Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 60 references

Design of Dual-Band Plasmonic Absorber for Biomedical Sensing and Environmental Monitoring

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a silver ring-and-rod array on a polymer-backed silver plate works as a dual-band plasmonic absorber, absorbing 99.5% of light at 1366 nm and 99.99% at 2683 nm, with refractive-index sensitivities of 828 nm/RIU and…

desk verdict Simulated dual-band plasmonic absorber with a clean design but internal inconsistencies in the headline sensitivity numbers; worth a careful revision, not acceptance as is. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12356 v1 pith:SDBTRVBX submitted 2024-11-19 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Ayon Sarker , Sajid Muhaimin Choudhury This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords dual-bandplasmonicabsorberrefractiveindexsensingsurfaceplasmonresonancegapFDTDsimulationnear-infraredmid-infraredbiomedical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single planar silver nanostructure array on a silver-backed PMMA spacer can function as a dual-band plasmonic absorber, absorbing nearly all incident light at one near-infrared wavelength (1366 nm) and one mid-infrared wavelength (2683 nm) at the same time. If the claim holds, the same compact surface could serve as a refractive-index sensor across two separate IR windows, detecting biomolecules, viruses, dissolved chemicals, and even DNA hybridization by tracking how the two absorption peaks shift. The reported sensitivities—828 nm per refractive-index unit for the NIR mode and 1550 nm/RIU for the MIR mode—would put this design ahead of several previously reported dual-band absorbers. The evidence comes entirely from 3D FDTD simulations using tabulated silver and PMMA optical constants, with no experimental prototype or convergence study included.

What carries the argument

The central object is the described silver nanostructure geometry: a ring, a central hexagon, and six touching nanorods on a PMMA spacer over a silver plate. The argument is carried by two coupled plasmon mechanisms—localized surface plasmons (LSPs) on the nanorods and ring walls, and gap surface plasmons (GSPs) confined in the 90-nm PMMA gap—which together funnel incident light into absorption and make the resonances sharp. The selective coupling is what separates the modes: M1 is dominated by the nanorods and their coupling to the backplane's image dipoles, while M2 is dominated by the ring walls; this is why geometry changes to the nanorods mainly move M1 and changes to the ring radii mainly move M2. The sensitivity result follows from the linear dependence of resonance position on surrounding refractive index, quantified through the standard $RIS = \Delta \lambda / \Delta n$ relation.

What would settle it

Fabricate the described silver/PMMA/silver array and measure its reflection spectrum from 1.0 to 3.0 μm; the claim fails if two absorption peaks above 99% at 1366 nm and 2683 nm do not appear, or if the peak shifts with bulk refractive index do not match 828 and 1550 nm/RIU. Alternatively, re-run the FDTD simulation with half the mesh size and a larger unit-cell domain; if the peak positions or absorption values change by more than a few nanometers or a few percentage points, the reported numbers are numerical artifacts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that one unit cell—a silver ring of inner radius 170 nm and outer radius 210 nm, a central hexagonal silver cuboid of circumradius 80 nm, and six 40-nm-diameter silver nanorods touching the hexagon vertices, repeated on a 675-nm square lattice atop a 90-nm PMMA layer and a 265-nm silver backplane—produces two distinct, near-perfect absorption resonances. The first mode, M1 at 1366 nm, reaches 99.5% absorption and is attributed mainly to localized surface plasmons on the nanorods coupled to mirror-image dipoles in the ring and backplane. The second mode, M2 at 2683 nm, reaches 99.99% absorption and is associated with plasmons on the inner and outer walls of the ring, also coupled through the spacer. Both modes show gap-surface-plasmon fields confined in the PMMA and strong magnetic-field enhancement. As the surrounding refractive index is varied from 1.0 to 2.0, both resonances shift linearly, yielding refractive-index sensitivities of 828 nm/RIU (M1) and 1550 nm/RIU (M2), with figures of merit of 6.3 and 5.9 per RIU.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on the unverified assumption that a 3D FDTD simulation using tabulated silver and PMMA refractive indices faithfully represents a physically realizable device, since the paper includes no experimental measurement, mesh-convergence check, or fabrication data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single compact device could take the place of separate NIR and MIR sensors, reading two analyte channels at once.
  • Because both resonances shift linearly with bulk refractive index, a sensor built on this design would convert analyte concentration or identity directly into a peak-wavelength reading.
  • The near-perfect absorption values (99.5% and 99.99%) allow the sensor to operate in reflection with a very small background signal, simplifying readout.
  • The simulated demonstrations—gas-hydrate detection, protein and virus identification, and DNA-hybridization monitoring—would all work on one platform if the structure is fabricated as modeled.
  • The polarization- and angle-insensitive response of both modes relaxes optical-alignment requirements in practical sensing setups.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not explore the idea, but the same geometry could in principle be tuned to place M1 in the center of the NIR-III biological window and M2 on a specific molecular vibrational band, enabling simultaneous refractive-index and spectroscopic detection.
  • One testable extension is to vary the PMMA spacer thickness: thinner spacers should strengthen gap-plasmon coupling, pushing M2 further into the MIR and changing its sensitivity at the cost of fabrication tolerance.
  • The reported sensitivities are bulk-refractive-index values, whereas the surface-binding scenarios (DNA, viruses, protein layers) involve thin adlayers; comparing those simulated shifts directly with the bulk RIS should be done cautiously because the effective response depends on layer thickness.
  • Because the design uses a single metal-dielectric-metal patterning step, it is in principle fabricable with standard electron-beam lithography; a first measured reflection spectrum would immediately test whether the FDTD predictions are material-model- and mesh-independent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a dual-band plasmonic absorber consisting of silver ring/hexagon/nanorod nanostructures on a PMMA spacer over a silver backplate, and characterizes it with 3D FDTD simulations. The authors report two absorption peaks at 1366 nm (M1) and 2683 nm (M2) with near-perfect absorption, attribute them to localized and gap surface plasmon resonances combined with coupling to the backplate, and derive refractive index sensitivities of 828 nm/RIU (M1) and 1550 nm/RIU (M2). They further simulate a range of sensing scenarios (gas hydrates, proteins, DNA hybridization, viruses, solutes) and compare the sensitivity with literature values.

Significance. If the reported numbers are internally consistent, the design offers a dual-band response spanning NIR and MIR with high simulated absorption and refractive-index sensitivity, which would be useful for simultaneous multi-analyte sensing. The paper's strengths include the clear geometric parameterization of the unit cell, the use of standard Palik silver data and a Sellmeier model for PMMA, the field-distribution analysis connecting the two modes to distinct near-field patterns, and the broad set of application-oriented simulations. The claimed sensitivity of 1550 nm/RIU for the MIR mode is competitive with the literature values cited in Table 1. However, the central quantitative claims contain internal inconsistencies that must be resolved before the results can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] The reported refractive index sensitivities are inconsistent with the gas-hydrate application simulation. Section 4.1 reports RIS = 828 nm/RIU for M1 and 1550 nm/RIU for M2. In Supplementary §2.1, the background index changes from 1.33 (seawater) to 1.346 (seawater with gas hydrate), i.e. Δn = 0.016. The observed shifts are 1561→1572 nm (11 nm) for M1 and 3021→3036.5 nm (15.5 nm) for M2. These shifts should be 13.2 nm and 24.8 nm if the quoted RIS values apply. Even the air-to-seawater transitions, 1366→1561 nm for M1 and 2683→3021 nm for M2, imply effective sensitivities of about 591 nm/RIU and 1024 nm/RIU, not 828 and 1550 nm/RIU. At least one set of numbers is wrong; the authors must reconcile the calibration curve in Figure 6 with the application shifts, or the sensitivity claim is not supported.
  2. [§4] The text claims that as the polarization angle changes, the resonance positions and absorption 'stayed almost unchanged' and attributes this to the highly symmetrical configuration, but the next paragraph and Figure 5 show that M1 shifts from 1366 nm at 0° to 1400 nm at 90°. A 34 nm shift is not negligible relative to the reported FWHM of 132 nm, and it directly contradicts the stated polarization insensitivity. The authors should either revise the claim to acknowledge the M1 shift or provide a quantitative criterion for what they mean by 'almost unchanged'.
  3. [§3 and §4] The FDTD methods section specifies no mesh size, no convergence test, and no simulation-time or source-detail parameters. Given that the paper's headline claims include absorption values of 99.99% and reflection minima of 0.0051%, a mesh-convergence check (e.g., absorption and resonance wavelength versus mesh step) is needed to confirm that these values are not numerical artifacts. This is a load-bearing requirement for a purely simulation-based design study.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract and §4] The absorption percentages differ between the abstract (99.3% and 99.9%) and Section 4 (99.5% and 99.99%) for the same two modes; the correct values should be stated consistently in both places.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption says the spectrum is for 'normally incident TM-polarized light with the electric field along the x-axis,' but the main text and Figure 5 indicate that polarization affects M1; please specify whether Figure 2 corresponds to 0° polarization and clarify the polarization convention.
  3. [Supplementary §2.4] The sentence 'as can be verified by the response of the resonant wavelengths to the refractive indices provided in Figure 5.a)' appears to refer to Figure 6 of the main text (the RIS calibration), not Figure 5 (polarization); the cross-reference is incorrect.
  4. [§4, Figure 4 discussion] The sentence 'with the increasing diameter of nanorods (D_NR), a redshift ... can be noticed in Figure a)' has a missing figure number; it should refer to Figure 4.a.
  5. [Supplementary §2.1 and throughout] The supplementary material contains numerous unresolved citation placeholders such as '[?]' (e.g., in the gas hydrate section, protein refractive indices, amino acid isomer data, salt and sugar solution values, and virus refractive indices); these need to be completed before submission.
  6. [Supplementary §2.5] In the E. coli detection scenario, the text first states a bacteria-capturing layer thickness of 20 nm and later says a layer of 15 nm thickness is added for captured bacteria; the geometric description should be clarified to avoid ambiguity.
  7. [§6] The conclusion refers to 'this letter,' but the manuscript is formatted as a full-length article; this should be corrected for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the FDTD forward model produces the absorption peaks and sensitivity slopes as emergent outputs; the reported RIS/application inconsistency is a numerical inconsistency, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a straightforward forward FDTD simulation: a fixed geometry (Ag nanostructures, PMMA spacer, Ag plate) and fixed material models (Palik silver data and the PMMA Sellmeier equation) are used to compute reflection, transmission, and absorption spectra. The two absorption peaks at 1366 nm and 2683 nm are emergent features of the solution to Maxwell's equations, not inputs or fitted targets. The refractive-index sensitivity is obtained by sweeping the background index and taking the slope of the simulated resonance shift versus index; this is a post-processing summary of the simulation output, not a parameter fitted to the later application shifts. The application sections are separate forward simulations with analyte-specific refractive indices or added layers, so they are not forced to reproduce the reported RIS values. The fact that the reported RIS values (828 and 1550 nm/RIU) are inconsistent with the gas-hydrate shifts (11 nm for Δn=0.016 vs. 13.2 nm predicted; 15.5 nm vs. 24.8 nm predicted) is a serious quantitative inconsistency that undermines the reliability of the numbers, but it is not circularity: the application simulations are not derived from the RIS values, nor are the RIS values defined in terms of the application shifts. No self-citation chain, uniqueness argument, or fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction is present. The absence of experimental validation and mesh-convergence checks affects correctness confidence, but not circularity. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is a numerical design, so the ledger is dominated by hand-chosen geometric parameters and material-model assumptions. No new physical entities or fundamental constants are introduced; the main burden is that the entire performance rests on the FDTD model without experimental confirmation.

free parameters (8)
  • Unit cell period P = 675 nm
    Chosen by hand; determines the resonance wavelengths and array coupling.
  • Ring inner radius R_IN = 170 nm
    Chosen by hand; controls coupling between ring and rods and affects M2.
  • Ring outer radius R_OUT = 210 nm
    Chosen by hand; controls ring width and the M2 resonance position.
  • Hexagon circumradius R_H = 80 nm
    Chosen by hand; sets rod positions through Eq. 1.
  • Nanorod diameter D_NR = 40 nm
    Chosen by hand; swept in Figure 4a and strongly affects M1.
  • Ag nanostructure thickness = 45 nm
    Chosen by hand; affects the gap plasmon resonance.
  • PMMA spacer thickness = 90 nm
    Chosen by hand; the gap-plasmon resonance depends on this thickness.
  • Ag backplate thickness = 265 nm
    Chosen from a skin-depth argument to make transmission negligible, not swept as a performance parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Silver optical constants from Palik and the PMMA Sellmeier model are accurate for the simulated NIR and MIR wavelengths.
    Section 3 states these material models; the absorption peaks and widths depend on them.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions in x and y with PML in z and a normal-incidence plane wave correctly model the infinite 2D array.
    Section 3 describes these simulation settings, but no convergence study or alternative-method comparison is provided.
  • domain assumption The resonance shift is a linear function of bulk refractive index over the fitted range, justifying a single RIS slope.
    Section 4.1 and Eq. 4 extract RIS from a linear trend over n = 1 to 2 and use it to characterize sensing.
  • domain assumption Transmission is negligible because the Ag backplate is thicker than the skin depth, so absorption can be computed as A = 1 - R.
    Section 4 states A = 1 - R - T and assumes T is virtually zero throughout the spectrum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Design of Dual-Band Plasmonic Absorber for Biomedical Sensing and Environmental Monitoring." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SDBTRVBX

@misc{pith2026241112356,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Design of Dual-Band Plasmonic Absorber for Biomedical Sensing and Environmental Monitoring},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SDBTRVBX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12356}
}
read the original abstract

This study introduces a dual-band plasmonic absorber designed for simultaneous sensing applications in the near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) regions. The absorber, composed of silver nanostructures on a metal plate with a dielectric spacer, exhibits a combination of localized and gap surface plasmon resonances, resulting in two distinct absorption peaks in theoretical analysis based on the FDTD method. Numerical simulations also validate the sensor's high refractive index sensitivity, enabling the detection of biomolecules, proteins, viruses, and various solutes in aqueous solutions. The absorber demonstrates significant resonance shifts, making it a promising candidate for environmental monitoring, medical diagnostics, and chemical sensing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12356 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Three-dimensional illustration of the proposed absorber, b) Orthographic top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reflection, absorption, and transmission spectra of the proposed absorber for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electric and magnetic field distribution in the structure, a) Localized electric field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Change in absorption spectra in response to the change in a) diameter of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Absorption spectra obtained for various polarization angles of the normally [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The resonant wavelengths of the two modes exhibit a linear trend in shifting as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. I. Stockman, K. Kneipp, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, S. Saha, A. Dutta, J. Ndukaife, N. Kinsey, H. Reddy, U. Guler, V. M. Shalaev, et al., Roadmap on plasmonics, Journal of Optics 20 (4) (2018) 043001

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Q. Duan, Y. Liu, S. Chang, H. Chen, J.-h. Chen, Surface plasmonic sensors: Sensing mechanism and recent applications, Sensors 21 (16) (2021) 5262

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    C. Lee, B. Lawrie, R. Pooser, K.-G. Lee, C. Rockstuhl, M. Tame, Quan- tum plasmonic sensors, Chemical Reviews 121 (8) (2021) 4743–4804

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Divya, S

    J. Divya, S. Selvendran, A. S. Raja, A. Sivasubramanian, Surface plas- monbasedplasmonicsensors: Areviewontheirpast, presentandfuture, Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X 11 (2022) 100175

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    M. A. Butt, Insight into plasmonics: resurrection of modern-day science, Computer Optics 48 (1) (2024) 5–17. 15

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Ghobadi, "strong light-matter interaction in lithography-free perfect absorbers for photoconversion, photodetection, light emission, sensing, and filtering applications, Ph.D

    A. Ghobadi, "strong light-matter interaction in lithography-free perfect absorbers for photoconversion, photodetection, light emission, sensing, and filtering applications, Ph.D. thesis, Bilkent Universitesi (Turkey) (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Y. Li, Q. Liao, W. Hou, L. Qin, Silver-based surface plasmon sensors: fabrication and applications, International journal of molecular sciences 24 (4) (2023) 4142

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Sudarsan, Optical materials: fundamentals and applications, Func- tional Materials: Preparation, Processing and Applications (2012) 285– 322

    V. Sudarsan, Optical materials: fundamentals and applications, Func- tional Materials: Preparation, Processing and Applications (2012) 285– 322

    work page 2012

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Y. H. Jang, Y. J. Jang, S. Kim, L. N. Quan, K. Chung, D. H. Kim, Plas- monic solar cells: from rational design to mechanism overview, Chemical reviews 116 (24) (2016) 14982–15034

    2016

  2. [10]

    R. P. Kooyman, Physics of Surface Plasmon Resonance, in: Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance, The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008

    2008

  3. [11]

    L. Du, X. Zhang, T. Mei, X. Yuan, Localized surface plasmons, surface plasmon polaritons, and their coupling in 2d metallic array for sers, Optics express 18 (3) (2010) 1959–1965

    2010

  4. [12]

    W. X. Tang, H. C. Zhang, H. F. Ma, W. X. Jiang, T. J. Cui, Con- cept, theory, design, and applications of spoof surface plasmon polari- tons at microwave frequencies, Advanced Optical Materials 7 (1) (2019) 1800421

    2019

  5. [13]

    S. J. Zalyubovskiy, M. Bogdanova, A. Deinega, Y. Lozovik, A. D. Pris, K. H. An, W. P. Hall, R. A. Potyrailo, Theoretical limit of localized surface plasmon resonance sensitivity to local refractive index change and its comparison to conventional surface plasmon resonance senso...

    2012

  6. [14]

    X. Rao, H. Zhu, X. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Qi, H. Yang, Self-referential plasmonic refractive index sensor by square hole array and gold film coupling structure, Plasmonics (2024) 1–10. 16

    2024

  7. [15]

    S. Hu, W. Shi, Y. Chen, J. Yuan, X. Xiong, T. Liu, S. Ding, W. Xiao, Y. Chen, G.-S. Liu, et al., Universal and flexible design for high- sensitivity and wide-ranging surface plasmon resonance sensors based on a three-dimensional tuning hypersurface, Sensors and Actuators B: Ch...

    2023

  8. [16]

    A. A. Dormeny, P. A. Sohi, M. Kahrizi, Design and simulation of a refractive index sensor based on spr and lspr using gold nanostructures, Results in Physics 16 (2020) 102869

    2020

  9. [17]

    Singh, V

    P. Singh, V. Singh, S. Chualya, Numerical analysis of lspr based fiber sensor for low refractive index detection, Optik 224 (2020) 165704

    2020

  10. [18]

    Jatschka, A

    J. Jatschka, A. Dathe, A. Csáki, W. Fritzsche, O. Stranik, Propagating and localized surface plasmon resonance sensing—a critical comparison based on measurements and theory, Sensing and bio-sensing research 7 (2016) 62–70

    2016

  11. [19]

    Y. Min, Y. Wang, Manipulating bimetallic nanostructures with tunable localized surface plasmon resonance and their applications for sensing, Frontiers in Chemistry 8 (2020) 411

    2020

  12. [20]

    H. Wang, T. Wang, S. Zhong, J. Zhang, R. Yan, P. Xu, Y.-h. Zhang, X. Yue, L. Wang, Y. Wang, et al., Sensitivity investigation of a biosen- sor with resonant coupling of propagating surface plasmons to localized surface plasmons in the near infrared region, Nanoscale 15 (25) (2...

    2023

  13. [21]

    P. T. Dang, T. V. Vu, J. Kim, J. Park, V.-C. Nguyen, D. D. Vo, T. K. Nguyen, K. Q. Le, J.-H. Lee, Efficient broadband truncated-pyramid- based metamaterial absorber in the visible and near-infrared regions, Crystals 10 (9) (2020) 784

    2020

  14. [22]

    H. Liu, X. Sun, F. Yao, Y. Pei, H. Yuan, H. Zhao, Controllable cou- pling of localized and propagating surface plasmons to tamm plasmons, Plasmonics 7 (2012) 749–754

    2012

  15. [23]

    Farhang, N

    A. Farhang, N. Bigler, O. J. Martin, Coupling of multiple lsp and spp resonances: interactions between an elongated nanoparticle and a thin metallic film, Optics Letters 38 (22) (2013) 4758–4761. 17

    2013

  16. [24]

    S. S. Bukhari, J. Vardaxoglou, W. Whittow, A metasurfaces review: Definitions and applications, Applied Sciences 9 (13) (2019) 2727

    2019

  17. [25]

    Chou Chau, T

    Y.-F. Chou Chau, T. Y. Ming, C.-T. Chou Chao, R. Thotagamuge, M. R. R. Kooh, H. J. Huang, C. M. Lim, H.-P. Chiang, Significantly enhanced coupling effect and gap plasmon resonance in a mim-cavity based sensing structure, Scientific reports 11 (1) (2021) 18515

    2021

  18. [26]

    Chou Chau, et al., Perfect dual-band absorber based on plasmonic effect with the cross-hair/nanorod combination

    Y. Chou Chau, et al., Perfect dual-band absorber based on plasmonic effect with the cross-hair/nanorod combination. nanomaterials 10, 493 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Liang, X

    Y. Liang, X. Liu, J. Xin, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Song, Ultra-broadband long-wave infrared metasurface absorber based on peano fractal curve, Results in Physics 33 (2022) 105169

    2022

  20. [28]

    Zhong, S

    Y. Zhong, S. D. Malagari, T. Hamilton, D. Wasserman, Review of mid- infrared plasmonic materials, Journal of Nanophotonics 9 (1) (2015) 093791–093791

    2015

  21. [29]

    Sandorfy, R

    C. Sandorfy, R. Buchet, G. Lachenal, Principles of molecular vibrations for near-infrared spectroscopy, Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Food Sci- ence and Technology; Ozaki, Y., McClure, WF, Christy, AA, Eds (2007) 11–46

    2007

  22. [30]

    T. G. Mayerhöfer, S. Pahlow, J. Popp, Recent technological and sci- entific developments concerning the use of infrared spectroscopy for point-of-care applications, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 251 (2021) 119411

    2021

  23. [31]

    Kontsek, A

    E. Kontsek, A. Pesti, M. Björnstedt, T. Üveges, E. Szabó, T. Garay, P. Gordon, S. Gergely, A. Kiss, Mid-infrared imaging is able to charac- terize and separate cancer cell lines, Pathology & Oncology Research 26 (2020) 2401–2407

    2020

  24. [32]

    Manley, Near-infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging: non- destructive analysis of biological materials, Chemical Society Reviews 43 (24) (2014) 8200–8214

    M. Manley, Near-infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging: non- destructive analysis of biological materials, Chemical Society Reviews 43 (24) (2014) 8200–8214. 18

    2014

  25. [33]

    De Bruyne, M

    S. De Bruyne, M. M. Speeckaert, J. R. Delanghe, Applications of mid- infrared spectroscopy in the clinical laboratory setting, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences 55 (1) (2018) 1–20

    2018

  26. [34]

    Alipour, A

    A. Alipour, A. Mir, A. Farmani, Ultra high-sensitivity and tunable dual- band perfect absorber as a plasmonic sensor, Optics & Laser Technology 127 (2020) 106201

    2020

  27. [35]

    Chou Chao, Y.-F

    C.-T. Chou Chao, Y.-F. Chou Chau, H.-P. Chiang, Biosensing on a plasmonic dual-band perfect absorber using intersection nanostructure, ACS omega 7 (1) (2021) 1139–1149

    2021

  28. [36]

    Cheng, H

    Y. Cheng, H. Zhang, X. S. Mao, R. Gong, Dual-band plasmonic perfect absorber based on all-metal nanostructure for refractive index sensing application, Materials Letters 219 (2018) 123–126

    2018

  29. [37]

    K. Chen, R. Adato, H. Altug, Dual-band perfect absorber for multispec- tral plasmon-enhanced infrared spectroscopy, ACS nano 6 (9) (2012) 7998–8006

    2012

  30. [38]

    Zhang, W

    L. Zhang, W. Lu, L. Zhu, H. Xu, H. Wang, H. Pan, Z. An, Dual- band complementary metamaterial perfect absorber for multispectral molecular sensing, Optics Express 31 (19) (2023) 31024–31038

    2023

  31. [39]

    X.-Y. Chen, K. Yu, S.-W. Zheng, M.-D. Qian, Y.-F. Liu, Dual-band, high sensitivity, angle-insensitive graphene—perfect absorber based on surface plasmon resonance, Diamond and Related Materials 142 (2024) 110728

    2024

  32. [40]

    W. Shen, T. Hu, X. Liu, J. Zha, F. Meng, Z. Wu, Z. Cui, Y. Yang, H. Li, Q. Zhang, et al., Defect engineering of layered double hydroxide nanosheets as inorganic photosensitizers for nir-iii photodynamic cancer therapy, Nature Communications 13 (1) (2022) 3384

    2022

  33. [41]

    L. A. Sordillo, Y. Pu, S. Pratavieira, Y. Budansky, R. R. Alfano, Deep optical imaging of tissue using the second and third near-infrared spec- tral windows, Journal of biomedical optics 19 (5) (2014) 056004–056004

    2014

  34. [42]

    Boltasseva, H

    A. Boltasseva, H. A. Atwater, Low-loss plasmonic metamaterials, Sci- ence 331 (6015) (2011) 290–291. 19

    2011

  35. [43]

    X. Wu, Y. Zheng, Y. Luo, J. Zhang, Z. Yi, X. Wu, S. Cheng, W. Yang, Y. Yu, P. Wu, A four-band and polarization-independent bds-based tun- able absorber with high refractive index sensitivity, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 23 (47) (2021) 26864–26873

    2021

  36. [44]

    Singh, P

    N. Singh, P. Khanna, In situ synthesis of silver nano-particles in poly- methylmethacrylate, Materials chemistry and physics 104 (2-3) (2007) 367–372

    2007

  37. [45]

    Kazemian Abyaneh, S

    M. Kazemian Abyaneh, S. Jafarkhani, S. Kulkarni, Electrical trans- port behaviour of silver–pmma nanocomposite films at low temperature, Journal of Experimental Nanoscience 6 (2) (2011) 159–173

    2011

  38. [46]

    E. D. Palik, Handbook of optical constants of solids, Vol. 3, Academic press, 1998

    1998

  39. [47]

    Paschotta, et al., Encyclopedia of laser physics and technology, Vol

    R. Paschotta, et al., Encyclopedia of laser physics and technology, Vol. 1, Wiley Online Library, 2008

    2008

  40. [48]

    M. N. Polyanskiy, Refractiveindex. info database of optical constants, Scientific Data 11 (1) (2024) 94

    2024

  41. [49]

    F. Ding, Y. Yang, R. A. Deshpande, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, A review of gap-surface plasmon metasurfaces: fundamentals and applications, Nanophotonics 7 (6) (2018) 1129–1156

    2018

  42. [50]

    N. J. Halas, S. Lal, W.-S. Chang, S. Link, P. Nordlander, Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostructures, Chemical reviews 111 (6) (2011) 3913–3961

    2011

  43. [51]

    Y. Xu, P. Bai, X. Zhou, Y. Akimov, C. E. Png, L.-K. Ang, W. Knoll, L. Wu, Optical refractive index sensors with plasmonic and photonic structures: promising and inconvenient truth, Advanced Optical Mate- rials 7 (9) (2019) 1801433

    2019

  44. [52]

    W. Wang, Z. Mai, Y. Chen, J. Wang, L. Li, Q. Su, X. Li, X. Hong, A label-free fiber optic spr biosensor for specific detection of c-reactive protein, Scientific reports 7 (1) (2017) 16904

    2017

  45. [53]

    Li, A review: Development of novel fiber-optic platforms for bulk and surface refractive index sensing applications, Sensors and Actuators Reports 2 (1) (2020) 100018

    J. Li, A review: Development of novel fiber-optic platforms for bulk and surface refractive index sensing applications, Sensors and Actuators Reports 2 (1) (2020) 100018. 20

    2020

  46. [54]

    Zahra, M

    T. Zahra, M. A. Mohemine, A. A. Syed, F. Liu, W. Ali, Z. Muhammad, Design and performance of a dual-band plasmonic perfect absorber for infrared refractive index sensing, Applied Optics 63 (29) (2024) 7796– 7801

    2024

  47. [55]

    Amoosoltani, K

    N. Amoosoltani, K. Mehrabi, A. Zarifkar, A. Farmani, N. Yasrebi, Double-ring resonator plasmonic refractive index sensor utilizing dual- band unidirectional reflectionless propagation effect, Plasmonics 16 (2021) 1277–1285

    2021

  48. [56]

    Madadi, K

    Z. Madadi, K. Abedi, G. Darvish, M. Khatir, Dual-wavelength plas- monic perfect absorber suitable for refractive index sensing, Plasmonics 15 (2020) 703–708

    2020

  49. [57]

    Z. Chen, H. Chen, J. Yin, R. Zhang, H. Jile, D. Xu, Z. Yi, Z. Zhou, S. Cai, P. Yan, Multi-band, tunable, high figure of merit, high sensitiv- ity single-layer patterned graphene—perfect absorber based on surface plasmon resonance, Diamond and Related Materials 116 (2021) 108393

    2021

  50. [58]

    H. Chen, Z. Chen, H. Yang, L. Wen, Z. Yi, Z. Zhou, B. Dai, J. Zhang, X. Wu, P. Wu, Multi-mode surface plasmon resonance absorber based on dart-type single-layer graphene, RSC advances 12 (13) (2022) 7821– 7829. 21 Design of Dual-Band Plasmonic Absorber for Biomedical Sensing a...

    2022

  51. [59]

    Varying the angle of incident of the light Figure S1: Absorption spectra obtained for various incident angles of the incident light

    Result and discussion 1.1. Varying the angle of incident of the light Figure S1: Absorption spectra obtained for various incident angles of the incident light. Figure S1 shows the comparison of the structure’s behavior under light at various incident angles rather than at norm...

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    ef- fective

    Applications 2.1. Detection of gas hydrate The proposed structure was simulated to determine its potential appli- cation in assessing the presence of gas hydrates in seawater using the con- cept of refractive index sensing. Clathrate hydrates, commonly known as gas hydrates, a...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.