Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Structure of weakly collisional shock waves of multicomponent plasmas inside hohlraums of indirect inertial confinement fusions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the plasma collision between gold and hydrogen–deuterium fuel inside a hohlraum forms a weakly collisional electrostatic shock (Kn ~ 1) in which the two isotopes separate into distinct sub-shocks and mix over…

desk verdict A useful multicomponent shock simulation whose weakly collisional framing is not yet supported by any described collision model or Knudsen-number measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11008 v1 pith:ROUDOAPS submitted 2024-11-17 physics.plasm-ph

Tianyi Liang , Dong Wu , Lifeng Wang , Lianqiang Shan , Zongqiang Yuan , Hongbo Cai , Yuqiu Gu , Zhengmao Sheng
show 1 more author
Xiantu He
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords weaklycollisionalshockKnudsennumberinertialconfinementfusionhohlraumionseparationmixingelectrostaticparticle-in-cellsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that inside a fusion hohlraum, the collision between an expanding gold plasma and a hydrogen–deuterium plasma forms a weakly collisional electrostatic shock with Knudsen number near 1, a regime where kinetic effects and collisions both matter. Using large-scale particle-in-cell simulations, it shows that the electrostatic field of the shock accelerates and reflects hydrogen more strongly than deuterium, so the two isotopes develop separate sub-shocks and separate in density, velocity, and temperature. The predicted mixing region grows to a few hundred micrometres, far larger than what radiation-hydrodynamics codes can resolve, which would affect fuel composition and implosion efficiency in indirect-drive inertial confinement fusion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the weakly collisional electrostatic shock that forms when an expanding gold plasma drives a piston-like compression into a hydrogen–deuterium plasma, quantified by the Knudsen number Kn ≈ O(1). The mechanism that separates ions is the electrostatic potential barrier at the shock front, whose reflection condition Z_i e Δφ ≥ ½ m_i (v_i − V_s)² lets lighter, higher-charge-to-mass species (H) be reflected and accelerated more than heavier D, aided by the electrostatic sheath field set up by fast electrons during rarefaction. The computational vehicle is the 1D implicit particle-in-cell code LAPINS, which resolves these kinetics over a 3 mm hohlraum-scale domain.

What would settle it

Run the same 1D simulation with the collision operator disabled: if the C-shaped phase-space structures, the two sub-shock peaks, and the sub-shock speed ratio (1.06 vs √2) persist essentially unchanged, then the observed shock is collisionless and the weakly collisional framework is not supported. A softer test is to vary the Coulomb collision frequency up and down by an order of magnitude and check whether the speed ratio and mixing width respond continuously toward the collisionless and collisional limits.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that hohlraum region 3—where gold ablated from the wall meets the fusion fuel plasma—hosts a weakly collisional electrostatic shock, Kn ≈ O(1), rather than a purely collisional or purely collisionless one. In the simulation, the electrostatic sheath created by fast electrons drives a rarefaction that launches the shock into the HD plasma; the shock's potential barrier reflects upstream ions, and because hydrogen and deuterium have different charge-to-mass ratios, they respond differently to the same field. The result is a two-peaked density structure: hydrogen is pulled by electrons and forms a faster sub-shock (626 km/s) while deuterium is pushed by gold ions and forms a slower sub-shock (592 km/s). The ratio of sub-shock speeds, 1.06, is far below the collisionless estimate √2, which the paper takes as evidence that weak collisions suppress the kinetic separation. The ions also separate in flow velocity and temperature, hydrogen concentration rises at the front, and the three-species mixing region expands at about 0.3 µm/ps until saturating near 230 µm. These are features that radiation-hydrodynamics codes cannot capture, so kinetic simulation is required.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the simulated shock is weakly collisional rather than collisionless depends on the unstated assumption that the LAPINS code actually includes and correctly parameterizes Coulomb collisions with the quoted gold–deuterium collision frequency, since the paper never describes its collision operator.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Radiation-hydrodynamics codes used for whole-hohlraum design cannot reproduce ion separation and mixing at this shock; kinetic or hybrid-kinetic codes are needed for region 3.
  • Hydrogen and deuterium reach the capsule with different speeds and temperatures, so fuel layering and fusion reaction histories in the hohlraum should show species-dependent signatures.
  • The mixing width of ~100–230 µm is comparable to capsule features and should be included when assessing how ablated gold contaminates the fuel.
  • Ions reflected by the shock form quasi-monoenergetic beams with energies above 2Vs, which could seed beam-target fusion reactions and broaden neutron spectra.
  • As the hydrogen mole fraction rises, the shock becomes stronger and the H–D separation shrinks, meaning fuel composition directly tunes the shock structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper never specifies the Coulomb collision operator in LAPINS; a direct test is to disable collisions and see whether the ratio VsH/VsD moves toward √2, which would collapse the weakly collisional claim.
  • If the weakly collisional picture holds, similar species-dependent sub-shocks should appear at other high-Z/fuel interfaces inside hohlraums, such as gold against plastic or high-density-carbon ablators.
  • The diffusion-flux analysis is borrowed from strongly collisional BSM theory; comparing the simulated cH − cH0 profile with the BSM prediction would quantify how far the weakly collisional regime is from the collisional limit.
  • The predicted double-peaked ion energy spectrum at a fixed diagnostic plane is a direct experimental observable that could be sought in hohlraum experiments with time-resolved ion spectrometers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports one-dimensional implicit PIC simulations of an expanding gold plasma colliding with a uniform hydrogen-deuterium plasma, as a model of region 3 inside an indirect-drive ICF hohlraum. The authors observe electrostatic shock structures with separate H and D sub-shocks, C-shaped phase-space signatures of ion reflection, electrostatic sheath acceleration, and a growing mixing region. They classify the shocks as weakly collisional (Kn ~ O(1)) on the basis of an analytic collision-frequency estimate nu_D,Au ~ 10^12 to 10^13 s^-1, and they compare the observed ion separation and mixing qualitatively with a BSM-type diffusion formula (Eq. 8). The main claims are that weak collisions partially suppress kinetic effects while leaving them significant, and that the resulting mixing width (about 230 micrometers) is resolvable only in kinetic simulations.

Significance. If the weak-collision classification were established, the paper would offer a useful bridge between collisionless kinetic studies and hydrodynamic multi-ion descriptions for a hohlraum-relevant geometry. The qualitative predictions are concrete and falsifiable: distinct sub-shock velocities for H and D, two peaks in the time-integrated ion energy spectra, and a mixing width of order 100 micrometers that radiation-hydrodynamics codes would not capture. I also credit the authors for showing full phase-space and potential diagnostics across several mole fractions and for attempting to connect the kinetic results to the BSM diffusion framework. However, the paper's central contribution depends on a collision model that is never specified, and the quantitative claims are not supported by convergence tests; the significance is therefore conditional on the missing evidence being supplied.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II (collision-frequency estimate) through Sec. III.C] The central classification 'weakly collisional shock, Kn ~ O(1)' is based solely on the analytic estimate nu_D,Au ~ 10^12 to 10^13 s^-1. The paper never states whether the LAPINS runs include Coulomb collisions, describes no collision operator (binary, drag-diffusion, or otherwise), and reports no collision frequency or mean free path actually used in the simulation. Consequently, the assertion in Sec. III.C that 'when collisions are present' the gold expansion is hindered, and the statement in Sec. III.B that weak collisions suppress kinetic effects, have no demonstrable support in the presented runs. Moreover, Kn = lambda |grad ln n| is never evaluated from the simulated density profiles. If the simulations are effectively collisionless, the C-shaped phase-space structures, ion reflection, and separate sub-shocks are standard collisionless-shock features, and the paper's title claim is unsupported. The authors must specify the collision model, give its parameters, and report a Kn value computed from the simulation (or from the code's actual collision rate) before the central claim can be assessed.
  2. [Sec. II (simulation setup)] The numerical setup is not reproducible as written and no convergence evidence is provided. The cell size is 1 micrometer while the upstream electron Debye length is about 13 nm (and smaller in the gold plasma), so the implicit scheme must be doing important sub-grid physics; a resolution study in cell size and macro-particle number is needed to show that the shock widths, sub-shock separation, and mixing width are converged. In addition, the initial gold-plasma width and the location of the Au/HD interface are not given, although these determine the shock launch time and the subsequent mixing width. These omissions are load-bearing because the paper's quantitative outputs include the measured shock velocities (626 and 592 km/s) and the 230-micrometer mixing width.
  3. [Sec. III.B and Sec. III.C] The claim that weak collisions suppress collisionless kinetic effects is not demonstrated by any controlled comparison. The paper contrasts the observed behavior with Ref. [35]'s collisionless multicomponent shocks and with free-rarefaction behavior, but no LAPINS run with collisions disabled (or with collision frequency varied) is shown. Without such a comparison, statements such as 'in the presence of weak collisions, the kinetic effects dominated by the electric field have been suppressed' (Sec. III.B) and the piston-like expansion attributed to collisions (Sec. III.C) are interpretive rather than evidenced. A collisionless control simulation would directly test the paper's central mechanism.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (6)] The right-hand side of Eq. (6) should read rho_0 u_0 c_H0, not 0, for the steady-state hydrogen mass flux; the subsequent derivation of Eq. (8) is otherwise misleading.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption and Sec. II text] The second black-dashed-line velocity is labeled VshH but should be VshD (592 km/s).
  3. [Sec. II, sound-speed values] The quoted sound speeds c_sH = 113 km/s and c_sD = 79.8 km/s do not follow from the stated formula sqrt(k Te0 / m_i) with Te0 = 100 eV, which gives about 98 and 69 km/s; please correct the values or the formula.
  4. [Sec. III.C, cross-reference] The mixing-width time evolution is described as 'depicted in Fig. 5(d)', but it appears in Fig. 6(d); the cross-reference should be fixed.
  5. [Sec. IV, conclusion] The sentence 'The collision of the reversed ions with the upstream ions resulting of the upstream ions' is garbled and should be rewritten.
  6. [Sec. III.B, notation] The diffusion flux i_H is used in Eq. (6) but defined only in Eq. (7); define it before first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: shock structure, ion separation, and mixing width are simulation outputs compared with, not fitted into, analytic estimates.

full rationale

No circular step is exhibited in the paper. The central quantities—sub-shock velocities (VsH = 626 km/s, VsD = 592 km/s), C-shaped phase-space structures, flow velocity and temperature profiles, and the approximately 230-µm mixing width—are measured from the LAPINS particle-in-cell simulation and are not derived from a fitted parameter or from the interpretive diffusion model. The BSM diffusion flux, Eq. (7), and concentration relation, Eq. (8), are used after the simulation to organize the observed separation qualitatively; they do not enter the simulation as an input, and no output is expressed as an equivalent form of them. The analytic estimates—Eq. (2) for the velocity ratio, Tic ~ 1/2 mi Vs^2 for downstream temperature, and the νD,Au ~ 10^12–10^13/s estimate for Kn ~ O(1)—are independent order-of-magnitude checks, not refitted predictions. Self-citations to LAPINS (Refs. 44–48) and to the authors' earlier colliding-plasma simulation (Ref. 38) identify the tool and a comparison limit; the present claims rest on the simulations reported here. The one substantive weakness is not circularity: the Coulomb collision operator in LAPINS is never described, so the weakly collisional classification relies on an analytical collision-frequency estimate in Sec. II rather than a directly measured code quantity, and Sec. III.C invokes "when collisions are present" without specifying a collisional run. That is an unsupported premise or reproducibility gap, not a reduction of an output to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central simulation uses a dozen hand-chosen initial conditions and invokes the BSM diffusion theory for interpretation; no new physical entities are introduced. The main burden is the unstated collision operator and the unverified numerical resolution.

free parameters (7)
  • Gold ionization state Z_Au = 50 (fixed)
    Set as a constant initial condition; determines the electrostatic field strength and collision rates in the simulation, but not fitted to data.
  • Gold electron temperature T_e1 = 3000 eV
    Chosen initial condition for the gold plasma; controls electron pressure and sheath formation.
  • Gold ion temperature T_Au = 100 eV
    Chosen initial condition.
  • Gold electron density n_e1 = 1.0e21 cm^-3
    Chosen initial condition; sets the gold plasma density and hence the piston-like expansion.
  • HD plasma electron density n_e0 = 2.0e19 cm^-3
    Chosen initial condition for the upstream plasma; sets the density jump across the shock.
  • HD plasma temperature T_H=T_D=T_e0 = 100 eV
    Chosen initial condition.
  • Hydrogen mole fraction f_H = 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5
    Scanned parameter; the paper studies its effect on shock structure.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The BSM multi-ion diffusion model (Eq. 7) with coefficients from Refs [6,13,14] correctly describes ion concentration separation in weakly collisional shocks.
    Invoked in Sec. III.B to interpret the hydrogen concentration enhancement and deficit; the simulation results are compared qualitatively to this model, but the model's validity at Kn ~ O(1) is not established in the paper.
  • domain assumption The ion reflection condition Z_i e Delta_phi >= 1/2 m_i (v_i - V_s)^2 (Eq. 1) applies to weakly collisional shocks with the potential barrier evaluated at the shock front.
    Used in Sec. II to explain sub-shock velocity differences and in Eq. (2) to estimate the shock velocity ratio; strictly derived for collisionless reflection.
  • ad hoc to paper The implicit PIC code LAPINS resolves the relevant plasma scales with a cell size of 1 micron and 400-1000 macro-particles per cell, despite the electron Debye length being about 17 nm.
    No convergence study or resolution test is provided; the electrostatic sheath and shock structure could depend on cell size and particle number. This underpins all results.
  • domain assumption The chosen gold and HD plasma parameters represent the physical conditions of hohlraum region 3.
    The paper motivates the setup with Fig. 1 but does not show a derivation from radiation-hydrodynamic simulations or experiments.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structure of weakly collisional shock waves of multicomponent plasmas inside hohlraums of indirect inertial confinement fusions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ROUDOAPS

@misc{pith2026241111008,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structure of weakly collisional shock waves of multicomponent plasmas inside hohlraums of indirect inertial confinement fusions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ROUDOAPS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11008}
}
abstract

In laser-driven indirect inertial confinement fusion (ICF), a hohlraum--a cavity constructed from high-Z materials--serves the purpose of converting laser energy into thermal x-ray energy. This process involves the interaction of low-density ablated plasmas, which can give rise to weakly collisional shock waves characterized by a Knudsen number $K_n$ on the order of 1. The Knudsen number serves as a metric for assessing the relative importance of collisional interactions. Preliminary experimental investigations and computational simulations have demonstrated that the kinetic effects associated with weakly collisional shock waves significantly impact the efficiency of the implosion process. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the physics underlying weakly collisional shock waves is essential. This research aims to explore the formation and fundamental structural properties of weakly collisional shock waves within a hohlraum, as well as the phenomena of ion mixing and ion separation in multicomponent plasmas. Weakly collisional shocks occupy a transition regime between collisional shock waves ($K_n \ll 1$) and collisionless shock waves ($K_n \gg 1$), thereby exhibiting both kinetic effects and hydrodynamic behavior. These shock waves are primarily governed by an electrostatic field, which facilitates significant electrostatic sheath acceleration and ion reflection acceleration. The differentiation of ions occurs due to the varying charge-to-mass ratios of different ion species in the presence of electrostatic field, resulting in the separation of ion densities, velocities, temperatures and concentrations. The presence of weakly collisional shock waves within the hohlraum is expected to affect the transition of laser energy and the overall efficiency of the implosion process.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11008 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The schematic diagram of three kinds of interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The temporal evolution of the density profiles of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) The profile of flow velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) - (d) The charge density profiles of various species, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a)-(c) The spatial distribution of species fractions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    H. B. Cai, L. Q. Shan, Z. Q. Yuan, W. S. Zhang, W. W. Wang, C. Tian, F. Zhang, J. Teng, S. Q. Yang, Q. Tang, Z. F. Song, J. B. Chen, W. M. Zhou, Y. Q. Gu, B. H. Zhang, S. P. Zhu, and X. T. He, Study of the kinetic effects in indirect-drive inertial confinement fu- sion hohlraums, High Energy Density Physics 36, 100756 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [35]

    Sorasio, M

    G. Sorasio, M. Marti, R. Fonseca, and L. O. Silva, Very high mach-number electrostatic shocks in collision- less plasmas, Physical Review Letters 96, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.96.045005 (2006)

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2006

  3. [1]

    S. L. Pape, L. F. B. Hopkins, L. Divol, et al., The near vacuum hohlraum campaign at the nif: A new approach, Physics of Plasmas 23, 056311 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [2]

    2,the observed ratio is VsH/VsD = 1 .06

    As measured in Fig. 2,the observed ratio is VsH/VsD = 1 .06. Consequently, in the context of weakly collisional shock waves, the velocity separation of sub-shocks is less pronounced compared to the collisionless xounterparts. On the other hand, as the energy of the shock wave dissipates, the velocities of the two sub-shock waves gradually diminish and con...

    work page

  5. [3]

    L. B. Hopkins, N. Meezan, S. L. Pape, et al., First high-convergence cryogenic implosion in a near-vacuum hohlraum, Physical Review Letters 114, 175001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [4]

    X. Xie, L. Hou, H. Cai, C. Wu, X. Peng, X. Duan, S. Liu, D. Yang, S. Li, Z. Li, Q. Li, Y. Liu, H. Du, K. Ren, F. Ge, W. Yang, L. Guo, W. Shang, X. Che, L. Jing, Y. Li, H. Wei, Y. Yang, A. Sun, R. Yu, Y. Huang, X. Jiang, T. Xu, X. He, C. Li, Y. Li, F. Wang, H. He, J. Yang, K. Du, S. Jiang, B. Zhang, and Y. Ding, Measurement of time-dependent drive flux on ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.075001 2022

  7. [5]

    Yan, H.-B

    X.-X. Yan, H.-B. Cai, W.-S. Zhang, L. Hao, P.-L. Yao, X. Li, S.-Y. Zou, S.-P. Zhu, and X.-T. He, Anomalous mix induced by a collisionless shock wave in an inertial confinement fusion hohlraum, Nuclear Fusion 59, 106016 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [6]

    Thoma, D

    C. Thoma, D. R. Welch, R. E. Clark, et al., Hybrid-pic modeling of laser-plasma interactions and hot electron generation in gold hohlraum walls, Physics of Plasmas 24, 062707 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 51 references
  1. [7]

    A. N. Simakov, B. D. Keenan, W. T. Taitano, and L. Chac´ on, Plasma ion stratification by weak planar shocks, Physics of Plasmas 24, 092702 (2017)

    2017

  2. [8]

    B. D. Keenan, A. N. Simakov, W. T. Taitano, and L. Chac´ on, Ion species stratification within strong shocks in two-ion plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 25, 032103 (2018)

    2018

  3. [9]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. kang Liu, W. shuai Zhang, E. hao Zhang, X. chuan Ning, F. qi Meng, Y. peng Wang, H. bo Cai, and S. ping Zhu, Kinetic effects on the interaction of counter- propagating plasma shocks inside an icf hohlraum, Nu- clear Fusion 64, 096005 (2024)

    2024

  4. [10]

    J. D. Jukes, The structure of a shock wave in a fully ionized gas, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 3, 275 (1957)

    1957

  5. [11]

    M. S. Greywall, Thickness of an embedded ion shock, The Physics of Fluids 18, 1439 (1975)

    1975

  6. [12]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and Y. P. Raizer, Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Courier Corporation, 2002) pp. 515–521

    2002

  7. [13]

    B. D. Keenan, A. N. Simakov, L. Chac´ on, and W. T. Taitano, Deciphering the kinetic structure of multi-ion plasma shocks, Physical Review E 96, 053203 (2017)

    2017

  8. [14]

    A. N. Simakov and K. Molvig, Hydrodynamic description of an unmagnetized plasma with multiple ion species. ii. two and three ion species plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 23, 032116 (2016)

    2016

  9. [15]

    A. N. Simakov and K. Molvig, Hydrodynamic description of an unmagnetized plasma with multiple ion species. i. general formulation, Physics of Plasmas 23, 032115 (2016)

    2016

  10. [16]

    T. G. Cowling, Vi. the influence of diffusion on the prop- agation of shock waves, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 33, 61 (1942), doi: 10.1080/14786444208521339

    1942 doi

  11. [17]

    M. J. Rosenberg, H. G. Rinderknecht, N. M. Hoffman, P. A. Amendt, S. Atzeni, A. B. Zylstra, C. K. Li, F. H. S´ eguin, H. Sio, M. G. Johnson, J. A. Frenje, R. D. Pe- trasso, V. Y. Glebov, C. Stoeckl, W. Seka, F. J. Marshall, J. A. Delettrez, T. C. Sangster, R. Betti, V. N. Gon-...

    2014

  12. [18]

    H. Sio, O. Larroche, S. Atzeni, N. V. Kabadi, J. A. Frenje, M. G. Johnson, C. Stoeckl, C. K. Li, C. J. For- rest, V. Glebov, P. J. Adrian, A. Bose, A. Birkel, S. P. Regan, F. H. Seguin, and R. D. Petrasso, Probing ion species separation and ion thermal decoupling in shock- dri...

    2019

  13. [19]

    H. Sio, J. A. Frenje, A. Le, S. Atzeni, T. J. Kwan, M. G. Johnson, G. Kagan, C. Stoeckl, C. K. Li, C. E. Parker, C. J. Forrest, V. Glebov, N. V. Kabadi, A. Bose, H. G. Rinderknecht, P. Amendt, D. T. Casey, R. Mancini, W. T. Taitano, B. Keenan, A. N. Simakov, L. Chac´ on, S. P....

    2019

  14. [20]

    Amendt, O

    P. Amendt, O. L. Landen, H. F. Robey, C. K. Li, and R. D. Petrasso, Plasma barodiffusion in inertial- confinement-fusion implosions: Application to observed yield anomalies in thermonuclear fuel mixtures, Physical Review Letters 105, 115005 (2010)

    2010

  15. [21]

    L. Yin, B. J. Albright, E. L. Vold, W. D. Nystrom, R. F. Bird, and K. J. Bowers, Plasma kinetic effects on in- terfacial mix and burn rates in multispatial dimensions, Physics of Plasmas 26, 062302 (2019)

    2019

  16. [22]

    A. B. Zylstra, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, et al., Metrics for implosion performance with enhanced energy coupling on nif, Nuclear Fusion 61, 116066 (2021)

    2021

  17. [23]

    A. B. Zylstra, A. L. Kritcher, O. A. Hurricane, et al., Record energetics for an inertial fusion implosion at nif, Physical Review Letters 126, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  18. [24]

    A. B. Zylstra, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, et al., Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion, Nature 601, 542 (2022)

    2022

  19. [25]

    A. B. Zylstra, A. L. Kritcher, O. A. Hurricane, et al., Ex- perimental achievement and signatures of ignition at the national ignition facility, Physical Review E 106, 025202 (2022)

    2022

  20. [26]

    Atzeni, D

    S. Atzeni, D. Batani, C. N. Danson, et al., Breakthrough at the nif paves the way to inertial fusion energy, Euro- physics News 53, 18 (2022)

    2022

  21. [27]

    Balogh and R

    A. Balogh and R. A. Treumann, Physics of Collisionless Shocks: Space Plasma Shock Waves(Springer New York,

  22. [28]

    D. S. Spicer, R. W. Clark, and S. P. Maran, A model of the pre-sedov expansion phase of supernova remnant– ambient plasma coupling and x-ray emission from sn 1987a, The Astrophysical Journal 356, 549 (1990)

    1990

  23. [29]

    L. F. Burlaga, N. F. Ness, M. H. Acu˜ na, R. P. Lep- ping, J. E. P. Connerney, and J. D. Richardson, Magnetic fields at the solar wind termination shock, Nature 454, 10 75 (2008)

    2008

  24. [30]

    R. Z. Sagdeev and C. F. Kennel, Collisionless shock waves, Scientific American 264, 106 (1991)

    1991

  25. [31]

    Bertucci, C

    C. Bertucci, C. Mazelle, M. H. Acu˜ na, C. T. Russell, and J. A. Slavin, Structure of the mag- netic pileup boundary at mars and venus, Jour- nal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010592 (2005)

    2005 doi

  26. [32]

    Gregori, B

    G. Gregori, B. Reville, and F. Miniati, The generation and amplification of intergalactic magnetic fields in ana- logue laboratory experiments with high power lasers, Physics Reports 601, 1 (2015)

    2015

  27. [33]

    S. A. Colgate and M. H. Johnson, Hydrodynamic origin of cosmic rays, Physical Review Letters 5, 235 (1960)

    1960

  28. [36]

    Kumar, Y

    R. Kumar, Y. Sakawa, T. Sano, L. N. D¨ ohl, N. Woolsey, and A. Morace, Ion acceleration at two collisionless shocks in a multicomponent plasma, Physical Review E 103, 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.043201 (2021)

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    L. Q. Shan, H. B. Cai, W. S. Zhang, et al., Experimental evidence of kinetic effects in indirect-drive inertial con- finement fusion hohlraums, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 195001 (2018)

    2018

  30. [39]

    Liang, D

    T. Liang, D. Wu, X. Ning, L. Shan, Z. Yuan, H. Cai, Z. Sheng, and X. He, Large-scale kinetic simulations of colliding plasmas within a hohlraum of indirect-drive in- ertial confinement fusion, Physical Review E109, 035207 (2024)

    2024

  31. [40]

    Ahmed, M

    H. Ahmed, M. E. Dieckmann, L. Romagnani, D. Do- ria, G. Sarri, M. Cerchez, E. Ianni, I. Kourakis, A. L. Giesecke, M. Notley, R. Prasad, K. Quinn, O. Willi, and M. Borghesi, Time-resolved characterization of the for- mation of a collisionless shock, Physical Review Letters 110,...

    2013 doi

  32. [41]

    H. G. Rinderknecht, P. A. Amendt, S. C. Wilks, and G. Collins, Kinetic physics in icf: present understanding and future directions, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fu- sion 60, 064001 (2018)

    2018

  33. [42]

    S. L. Pape, L. Divol, L. B. Hopkins, et al., Observation of a reflected shock in an indirectly driven spherical im- plosion at the national ignition facility, Physical Review Letters 112, 225002 (2014)

    2014

  34. [43]

    L. F. B. Hopkins, S. L. Pape, L. Divol, et al., Near- vacuum hohlraums for driving fusion implosions with high density carbon ablators, Physics of Plasmas 22, 056318 (2015)

    2015

  35. [44]

    bo Cai, X

    H. bo Cai, X. xin Yan, P. lin Yao, and S. ping Zhu, Hybrid fluid-particle modeling of shock-driven hydrodynamic in- stabilities in a plasma, Matter and Radiation at Extremes 6, 035901 (2021)

    2021

  36. [45]

    D. Wu, X. T. He, W. Yu, and S. Fritzsche, Monte carlo approach to calculate proton stopping in warm dense matter within particle-in-cell simulations, Physical Re- view E 95, 023207 (2017)

    2017

  37. [46]

    D. Wu, W. Yu, S. Fritzsche, and X. T. He, High-order implicit particle-in-cell method for plasma simulations at solid densities, Physical Review E 100, 013207 (2019)

    2019

  38. [47]

    D. Wu, Z. M. Sheng, W. Yu, S. Fritzsche, and X. T. He, A pairwise nuclear fusion algorithm for particle-in-cell simulations: Weighted particles at relativistic energies, AIP Advances 11, 075003 (2021)

    2021

  39. [48]

    D. Wu, W. Yu, S. Fritzsche, and X. T. He, Particle-in-cell simulation method for macroscopic degenerate plasmas, Physical Review E 102, 033312 (2020)

    2020

  40. [49]

    Wu and J

    D. Wu and J. Zhang, Head-on collision of large-scale high density plasmas jets: A first-principle kinetic simulation approach, Physics of Plasmas 30, 072711 (2023)

    2023

  41. [50]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Chapter vi - diffusion, in Fluid Mechanics (Second Edition), edited by L. Landau and E. Lifshitz (Pergamon, 1987) second edition ed., pp. 227– 237

    1987

  42. [51]

    Kagan and X.-Z

    G. Kagan and X.-Z. Tang, Electro-diffusion in a plasma with two ion species, Physics of Plasmas 19, 082709 (2012)

    2012

  43. [52]

    Atzeni and J

    S. Atzeni and J. Meyer-ter Vehn, The physics of iner- tial fusion: beam plasma interaction, hydrodynamics, hot dense matter, Vol. 125 (OUP Oxford, 2004) pp. 134–194

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.