Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Isospectral reduction of the SSH3 lattice and its bulk-edge correspondence

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An SSH3 trimer chain can be reduced to a two-site model whose winding number counts its topological edge-state pairs.

desk verdict A clean isospectral reduction and a well-done acoustic experiment, but the central bulk-edge correspondence is asserted more than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12283 v2 pith:M4573S3N submitted 2024-11-19 physics.app-ph

Qian-Hao Guo , Yang Zhang , Xiao-Huan Wan , Li-Yang Zheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph
keywords isospectralreductionSSH3trimerlatticebulk-edgecorrespondencewindingnumbertopologicaledgestatesacousticinsulatorenergy-dependentcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that every SSH3 trimer chain---three sites per unit cell with staggered couplings---can be mapped without changing its spectrum onto a two-site model by integrating out the middle site. In that reduced model all topological information is carried by a single energy-dependent coupling $\rho = uw + \varepsilon v e^{-iq}$. The paper argues that the winding number of $\rho$ around the origin, summed over bands, equals twice the number of topologically protected edge-state pairs: $\nu = 0,2,4$ for zero, one, and two pairs. A reader should care because the SSH3 chain lacks the conventional symmetries that usually make bulk-edge correspondence well-defined, and the paper supplies a concrete counting rule that is verified in an acoustic experiment.

What carries the argument

The central object is the isospectrally reduced model (IRM), obtained by eliminating the B site from the $3\times 3$ SSH3 Hamiltonian. The effective $2\times 2$ operator acting on $(\tilde{p}_A, \tilde{p}_C)$ is $H = \begin{pmatrix} u^2 & \rho \\ \rho^* & w^2 \end{pmatrix}$ with $\rho = uw + \varepsilon v e^{-iq}$; it is nonlinear in $\varepsilon$ because the eliminated site feeds back through its Green's function. Its role is to turn a three-band lattice problem into a two-site problem whose only nontrivial coupling $\rho$ winds around the origin. The winding number of $\rho$ supplies the topological invariant, and the condition $|uw/(v\varepsilon)| < 1$ marks where $\rho = 0$ solutions become evanescent, giving edge states.

What would settle it

Measure the full spectrum of a finite N-cell SSH3 chain (or simulate it) with couplings in the predicted two-pair regime, e.g. $u=0.36$, $w=0.42$, $v=0.69$, and count midgap states: the claim fails if the number of pairs is not 2 or if their energies are not $\pm u$ and $\pm w$ within experimental resolution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the SSH3 lattice admits an isospectral reduction to a two-site 'fringe' model with Hamiltonian $H = \begin{pmatrix} u^2 & \rho \\ \rho^* & w^2 \end{pmatrix}$, where $\rho = uw + \varepsilon v e^{-iq}$, and the original three-band spectrum is recovered exactly. When $\rho = 0$ with complex wavevector $q = \kappa - i\zeta$ and evanescent condition $\zeta > 0$, the reduced model has an on-site inversion symmetry that protects pairs of edge states at energies $\varepsilon = \pm u$ and $\varepsilon = \pm w$. The winding number of $\rho$ as $q$ runs over the Brillouin zone counts these pairs: $\nu = 2$ for one pair and $\nu = 4$ for two, with $\nu = 0$ for the trivial phase. This establishes a bulk-edge correspondence for the SSH3 chain without requiring band-gap closing, and measurements on a 31-cell acoustic chain confirm the predicted edge-state profiles and energies.

Load-bearing premise

The count of edge-state pairs rests on assuming that every complex-wavevector solution of $\rho = 0$ with $\zeta > 0$ in the infinite chain corresponds to one physical eigenstate localized at a termination, with the two ends independent, rather than on solving the finite-length chain's boundary value problem.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The SSH3 phase diagram is set by the inequalities $v > u$ and $v > w$, not by band-gap closures; topological transitions occur when $|uw/(v\varepsilon)| = 1$.
  • Each topological phase carries a definite number of edge-state pairs at fixed energies $\pm u$ and $\pm w$, so the edge spectrum is predictable from bulk data.
  • The IRM's energy-dependent coupling means the effective hopping strength changes with eigenstate energy, so topological phase boundaries can be crossed by changing frequency in a single sample.
  • Measured acoustic spectra and amplitude profiles at 4.12 and 4.31 kHz match the reduced-model wavefunctions, and the states survive random disorder up to $\delta = 1$ mm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same integration-out procedure should apply to any chain with a site coupled only to its cell neighbors, so the IRM construction likely generalizes to tetramer or pentamer lattices whose reduced models will contain more energy-dependent couplings and possibly higher winding numbers.
  • Editorial extension: because the coupling $\rho$ depends on $\varepsilon$, a single physical chain could be switched between trivial and topological response by driving at different frequencies, offering frequency-selective edge-state routing.
  • Editorial extension: the evanescent-counting argument assumes the two terminations are independent; for short chains the finite-length boundary problem may mix the two ends and shift edge-state frequencies away from $\pm u$ and $\pm w$, which is a checkable finite-size prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an isospectral reduction (IR) of the three-site SSH3 lattice into an energy-dependent two-site model, whose off-diagonal coupling is ρ = uw + ε v e^{-iq}. The authors argue that the winding number of ρ on the three energy bands counts the number of topological edge-state pairs of the original chain: ν = 0, 2, or 4 for the trivial, one-pair, and two-pair phases. The transition criterion is |uw/(vε)| < 1, evaluated at the expected edge-state energies ±u and ±w. The claims are supported by numerical spectra for a 31-cell chain, by an acoustic implementation that measures band structure and edge-state profiles, and by a disorder-robustness calculation. The central theoretical step is the derivation of edge states from complex wavevector solutions of ρ = 0 with evanescence condition ζ > 0, which is used to infer the bulk-edge correspondence.

Significance. If the claimed correspondence is established rigorously, the paper provides a practical and intuitive invariant for a lattice that lacks the conventional symmetries usually invoked for bulk-edge correspondence, and it would extend isospectral reduction methods to topological wave systems. The exact Schur-complement reduction in Eq. (3) is clean and parameter-free, the acoustic mapping is clearly explained, and the experimental measurements of the predicted edge states are a definite strength. The numerical and experimental evidence for the specific deep-blue phase (SC > SA, SB) is convincing. However, the general bulk-edge correspondence is currently asserted rather than proven; the main evidence is a single parameter path in Fig. 2(a) and three illustrative winding plots in Figs. 2(c)-(e). A rigorous finite-chain argument or a systematic parameter scan is needed before the central claim can be accepted as a general result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eqs. (4)-(5) and the paragraph following Eq. (4)] The central bulk-edge correspondence is inferred from semi-infinite solutions of ρ = 0 with ζ > 0, but the finite N-cell boundary value problem is not solved. The ansatz in Eq. (5) satisfies the left termination by construction, yet it does not satisfy the right boundary condition pA_{N+1} = 0 in the C-site equation at l = N; a finite-chain eigenstate must be a superposition of the two evanescent solutions so that both terminations are matched. Such a superposition generally shifts the edge-state energies away from ±u and ±w and could, in principle, remove a state. Because the claim that the winding number ν counts edge-state pairs (ν = 0, 2, 4) rests on this step, the authors should either solve the finite-chain problem (e.g., by a transfer-matrix method) or provide a systematic numerical demonstration over the parameter space, rather than only the N = 31 path in Fig. 2(a).
  2. [Fig. 2(c)-(e) and the paragraph on winding numbers] The winding number ν is presented as the bulk invariant of the IRM, but ρ(q) is evaluated along the three energy bands ε_n(q) of the original SSH3 lattice, so ν is a functional of the SSH3 band structure rather than an invariant of a fixed, energy-independent Hamiltonian. The paper should state this explicitly and give the definition of ν as a sum over bands, including how the second band can wind twice in Fig. 2(e). As written, the text asserts the correspondence after illustrating three parameter points; it does not prove that ν equals the number of in-gap states for general (u, v, w).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (5)-(6)] For ε^+_ϕ = +u and ε^+_ψ = +w, Eq. (4) gives κ^+ = (2n+1)π, so e^{-iq} = -e^{-ζ}; the wavefunctions should therefore contain a factor (-1)^{l-1}. As written, Eq. (5) and Eq. (6) satisfy ρ = 0 only with κ = 0, which corresponds to the negative-energy solutions. Please correct the sign or clarify the convention for q.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase "there distinct topological phases" should read "three distinct topological phases."
  3. [Fig. 1(e) and experimental setup] The caption "mode intercity" should be "mode intensity," and the text "a perforation (radium 4 mm)" should be "a perforation (radius 4 mm)."
  4. [Fig. 4(a)] The disorder study perturbs channel widths while preserving the deep-blue phase condition (SC remains larger than SA and SB); a sentence clarifying that robustness across the phase boundary is not tested would be useful.
  5. [Experimental verification] The experiments demonstrate the deep-blue phase with two edge-state pairs; the one-pair and trivial phases are supported only by the numerical spectrum in Fig. 2(a). A brief statement acknowledging this limitation would improve the accuracy of the claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the SSH3-to-IRM reduction is an exact Schur complement and the edge-state phase diagram is derived from ρ=0, not fitted.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Eq. (3) obtains the two-site IRM by the exact Schur-complement formula H = ε R_S with ρ = uw + ε v e^{-iq}; this is an algebraic identity from H(q) in Eq. (1), not an ansatz tuned to reproduce edge states. The edge-state condition ρ = 0 and the evanescence criterion ζ > 0 are solved explicitly in Eq. (4), giving edge-state pairs at ε = ±u and ε = ±w, with phase boundaries |uw/(vε)| < 1. Those predictions are then compared with experimental spectra and wave profiles in Figs. 2-3 after the fact; no parameter is fitted to the edge-state data. The winding-number counts in Figs. 2(c)-2(e) are computed from the derived complex function ρ(q) along each band, and the claimed correspondence between winding number and number of edge-state pairs, while stated rather than proved via the argument principle, is not circular because both quantities are computed from the same exact reduced matrix rather than one being imposed as the other. Self-citations [44,48,49] provide context or the acoustic mapping relations in Eq. (2); the mapping itself is displayed explicitly, so the citations are not load-bearing. The semi-infinite-chain inference of edge states from the ζ > 0 condition without solving the two-boundary finite-chain problem is a potential correctness/rigor gap, but it is not a circularity: the paper does not define its predicted edge states as the fitted inputs. Overall score 1 reflects minor non-load-bearing self-citation, not circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the target predictions: u, w, and v are determined by the acoustic geometry through Eq. (2). The central derivation rests on the tight-binding mapping, the exact Schur-complement reduction, and an unproven correspondence between complex-wavevector solutions and finite-chain edge states. No new physical entities are introduced; the IRM is an effective model of the same system.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The acoustic chain obeys the tight-binding Hamiltonian H(q) under the low-frequency approximation with bridging relations u → SA√αβ, w → SB√βγ, v → SC√αγ.
    Used in Eq. (2) to connect geometry to model parameters; the experimental comparison depends on this mapping.
  • standard math The reduced nonlinear eigenvalue problem H(ε,q)x = ε²x has exactly the same eigenspectrum as H(q) via the Schur complement and isospectral reduction.
    Invoked when Eq. (3) is described as isospectrally reduced; this is a standard matrix identity when the inner degree of freedom is integrated out.
  • domain assumption Each complex-wavevector solution with ζ > 0 yields a physical edge state in the finite chain without further boundary-condition analysis.
    This is the least-explicit step; the paper uses the evanescent condition after Eq. (4) to conclude edge states exist, without solving the finite chain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Isospectral reduction of the SSH3 lattice and its bulk-edge correspondence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M4573S3N

@misc{pith2026241112283,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Isospectral reduction of the SSH3 lattice and its bulk-edge correspondence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M4573S3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12283}
}
read the original abstract

Here, we propose an isospectral reduction (IR) approach for the mapping of a trimer Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH3) lattice into a simplified two-site model, whose coupling dynamics ingeniously results in a precise bulk-edge correspondence of the original lattice. The isospectrally-reduced model has inter-cell couplings with dynamic response to the eigenstate energy, allowing for the control of topological phase transition by energy. We relate the bulk property of the reduced model to the band topology of the SSH3 lattice, allowing for there distinct topological phases with different number of topological edge state pair. An acoustic SSH3 chain is fabricated for experimental demonstration. The said topological edge state pairs are measured. Our study takes a pivotal step toward the exploration of topology in multiple wave systems, opening up possibilities for advanced control of topological waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12283 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic presentation of the SSH3 model. (b) A sample of the acoustic SSH3 chain and experimental setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Eigenspectra of the chain with 31 cells in de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Eigen-profiles of two edge states in the first bandgap. (b) Schematic of experimental setup for localization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Robustness of topological edge states against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Z. Yang, F. Gao, X. Shi, X. Lin, Z. Gao, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Topological acoustics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 114301 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    L. Ye, C. Qiu, M. Xiao, T. Li, J. Du, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Topological dislocation modes in three- dimensional acoustic topological insulators, Nature Com- munications 13, 508 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, et al., Topological photonics, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    D. Liao, J. Zhang, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, A. Cortijo, M. A. Vozmediano, F. Guinea, Y. Cheng, X. Liu, and J. Chris- tensen, Visualizing the topological pentagon states of a giant c540 metamaterial, Nature Communications 15, 9644 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Zhang, F

    X. Zhang, F. Zangeneh-Nejad, Z.-G. Chen, M.-H. Lu, and J. Christensen, A second wave of topological phenomena in photonics and acoustics, Nature 618, 687 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Zheng, V

    L.-Y. Zheng, V. Achilleos, O. Richoux, G. Theocharis, and V. Pagneux, Observation of edge waves in a two- dimensional su-schrieffer-heeger acoustic network, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 034014 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Zhang, P

    Z. Zhang, P. Delplace, and R. Fleury, Superior robust- ness of anomalous non-reciprocal topological edge states, Nature 598, 293 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Y. Jin, D. Torrent, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Robustness of conventional and topologically protected edge states in phononic crystal plates, Physical Review B 98, 054307 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Wang, Y.-B

    J.-H. Wang, Y.-B. Yang, N. Dai, and Y. Xu, Structural- disorder-induced second-order topological insulators in three dimensions, Physical Review Letters 126, 206404 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    G. M. Graf and M. Porta, Bulk-edge correspondence for two-dimensional topological insulators, Communications in Mathematical Physics 324, 851 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Kawarabayashi and Y

    T. Kawarabayashi and Y. Hatsugai, Bulk-edge correspon- dence with generalized chiral symmetry, Physical Review B 103, 205306 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    R. S. Mong and V. Shivamoggi, Edge states and the bulk- boundary correspondence in dirac hamiltonians, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 83, 125109 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi, A short course on topological insulators, Lecture notes in physics 919 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Physical review letters 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  7. [15]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the” parity anomaly”, Physical review letters 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  8. [16]

    H. Xue, Y. Yang, and B. Zhang, Topological acoustics, Nature Reviews Materials 7, 974 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Physical review letters 95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    S¨ usstrunk and S

    R. S¨ usstrunk and S. D. Huber, Observation of phononic helical edge states in a mechanical topological insulator, Science 349, 47 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    C. He, X. Ni, H. Ge, X.-C. Sun, Y.-B. Chen, M.-H. Lu, X.-P. Liu, and Y.-F. Chen, Acoustic topological insulator and robust one-way sound transport, Nature physics 12, 1124 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Song and E

    J. Song and E. Prodan, Quantization of topological in- variants under symmetry-breaking disorder, Physical Re- view B 92, 195119 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- hermitian systems, Physical Review X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-hermitian topological phe- nomena: A review, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 83 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Lieu, Topological phases in the non-hermitian su- schrieffer-heeger model, Physical Review B 97, 045106 (2018)

    S. Lieu, Topological phases in the non-hermitian su- schrieffer-heeger model, Physical Review B 97, 045106 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Zangeneh-Nejad and R

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad and R. Fleury, Nonlinear second- order topological insulators, Physical review letters 123, 053902 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Tuloup, R

    T. Tuloup, R. W. Bomantara, C. H. Lee, and J. Gong, Nonlinearity induced topological physics in momentum space and real space, Physical Review B 102, 115411 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Jiang, A

    B. Jiang, A. Bouhon, Z.-K. Lin, X. Zhou, B. Hou, F. Li, R.-J. Slager, and J.-H. Jiang, Experimental observation of non-abelian topological acoustic semimetals and their phase transitions, Nature Physics 17, 1239 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Q. Guo, T. Jiang, R.-Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhang, B. Yang, S. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Experimental obser- vation of non-abelian topological charges and edge states, Nature 594, 195 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Edge states in trimer lattices, Phys. Rev. A 99, 013833 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Anastasiadis, G

    A. Anastasiadis, G. Styliaris, R. Chaunsali, G. Theocharis, and F. K. Diakonos, Bulk-edge cor- respondence in the trimer su-schrieffer-heeger model, Physical Review B 106, 10.1103/physrevb.106.085109 (2022)

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    M. T. Eiles, C. W. W¨ achtler, A. Eisfeld, and J. M. Rost, Topological edge states in a rydberg composite, Physical Review B 109, 075422 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    D. Xie, W. Gou, T. Xiao, B. Gadway, and B. Yan, Topological characterizations of an extended su–schrieffer–heeger model, npj Quantum Information 5, 10.1038/s41534-019-0159-6 (2019)

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classi- fication of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Reviews of Modern Physics 88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Wang and Z.-C

    Q.-R. Wang and Z.-C. Gu, Construction and classifica- tion of symmetry-protected topological phases in inter- acting fermion systems, Physical Review X 10, 031055 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    I. I. Sougleridis, A. Anastasiadis, O. Richoux, V. Achilleos, G. Theocharis, V. Pagneux, and F. Di- akonos, Existence and characterization of edge states in an acoustic trimer su-schrieffer-heeger model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14264 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kempton, J

    M. Kempton, J. Sinkovic, D. Smith, and B. Webb, Char- 6 acterizing cospectral vertices via isospectral reduction, Linear Algebra and its Applications 594, 226 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Smith and B

    D. Smith and B. Webb, Hidden symmetries in real and theoretical networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 514, 855 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Bunimovich and B

    L. Bunimovich and B. Webb, Isospectral graph trans- formations, spectral equivalence, and global stability of dynamical networks, Nonlinearity 25, 211 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    R¨ ontgen, C

    M. R¨ ontgen, C. V. Morfonios, P. Schmelcher, and V. Pag- neux, Hidden symmetries in acoustic wave systems, Phys- ical Review Letters 130, 077201 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Bunimovich and B

    L. Bunimovich and B. Webb, Improved estimates of sur- vival probabilities via isospectral transformations, in Er- godic Theory, Open Dynamics, and Coherent Structures (Springer, 2014) pp. 119–135

    2014

  32. [40]

    accidental

    J.-M. Hou and W. Chen, Hidden antiunitary symmetry behind “accidental” degeneracy and its protection of de- generacy, Frontiers of Physics 13, 1 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    J. Li, A. Zhang, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, Group theory on quasisymmetry and protected near degeneracy, Physical Review Letters 133, 026402 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    R¨ ontgen, M

    M. R¨ ontgen, M. Pyzh, C. Morfonios, N. Palaiodimopou- los, F. Diakonos, and P. Schmelcher, Latent symmetry in- duced degeneracies, Physical Review Letters 126, 180601 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    R¨ ontgen, X

    M. R¨ ontgen, X. Chen, W. Gao, M. Pyzh, P. Schmelcher, V. Pagneux, V. Achilleos, and A. Coutant, Topological states protected by hidden symmetry, Physical Review B 110, 035106 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Zheng, Y.-F

    L.-Y. Zheng, Y.-F. Li, J. Zhang, and Y. Huang, Robust topological edge states induced by latent mirror symme- try, Physical Review B 108, L220303 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    L. S´ a, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Symmetry classifica- tion of many-body lindbladians: Tenfold way and be- yond, Physical Review X 13, 031019 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Y.-A. Chen, A. Kapustin, A. Turzillo, and M. You, Free and interacting short-range entangled phases of fermions: Beyond the tenfold way, Physical Review B 100, 195128 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    Zheng, V

    L.-Y. Zheng, V. Achilleos, Z.-G. Chen, O. Richoux, G. Theocharis, Y. Wu, J. Mei, S. Felix, V. Tournat, and V. Pagneux, Acoustic graphene network loaded with helmholtz resonators: a first-principle modeling, dirac cones, edge and interface waves, New Journal of Physics 22, 0130...

    2020

  41. [49]

    Coutant, A

    A. Coutant, A. Sivadon, L. Zheng, V. Achilleos, O. Ri- choux, G. Theocharis, and V. Pagneux, Acoustic su- schrieffer-heeger lattice: Direct mapping of acoustic waveguides to the su-schrieffer-heeger model, Physical Review B 103, 224309 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.