Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 300 references

A New Era of Excitonic Insulators

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Excitonic insulators, a 1960s theoretical idea, can now be tested in real materials through collective-mode and pump-probe experiments.

desk verdict A workmanlike invited review that rightly captures the field's experimental turn and its unresolved lattice-versus-electronic debate, without overclaiming—worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10985 v2 pith:ZHJWRD5U submitted 2024-11-17 cond-mat.str-el

Tatsuya Kaneko , Yukinori Ohta This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords excitonicinsulatorelectron-holecondensationBCS-BECcrossovercollectivemodeselectron-phononcouplingTa2NiSe5TiSe2stronglycorrelatedelectrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the excitonic insulator (EI)—a state in which electrons and holes bind into pairs and condense, opening a gap in a narrow-gap semiconductor or semimetal—has moved from a 1960s theoretical idea to a subject that can be tested in real materials. The paper shows how the excitonic order parameter, defined as the expectation value of an electron–hole pair operator $\langle \hat{a}^\dagger_k \hat{b}_k\rangle$, obeys a gap equation analogous to BCS superconductivity, so the formation of the order is naturally described as a BCS–Bose-Einstein-condensation crossover. It reviews candidate materials—TiSe$_2$, Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$, cobalt oxides, monolayer WTe$_2$, and others—and identifies the central open problem: in materials like TiSe$_2$ and Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$, lattice distortions accompany the transition, and disentangling the excitonic (electronic) contribution from the electron–phonon contribution to the gap is hard. The review's main contention is that collective modes—the amplitude and phase (Higgs and Nambu–Goldstone) excitations of the order parameter, and their hybridization with phonons—give dynamical signatures that can separate the two contributions, and that pump-probe and nonlinear optical experiments are now able to look for those signatures.

What carries the argument

The central object is the excitonic order parameter $\Delta$, the expectation value of the interband electron–hole pair operator $\hat{a}^\dagger_k \hat{b}_k$, which acts as the off-diagonal (hybridization) component of the two-band Hamiltonian and opens the insulating gap. The argument is carried by the self-consistent gap equation, whose BCS-like form ties the EI to the BCS–BEC crossover, and by the collective excitation spectrum of the ordered state: fluctuations of $|\Delta|$ give the amplitude (Higgs) mode, fluctuations of the phase give the Nambu–Goldstone mode, and coupling to a phonon $g x_j (\hat{a}^\dagger_j \hat{b}_j + \mathrm{H.c.})$ locks the phase, hybridizes the phase mode with the phonon, and opens a gap in the lowest collective mode.

What would settle it

A concrete disproof would be a first-principles or experimentally constrained lattice-only model of Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$—phonons and electron–phonon coupling with zero interband Coulomb interaction—that reproduces, at all temperatures, the measured valence-band flattening, the gap opening, and the Raman continuum. If such a model succeeds, the claim that excitonic correlations are needed for these signatures fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that excitonic-insulator research has reached the stage at which theoretical predictions and state-of-the-art experiments can be combined. The underlying physics is presented through a two-band model with interband Coulomb interaction $V$: the order parameter $\Delta = -(V/N)\sum_k \langle \hat{a}^\dagger_k \hat{b}_k\rangle$ represents condensation of electron–hole pairs, and the self-consistent gap equation for $\Delta$ has the same mathematical structure as the BCS gap equation, with a smooth crossover between a weak-coupling BCS-like regime and a strong-coupling BEC-like regime. The paper reviews how strongly correlated calculations on the extended Falicov–Kimball model and the two-orbital Hubbard model realize excitonic order, and how candidate materials—TiSe$_2$, Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$, the cobalt oxides, and others—show gap openings and band deformations consistent with the excitonic scenario. It argues that because lattice distortions are present in the main candidates, static band-structure comparisons alone cannot settle whether the transition is excitonic or lattice-driven; the decisive evidence should come from the collective dynamics of the ordered state, where the gapless phase mode of a pure excitonic order becomes gapped when electron–phonon coupling locks the phase, and where the amplitude mode can be probed by nonlinear optical responses such as third-harmonic generation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that purely electronic models that leave out electron–phonon coupling can still capture the essential physics of candidates such as Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$, so that agreement between their predicted spectra and measured ARPES data supports the excitonic interpretation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If collective modes are observable, pump-probe and nonlinear optical experiments on Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$ and TiSe$_2$ can distinguish an excitonic order from a purely lattice-driven transition by looking for the gapped hybridized phase–phonon mode and the amplitude mode near $2|\Delta|$.
  • The BCS–BEC crossover picture means that in the strong-coupling regime a gapped 'preformed pair' state should exist above the ordering temperature, giving a testable prediction for ARPES and optical conductivity in candidates near the BEC side.
  • Strongly correlated $d^6$ cobalt oxides, where the valence and conduction orbitals sit on the same atom, are predicted to host spin-triplet excitonic orders with nearly zero net magnetization—magnetic multipole (hidden) order that can be looked for in neutron scattering or RIXS.
  • Materials with only tiny lattice distortions, such as HfTe$_2$ and Ta$_2$Pd$_3$Te$_5$, are singled out as promising places to find a near-pure excitonic order, because the lattice contribution that complicates TiSe$_2$ and Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$ is much weaker.
  • If the excitonic scenario holds, the superconducting domes seen under pressure in Ta$_2$NiSe$_5$ and TiSe$_2$ connect excitonic order to the broader phenomenology of superconductivity emerging from a competing ordered state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors leave implicit that the same collective-mode experiments could map the BCS–BEC crossover in a single material by tuning the band gap through pressure, strain, or doping, turning the schematic phase diagram into a measured one.
  • The review's emphasis on lattice-free candidates suggests a targeted search strategy: compute phonon spectra of proposed EI materials and prioritize those with no soft mode at the ordering wavevector; those are the cleanest tests of the purely electronic excitonic mechanism.
  • Although the review focuses on equilibrium and pump-probe states, its collective-mode analysis implies that terahertz or mid-infrared driving tuned to the gapped hybridized mode could coherently control the excitonic phase, analogous to coherent control of superconducting amplitude modes—a testable direction not explored in the paper.
  • The spin-triplet case in cobalt oxides ties excitonic order to hidden multipolar order; one inference is that techniques sensitive to higher-order multipoles, such as resonant X-ray diffraction at the Co $L$-edge, would be a sharper probe than magnetization measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This invited review surveys the theory and experiment of excitonic insulators (EIs), from the 1960s concept through the BCS–BEC crossover description, strongly correlated lattice models (EFKM and TOHM), and a wide range of candidate materials, with emphasis on TiSe2, Ta2NiSe5, and cobalt oxides. The authors argue that recent experimental techniques and theoretical solvers have brought the field to a stage where predictions can be confronted with state-of-the-art measurements, and they highlight collective modes and pump-probe dynamics as the most promising route to separate excitonic from lattice-driven physics. The review is explicitly balanced, repeatedly acknowledging that in materials like TiSe2 and Ta2NiSe5 the phase transition is accompanied by lattice distortions and that the static band-structure signatures of excitonic and phononic mechanisms are difficult to disentangle.

Significance. If the field is indeed entering the era described here, this review provides a valuable and timely synthesis of a large and fragmented literature. Its strengths are its breadth (roughly 330 references covering theory, numerics, ARPES, optics, and pump-probe experiments), its candid treatment of open debates such as the 'chicken-and-egg problem' of lattice versus electronic order, and its clear explanation of why collective modes, not just static band structures, are the natural discriminators. The review also collects falsifiable predictions, for example the phase-mode-induced in-gap mode at twice the phase-mode frequency in nonlinear spectroscopy (Section 5.3), and reproduces figures from primary sources with proper attribution. As a review, it does not advance a new derivation, but its central claim—that theory and experiment can now be combined productively—is supported by the many concrete examples and by the authors' honest statement of the remaining limitations. The manuscript is appropriate for an invited review in a general condensed-matter journal.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (1)] In the noninteracting Hamiltonian, the last energy term is written as ϵ(a) ˆb† j ˆb j; it should presumably be ϵ(b) ˆb† j ˆb j, to be consistent with the definition of the orbital-dependent level.
  2. [Eq. (11)] The definition of the number operator contains a typo: ˆn j,a = ˆa† i ˆa j should read ˆn j,a = ˆa† j ˆa j.
  3. [Section 4.2] After the discussion of Figure 10, where the VCA spectra of a purely electronic quasi-1D EFKM reproduce the ARPES gap opening and band flattening, the text should cross-reference Section 5 explicitly to remind the reader that this comparison does not by itself discriminate between excitonic and electron-phonon mechanisms; the present wording already notes the omission of electron-phonon interactions, but an explicit pointer would reinforce the point.
  4. [Section 1 and Abstract] The phrase 'A New Era' in the title and the statement that the field has 'proceeded to the stage where we can combine theoretical predictions with state-of-the-art experiments' are somewhat stronger than the evidence presented, since the review itself stresses that the lattice-versus-electronic debate is unresolved for the leading candidates. A more measured formulation, such as 'an era in which theory and experiment can be combined to sharpen the debate,' would better match the body of the text.
  5. [Section 4.2] In the sentence 'Ta2NiSe5 was composed in the 1980s,' the verb 'composed' is imprecise; 'synthesized' or 'first synthesized' would be clearer.
  6. [Section 4.3] The description of the α, β, and γ phases of LaCoO3 under high magnetic fields is dense; a sentence stating which experimental observable (e.g., magnetostriction or magnetization) distinguishes the uniform excitonic order from the bi-exciton superlattice would help the non-specialist reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's claims rest on external experimental results and disclosed model-data comparisons; self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

This manuscript is an invited review rather than a derivation or prediction paper. Its central claim (Sect. 1) — that excitonic-insulator research has advanced to a stage where theoretical predictions can be combined with state-of-the-art experiments — is supported by a broad body of ARPES, optical, pump-probe, neutron, and X-ray studies performed by many independent groups (e.g., Refs. 19, 23–25, 27, 142–157, 163–166), not solely by the authors' own work. The authors' own publications (e.g., Refs. 22, 59, 68, 306) are cited as sources of specific numerical calculations or collective-mode formalisms, but these citations are not used as a substitute for external evidence; the numerical methods (VCA, DMRG, DMFT) are standard, and the experimental data being matched are from outside the authors' group. The closest approach to a 'prediction' is the Fig. 10 comparison in Sect. 4.2, where VCA spectra of a quasi-1D EFKM 'can reproduce the temperature-dependent gap opening and flattening of the VB observed in ARPES.' This is not circular by construction: the theoretical gap follows from the model's interband Coulomb interaction V, and the ARPES data are not used to fit the model parameters and then re-labeled as a prediction. The comparison is presented as a reproduction, not as a parameter-free forecast. The paper also explicitly discloses the model's limitation — 'the theoretical calculations are conducted in the purely electronic model and contributions from electron–phonon interactions are not considered' (Sect. 4.2, Fig. 10 caption) — and later characterizes the static discrimination problem as a 'chicken-and-egg problem' (Sect. 5). This is an acknowledged confound between excitonic and lattice-driven mechanisms, which is a correctness or evidence limitation rather than a definitional equivalence. No imported uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggled in solely via self-citation, or renaming of a known result was found. Consequently, the review exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or entities. The above entries reflect the assumptions the review adopts from the cited literature in building its synthesis.

free parameters (1)
  • Interorbital Coulomb interaction U in the EFKM/TOHM = Not specified in review; set in the underlying calculations (e.g., Ref. 22)
    The model calculations used to reproduce ARPES spectra (Fig. 10) and phase diagrams (Fig. 4) depend on the value of U relative to hopping; the review does not report or justify these choices.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock approximation captures the qualitative physics of the excitonic order in Sect. 2.1.
    The gap equation (8) is derived under HFA; this approximation is known to overestimate transition temperatures, but it is the framework for the standard phase diagram.
  • domain assumption The BCS-BEC crossover concept applies to the excitonic insulator.
    The author draws on this analogy throughout Sect. 2.2 and later to interpret results; its validity for EIs is assumed without new justification.
  • domain assumption The variational cluster approach (VCA) result for the quasi-1D EFKM (Ref. 22) faithfully represents the model and is applicable to Ta2NiSe5.
    The review uses this calculation as evidence that ARPES spectra can be explained by the EI scenario, but the model is a simplified quasi-1D electronic model without electron-phonon coupling.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A New Era of Excitonic Insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZHJWRD5U

@misc{pith2026241110985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A New Era of Excitonic Insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZHJWRD5U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10985}
}
read the original abstract

The fundamental idea of the excitonic insulator (EI) driven by electron-hole correlations in narrow-gap semiconductors or semimetals was originally proposed in the 1960s, and only theoretical studies had been advanced for a long time. However, the rise of new candidate materials and recent developments in measurement techniques have enabled us to discuss the possibilities of EI states in real materials experimentally. In this article, we review recent progress in the research of EIs. We start with an introduction to the theoretical background of the EI and the mechanism of the order formation including its relation to the physics of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) - Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover. We also review the EI states studied in the context of strongly correlated electron systems. Then, we introduce the candidate materials for the EI and the issues raised by recent experiments. For example, the phase transitions in several candidate materials are accompanied by lattice distortions, and the contributions from electron-lattice coupling hinder the identification of the excitonic entity. We also review the profiles of the collective modes to discuss the dynamical signatures of the EI.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.10985 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Color online) Semiconductor, semimetal, and excitonic insulator. section.] For example, εγ(k) = ϵ (γ) + 2t (γ) (cos kx + cos ky) on the 2D square lattice with the nearest-neighbor hopping t (γ) (where the lattice constant is set to 1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the phase diagram suggested in the 1960s.9, 10) The horizontal axis G in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Color online) (a) Typical phase diagram in the Hubbard system as a function of the local Coulomb interaction U, where red solid and gray dashed lines correspond to Tc and T ∗ , respectively. (b) Phase diagram in the excitonic system. coupling regime with U > 0, the temperature of the gap open￾ing (Mott transition) (T ∗ ) and the transition temperature to the AFM (Tc) do not coincide. The paramagnetic (PM) MI state … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Color online) Ground-state phase diagram of the 1D EFKM with tb = −0.1 (= tf ) evaluated by the DMRG method, where ta = 1 is the unit of energy. BI, EI, and SOO denote band insulator, excitonic insulator, and staggered orbital order, respectively. The inset shows the …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a)]. Hence, the BI and MI phases reside in the lim￾its D ≫ U and U ≫ D, respectively. The TOHM has been employed to describe the spin-state crossover, such as in the cobalt oxides.71, 72) In the context of the spin-state crossover, the BI corresponds to the low-spin (…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Color online) A schematic figure of the electronic state in a spin￾triplet excitonic order when the VB and CB are composed of two orbitals in the same atom. Two orbitals (dx 2−y 2 and dxy orbitals) on the same atom (left) and spin density distribution expected from th…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Color online) Crystal structure of 1T-TiSe2 (upper left panel) and periodic lattice distortion at low temperatures (upper right panel) visualized by VESTA,105) where the arrows indicate the directions of the displacements. Schematic band structure and Fermi surfaces o…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Color online) Crystal structure of Ta2NiSe5 visualized by VESTA105) (upper panel), schematic band structure in the normal state (lower left panel), and schematic figure of the phase transition in the three-chain structure in Ta2NiSe5 (lower right panel). 10 [PITH_FUL…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (Color online) Magnetic multipole structure predicted in Pr0.5Ca0.5CoO3 as a consequence of a spin-triplet-type excitonic order. Re￾produced from Ref. 98 © 2017 The Physical Society of Japan. is known that the valence transition from Pr3+ to Pr4+ occurs simultaneously…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (Color online) Temperature–magnetic-field phase diagram of LaCoO3 obtained from the magnetostriction measurement under ultrahigh magnetic fields. Reproduced from Ref. 27 © 2023 The Authors, CC BY 4.0 license. magnetostriction measurements were performed.27) Thus, the …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: shows a typical excitation structure in the pure excitonic order. In addition to the collective excitation, there are single-particle (independent particle) excitations across the gap. In the weak-coupling BCS regime, the gap is given by 2|∆|. In Figs. 13(b) and 13(c)…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a)]. Since the energy is minimized at the fixed point involving electron–lattice coupling, its excitation requires en￾ergy, resulting in a gap in the collective mode. Meanwhile, although the bottom of the amplitude mode usually coincides with the bottom of the excita…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (Color online) Linear response function −(1/π)Imχ11(ω; q = 0) in the EI with electron–phonon coupling, where U is equal to V and λ ∝ g 2 /ω0 corresponds to the strength of electron–phonon coupling. The horizontal red dashed line represents the bare phonon frequency, a…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sachdev: Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    S. Sachdev: Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    D. I. Khomskii: Transition Metal Compounds (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen: Nature 518 (2015) 179

    2015

  4. [4]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrie ffer: Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1175

    1957

  5. [5]

    Collective Modes in Excitonic Insulators In the candidate materials TiSe 2 and Ta2NiSe5, the phase transitions are accompanied by lattice distortions. Since the lattice contributions hinder the identification of the excitonic contribution in these materials, it is often debated whether the deformations of the electronic states are due to the lattice disto...

    2020

  6. [6]

    First, we introduced the concept of the EI using a simple the- oretical model and discussed its relation to the BCS–BEC crossover

    Summary and Outlook We reviewed the recent progress of the studies on the EI. First, we introduced the concept of the EI using a simple the- oretical model and discussed its relation to the BCS–BEC crossover. We also reviewed the theoretical development of the research of the EIs in the context of strongly correlated electron systems, i.e., the EI states ...

  7. [7]

    N. F. Mott: Philos. Mag. 6 (1961) 287

    1961

  8. [8]

    Knox: Solid State Physics (Academic, New York, 1963), V ol

    R. Knox: Solid State Physics (Academic, New York, 1963), V ol. 5, p. 100

    1963

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    L. V . Keldysh and Y . V . Kopeav: Sov. Phys. Solid State6 (1965) 2219

    1965

  2. [10]

    Des Cloizeaux: J

    J. Des Cloizeaux: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 259

    1965

  3. [11]

    A. N. Kozlov and L. A. Maksimov: Sov. Phys. JETP 21 (1965) 790

    1965

  4. [12]

    J ´erome, T

    D. J ´erome, T. M. Rice, and W. Kohn: Phys. Rev.158 (1967) 462

    1967

  5. [13]

    Zittartz: Phys

    J. Zittartz: Phys. Rev. 162 (1967) 752

    1967

  6. [14]

    Kohn: Phys

    W. Kohn: Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 439

    1967

  7. [15]

    B. I. Halperin and T. M. Rice: Rev. Mod. Phys. 40 (1968) 755

    1968

  8. [16]

    B. I. Halperin and T. M. Rice: Solid State Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1968), V ol. 21, p. 115

    1968

  9. [17]

    Kohn and D

    W. Kohn and D. Sherrington: Rev. Mod. Phys. 42 (1970) 1

    1970

  10. [18]

    S. A. Moskalenko and D. W. Snoke: Bose-Einstein Condensation of Excitons and Biexcitons: And Coherent Nonlinear Optics with Exci- tons (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    2000

  11. [19]

    P. B. Littlewood, P. R. Eastham, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, B. D. Simons, and M. H. Szymanska: J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16 (2004) S3597

    2004

  12. [20]

    M. M. Traum, G. Margaritondo, N. V . Smith, J. E. Rowe, and F. J. Di Salvo: Phys. Rev. B 17 (1978) 1836

    1978

  13. [21]

    Cercellier, C

    H. Cercellier, C. Monney, F. Clerc, C. Battaglia, L. Despont, M. G. Garnier, H. Beck, P. Aebi, L. Patthey, H. Berger, and L. Forr ´o: Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 146403

    2007

  14. [22]

    Kogar, M

    A. Kogar, M. S. Rak, S. Vig, A. A. Husain, F. Flicker, Y . I. Joe, L. Ven- ema, G. J. MacDougall, T. C. Chiang, E. Fradkin, J. van Wezel, and P. Abbamonte: Science 358 (2017) 1314

    2017

  15. [23]

    Wakisaka, T

    Y . Wakisaka, T. Sudayama, K. Takubo, T. Mizokawa, M. Arita, H. Na- matame, M. Taniguchi, N. Katayama, M. Nohara, and H. Takagi: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 026402

    2009

  16. [24]

    K. Seki, Y . Wakisaka, T. Kaneko, T. Toriyama, T. Konishi, T. Su- dayama, N. L. Saini, M. Arita, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, N. Katayama, M. Nohara, H. Takagi, T. Mizokawa, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 155116

    2014

  17. [25]

    Y . F. Lu, H. Kono, T. I. Larkin, A. W. Rost, T. Takayama, A. V . Boris, B. Keimer, and H. Takagi: Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 14408

    2017

  18. [26]

    Werdehausen, T

    D. Werdehausen, T. Takayama, M. H ¨oppner, G. Albrecht, A. W. Rost, Y . Lu, D. Manske, H. Takagi, and S. Kaiser: Sci. Adv. 4 (2018) eaap8652

    2018

  19. [27]

    K. Kim, H. Kim, J. Kim, C. Kwon, J. S. Kim, and B. J. Kim: Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 1969

    2021

  20. [28]

    Kune ˇs and P

    J. Kune ˇs and P. Augustinsk´y: Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 235112

    2014

  21. [29]

    Ikeda, Y

    A. Ikeda, Y . H. Matsuda, K. Sato, Y . Ishii, H. Sawabe, D. Nakamura, S. Takeyama, and J. Nasu: Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 1744

    2023

  22. [30]

    Y . Jia, P. Wang, C.-L. Chiu, Z. Song, G. Yu, B. J ¨ack, S. Lei, S. Kle- menz, F. A. Cevallos, M. Onyszczak, N. Fishchenko, X. Liu, G. Farahi, F. Xie, Y . Xu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, R. J. Cava, L. M. Schoop, A. Yazdani, and S. Wu: Nat. Phys.18 (2022) 87

    2022

  23. [31]

    B. Sun, W. Zhao, T. Palomaki, Z. Fei, E. Runburg, P. Malinowski, X. Huang, J. Cenker, Y .-T. Cui, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, S. S. Ataei, D. Varsano, M. Palummo, E. Molinari, M. Rontani, and D. H. Cob- den: Nat. Phys. 18 (2022) 94

    2022

  24. [32]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg: Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 13

    1996

  25. [33]

    S. R. White: Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2863

    1992

  26. [34]

    C. D. Batista: Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 166403

    2002

  27. [35]

    D. M. Eagles: Phys. Rev. 186 (1969) 456

    1969

  28. [36]

    A. J. Leggett: Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter, 1980, pp. 13–27

    1980

  29. [37]

    Nozi `eres and S

    P. Nozi `eres and S. Schmitt-Rink: J. Low Temp. Phys. 59 (1985) 195

    1985

  30. [38]

    Randeria and E

    M. Randeria and E. Taylor: Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.5 (2014) 209

    2014

  31. [39]

    G. C. Strinati, P. Pieri, G. R ¨opke, P. Schuck, and M. Urban: Phys. Rep. 738 (2018) 1

    2018

  32. [40]

    F. X. Bronold and H. Fehske: Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 165107

    2006

  33. [41]

    L. N. Cooper: Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 1189

    1956

  34. [42]

    Esslinger: Annu

    T. Esslinger: Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1 (2010) 129

    2010

  35. [43]

    Tarruell and L

    L. Tarruell and L. Sanchez-Palencia: C. R. Phys. 19 (2018) 365

    2018

  36. [44]

    Ejima, F

    S. Ejima, F. Lange, and H. Fehske: SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 077

    2021

  37. [45]

    M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes: Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 144504

    2022

  38. [46]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y . Yamakawa, and H. Kontani: Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 7845

    2023

  39. [47]

    Kune ˇs: J

    J. Kune ˇs: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27 (2015) 333201

    2015

  40. [48]

    L. M. Falicov and J. C. Kimball: Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 997

    1969

  41. [49]

    J. K. Freericks and V . Zlati´c: Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 1333

    2003

  42. [50]

    C. D. Batista, J. E. Gubernatis, J. Bon ˇca, and H. Q. Lin: Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 187601

    2004

  43. [51]

    Farka ˇsovsk´y: Phys

    P. Farka ˇsovsk´y: Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008) 155130

    2008

  44. [52]

    Schneider and G

    C. Schneider and G. Czycholl: Eur. Phys. J. B 64 (2008) 43

    2008

  45. [53]

    D. Ihle, M. Pfa fferott, E. Burovski, F. X. Bronold, and H. Fehske: Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 193103

    2008

  46. [54]

    Zenker, D

    B. Zenker, D. Ihle, F. X. Bronold, and H. Fehske: Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 115122

    2010

  47. [55]

    V .-N. Phan, K. W. Becker, and H. Fehske: Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 205117

    2010

  48. [56]

    V .-N. Phan, H. Fehske, and K. W. Becker: EPL 95 (2011) 17006

    2011

  49. [57]

    Zenker, D

    B. Zenker, D. Ihle, F. X. Bronold, and H. Fehske: Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 235123

    2011

  50. [58]

    K. Seki, R. Eder, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 245106

    2011

  51. [59]

    Zenker, D

    B. Zenker, D. Ihle, F. X. Bronold, and H. Fehske: Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 121102

    2012

  52. [60]

    Kaneko, S

    T. Kaneko, S. Ejima, H. Fehske, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 035312

    2013

  53. [61]

    Ejima, T

    S. Ejima, T. Kaneko, Y . Ohta, and H. Fehske: Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 026401

    2014

  54. [62]

    Farka ˇsovsk´y: Phys

    P. Farka ˇsovsk´y: Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 045101

    2017

  55. [63]

    Hamada, T

    K. Hamada, T. Kaneko, S. Miyakoshi, and Y . Ohta: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86 (2017) 074709

    2017

  56. [64]

    Kadosawa, S

    M. Kadosawa, S. Nishimoto, K. Sugimoto, and Y . Ohta: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89 (2020) 053706

    2020

  57. [65]

    Kaneko and M

    M. Kaneko and M. Tsuchiizu: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90 (2021) 023707

    2021

  58. [66]

    Eaton, D

    A. Eaton, D. Mukherjee, and H. A. Fertig: Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024) 035132

    2024

  59. [67]

    Takahashi: Thermodynamics of One-dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    M. Takahashi: Thermodynamics of One-dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    1999

  60. [68]

    Zenker, H

    B. Zenker, H. Fehske, and H. Beck: Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 195118

    2014

  61. [69]

    Do, D.-H

    T.-H.-H. Do, D.-H. Bui, and V .-N. Phan: EPL 119 (2017) 47003

    2017

  62. [70]

    Murakami, D

    Y . Murakami, D. Goleˇz, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner: Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 247601

    2017

  63. [71]

    Do and V .-N

    T.-H.-H. Do and V .-N. Phan: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34 (2022) 165602

    2022

  64. [72]

    Werner and A

    P. Werner and A. J. Millis: Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 126405

    2007

  65. [73]

    Suzuki, T

    R. Suzuki, T. Watanabe, and S. Ishihara: Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 054410

    2009

  66. [74]

    Kune ˇs and V

    J. Kune ˇs and V . Kˇr´apek: Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 256401. 19 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. INVITED REVIEW PAPERS

    2011

  67. [75]

    Higashiyama, K

    T. Higashiyama, K. Inaba, and S. Suga: Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 043624

    2008

  68. [76]

    Balents: Phys

    L. Balents: Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 2346

    2000

  69. [77]

    P. M. R. Brydon and C. Timm: Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 180504

    2009

  70. [78]

    P. M. R. Brydon and C. Timm: Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009) 174401

    2009

  71. [79]

    Zocher, C

    B. Zocher, C. Timm, and P. M. R. Brydon: Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 144425

    2011

  72. [80]

    Koga and J

    R. Koga and J. Nasu: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93 (2024) 054703

    2024

  73. [81]

    Kaneko, K

    T. Kaneko, K. Seki, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B85 (2012) 165135

    2012

  74. [82]

    Kaneko and Y

    T. Kaneko and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B90 (2014) 245144

    2014

  75. [83]

    Kaneko, B

    T. Kaneko, B. Zenker, H. Fehske, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B92 (2015) 115106

    2015

  76. [84]

    Fujiuchi, K

    R. Fujiuchi, K. Sugimoto, and Y . Ohta: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87 (2018) 063705

    2018

  77. [85]

    Kune ˇs and P

    J. Kune ˇs and P. Augustinsk´y: Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 115134

    2014

  78. [86]

    Kune ˇs: Phys

    J. Kune ˇs: Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 235140

    2014

  79. [87]

    Niyazi, D

    A. Niyazi, D. Ge ffroy, and J. Kuneˇs: Phys. Rev. B102 (2020) 085159

    2020

  80. [88]

    Huang, B

    X.-X. Huang, B. Moritz, M. Claassen, and T. P. Devereaux: Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 165124

    2022

  81. [89]

    Kitagawa and H

    K. Kitagawa and H. Matsueda: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91 (2022) 104705

    2022

  82. [90]

    J. Nasu, T. Watanabe, M. Naka, and S. Ishihara: Phys. Rev. B93 (2016) 205136

    2016

  83. [91]

    J. Nasu, M. Naka, and S. Ishihara: Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 045143

    2020

  84. [92]

    Nasu and M

    J. Nasu and M. Naka: Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) L121104

    2021

  85. [93]

    P. B. Littlewood and X. Zhu: Phys. Scr. 1996 (1996) 56

    1996

  86. [94]

    Kune ˇs and D

    J. Kune ˇs and D. Geffroy: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 256403

    2016

  87. [95]

    Ge ffroy, A

    D. Ge ffroy, A. Hariki, and J. Kuneˇs: Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 155114

    2018

  88. [96]

    Nishida, S

    H. Nishida, S. Miyakoshi, T. Kaneko, K. Sugimoto, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 035119

    2019

  89. [97]

    Yamamoto, K

    S. Yamamoto, K. Sugimoto, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 174428

    2020

  90. [98]

    Shinjo, S

    K. Shinjo, S. Sota, S. Yunoki, and T. Tohyama: Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 195118

    2023

  91. [99]

    Kaneko and Y

    T. Kaneko and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B94 (2016) 125127

    2016

  92. [100]

    Yamaguchi, K

    T. Yamaguchi, K. Sugimoto, and Y . Ohta: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.86 (2017) 043701

    2017

  93. [101]

    van den Brink and D

    J. van den Brink and D. I. Khomskii: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 (2008) 434217

    2008

  94. [102]

    Greenaway and R

    D. Greenaway and R. Nitsche: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26 (1965) 1445

    1965

  95. [103]

    F. J. Di Salvo, D. E. Moncton, and J. V . Waszczak: Phys. Rev. B 14 (1976) 4321

    1976

  96. [104]

    M. Holt, P. Zschack, H. Hong, M. Y . Chou, and T.-C. Chiang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 3799

    2001

  97. [105]

    Weber, S

    F. Weber, S. Rosenkranz, J.-P. Castellan, R. Osborn, G. Karapetrov, R. Hott, R. Heid, K.-P. Bohnen, and A. Alatas: Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 266401

    2011

  98. [106]

    Kitou, A

    S. Kitou, A. Nakano, S. Kobayashi, K. Sugawara, N. Katayama, N. Maejima, A. Machida, T. Watanuki, K. Ichimura, S. Tanda, T. Nakamura, and H. Sawa: Phys. Rev. B99 (2019) 104109

    2019

  99. [107]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi: J. Appl. Cryst. 44 (2011) 1272

    2011

  100. [108]

    Chhowalla, H

    M. Chhowalla, H. S. Shin, G. Eda, L.-J. Li, K. P. Loh, and H. Zhang: Nat. Chem. 5 (2013) 263

    2013

  101. [109]

    Q. Zhao, Y . Guo, K. Si, Z. Ren, J. Bai, and X. Xu: Phys. Status Solidi B 254 (2017) 1700033

    2017

  102. [110]

    Glebko, I

    N. Glebko, I. Aleksandrova, G. C. Tewari, T. S. Tripathi, M. Karp- pinen, and A. J. Karttunen: J. Phys. Chem. C 122 (2018) 26835

    2018

  103. [111]

    Zunger and A

    A. Zunger and A. J. Freeman: Phys. Rev. B 17 (1978) 1839

    1978

  104. [112]

    C. M. Fang, R. A. de Groot, and C. Haas: Phys. Rev. B56 (1997) 4455

    1997

  105. [113]

    Pillo, J

    T. Pillo, J. Hayoz, H. Berger, F. L ´evy, L. Schlapbach, and P. Aebi: Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 16213

    2000

  106. [114]

    T. E. Kidd, T. Miller, M. Y . Chou, and T.-C. Chiang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 226402

    2002

  107. [115]

    D. Qian, D. Hsieh, L. Wray, E. Morosan, N. L. Wang, Y . Xia, R. J. Cava, and M. Z. Hasan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 117007

    2007

  108. [116]

    Chen, Y .-H

    P. Chen, Y .-H. Chan, X.-Y . Fang, Y . Zhang, M.-Y . Chou, S.-K. Mo, Z. Hussain, A.-V . Fedorov, and T.-C. Chiang: Nat. Commun.6 (2015) 8943

    2015

  109. [117]

    Sugawara, Y

    K. Sugawara, Y . Nakata, R. Shimizu, P. Han, T. Hitosugi, T. Sato, and T. Takahashi: ACS Nano10 (2016) 1341

    2016

  110. [118]

    M. D. Watson, O. J. Clark, F. Mazzola, I. Markovi ´c, V . Sunko, T. K. Kim, K. Rossnagel, and P. D. C. King: Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 076404

    2019

  111. [119]

    Motizuki: Structural Phase Transitions in Layered Transition Metal Compounds (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)

    K. Motizuki: Structural Phase Transitions in Layered Transition Metal Compounds (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)

    1986

  112. [120]

    Yoshida and K

    Y . Yoshida and K. Motizuki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49 (1980) 898

    1980

  113. [121]

    Takaoka and K

    Y . Takaoka and K. Motizuki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49 (1980) 1838

    1980

  114. [122]

    Suzuki, A

    N. Suzuki, A. Yamamoto, and K. Motizuki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54 (1985) 4668

    1985

  115. [123]

    Monney, C

    C. Monney, C. Battaglia, H. Cercellier, P. Aebi, and H. Beck: Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 106404

    2011

  116. [124]

    Calandra and F

    M. Calandra and F. Mauri: Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 196406

    2011

  117. [125]

    Bianco, M

    R. Bianco, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri: Phys. Rev. B92 (2015) 094107

    2015

  118. [126]

    D. L. Duong, M. Burghard, and J. C. Sch ¨on: Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 245131

    2015

  119. [127]

    Hellgren, J

    M. Hellgren, J. Baima, R. Bianco, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, and L. Wirtz: Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 176401

    2017

  120. [128]

    Singh, C.-H

    B. Singh, C.-H. Hsu, W.-F. Tsai, V . M. Pereira, and H. Lin: Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 245136

    2017

  121. [129]

    J. S. Zhou, L. Monacelli, R. Bianco, I. Errea, F. Mauri, and M. Calan- dra: Nano Lett. 20 (2020) 4809

    2020

  122. [130]

    Monney, H

    C. Monney, H. Cercellier, F. Clerc, C. Battaglia, E. F. Schwier, C. Did- iot, M. G. Garnier, H. Beck, P. Aebi, H. Berger, L. Forr ´o, and L. Patthey: Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 045116

    2009

  123. [131]

    Monney, E

    C. Monney, E. F. Schwier, M. G. Garnier, N. Mariotti, C. Didiot, H. Beck, P. Aebi, H. Cercellier, J. Marcus, C. Battaglia, H. Berger, and A. N. Titov: Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 155104

    2010

  124. [132]

    Monney, E

    C. Monney, E. F. Schwier, M. G. Garnier, N. Mariotti, C. Didiot, H. Cercellier, J. Marcus, H. Berger, A. N. Titov, H. Beck, and P. Aebi: New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 125019

    2010

  125. [133]

    Monney, G

    C. Monney, G. Monney, P. Aebi, and H. Beck: Phys. Rev. B85 (2012) 235150

    2012

  126. [134]

    Monney, C

    G. Monney, C. Monney, B. Hildebrand, P. Aebi, and H. Beck: Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 086402

    2015

  127. [135]

    Monney, G

    C. Monney, G. Monney, P. Aebi, and H. Beck: New J. Phys.14 (2012) 075026

    2012

  128. [136]

    C. Chen, B. Singh, H. Lin, and V . M. Pereira: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 226602

    2018

  129. [137]

    J. M. Bok, J. Hwang, and H.-Y . Choi: Phys. Rev. B103 (2021) 205108

    2021

  130. [138]

    van Wezel, P

    J. van Wezel, P. Nahai-Williamson, and S. S. Saxena: Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 165109

    2010

  131. [139]

    van Wezel, P

    J. van Wezel, P. Nahai-Williamson, and S. S. Saxena: Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 024502

    2011

  132. [140]

    Zenker, H

    B. Zenker, H. Fehske, H. Beck, C. Monney, and A. R. Bishop: Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 075138

    2013

  133. [141]

    Watanabe, K

    H. Watanabe, K. Seki, and S. Yunoki: Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 205135

    2015

  134. [142]

    Kaneko, Y

    T. Kaneko, Y . Ohta, and S. Yunoki: Phys. Rev. B97 (2018) 155131

    2018

  135. [143]

    Z. Lin, C. Wang, A. Balassis, J. P. Echeverry, A. S. Vasenko, V . M. Silkin, E. V . Chulkov, Y . Shi, J. Zhang, J. Guo, and X. Zhu: Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 187601

    2022

  136. [144]

    Rohwer, S

    T. Rohwer, S. Hellmann, M. Wiesenmayer, C. Sohrt, A. Stange, B. Slomski, A. Carr, Y . Liu, L. M. Avila, M. Kall ¨ane, S. Mathias, L. Kipp, K. Rossnagel, and M. Bauer: Nature (London) 471 (2011) 490

    2011

  137. [145]

    Hellmann, T

    S. Hellmann, T. Rohwer, M. Kall ¨ane, K. Hanff, C. Sohrt, A. Stange, A. Carr, M. Murnane, H. Kapteyn, L. Kipp, M. Bauer, and K. Ross- nagel: Nat. Commun. 3 (2012) 1069

    2012

  138. [146]

    Mathias, S

    S. Mathias, S. Eich, J. Urbancic, S. Michael, A. V . Carr, S. Emmerich, A. Stange, T. Popmintchev, T. Rohwer, M. Wiesenmayer, A. Ru ff- ing, S. Jakobs, S. Hellmann, P. Matyba, C. Chen, L. Kipp, M. Bauer, H. C. Kapteyn, H. C. Schneider, K. Rossnagel, M. M. Murnane, and M. Aesch...

    2016

  139. [147]

    Monney, M

    C. Monney, M. Puppin, C. W. Nicholson, M. Hoesch, R. T. Chap- man, E. Springate, H. Berger, A. Magrez, C. Cacho, R. Ernstorfer, and M. Wolf: Phys. Rev. B94 (2016) 165165

    2016

  140. [148]

    Huber, Y

    M. Huber, Y . Lin, N. Dale, R. Sailus, S. Tongay, R. A. Kaindl, and A. Lanzara: Sci. Rep. 12 (2022) 15860

    2022

  141. [149]

    M ¨ohr-V orobeva, S

    E. M ¨ohr-V orobeva, S. L. Johnson, P. Beaud, U. Staub, R. De Souza, C. Milne, G. Ingold, J. Demsar, H. Schaefer, and A. Titov: Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 036403

    2011

  142. [150]

    Porer, U

    M. Porer, U. Leierseder, J.-M. M ´enard, H. Dachraoui, L. Mouchliadis, I. Perakis, U. Heinzmann, J. Demsar, K. Rossnagel, and R. Huber: Nat. Mater. 13 (2014) 857

    2014

  143. [151]

    Hedayat, C

    H. Hedayat, C. J. Sayers, D. Bugini, C. Dallera, D. Wolverson, T. Bat- ten, S. Karbassi, S. Friedemann, G. Cerullo, J. van Wezel, S. R. Clark, E. Carpene, and E. Da Como: Phys. Rev. Res. 1 (2019) 023029

    2019

  144. [152]

    Lian, S.-J

    C. Lian, S.-J. Zhang, S.-Q. Hu, M.-X. Guan, and S. Meng: Nat. Com- 20 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. INVITED REVIEW PAPERS mun. 11 (2020) 43

    2020

  145. [153]

    M. R. Otto, J.-H. P ¨ohls, L. P. R. de Cotret, M. J. Stern, M. Sutton, and B. J. Siwick: Sci. Adv. 7 (2021) eabf2810

    2021

  146. [154]

    Burian, M

    M. Burian, M. Porer, J. R. L. Mardegan, V . Esposito, S. Parchenko, B. Burganov, N. Gurung, M. Ramakrishnan, V . Scagnoli, H. Ueda, S. Francoual, F. Fabrizi, Y . Tanaka, T. Togashi, Y . Kubota, M. Yabashi, K. Rossnagel, S. L. Johnson, and U. Staub: Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (2021) 013128

    2021

  147. [155]

    S. Duan, W. Xia, C. Huang, S. Wang, L. Gu, H. Liu, D. Xiang, D. Qian, Y . Guo, and W. Zhang: Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 226501

    2023

  148. [156]

    P. Chen, W. W. Pai, Y . H. Chan, A. Takayama, C. Z. Xu, A. Karn, S. Hasegawa, M. Y . Chou, S. K. Mo, A. V . Fedorov, and T. C. Chiang: Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 516

    2017

  149. [157]

    Gao, Y .-H

    Q. Gao, Y .-H. Chan, Y . Wang, H. Zhang, P. Jinxu, S. Cui, Y . Yang, Z. Liu, D. Shen, Z. Sun, J. Jiang, T. C. Chiang, and P. Chen: Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 994

    2023

  150. [158]

    Y . Song, C. Jia, H. Xiong, B. Wang, Z. Jiang, K. Huang, J. Hwang, Z. Li, C. Hwang, Z. Liu, D. Shen, J. A. Sobota, P. Kirchmann, J. Xue, T. P. Devereaux, S.-K. Mo, Z.-X. Shen, and S. Tang: Nat. Commun.14 (2023) 1116

    2023

  151. [159]

    Gao, Y .-H

    Q. Gao, Y .-H. Chan, P. Jiao, H. Chen, S. Yin, K. Tangprapha, Y . Yang, X. Li, Z. Liu, D. Shen, S. Jiang, and P. Chen: Nat. Phys. 20 (2024) 597

    2024

  152. [160]

    S. A. Sunshine and J. A. Ibers: Inorg. Chem. 24 (1985) 3611

    1985

  153. [161]

    Di Salvo, C

    F. Di Salvo, C. Chen, R. Fleming, J. Waszczak, R. Dunn, S. Sunshine, and J. A. Ibers: J. Less-Common Met. 116 (1986) 51

    1986

  154. [162]

    S. Li, S. Kawai, Y . Kobayashi, and M. Itoh: Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 165127

    2018

  155. [163]

    Hirose, S

    Y . Hirose, S. Sano, T. Hirahara, Y . Uwatoko, J. Gouchi, T. Takeuchi, and R. Settai: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92 (2023) 084705

    2023

  156. [164]

    Nakano, T

    A. Nakano, T. Hasegawa, S. Tamura, N. Katayama, S. Tsutsui, and H. Sawa: Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 045139

    2018

  157. [165]

    Fukutani, R

    K. Fukutani, R. Stania, J. Jung, E. F. Schwier, K. Shimada, C. I. Kwon, J. S. Kim, and H. W. Yeom: Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 206401

    2019

  158. [166]

    M. D. Watson, I. Markovi´c, E. A. Morales, P. Le F`evre, M. Merz, A. A. Haghighirad, and P. D. C. King: Phys. Rev. Res.2 (2020) 013236

    2020

  159. [167]

    L. Chen, T. T. Han, C. Cai, Z. G. Wang, Y . D. Wang, Z. M. Xin, and Y . Zhang: Phys. Rev. B102 (2020) 161116

    2020

  160. [168]

    Fukutani, R

    K. Fukutani, R. Stania, C. Il Kwon, J. S. Kim, K. J. Kong, J. Kim, and H. W. Yeom: Nat. Phys.17 (2021) 1024

    2021

  161. [169]

    Lee, C.-J

    J. Lee, C.-J. Kang, M. J. Eom, J. S. Kim, B. I. Min, and H. W. Yeom: Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 075408

    2019

  162. [170]

    Canadell and M

    E. Canadell and M. H. Whangbo: Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 3974

    1987

  163. [171]

    Mazza, M

    G. Mazza, M. R ¨osner, L. Windg¨atter, S. Latini, H. H¨ubener, A. J. Mil- lis, A. Rubio, and A. Georges: Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 197601

    2020

  164. [172]

    Kaneko, T

    T. Kaneko, T. Toriyama, T. Konishi, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 035121

    2013

  165. [173]

    Sugimoto, T

    K. Sugimoto, T. Kaneko, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B93 (2016) 041105

    2016

  166. [174]

    Sugimoto and Y

    K. Sugimoto and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 085111

    2016

  167. [175]

    Yamada, K

    T. Yamada, K. Domon, and Y . ¯Ono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 (2016) 053703

    2016

  168. [176]

    Domon, T

    K. Domon, T. Yamada, and Y . ¯Ono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 (2016) 065005

    2016

  169. [177]

    Sugimoto, S

    K. Sugimoto, S. Nishimoto, T. Kaneko, and Y . Ohta: Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 247602

    2018

  170. [178]

    Domon, T

    K. Domon, T. Yamada, and Y . ¯Ono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87 (2018) 054701

    2018

  171. [179]

    Yamada, K

    T. Yamada, K. Domon, and Y . ¯Ono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88 (2019) 064701

    2019

  172. [180]

    Baldini, A

    E. Baldini, A. Zong, D. Choi, C. Lee, M. H. Michael, L. Windgaetter, I. I. Mazin, S. Latini, D. Azoury, B. Lv, A. Kogar, Y . Su, Y . Wang, Y . Lu, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, A. J. Millis, A. Rubio, E. Demler, and N. Gedik: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120 (2023) e2221688120

    2023

  173. [181]

    C. Chen, W. Tang, X. Chen, Z. Kang, S. Ding, K. Scott, S. Wang, Z. Li, J. P. C. Ruff, M. Hashimoto, D.-H. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. H. da Silva Neto, R. J. Birgeneau, Y . Chen, S. G. Louie, Y . Wang, and Y . He: Nat. Commun.14 (2023) 7512

    2023

  174. [182]

    C. Chen, X. Chen, W. Tang, Z. Li, S. Wang, S. Ding, Z. Kang, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, J. P. C. Ruff, S. G. Louie, R. J. Birgeneau, Y . Chen, Y . Wang, and Y . He: Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (2023) 043089

    2023

  175. [183]

    S. R. U. Haque, M. H. Michael, J. Zhu, Y . Zhang, L. Windg¨atter, S. La- tini, J. P. Wakefield, G.-F. Zhang, J. Zhang, A. Rubio, J. G. Checkelsky, E. Demler, and R. D. Averitt: Nat. Mater.23 (2024) 796

    2024

  176. [184]

    T. I. Larkin, A. N. Yaresko, D. Pr ¨opper, K. A. Kikoin, Y . F. Lu, T. Takayama, Y .-L. Mathis, A. W. Rost, H. Takagi, B. Keimer, and A. V . Boris: Phys. Rev. B95 (2017) 195144

    2017

  177. [185]

    Okamura, T

    H. Okamura, T. Mizokawa, K. Miki, Y . Matsui, N. Noguchi, N. Katayama, H. Sawa, M. Nohara, Y . Lu, H. Takagi, Y . Ikemoto, and T. Moriwaki: Phys. Rev. B107 (2023) 045141

    2023

  178. [186]

    T. I. Larkin, R. D. Dawson, M. H¨oppner, T. Takayama, M. Isobe, Y .-L. Mathis, H. Takagi, B. Keimer, and A. V . Boris: Phys. Rev. B98 (2018) 125113

    2018

  179. [187]

    M.-J. Kim, A. Schulz, T. Takayama, M. Isobe, H. Takagi, and S. Kaiser: Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 042039

    2020

  180. [188]

    P. A. V olkov, M. Ye, H. Lohani, I. Feldman, A. Kanigel, and G. Blum- berg: npj Quantum Mater. 6 (2021) 52

    2021

  181. [189]

    P. A. V olkov, M. Ye, H. Lohani, I. Feldman, A. Kanigel, and G. Blum- berg: Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) L241103

    2021

  182. [190]

    M. Ye, P. A. V olkov, H. Lohani, I. Feldman, M. Kim, A. Kanigel, and G. Blumberg: Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 045102

    2021

  183. [191]

    S. Mor, M. Herzog, D. Gole ˇz, P. Werner, M. Eckstein, N. Katayama, M. Nohara, H. Takagi, T. Mizokawa, C. Monney, and J. St¨ahler: Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 086401

    2017

  184. [192]

    Okazaki, Y

    K. Okazaki, Y . Ogawa, T. Suzuki, T. Yamamoto, T. Someya, S. Michi- mae, M. Watanabe, Y . Lu, M. Nohara, H. Takagi, N. Katayama, H. Sawa, M. Fujisawa, T. Kanai, N. Ishii, J. Itatani, T. Mizokawa, and S. Shin: Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 4322

    2018

  185. [193]

    Mitsuoka, T

    T. Mitsuoka, T. Suzuki, H. Takagi, N. Katayama, H. Sawa, M. Nohara, M. Watanabe, J. Xu, Q. Ren, M. Fujisawa, T. Kanai, J. Itatani, S. Shin, K. Okazaki, and T. Mizokawa: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89 (2020) 124703

    2020

  186. [194]

    T. Tang, H. Wang, S. Duan, Y . Yang, C. Huang, Y . Guo, D. Qian, and W. Zhang: Phys. Rev. B101 (2020) 235148

    2020

  187. [195]

    Suzuki, Y

    T. Suzuki, Y . Shinohara, Y . Lu, M. Watanabe, J. Xu, K. L. Ishikawa, H. Takagi, M. Nohara, N. Katayama, H. Sawa, M. Fujisawa, T. Kanai, J. Itatani, T. Mizokawa, S. Shin, and K. Okazaki: Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) L121105

    2021

  188. [196]

    T. Saha, D. Gole ˇz, G. De Ninno, J. Mravlje, Y . Murakami, B. Ressel, M. Stupar, and P. c. v. R. Ribiˇc: Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 144304

    2021

  189. [197]

    Gole ˇz, S

    D. Gole ˇz, S. K. Y . Dufresne, M.-J. Kim, F. Boschini, H. Chu, Y . Mu- rakami, G. Levy, A. K. Mills, S. Zhdanovich, M. Isobe, H. Takagi, S. Kaiser, P. Werner, D. J. Jones, A. Georges, A. Damascelli, and A. J. Millis: Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) L121106

    2022

  190. [198]

    Takahashi, T

    Y . Takahashi, T. Suzuki, M. Hattori, M. Okawa, H. Takagi, N. Katayama, H. Sawa, M. Nohara, Y . Zhong, K. Liu, T. Kanai, J. Itatani, S. Shin, K. Okazaki, and T. Mizokawa: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92 (2023) 064706

    2023

  191. [199]

    Werdehausen, T

    D. Werdehausen, T. Takayama, G. Albrecht, Y . Lu, H. Takagi, and S. Kaiser: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30 (2018) 305602

    2018

  192. [200]

    S. Mor, M. Herzog, J. Noack, N. Katayama, M. Nohara, H. Takagi, A. Trunschke, T. Mizokawa, C. Monney, and J. St¨ahler: Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 115154

    2018

  193. [201]

    H. Ning, O. Mehio, M. Buchhold, T. Kurumaji, G. Refael, J. G. Check- elsky, and D. Hsieh: Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 267602

    2020

  194. [202]

    H. M. Bretscher, P. Andrich, P. Telang, A. Singh, L. Harnagea, A. K. Sood, and A. Rao: Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 1699

    2021

  195. [203]

    H. M. Bretscher, P. Andrich, Y . Murakami, D. Gole ˇz, B. Remez, P. Telang, A. Singh, L. Harnagea, N. R. Cooper, A. J. Millis, P. Werner, A. K. Sood, and A. Rao: Sci. Adv. 7 (2021) eabd6147

    2021

  196. [204]

    Miyamoto, M

    T. Miyamoto, M. Mizui, N. Takamura, J. Hirata, H. Yamakawa, T. Mo- rimoto, T. Terashige, N. Kida, A. Nakano, H. Sawa, and H. Okamoto: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91 (2022) 023701

    2022

  197. [205]

    M. Guan, D. Chen, Q. Chen, Y . Yao, and S. Meng: Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 256503

    2023

  198. [206]

    Katsumi, A

    K. Katsumi, A. Alekhin, S.-M. Souliou, M. Merz, A.-A. Haghighirad, M. Le Tacon, S. Houver, M. Cazayous, A. Sacuto, and Y . Gallais: Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 106904

    2023

  199. [207]

    Takamura, T

    N. Takamura, T. Miyamoto, R. Ikeda, T. Kubo, M. Yamamoto, H. Sato, Y . Han, T. Ito, T. Sato, A. Nakano, H. Sawa, and H. Okamoto: Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 043187

    2024

  200. [208]

    Jiang, Y

    Y . Jiang, Y . Mi, J. Guo, Z. Wang, N. Zhang, B. Liu, and S.-N. Luo: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 26 (2024) 15417

    2024

  201. [209]

    Matsubayashi, H

    K. Matsubayashi, H. Okamura, T. Mizokawa, N. Katayama, A. Nakano, H. Sawa, T. Kaneko, T. Toriyama, T. Konishi, Y . Ohta, H. Arima, R. Yamanaka, A. Hisada, T. Okada, Y . Ikemoto, T. Mori- waki, K. Munakata, A. Nakao, M. Nohara, Y . Lu, H. Takagi, and 21 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. INVIT...

    2021

  202. [210]

    A. F. Kusmartseva, B. Sipos, H. Berger, L. Forr ´o, and E. Tutiˇs: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 236401

    2009

  203. [211]

    Morosan, H

    E. Morosan, H. W. Zandbergen, B. S. Dennis, J. W. G. Bos, Y . Onose, T. Klimczuk, A. P. Ramirez, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava: Nat. Phys. 2 (2006) 544

    2006

  204. [212]

    L. J. Li, E. C. T. O’Farrell, K. P. Loh, G. Eda, B. ¨Ozyilmaz, and A. H. Castro Neto: Nature 529 (2016) 185

    2016

  205. [213]

    Nakano, K

    A. Nakano, K. Sugawara, S. Tamura, N. Katayama, K. Matsub- ayashi, T. Okada, Y . Uwatoko, K. Munakata, A. Nakao, H. Sagayama, R. Kumai, K. Sugimoto, N. Maejima, A. Machida, T. Watanuki, and H. Sawa: IUCrJ 5 (2018) 158

    2018

  206. [214]

    Hosono and K

    H. Hosono and K. Kuroki: Physica C 514 (2015) 399

    2015

  207. [215]

    Huang, B

    J. Huang, B. Jiang, J. Yao, D. Yan, X. Lei, J. Gao, Z. Guo, F. Jin, Y . Li, Z. Yuan, C. Chai, H. Sheng, M. Pan, F. Chen, J. Liu, S. Gao, G. Qu, B. Liu, Z. Jiang, Z. Liu, X. Ma, S. Zhou, Y . Huang, C. Yun, Q. Zhang, S. Li, S. Jin, H. Ding, J. Shen, D. Su, Y . Shi, Z. Wang, and ...

    2024

  208. [216]

    Zhang, Y

    P. Zhang, Y . Dong, D. Yan, B. Jiang, T. Yang, J. Li, Z. Guo, Y . Huang, Haobo, Q. Li, Y . Li, K. Kurokawa, R. Wang, Y . Nie, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, W.-H. Jiao, J. Shen, T. Qian, Z. Wang, Y . Shi, and T. Kondo: Phys. Rev. X 14 (2024) 011047

    2024

  209. [217]

    M. S. Hossain, T. A. Cochran, Y .-X. Jiang, S. Zhang, H. Wu, X. Liu, X. Zheng, B. Kim, G. Cheng, Q. Zhang, M. Litskevich, J. Zhang, Z.-J. Cheng, J. Liu, J.-X. Yin, X. P. Yang, J. Denlinger, M. Tallarida, J. Dai, E. Vescovo, A. Rajapitamahuni, H. Miao, N. Yao, Y . Peng, Y . Yao...

    2023 arXiv

  210. [218]

    Heikes, R

    R. Heikes, R. Miller, and R. Mazelsky: Physica 30 (1964) 1600

    1964

  211. [219]

    P. M. Raccah and J. B. Goodenough: Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 932

    1967

  212. [220]

    M. A. Korotin, S. Y . Ezhov, I. V . Solovyev, V . I. Anisimov, D. I. Khom- skii, and G. A. Sawatzky: Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 5309

    1996

  213. [221]

    Mizokawa and A

    T. Mizokawa and A. Fujimori: Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 5368

    1996

  214. [222]

    M. W. Haverkort, Z. Hu, J. C. Cezar, T. Burnus, H. Hartmann, M. Reuther, C. Zobel, T. Lorenz, A. Tanaka, N. B. Brookes, H. H. Hsieh, H.-J. Lin, C. T. Chen, and L. H. Tjeng: Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 176405

    2006

  215. [223]

    Eder: Phys

    R. Eder: Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 035101

    2010

  216. [224]

    Tomiyasu, J

    K. Tomiyasu, J. Okamoto, H. Y . Huang, Z. Y . Chen, E. P. Sinaga, W. B. Wu, Y . Y . Chu, A. Singh, R.-P. Wang, F. M. F. de Groot, A. Chainani, S. Ishihara, C. T. Chen, and D. J. Huang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 196402

    2017

  217. [225]

    Takegami, A

    D. Takegami, A. Tanaka, S. Agrestini, Z. Hu, J. Weinen, M. Rotter, C. Sch ¨ußler-Langeheine, T. Willers, T. C. Koethe, T. Lorenz, Y . F. Liao, K. D. Tsuei, H.-J. Lin, C. T. Chen, and L. H. Tjeng: Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 011037

    2023

  218. [226]

    Tsubouchi, T

    S. Tsubouchi, T. Ky ˆomen, M. Itoh, P. Ganguly, M. Oguni, Y . Shimojo, Y . Morii, and Y . Ishii: Phys. Rev. B66 (2002) 052418

    2002

  219. [227]

    Tsubouchi, T

    S. Tsubouchi, T. Ky ˆomen, M. Itoh, and M. Oguni: Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 144406

    2004

  220. [228]

    Fujita, T

    T. Fujita, T. Miyashita, Y . Yasui, Y . Kobayashi, M. Sato, E. Nishi- bori, M. Sakata, Y . Shimojo, N. Igawa, Y . Ishii, K. Kakurai, T. Adachi, Y . Ohishi, and M. Takata: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.73 (2004) 1987

    2004

  221. [229]

    Hejtm ´anek, E

    J. Hejtm ´anek, E. ˇSantav´a, K. Kn´ıˇzek, M. Maryˇsko, Z. Jir´ak, T. Naito, H. Sasaki, and H. Fujishiro: Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010) 165107

    2010

  222. [230]

    Hardy, F

    V . Hardy, F. Guillou, and Y . Br ´eard: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25 (2013) 246003

    2013

  223. [231]

    Hejtm ´anek, Z

    J. Hejtm ´anek, Z. Jir ´ak, O. Kaman, K. Kn ´ıˇzek, E. ˇSantav´a, K. Nitta, T. Naito, and H. Fujishiro: Euro. Phys. J. B 86 (2013) 305

    2013

  224. [232]

    Yamaguchi, K

    T. Yamaguchi, K. Sugimoto, and Y . Ohta: Physica B536 (2018) 37

    2018

  225. [233]

    J. F. Afonso and J. Kune ˇs: Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 115131

    2017

  226. [234]

    Moyoshi, K

    T. Moyoshi, K. Kamazawa, M. Matsuda, and M. Sato: Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 205105

    2018

  227. [235]

    R.-P. Wang, A. Hariki, A. Sotnikov, F. Frati, J. Okamoto, H.-Y . Huang, A. Singh, D.-J. Huang, K. Tomiyasu, C.-H. Du, J. Kuneˇs, and F. M. F. de Groot: Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 035149

    2018

  228. [236]

    Ikeda, Y

    A. Ikeda, Y . H. Matsuda, K. Sato, and J. Nasu: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93 (2024) 121005

    2024

  229. [237]

    Sotnikov and J

    A. Sotnikov and J. Kune ˇs: Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 30510

    2016

  230. [238]

    Sotnikov and J

    A. Sotnikov and J. Kune ˇs: Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 245102

    2017

  231. [239]

    Tatsuno, E

    T. Tatsuno, E. Mizoguchi, J. Nasu, M. Naka, and S. Ishihara: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 (2016) 083706

    2016

  232. [240]

    Ikeda, T

    A. Ikeda, T. Nomura, Y . H. Matsuda, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, and K. Sato: Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 220401

    2016

  233. [241]

    Ikeda, Y

    A. Ikeda, Y . H. Matsuda, and K. Sato: Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 177202

    2020

  234. [242]

    Ikeda, S

    A. Ikeda, S. Lee, T. T. Terashima, Y . H. Matsuda, M. Tokunaga, and T. Naito: Phys. Rev. B94 (2016) 115129

    2016

  235. [243]

    P. Wang, G. Yu, Y . Jia, M. Onyszczak, F. A. Cevallos, S. Lei, S. Kle- menz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, L. M. Schoop, and S. Wu: Nature 589 (2021) 225

    2021

  236. [244]

    Y . H. Kwan, T. Devakul, S. L. Sondhi, and S. A. Parameswaran: Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 125133

    2021

  237. [245]

    P. A. Lee: Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) L041101

    2021

  238. [246]

    He and P

    W.-Y . He and P. A. Lee: Phys. Rev. B104 (2021) L041110

    2021

  239. [247]

    Que, Y .-H

    Y . Que, Y .-H. Chan, J. Jia, A. Das, Z. Tong, Y .-T. Chang, Z. Cui, A. Ku- mar, G. Singh, S. Mukherjee, H. Lin, and B. Weber: Adv. Mater. 36 (2024) 2309356

    2024

  240. [248]

    Varsano, M

    D. Varsano, M. Palummo, E. Molinari, and M. Rontani: Nat. Nan- otechnol. 15 (2020) 367

    2020

  241. [249]

    Neuenschwander and P

    J. Neuenschwander and P. Wachter: Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 12693

    1990

  242. [250]

    Bucher, P

    B. Bucher, P. Steiner, and P. Wachter: Phys. Rev. Lett.67 (1991) 2717

    1991

  243. [251]

    Wachter, B

    P. Wachter, B. Bucher, and J. Malar: Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 094502

    2004

  244. [252]

    Okuma, K

    R. Okuma, K. Yamagami, Y . Fujisawa, C. H. Hsu, Y . Obata, N. To- moda, M. Dronova, K. Kuroda, H. Ishikawa, K. Kawaguchi, K. Aido, K. Kindo, Y . H. Chan, H. Lin, Y . Ihara, T. Kondo, and Y . Okada: arXiv:2405.16781 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  245. [253]

    B. A. V olkov, Y . V . Kopaev, and A. I. Rusinov: Sov. Phys. JETP 41 (1975) 952

    1975

  246. [254]

    Young, D

    D. Young, D. Hall, M. Torelli, Z. Fisk, J. Sarrao, J. Thompson, H.-R. Ott, S. Oseroff, R. Goodrich, and R. Zysler: Nature 397 (1999) 412

    1999

  247. [255]

    Zhitomirsky, T

    M. Zhitomirsky, T. Rice, and V . Anisimov: Nature402 (1999) 251

    1999

  248. [256]

    Balents and C

    L. Balents and C. M. Varma: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 1264

    2000

  249. [257]

    Matsubayashi, M

    K. Matsubayashi, M. Maki, T. Tsuzuki, T. Nishioka, and N. K. Sato: Nature 420 (2002) 143

    2002

  250. [258]

    Matsubayashi, M

    K. Matsubayashi, M. Maki, T. Moriwaka, T. Tsuzuki, T. Nishioka, C. H. Lee, A. Yamamoto, T. Ohta, and N. K. Sato: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72 (2003) 2097

    2003

  251. [259]

    Varsano, S

    D. Varsano, S. Sorella, D. Sangalli, M. Barborini, S. Corni, E. Moli- nari, and M. Rontani: Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1461

    2017

  252. [260]

    Z. Zhu, P. Nie, B. Fauqu ´e, B. Vignolle, C. Proust, R. D. McDonald, N. Harrison, and K. Behnia: Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 011058

    2019

  253. [261]

    Jiang, W

    Z. Jiang, W. Lou, Y . Liu, Y . Li, H. Song, K. Chang, W. Duan, and S. Zhang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 166401

    2020

  254. [262]

    Sethi, Y

    G. Sethi, Y . Zhou, L. Zhu, L. Yang, and F. Liu: Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 196403

    2021

  255. [263]

    Sethi, M

    G. Sethi, M. Cuma, and F. Liu: Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 186401

    2023

  256. [264]

    Delgado, C

    A. Delgado, C. Dusold, J. Jiang, A. Cronin, S. G. Louie, and F. R. Fischer: arXiv:2301.06171 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  257. [265]

    S. S. Ataei, D. Varsano, E. Molinari, and M. Rontani: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118 (2021) e2010110118

    2021

  258. [266]

    Pezzini, M

    S. Pezzini, M. R. van Delft, L. M. Schoop, B. V . Lotsch, A. Carrington, M. I. Katsnelson, N. E. Hussey, and S. Wiedmann: Nat. Phys.14 (2018) 178

    2018

  259. [267]

    A. N. Rudenko, E. A. Stepanov, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnel- son: Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 216401

    2018

  260. [268]

    M. M. Scherer, C. Honerkamp, A. N. Rudenko, E. A. Stepanov, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson: Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 241112

    2018

  261. [269]

    Jiang, Y

    Z. Jiang, Y . Li, W. Duan, and S. Zhang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 236402

    2019

  262. [270]

    Di Sabatino, A

    S. Di Sabatino, A. Molina-S ´anchez, P. Romaniello, and D. Sangalli: Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) 115121

    2023

  263. [271]

    Jiang, Y

    Z. Jiang, Y . Li, S. Zhang, and W. Duan: Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 081408

    2018

  264. [272]

    Dong and Y

    S. Dong and Y . Li: Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020) 155119

    2020

  265. [273]

    D. Wang, N. Luo, W. Duan, and X. Zou: J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12 (2021) 5479

    2021

  266. [274]

    H. D. Scammell, J. Ingham, T. Li, and O. P. Sushkov: Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 605

    2023

  267. [275]

    R. Wang, O. Erten, B. Wang, and D. Y . Xing: Nat. Commun.10 (2019) 210

    2019

  268. [276]

    Liu, L.-H

    Z.-R. Liu, L.-H. Hu, C.-Z. Chen, B. Zhou, and D.-H. Xu: Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) L201115

    2021

  269. [277]

    Dong and Y

    S. Dong and Y . Li: Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) 235147

    2023

  270. [278]

    H. Yang, J. Zeng, Y . Shao, Y . Xu, X. Dai, and X.-Z. Li: Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) 075167. 22 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. INVITED REVIEW PAPERS

    2024

  271. [279]

    M. Xie, H. Pan, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma: Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 046402

    2023

  272. [280]

    Dong and Y .-H

    Z. Dong and Y .-H. Zhang: Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) L081101

    2023

  273. [281]

    Xie, C.-P

    Y .-M. Xie, C.-P. Zhang, and K. T. Law: Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024) 045115

    2024

  274. [282]

    Khaliullin: Phys

    G. Khaliullin: Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 197201

    2013

  275. [283]

    G. Cao, T. F. Qi, L. Li, J. Terzic, S. J. Yuan, L. E. DeLong, G. Murthy, and R. K. Kaul: Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 056402

    2014

  276. [284]

    T. Dey, A. Maljuk, D. V . Efremov, O. Kataeva, S. Gass, C. G. F. Blum, F. Steckel, D. Gruner, T. Ritschel, A. U. B. Wolter, J. Geck, C. Hess, K. Koepernik, J. van den Brink, S. Wurmehl, and B. B ¨uchner: Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 014434

    2016

  277. [285]

    Pajskr, P

    K. Pajskr, P. Nov ´ak, V . Pokorn´y, J. Kolorenˇc, R. Arita, and J. Kune ˇs: Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 035129

    2016

  278. [286]

    Kusch, V

    M. Kusch, V . M. Katukuri, N. A. Bogdanov, B. B¨uchner, T. Dey, D. V . Efremov, J. E. Hamann-Borrero, B. H. Kim, M. Krisch, A. Maljuk, M. M. Sala, S. Wurmehl, G. Aslan-Cansever, M. Sturza, L. Hozoi, J. van den Brink, and J. Geck: Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 064421

    2018

  279. [287]

    M. A. Laguna-Marco, E. Arias-Egido, C. Piquer, V . Cuartero, L. Hern´andez-L´opez, P. Kayser, J. A. Alonso, J. A. T. Barker, G. Fab- bris, C. A. Escanhoela, and T. Irifune: Phys. Rev. B101 (2020) 014449

    2020

  280. [288]

    A. A. Aczel, Q. Chen, J. P. Clancy, C. dela Cruz, D. Reig-i Plessis, G. J. MacDougall, C. J. Pollock, M. H. Upton, T. J. Williams, N. LaManna, J. P. Carlo, J. Beare, G. M. Luke, and H. D. Zhou: Phys. Rev. Mater.6 (2022) 094409

    2022

  281. [289]

    Akbari and G

    A. Akbari and G. Khaliullin: Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 035137

    2014

  282. [290]

    A. Jain, M. Krautloher, J. Porras, G. H. Ryu, D. P. Chen, D. L. Aber- nathy, J. T. Park, A. Ivanov, J. Chaloupka, G. Khaliullin, B. Keimer, and B. J. Kim: Nat. Phys. 13 (2017) 633

    2017

  283. [291]

    Yamamoto, Y

    S. Yamamoto, Y . Ohta, and K. Sugimoto: Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 045136

    2022

  284. [292]

    D. G. Mazzone, Y . Shen, H. Suwa, G. Fabbris, J. Yang, S. S. Zhang, H. Miao, J. Sears, K. Jia, Y . G. Shi, M. H. Upton, D. M. Casa, X. Liu, J. Liu, C. D. Batista, and M. P. M. Dean: Nat. Commun.13 (2022) 913

    2022

  285. [293]

    Suwa, S.-S

    H. Suwa, S.-S. Zhang, and C. D. Batista: Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (2021) 013224

    2021

  286. [294]

    T. Sato, T. Shirakawa, and S. Yunoki: Phys. Rev. B91 (2015) 125122

    2015

  287. [295]

    L. Du, X. Li, W. Lou, G. Sullivan, K. Chang, J. Kono, and R.-R. Du: Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1971

    2017

  288. [296]

    W. Yu, V . Cleric`o, C. H. Fuentevilla, X. Shi, Y . Jiang, D. Saha, W. K. Lou, K. Chang, D. H. Huang, G. Gumbs, D. Smirnov, C. J. Stanton, Z. Jiang, V . Bellani, Y . Meziani, E. Diez, W. Pan, S. D. Hawkins, and J. F. Klem: New J. Phys. 20 (2018) 053062

    2018

  289. [297]

    L. Ma, P. X. Nguyen, Z. Wang, Y . Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan: Nature 598 (2021) 585

    2021

  290. [298]

    P. X. Nguyen, L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak: arXiv:2309.14940 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  291. [299]

    D. Chen, Z. Lian, X. Huang, Y . Su, M. Rashetnia, L. Ma, L. Yan, M. Blei, L. Xiang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, D. Smirnov, Z. Wang, C. Zhang, Y .-T. Cui, and S.-F. Shi: Nat. Phys.18 (2022) 1171

    2022

  292. [300]

    Zhang, E

    Z. Zhang, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Wang, M. Sayyad, K. Yumigeta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Wang: Nat. Phys.18 (2022) 1214

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.