Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Highly stable modular-assembled laser system for a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A modular, all-quartz laser system achieves power stability better than 1:1000, Raman phase noise of -100 dBc/Hz, and 80% fringe contrast in a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope.

desk verdict Solid modular quartz laser system for atom gyroscopes, with credible room-temperature specs; the 5–50°C field-readiness claim outruns the data because MTS frequency stability was only tested at 25°C. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12218 v1 pith:F5ELPNP7 submitted 2024-11-19 physics.atom-ph

Chuan Sun , Si-Bin Lu , Min Jiang , Zhan-Wei Yao , Shao-Kang Li , Xiao-Li Chen , Min Ke , Jia-Hao Fu
show 3 more authors
Run-Bing Li Jin Wang Ming-Sheng Zhan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords atominterferometrygyroscopelasersystemall-quartzopticalmodulesmodulationtransferspectroscopyphase-lockedloopthermalstabilityRamanlasers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a laser system designed to remove the biggest obstacle to field-deployable atom-interferometer gyroscopes: thermal instability of free-space optics. The authors build optical modules with millimeter-scale elements jointed on quartz plates with identical quartz supports, so that temperature changes shift the whole assembly uniformly instead of distorting beam alignment. At room temperature they measure power stability better than 1:1000 (Allan deviation $8.3\times10^{-4}$ at 100 s), polarization extinction above 30 dB, frequency fluctuation below 91 kHz after locking to a rubidium modulation-transfer spectrum, and Raman phase noise of $-100$ dBc/Hz at 1 kHz. Modules were cycled from 5 to 50 $^\circ$C, and in a working dual-atom interferometer the fringe contrast reached 80% at 26 $^\circ$C. The conclusion is that such a compact modular laser can support field applications of atom-interferometer sensors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the all-quartz-jointed optical module: a quartz base plate, quartz wedge supports, quartz grooves, and millimeter-scale optics bonded with low-shrinkage, low-stress UV adhesive, all sharing the same coefficient of thermal expansion. Temperature changes therefore move the whole assembly uniformly without bending the optical train, preserving power coupling and polarization. Active devices such as AOMs are inverted and suspended on quartz supports to reduce heat conduction into the base plate, and active and passive modules are jointed separately. Frequency control is carried by modulation transfer spectroscopy (MTS), which locks the primary diode laser's sideband to a rubidium transition, and by optical phase-locked loops (OPLLs) that lock two secondary lasers to the primary so the Raman pair keeps a $6.834$ GHz offset with low phase noise.

What would settle it

Measure the beatnote between the MTS-locked primary laser and an ultrastable cavity reference while cycling the optical module temperature from 5 to 50 $^\circ$C; if the locked frequency deviation exceeds roughly 100 kHz, the claimed frequency stability does not hold across the operating range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the all-quartz-jointed module construction is what delivers simultaneous thermal, power, polarization, and phase stability in a free-space laser system for atom interferometry. By using the same coefficient of thermal expansion for the base plate, supports, and optics, and by suspending active devices (AOMs, EOMs) on quartz supports to cut heat conduction, the system avoids the misalignment and birefringence that metal-based mounts cause when temperature changes. The result is a 260 mm × 220 mm × 60 mm laser system that, at room temperature, shows power fluctuation below $8.3\times10^{-4}$ at 100 s, PER above 30 dB, an MTS-locked frequency drift under 91 kHz, and Raman phase noise of $-100$ dBc/Hz at 1 kHz. Under a 5–50 $^\circ$C tooth-wave cycle the passive modules fluctuate by at most 3.2% in power and keep PER above 23.8 dB, while active modules fluctuate 9.4% with a 19.8 dB PER floor, recovering over 95% when the temperature returns. When integrated into a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope, fringe contrast peaked at 80% at 26 $^\circ$C and fell at $1.4\pm0.1\%$ per degree on the cool side and $2.8\pm0.1\%$ per degree on the warm side, attributed mainly to active-module power variations in the Raman beams.

Load-bearing premise

The field-readiness claim assumes the MTS frequency lock remains stable across the 5–50 $^\circ$C range, but the paper reports only power and polarization versus temperature, never frequency versus temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A laser system with this modular architecture can be reconfigured for other atom-interferometer sensors, such as gravimeters and gradiometers, by swapping optical modules rather than redesigning the whole system.
  • The stated 5–50 $^\circ$C operating range and over 95% power recovery imply that the laser system no longer forces the sensor head to sit in a temperature-controlled laboratory.
  • The measured fringe-contrast slopes of roughly 1.4% per degree on the cool side and 2.8% per degree on the warm side give a quantitative thermal budget for regulating the environment around a field-deployed gyroscope.
  • The active modules' 9.4% power fluctuation over the full temperature range identifies AOM heat management as the primary remaining limit on low-temperature-contrast performance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct beatnote measurement of the MTS-locked laser across the full temperature range would be the cleanest test of the field-readiness claim, since frequency-versus-temperature data are absent from the paper.
  • The attribution of fringe-contrast loss to active-module Raman power variation could be checked by monitoring or stabilizing the Raman power at the sensor head, which would separate module effects from fiber-delivery and sensor-head thermal effects.
  • The all-quartz modular construction could transfer to other precision atom-optics systems, such as optical clocks or Rydberg-atom sensors, wherever free-space alignment and polarization must survive thermal cycling.
  • Because the passive modules show 3.2% power variation over the full range while room-temperature stability is below 1:1000, the reported performance suggests the input fiber laser stability, rather than the quartz modules, now sets the practical floor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the design, assembly, and characterization of a compact fiber-laser-based 780-nm laser system built from all-quartz-jointed optical modules for a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope. The primary laser is MTS-locked to Rb, two secondary lasers are OPLL-locked, and AOM-controlled outputs provide cooling, repumping, blow-away, Raman, and detection beams. The authors report room-temperature relative power Allan deviations of 8.3e-4 and 4.6e-4 at 100 s for active and passive modules, PER values above 30 dB, a locked frequency fluctuation below 91 kHz over 8 h, and Raman phase noise of -100 dBc/Hz at 1 kHz (first OPLL) and better than -90 dBc/Hz (second OPLL). Temperature-cycling tests over 5-50 °C cover power and PER only; atom-interference fringes were obtained at 21, 26, and 31 °C with maximum contrast 80%, decreasing linearly away from 26 °C. The paper concludes that the modular laser system promotes field applications of atom-interferometer sensors.

Significance. The work has concrete engineering value: the CTE-matched quartz construction, inverted and suspended AOMs, >90% free-space-to-fiber coupling efficiency, and modular assembly are credible design contributions, and the room-temperature metrics are directly measured and internally coherent. The reported Allan deviations, PER traces, beatnote spectra, and phase-noise curves provide useful data for the atom-interferometry community. However, the field-readiness/temperature claim is the weak point: the MTS frequency lock is never characterized above 25 °C, and the gyroscope application test is only a fringe-contrast check over 21-31 °C with co-propagating Raman pulses. Those gaps prevent the strongest conclusions from being accepted as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4 (Figs. 6 and 7)] The temperature-cycling data in Fig. 6 characterize only module power stability and PER; the MTS-locked primary-laser frequency is characterized only at 25 °C in Fig. 7. The claim that the system is usable over 5-50 °C therefore rests on an untested parameter: whether the MTS lock remains within its sub-91-kHz fluctuation and does not unlock at temperature extremes. The 21-31 °C fringe-contrast data in Section 5 are indirect evidence over a narrower range, obtained with the lab temperature set by an air conditioner rather than a chamber, and contrast depends on many sensor-head and delivery parameters, so it cannot certify frequency stability across the full range. Please add frequency-deviation/Allan-deviation or lock-survival data versus temperature, or explicitly restrict the temperature claim to power and PER.
  2. [Section 5 (Fig. 9)] The statement that the fringe-contrast reduction with temperature is 'mainly influenced by variations in the Raman laser power' is not established by the presented data. No simultaneous measurement of the Raman power delivered to the sensor head during fringe acquisition is shown, and possible thermal effects in the PM-fiber delivery, waveplates, PBSs, or sensor-head optics are not isolated. The similarity between the slope asymmetry and the active-module power behavior is circumstantial. Please provide a direct correlation between measured Raman power and contrast, or soften the causal conclusion to a correlation.
  3. [Section 5] The application test uses co-propagating Raman pulse sequences, which do not produce the momentum-space separation that generates the Sagnac phase in a gyroscope. Thus the reported fringes demonstrate atom-interference contrast, not rotation sensitivity or gyroscope operation. As the title and abstract are framed around a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope, the paper should either report a counter-propagating Raman interference measurement or clearly state that Sagnac operation was not tested; as written, the application claim outruns the data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4 vs. Conclusion] The minimum PER values over temperature are inconsistent: Section 4 reports 19.8 dB for the active module and 23.8 dB for the passive module, while the Conclusion states the passive-module PER was greater than 25.3 dB. Please correct this discrepancy.
  2. [Section 4 (Figs. 4 and 7)] The phrase 'power fluctuation was under 1:1000' should specify that this is an Allan deviation at 100 s integration time, not a peak-to-peak fluctuation; the same precision should be used for the corresponding statement in the Conclusion.
  3. [Section 4 (Fig. 7 and Conclusion)] The text says the locked frequency was recorded for over 8 h, while the Conclusion says 'over 5 h'; please align these durations and state the RBW/VBW used for the 91-kHz fluctuation estimate.
  4. [Section 4 (Fig. 6)] The observation that AOM temperatures exceed 70 °C when the chamber is at 50 °C is a potential lifetime/reliability concern for field use; one sentence discussing the implications would strengthen the temperature discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper reports direct measurements of laser power, PER, frequency, phase noise, and fringe contrast; no derived claim reduces by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

This is an empirical characterization paper rather than a derivation. Each headline performance number is obtained by direct measurement against external references: power stability via Allan deviation of power-meter readings, PER via a polarization analyzer, frequency fluctuation via a beat note with an independently stabilized ultrastable cavity laser, and Raman phase noise via optical phase-locked-loop beat notes. The MTS lock and OPLL methods are standard techniques cited from the literature, and the cited references are not used to define the measured quantities. The only interpretive step is the attribution of fringe-contrast loss between 21 and 31 C to active-module-induced Raman power variations; this is a stated correlation consistent with the power-stability data, not a prediction derived from fitted values, and it does not feed back into the central performance claims. The paper's limitation that MTS frequency stability was not measured over 5-50 C (only power and PER were tested over that range) is a missing-evidence or correctness concern for the field-readiness claim, not a circularity, because the room-temperature frequency measurement is independent and the temperature tests do not presuppose the conclusion. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz-smuggling via citation, or uniqueness argument appears. Score 0 is therefore appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are used to derive the central performance claims; the two fringe-contrast slopes are descriptive fits. The main claims rest on three domain assumptions: quartz CTE matching preserves alignment, the MTS lock remains stable over temperature, and Raman power dominates the gyroscope contrast variation. None of these is independently measured.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Quartz components with identical CTE minimize thermal influence on alignment.
    Section 1 states 'Using materials with identical CTEs for the baseplate, supporting assemblies, and optical elements minimizes temperature influence'; the paper does not measure alignment drift directly, and active modules still show 9.4% power fluctuation.
  • domain assumption The MTS frequency lock remains stable across the 5-50 C temperature range.
    Frequency stability (<91 kHz) is measured only at room temperature (Section 4, Fig. 7); no frequency vs temperature data are presented.
  • domain assumption Fringe contrast loss is caused mainly by Raman laser power variations from the active modules.
    Section 5 says 'mainly influenced by variations in the Raman laser power, which is consistent with the test results', but the sensor head is not separately characterized.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Highly stable modular-assembled laser system for a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F5ELPNP7

@misc{pith2026241112218,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Highly stable modular-assembled laser system for a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F5ELPNP7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12218}
}
abstract

Operating atom-interferometer gyroscopes outside a laboratory environment is challenging primarily owing to the instability of laser systems. To enhance the thermal stability of free-space laser systems, a compact laser system using fiber lasers and all-quartz-jointed optical modules was developed for a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope. Millimeter-scale optical elements jointed on quartz plates with identical quartz supports, ensure laser power stability and facilitate component upgrades. The primary diode laser was locked to the modulation transfer spectrum of Rb atoms, and Raman lasers were phase-locked to the primary laser. Frequencies for repumping, blow-away, and detection lasers were adjusted with acousto-optic modulators. At room temperature, laser power fluctuation was under 1:1000, polarization extinction ratio exceeded 30 dB, frequency fluctuation was below 91 kHz, and phase noise reached to -100 dBc/Hz @ 1 kHz. The optical modules were tested at 5--50 $^{\circ}$C and applied to a dual-atom-interferometer gyroscope. The fringe contrast was tested over the temperature range. The proposed system paves the way for promoting field applications of atom-interferometer sensors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12218 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Transition levels and laser frequencies for an atom-interfreometer gyroscope. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of the proposed laser system. The primary diode laser is locked to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Photographs of the optical modules. Millimeter-scale optical elements are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Allan deviation of laser power stability at room temperature, showing relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Test of the PER for the active (a) and passive (b) optical modules. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative power stability and PER tests were conducted at varying temperatures. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Beatnote between the primary diode laser and an ultrastable laser. (a) Beatnote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phase noise of the Raman lasers locked with the OPLL method. (a) Beatnote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Atom interference fringes at varying temperatures (a)–(c) and fringe contrast’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Atomic interferometry usingstimulatedRaman transitions,

    M.Kasevichand S. Chu, “Atomic interferometry usingstimulatedRaman transitions,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 67 , 181 (1991)

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    Rotation sensing with a dual atom-interferometer Sagnac gyroscope,

    T. L. Gustavson, A. Landragin, and M. Kasevich, “Rotation sensing with a dual atom-interferometer Sagnac gyroscope,”Class.QuantumGravity 17 ,2385(2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Calibrationofatomictrajectoriesinalarge-area dual-atom-interferometergyroscope,

    Z.W.Yao,S.B.Lu,R.B.Li,J.Luo,J.Wang,andM.S.Zhan,“Calibrationofatomictrajectoriesinalarge-area dual-atom-interferometergyroscope,”Phys.Rev.A 97 ,013620(2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Self-alignment ofalarge-area dual-atom-interferometergyroscopeusingparameter-decoupled phase-seekingcalibrations,

    Z.W.Yao,H.H.Chen,S.B.Lu,R.B.Li,Z.X.Lu,X.L.Chen,G.H.Yu,M.Jiang,C.Sun,W.T.Ni,J.Wang, and M.S.Zhan, “Self-alignment ofalarge-area dual-atom-interferometergyroscopeusingparameter-decoupled phase-seekingcalibrations,”Phys.Rev.A 103 ,2469(2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Accuratemeasurementof theSagnaceffectformatterwaves,

    R.Gautier,M.Guessoum,L.A.Sidorenkov,Q.Bouton,A.Landragin,andR.Geiger,“Accuratemeasurementof theSagnaceffectformatterwaves,”Sci.Adv. 8 ,eabn8009(2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Self-calibratedatom-interferometergyroscopebymodulatingatomicvelocities,

    H.H.Chen,Z.W.Yao,Z. X.Lu, S.B.Lu, M.Jiang, S.K.Li, X.L.Chen,C.Sun,Y.F.Mao,Y.Li, R.B.Li, J.Wang, andM.S.Zhan,“Self-calibratedatom-interferometergyroscopebymodulatingatomicvelocities,”Rev. Sci.Instrum. 95 ,053201(2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Limitsonthesensitivityofacoldatominterferometry gyroscope,

    W.J.Xu,L.L.Chen,M.J.Nie,M.K.Zhou,andZ.K.Hu,“Limitsonthesensitivityofacoldatominterferometry gyroscope,”Opt.Express 32 ,42856(2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Demonstrationofan ultrahigh-sensitivityatom-interferometryabsolutegravimeter,

    Z.K.Hu,B.L.Sun,X.C.Duan,M.K.Zhou,L.L.Chen,S.Zhan,Q.Z.Zhang,andJ. Luo,“Demonstrationofan ultrahigh-sensitivityatom-interferometryabsolutegravimeter,”Phys.Rev.A 88 ,043610(2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Absolutemarinegravimetrywithmatter-waveinterferometry,

    Y.Bidel,N.Zahzam,C.Blanchard,A.Bonnin,M.Cadoret,A.Bresson,D.Rouxel,andM.F.Lequentrec-Lalancette, “Absolutemarinegravimetrywithmatter-waveinterferometry,”Nat.Commun. 9 ,627(2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Measurementoftheearth’sgravity gradientwithanatominterferometer-basedgravitygradiometer,

    M.J.Snadden,J.M.McGuirk,P.Bouyer,K.G.Haritos,and M.Kasevich,“Measurementoftheearth’sgravity gradientwithanatominterferometer-basedgravitygradiometer,”Phys.Rev.Lett. 81 ,971(1998)

    1998

  3. [11]

    CompactHigh-ResolutionAbsolute-GravityGradiometerBasedonAtomInterferometers,

    W. Lyu, J. Q. Zhong, X. W. Zhang, W. Liu, L. Zhu, W. H. Xu, X. Chen, B. Tang, J. Wang, and M. S. Zhan, “CompactHigh-ResolutionAbsolute-GravityGradiometerBasedonAtomInterferometers,” Phys.Rev.Appl. 18 , 054091(2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Compactdifferential gravimeteratthequantumprojection-noiselimit,

    C.Janvier,V.MÃľnoret,B.Desruelle,S.Merlet,A.Landragin,andF.PereiradosSantos,“Compactdifferential gravimeteratthequantumprojection-noiselimit,”Phys.Rev.A 105 ,0522801(2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Testofequivalenceprincipleat 10 − 8 levelbyadual-speciesdouble-diffractionRaman atominterferometer,

    L.Zhou,S.T.Long,B.Tang,X.Chen,F.Gao,W.C.Peng,W.T.Duan,J.Q.Zhong,Z.Y.Xiong,J.Wang,Y.Z Zhang, andM.S.Zhan, “Testofequivalenceprincipleat 10 − 8 levelbyadual-speciesdouble-diffractionRaman atominterferometer,”Phys.Rev.Lett. 115 ,013004(2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Atom-interferometric test of the equivalence principleatthe 10 − 12 level,

    P. Asenbaum, C. Overstreet, M. Kim, J. Curti, and M. Kasevich, “Atom-interferometric test of the equivalence principleatthe 10 − 12 level,”Phys.Rev.Lett. 125 ,191101(2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    PrecisionmeasurementoftheNewtonian gravitationalconstantusingcoldatoms,

    G.Rosi,F.Sorrentino,L.Cacciapuoti,M.Prevedelli,andG.M.Tino,“PrecisionmeasurementoftheNewtonian gravitationalconstantusingcoldatoms,”Nature 510 ,518(2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Measurementofthefine-structureconstantasa testofthestandardmodel,

    R.H.Parker,C.H.Yu,W.C.Zhong,B.Estey,andH.MÃijller,“Measurementofthefine-structureconstantasa testofthestandardmodel,”Science 360 ,6385(2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Cold-atomsources fortheMatter-wavelaserInterferometricGravitationAntenna(MIGA),

    Q.Beaufils,L.A.Sidorenkov,P.Lebegue,B.Venon,D.Holleville,L.Volodimer,M.Lours,J.Junca,X.H.Zou, A.Bertoldi,M.Prevedelli,D.O.Sabulsky,P.Bouyer,A.Landragin,B.Canuel,andR.Geiger,“Cold-atomsources fortheMatter-wavelaserInterferometricGravitationAntenna(MIGA),”Sci.Rep. 12 ,19000(2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Matter-waveAtomicGradiometerInterferometricSensor(MAGIS-100),

    M.Abe,P.Adamson,M.Borcean,etal.,“Matter-waveAtomicGradiometerInterferometricSensor(MAGIS-100),” QuantumSci.Technol. 6 ,044003(2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Aconfirmation ofthe generalrelativistic predictionof theLense-Thirring effect,

    I. Ciufoliniand E.C.Pavlis, “Aconfirmation ofthe generalrelativistic predictionof theLense-Thirring effect,” Nature 431 ,958(2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    Generalrelativisticeffectsinatominterferometry,

    S.Dimopoulos,P.W.Graham,J.M.Hogan,andM.Kasevich,“Generalrelativisticeffectsinatominterferometry,” Phys.Rev.D 78 ,042003(2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    ZAIGA:Zhaoshanlong-baselineAtomInterferometerGravitationAntenna,

    M.S.Zhan,J.Wang,W.T.Ni,D.F.Gao,G.Wang,L.X.He,R.B.Li,L.Zhou,X.Chen,J.Q.Zhong,B.Tang, Z.W.Yao,L.Zhu,Z.Y.Xiong,S.B.Lu,G.H.Yu,Q.F.Cheng,M. Liu,Y.R.Liang,P.Xu,X.D.He,M.Ke, Z.Tan,andJ.Luo,“ZAIGA:Zhaoshanlong-baselineAtomInterferometerGravitationAntenna,”Int.J.Mod.Phys. D 29 ,1940005(2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Navigationerrorqnalysisofatominterferometerinertialsensor,

    C.Jekeli,“Navigationerrorqnalysisofatominterferometerinertialsensor,”Navigation 52 ,1(2005)

    2005

  15. [23]

    Advancesinatomicgyroscopes: aviewfrominertialnavigationapplications,

    J.C.FangandJ.Qin,“Advancesinatomicgyroscopes: aviewfrominertialnavigationapplications,”Sensors 12 , 6331(2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Tidesandearthrotation,

    P.BroscheandH.Schuh,“Tidesandearthrotation,”Surv.Geophys. 19 ,417(1998)

    1998

  17. [25]

    Introductiontothespecialissueonrotationalseismology andengineeringapplications,

    W.H.K.Lee,M.ÃĞelebi,M.I.Todorovska,andH.Igel,“Introductiontothespecialissueonrotationalseismology andengineeringapplications,”B.Seism.SOC.AM. 99 ,945(2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    TheBose-Einsteincondensateandcoldatomlaboratory,

    K.Frye,S.Abend,W.Bartosch,etal.,“TheBose-Einsteincondensateandcoldatomlaboratory,”EPJQuantum Technol. 8 ,1(2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Aself-lockingRydbergatomelectricfieldsensor,

    C.T.Fancher,K.L.Nicolich,K.M.Backes,N.Malvania,K.Cox,D.H.Meyer,P.D.Kunz,J.C.Hill,W.Holland, andB.L.SchmittbergerMarlow,“Aself-lockingRydbergatomelectricfieldsensor,”Appl.Phys.Lett. 122 ,094001 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Realizationofacompact one-seedlasersystemforatominterferometer-basedgravimeters,

    J.Fang,J.G.Hu,X.Chen,H.R.Zhu,L.Zhou,J.Q.Zhong,J.Wang,andM.S.Zhan,“Realizationofacompact one-seedlasersystemforatominterferometer-basedgravimeters,”Opt.Express 26 ,1586(2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Simpleandrobustarchitectureofalasersystemforatom interferometry,

    S.Sarkar,R.Piccon,S.Merlet,andF.PereiradosSantos,“Simpleandrobustarchitectureofalasersystemforatom interferometry,”Opt.Express 30 ,3358(2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Highlyreliable opticalsystemforarubidiumspacecoldatomclock,

    W.Ren,Y.G.Sun,B.Wang,W.BXia,Q.Z.Qu,J.F.Xiang,Z.RDong,D.SLÃij,andL.Liu,“Highlyreliable opticalsystemforarubidiumspacecoldatomclock,”Appl.Opt. 55 ,3607(2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Compactportable lasersystemformobilecoldatomgravimeters,

    X.W.Zhang,J.Q.Zhong,B.Tang,X.Chen,L.Zhu,P.W.Huang,J.Wang,andM.S.Zhan,“Compactportable lasersystemformobilecoldatomgravimeters,”Appl.Opt. 57 ,6545(2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Modular-assembledlasersystemforalong-baselineatominterferometer,

    R.D.Xu,Q.Wang,S.T.Yan,Z.Hou,C.He,Y.H.Ji,Z.X.Li,J.J.Jiang,B.Y.Qiao,L.Zhou,J.Wang,andM.S. Zhan,“Modular-assembledlasersystemforalong-baselineatominterferometer,”Appl.Opt. 61 ,4648(2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Hydroxide-catalysis bondingforstableoptical systems forspace,

    E.J.Elliffe, J.Bogenstahl,A.Deshpande,J.Hough,C.Killow,S.Reid,D.Robertson,S.Rowan, H.Ward, and G. Cagnoli, “Hydroxide-catalysis bondingforstableoptical systems forspace,” Class. QuantumGrav. 22 , S257 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    TianQin: aspace-bornegravitationalwavedetector,

    J.Luo,L.S.Chen,H.Z.Duan,etal.,“TianQin: aspace-bornegravitationalwavedetector,”Class.QuantumGrav. 33 ,035010(2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Ultrastable,Zerodur-basedopticalbenchesforquantumgasexperiments,

    H.Duncker,O.Hellmig,A.Wenzlawski,A.Grote,A.J.Rafipoor,M.Rafipoor,K.Sengstock,andP.Windpassinger, “Ultrastable,Zerodur-basedopticalbenchesforquantumgasexperiments,”Appl.Opt. 53 ,4468(2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    AfiberedlasersystemfortheMIGA largescaleatominterferometer,

    D. O. Sabulsky, J. Junca, G. LefÃĺvre, X. Zou, A. Bertoldi, B. Battelier, M. Prevedelli, G. Stern, J. Santoire, Q.Beaufils,R.Geiger,A.Landragin,B.Desruelle,P.Bouyer,andB.Canuel,“AfiberedlasersystemfortheMIGA largescaleatominterferometer,”Sci.Rep. 10 ,3268(2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Miniaturizedoptical systemforhigh-precisionmobileatomicgravimeters,

    H.R.Zhu,P.W.Huang,B.Gao,B.Tang,X.Chen,J.Q.Zhong,J.Wang,andM.S.Zhan,“Miniaturizedoptical systemforhigh-precisionmobileatomicgravimeters,”Opt.Express 32 ,26157(2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Characterizationofsemiconductor-laserphasenoiseandestimationofbit-errorrateperformancewith low-speedofflinedigitalcoherentreceivers,

    K.Kikuchi,“Characterizationofsemiconductor-laserphasenoiseandestimationofbit-errorrateperformancewith low-speedofflinedigitalcoherentreceivers,”Opt.Express 20 ,5291(2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    Modulationtransferspectroscopyinatomicrubidium,

    D.J.McCarron,S.A.King,andS.L.Cornish,“Modulationtransferspectroscopyinatomicrubidium,”Meas.Sci. Technol. 19 ,105601(2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Characterizationof opticalphase-lockedtwodistributed-feedbackfiberlasersfor 87 R batominterferometry,

    S.Lee,S.Hwang,J.Baek,M.H.Lee,S.B.Lee,S.Seo,T.Y.Kwon,S.E.Park,andG.Moon,“Characterizationof opticalphase-lockedtwodistributed-feedbackfiberlasersfor 87 R batominterferometry,”Curr.Appl.Phys. 51 ,29 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Compactmulti-channelradiofrequencypulse-sequencegeneratorwithfast-switching capabilityforcold-atominterferometers,

    M.Jiang, S.B.Lu,Y.Li, C.Sun, Z.W.Yao, S.K.Li,H.H.Chen,X.L.Chen,Z.X.Lu, Y.F.Mao, R.B.Li, J.Wang,andM.S.Zhan,“Compactmulti-channelradiofrequencypulse-sequencegeneratorwithfast-switching capabilityforcold-atominterferometers,”Rev.Sci.Instrum. 94 ,093204(2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.