any dipole-allowed electronic or phonon transition.
    Stated in the introduction and Fig. 1c based on the electronic gap of about 0.5 eV and the highest optical phonon of about 82 meV; this is a stated assumption rather than an experimentally mapped exclusion of all possible transitions.
  • domain assumption The coupled oscillator model in Eqs. (2)-(3) captures the low-energy magnon dynamics of Sr2IrO4.
    Phenomenological model used to derive impulsive-drive behavior; it assumes that the linearized in-plane angle u and out-of-plane magnetization m are linearly coupled and that effective fields hu and hm act as impulsive sources.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonresonant nonlinear magnonics in an antiferromagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JSOH63LZ

@misc{pith2026241110579,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonresonant nonlinear magnonics in an antiferromagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JSOH63LZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10579}
}
abstract

Antiferromagnets exhibit rapid spin dynamics in a net zero magnetic background which enables novel spintronic applications and interrogation of many-body quantum phenomena. The layered antiferromagnet Sr$_2$IrO$_4$ hosts an exotic spin one-half Mott insulating state with an electronic gap arising from on-site Coulomb repulsion and strong spin-orbit coupling. This makes Sr$_2$IrO$_4$ an interesting candidate to interrogate dynamical attributes of the magnetic order using ultrafast laser pulses. We investigate the magnetization dynamics of Sr$_2$IrO$_4$ following circularly-polarized photoexcitation with below-gap mid-infrared (mid-IR -- 9 $\mu m$) and above-gap near-infrared (near-IR -- 1.3 $\mu m$) pulses. In both cases, we observe excitation of a zone-center coherent magnon mode featuring a 0.5 THz oscillation in the pump-induced Kerr-rotation signal. However, only below-gap excitation exhibits a helicity dependent response and linear (quadratic) scaling of the coherent magnon amplitude with excitation fluence (electric field). Moreover, below-gap excitation has a magnon generation efficiency that is at least two orders of magnitude greater in comparison to above-gap excitation. Our analysis indicates that the helicity dependence and enhanced generation efficiency arises from a unique one-photon two-magnon coupling mechanism for magnon generation. Thus, preferential spin-photon coupling without photoexcitation of electrons permits extremely efficient magnon generation. Our results reveal new possibilities for ultrafast control of antiferromagnets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [61]

    Time reversal symmetry dictates that the electric field of light couples to spin bilinears (∼SiSj) through the spin-dependent polarization

    which explains many aspects of the observed data. Time reversal symmetry dictates that the electric field of light couples to spin bilinears (∼SiSj) through the spin-dependent polarization. Through coupling to the field, high-energy magnons of equal and opposite momenta are excited. Finally, via anharmonic magnon-magnon scattering, lower energy magnons ar...

    work page

  2. [1]

    Zhang and R

    J. Zhang and R. D. Averitt, Dynamics and control in complex transition metal oxides, Annual Review of Materials Research 44, 19 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [2]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards properties on demand in quantum materials, Nature Materials 16, 1077 (2017). 18

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, D. van der Marel, M. Dressel, and K. Haule, Electrodynamics of correlated electron materials, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 471 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, T. F. Nova, B. Liu, M. Forst, D. Prabhakaran, P. G. Radaelli, and A. Cavalleri, Polarizing an antiferromagnet by optical engineering of the crystal field, Nature Physics 16, 937 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    A. S. Disa, J. Curtis, M. Fechner, A. Liu, A. von Hoegen, M. Forst, T. F. Nova, P. Narang, A. Maljuk, A. V. Boris, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Photo-induced high-temperature ferro- magnetism in YTiO 3, Nature 617, 73 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 041002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    Kampfrath, K

    T. Kampfrath, K. Tanaka, and K. A. Nelson, Resonant and nonresonant control over matter and light by intense terahertz transients, Nature Photonics 7, 680 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2731 (2010)

    2010

  2. [9]

    Ashoka, S

    A. Ashoka, S. Nagane, N. Strkalj, A. Sharma, B. Roose, A. J. Sneyd, J. Sung, J. L. MacManus- Driscoll, S. D. Stranks, S. Feldmann, and A. Rao, Local symmetry breaking drives picosecond spin domain formation in polycrystalline halide perovskite films, Nature Materials 22, 977 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    V. A. Stoica, D. Puggioni, J. Zhang, R. Singla, G. L. Dakovski, G. Coslovich, M. H. Seaberg, M. Kareev, S. Middey, P. Kissin, R. D. Averitt, J. Chakhalian, H. Wen, J. M. Rondinelli, and J. W. Freeland, Magnetic order driven ultrafast phase transition in NdNiO 3, Physical Revie...

    2022

  4. [11]

    A. Ron, S. Chaudhary, G. Zhang, H. Ning, E. Zoghlin, S. D. Wilson, R. D. Averitt, G. Refael, and D. Hsieh, Ultrafast enhancement of ferromagnetic spin exchange induced by ligand-to- metal charge transfer, Physical Review Letters 125, 197203 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    D. J. Lovinger, E. Zoghlin, P. Kissin, G. Ahn, K. Ahadi, P. Kim, M. Poore, S. Stemmer, S. J. Moon, S. D. Wilson, and R. D. Averitt, Magnetoelastic coupling to coherent acoustic phonon modes in the ferrimagnetic insulator GdTiO 3, Physical Review B 102, 085138 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    M. P. M. Dean, Y. Cao, X. Liu, S. Wall, R. Mankowsky, V. Thampy, X. M. Chen, J. G. Vale, D. Casa, J. Kim, A. H. Said, P. Juhas, R. Alonso-Mori, J. M. Glownia, A. Robert, J. Robinson, 19 M. Sikorski, S. Song, M. Kozina, H. Lemke, L. Patthey, S. Owada, T. Katayama, M. Yabashi, Y...

    2016

  7. [14]

    D. G. Mazzone, D. Meyers, Y. Cao, J. G. Vale, C. D. Dashwood, Y. Shi, A. J. A. James, N. J. Robinson, J. Lin, V. Thampy, Y. Tanaka, A. S. Johnson, H. Miao, R. Wang, T. A. Assefa, J. Kim, D. Casa, R. Mankowsky, D. Zhu, R. Alonso-Mori, S. Song, H. Yavas, T. Katayama, M. Yabashi,...

    2021

  8. [15]

    Matthiesen, J

    M. Matthiesen, J. R. Hortensius, S. Vanas-Valero, I. Kapon, D. Dumcenco, E. Giannini, M. Siskins, B. A. Ivanov, H. S. J. Van der Zant, E. Coronado, A. B. Kuzmenko, D. Afanasiev, and A. D. Caviglia, Controlling magnetism with light in a zero orbital angular momentum antiferroma...

    2023

  9. [16]

    Afanasiev, J

    D. Afanasiev, J. R. Hortensius, B. A. Ivanov, A. Sasani, E. Bousquet, Y. M. Blanter, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, and A. D. Caviglia, Ultrafast control of magnetic interactions via light-driven phonons, Nature Materials 20, 607 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    Afanasiev, A

    D. Afanasiev, A. Gatilova, D. J. Groenendijk, B. A. Ivanov, M. Gibert, S. Gariglio, J. Mentink, J. Li, N. Dasari, M. Eckstein, T. Rasing, A. D. Caviglia, and A. V. Kimel, Ultrafast spin dynamics in photodoped spin-orbit Mott insulator Sr 2IrO4, Physical Review X 9, 021020 (2019)

    2019

  11. [18]

    T. G. H. Blank, K. A. Grishunin, B. A. Ivanov, E. A. Mashkovich, D. Afanasiev, and A. V. Kimel, Empowering control of antiferromagnets by thz-induced spin coherence, Physical Re- view Letters 131, 096701 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    E. A. Mashkovich, K. A. Grishunin, R. M. Dubrovin, A. K. Zvezdin, R. V. Pisarev, and A. V. Kimel, Terahertz light-driven coupling of antiferromagnetic spins to lattice, Science 374, 1608 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    Grishunin, E

    K. Grishunin, E. A. Mashkovich, A. V. Kimel, A. M. Balbashov, and A. K. Zvezdin, Excitation and detection of terahertz coherent spin waves in antiferromagneticα-Fe2O3, Physical Review 20 B 104, 024419 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, T. J. Huisman, V. A. Gavrichkov, S. I. Polukeev, S. G. Ovchinnikov, D. Afanasiev, R. V. Pisarev, T. H. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Resonant pumping of d-d crystal field electronic transitions as a mechanism of ultrafast optical control of the exchange interac...

    2020

  15. [22]

    In general, lightwave-control of magnetism can be achieved ∗ rubaiath@stanford.edu † raveritt@ucsd.edu 2 in several ways

    and spintronic devices. In general, lightwave-control of magnetism can be achieved ∗ rubaiath@stanford.edu † raveritt@ucsd.edu 2 in several ways. This includes direct coupling between the magnetic field of light and spins [22][28], modification of exchange interactions [29][30...

  16. [23]

    Zhang, F

    Z. Zhang, F. Y. Gao, J. B. Curtis, Z. Liu, Y. Chien, A. von Hoegen, M. T. Wong, T. Kuri- hara, T. Suemoto, P. Narang, E. Baldini, and K. A. Nelson, Terahertz field-induced nonlinear coupling of two magnon modes in an antiferromagnet, Nature Physics 20, 801 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    Kampfrath, A

    T. Kampfrath, A. Sell, G. Klatt, A. Pashkin, S. Mahrlein, T. Dekorsy, M. Wolf, M. Fiebig, A. Leitenstorfer, and R. Huber, Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves, Nature Photonics 5, 31 (2011)

    2011

  18. [25]

    Huang, L

    C. Huang, L. Luo, M. Mootz, J. Shang, P. Man, S. Lu, I. E. Perakis, Y. X. Yao, A. Wu, and J. Wang, Extreme terahertz magnon multiplication induced by resonant magnetic pulse pairs, Nature Communications 15, 3214 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    Zhang, F

    Z. Zhang, F. Y. Gao, Y. Chien, Z. Liu, J. B. Curtis, E. R. Sung, X. Ma, W. Ren, S. Cao, P. Narang, A. von Hoegen, E. Baldini, and K. A. Nelson, Terahertz-field-driven magnon upconversion in an antiferromagnet, Nature Physics 20, 788 (2024)

    2024

  20. [27]

    Nemec, M

    P. Nemec, M. Fiebig, T. Kampfrath, and A. V. Kimel, Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics, Nature Physics 14, 229 (2018)

    2018

  21. [28]

    A. V. Kimel, B. A. Ivanov, R. V. Pisarev, P. A. Usachev, A. Kirilyuk, and T. Rasing, Inertia- driven spin switching in antiferromagnets, Nature Physics 5, 727 (2009)

    2009

  22. [29]

    R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, E. Hendry, A. Secchi, J. H. Mentink, M. Eckstein, A. Wu, R. V. Pisarev, V. V. Kruglyak, M. I. Katsnelson, T. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Ultrafast optical modification of exchange interactions in iron oxides, Nature Communications 6, 8190 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    Baierl, J

    S. Baierl, J. H. Mentink, M. Hohenleutner, L. Braun, T.-M. Do, C. Lange, A. Sell, M. Fiebig, G. Woltersdorf, T. Kampfrath, and R. Huber, Terahertz-driven nonlinear spin response of antiferromagnetic nickel oxide, Physical Review Letters 117, 197201 (2016)

    2016

  24. [31]

    T. F. Nova, A. Carella, A. Cantaluppi, M. Forst, D. Bossini, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, An effective magnetic field from optically driven phonons, 21 Nature Physics 13, 132 (2017)

    2017

  25. [32]

    J. H. Mentink, K. Balzer, and M. Eckstein, Ultrafast and reversible control of the exchange interaction in Mott insulators, Nature Communications 6, 6708 (2015)

    2015

  26. [33]

    R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, E. Hendry, and V. V. Kruglyak, Ultrafast inverse faraday effect in a paramagnetic terbium gallium garnet crystal, Physical Review B 86, 100405 (2012)

    2012

  27. [34]

    A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, P. A. Usachev, R. V. Pisarev, A. M. Balbashov, and T. Rasing, Ul- trafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses, Nature 435, 655 (2005)

    2005

  28. [35]

    Tzschaschel, K

    C. Tzschaschel, K. Otani, R. Iida, T. Shimura, H. Ueda, S. G¨ unther, M. Fiebig, and T. Satoh, Ultrafast optical excitation of coherent magnons in antiferromagnetic NiO, Physical Review B 95, 174407 (2017)

    2017

  29. [36]

    Satoh, S.-J

    T. Satoh, S.-J. Cho, R. Iida, T. Shimura, K. Kuroda, H. Ueda, Y. Ueda, B. A. Ivanov, F. Nori, and M. Fiebig, Spin oscillations in antiferromagnetic nio triggered by circularly polarized light, Physical Review Letters 105, 077402 (2010)

    2010

  30. [37]

    A. M. Kalashnikova, A. V. Kimel, R. V. Pisarev, V. N. Gridnev, P. A. Usachev, A. Kirilyuk, and T. Rasing, Impulsive excitation of coherent magnons and phonons by subpicosecond laser pulses in the weak ferromagnet FeBO 3, Physical Review B 78, 104301 (2008)

    2008

  31. [38]

    A. M. Kalashnikova, A. V. Kimel, R. V. Pisarev, V. N. Gridnev, A. Kirilyuk, and T. Ras- ing, Impulsive generation of coherent magnons by linearly polarized light in the easy-plane antiferromagnet FeBO3, Physical Review Letters 99, 167205 (2007)

    2007

  32. [39]

    J. G. Rau, E. K. H. Lee, and H. Y. Kee, Spin-orbit physics giving rise to novel phases in cor- related systems: Iridates and related materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 195 (2016)

    2016

  33. [40]

    Afanasiev, I

    D. Afanasiev, I. Razdolski, K. M. Skibinsky, D. Bolotin, S. V. Yagupov, M. B. Strugatsky, A. Kirilyuk, T. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Laser excitation of lattice-driven anharmonic mag- netization dynamics in dielectric FeBO 3, Physical Review Letters 112, 147403 (2014)

    2014

  34. [41]

    Cao and P

    G. Cao and P. Schlottmann, The challenge of spin–orbit-tuned ground states in iridates: a key issues review, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 042502 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    Witczak-Krempa, G

    W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, Correlated quantum phenomena in the strong spin-orbit regime, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 5, 57 (2014)

    2014

  36. [43]

    Y. Gim, A. Sethi, Q. Zhao, J. F. Mitchell, G. Cao, and S. L. Cooper, Isotropic and anisotropic regimes of the field-dependent spin dynamics in Sr 2IrO4: Raman scattering studies, Physical Review B 93, 024405 (2016)

    2016

  37. [44]

    Pesin and L

    D. Pesin and L. Balents, Mott physics and band topology in materials with strong spin–orbit interaction, Nature Physics 6, 376 (2010). 22

    2010

  38. [45]

    Porras, J

    J. Porras, J. Bertinshaw, H. Liu, G. Khaliullin, N. H. Sung, J.-W. Kim, S. Francoual, P. Stef- fens, G. Deng, M. M. Sala, A. Efimenko, A. Said, D. Casa, X. Huang, T. Gog, J. Kim, B. Keimer, and B. J. Kim, Pseudospin-lattice coupling in the spin-orbit Mott insulator Sr2IrO4, Ph...

    2019

  39. [46]

    Gretarsson, J

    H. Gretarsson, J. Sauceda, N. H. Sung, M. H¨ oppner, M. Minola, B. J. Kim, B. Keimer, and M. Le Tacon, Raman scattering study of vibrational and magnetic excitations in Sr2−xLaxIrO4, Physical Review B 96, 115138 (2017)

    2017

  40. [47]

    F. Ye, S. Chi, B. C. Chakoumakos, J. A. Fernandez-Baca, T. Qi, and G. Cao, Magnetic and crystal structures of Sr 2IrO4: A neutron diffraction study, Physical Review B 87, 140406 (2013)

    2013

  41. [48]

    Liu and G

    H. Liu and G. Khaliullin, Pseudo-jahn-teller effect and magnetoelastic coupling in spin-orbit Mott insulators, Physical Review Letters 122, 057203 (2019)

    2019

  42. [49]

    G. Cao, J. Bolivar, S. McCall, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, Weak ferromagnetism, metal- to-nonmetal transition, and negative differential resistivity in single-crystal Sr 2IrO4, Physical Review B 57, R11039 (1998)

    1998

  43. [50]

    B. J. Kim, H. Ohsumi, T. Komesu, S. Sakai, T. Morita, H. Takagi, and T. Arima, Phase- sensitive observation of a spin-orbital Mott state in Sr 2IrO4, Science 323, 1329 (2009)

    2009

  44. [51]

    Bertinshaw, Y

    J. Bertinshaw, Y. K. Kim, G. Khaliullin, and B. J. Kim, Square lattice iridates, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 315 (2018)

    2018

  45. [52]

    B. J. Kim, H. Jin, S. J. Moon, J.-Y. Kim, B.-G. Park, C. S. Leem, J. Yu, T. W. Noh, C. Kim, S.-J. Oh, J.-H. Park, V. Durairaj, G. Cao, and E. Rotenberg, Novel Jeff = 1/2 Mott state induced by relativistic spin-orbit coupling in Sr 2IrO4, Physical Review Letters 101, 076402 (2008)

    2008

  46. [53]

    S. J. Moon, H. Jin, W. S. Choi, J. S. Lee, S. S. A. Seo, J. Yu, G. Cao, T. W. Noh, and Y. S. Lee, Temperature dependence of the electronic structure of the Jeff = 1 2 Mott insulator Sr2IrO4 studied by optical spectroscopy, Physical Review B 80, 195110 (2009). 23

    2009

  47. [54]

    Binder and D

    K. Binder and D. P. Landau, Critical properties of the two-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg model, Physical Review B 13, 1140 (1976)

    1976

  48. [55]

    Pincini, J

    D. Pincini, J. G. Vale, C. Donnerer, A. de la Torre, E. C. Hunter, R. Perry, M. Moretti Sala, F. Baumberger, and D. F. McMorrow, Anisotropic exchange and spin-wave damping in pure and electron-doped Sr 2IrO4, Physical Review B 96, 075162 (2017)

    2017

  49. [56]

    Gretarsson, N

    H. Gretarsson, N. H. Sung, M. H¨ oppner, B. J. Kim, B. Keimer, and M. Le Tacon, Two-magnon raman scattering and pseudospin-lattice interactions in Sr2IrO4 and Sr3Ir2O7, Physical Review Letters 116, 136401 (2016)

    2016

  50. [57]

    X. Liu, M. P. M. Dean, Z. Y. Meng, M. H. Upton, T. Qi, T. Gog, Y. Cao, J. Q. Lin, D. Meyers, H. Ding, G. Cao, and J. P. Hill, Anisotropic softening of magnetic excitations in lightly electron-doped Sr 2IrO4, Physical Review B 93, 241102 (2016)

    2016

  51. [58]

    Y. K. Kim, O. Krupin, J. D. Denlinger, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, Q. Zhao, J. F. Mitchell, J. W. Allen, and B. J. Kim, Fermi arcs in a doped pseudospin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Science 345, 189 (2014)

    2014

  52. [59]

    Y. Cao, Q. Wang, T. J. Waugh, J. A. Reber, H. Li, X. Zhou, S. Parham, S. R. Par, C. Plumb, E. Rotenberg, A. Bostwick, J. D. Denlinger, T. Qi, M. A. Hermele, G. Cao, and D. S. Dessau, Hallmarks of the Mott-metal crossover in the hole-doped pseudospin-1/2 Mott in- sulator Sr2IrO...

    2016

  53. [60]

    Y. Cao, X. Liu, W. Xu, W.-G. Yin, D. Meyers, J. Kim, D. Casa, M. H. Upton, T. Gog, T. Berlijn, G. Alvarez, S. Yuan, J. Terzic, J. M. Tranquada, J. P. Hill, G. Cao, R. M. Konik, and M. P. M. Dean, Giant spin gap and magnon localization in the disordered Heisenberg antiferromagn...

    2017

  54. [62]

    Hsieh, F

    D. Hsieh, F. Mahmood, D. H. Torchinsky, G. Cao, and N. Gedik, Observation of a metal- to-insulator transition with both Mott-Hubbard and Slater characteristics in Sr 2IrO4 from time-resolved photocarrier dynamics, Physical Review B 86, 035128 (2012)

    2012

  55. [63]

    U. F. P. Seifert and L. Balents, Optical excitation of magnons in an easy-plane antiferromagnet: Application to Sr 2IrO4, Physical Review B 100, 125161 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Pr¨ opper, A

    D. Pr¨ opper, A. N. Yaresko, M. H¨ oppner, Y. Matiks, Y.-L. Mathis, T. Takayama, A. Mat- sumoto, H. Takagi, B. Keimer, and A. V. Boris, Optical anisotropy of the Jeff = 1/2 Mott insulator Sr2IrO4, Physical Review B 94, 035158 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    S. R. U. Haque, M. H. Michael, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, L. Windg¨ atter, S. Latini, J. P. Wakefield, G.-F. Zhang, J. Zhang, A. Rubio, J. G. Checkelsky, E. Demler, and R. D. Averitt, Terahertz parametric amplification as a reporter of exciton condensate dynamics, Nature Materials 23, ...

    2024

  58. [66]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-q incommensurate magnetic structures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 166002 (2015). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Gil Refael, David Hsieh, Dmitri N. Basov, Nuh Gedik, Andrea F. Young, Su- sanne Stemmer, Tony F. Hein...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.