Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Improving Controllability and Editability for Pretrained Text-to-Music Generation Models

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The thesis claims that Instruct-MusicGen, a lightly tuned version of MusicGen, achieves precise text-based editing of musical stems—adding, removing, and extracting instruments—with better instruction adherence and audio quality than…

desk verdict A solid compilation thesis whose central Instruct-MusicGen claim is conditional on synthetic stem-mix evaluations; the author's own limitations section says as much. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12641 v2 pith:HKQFP6NQ submitted 2024-11-19 cs.SD eess.AS

Yixiao Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords text-to-musicgenerationmusiceditinginstructiontuningGenstemdiffusionmodelszero-shotLLMagents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This PhD thesis tries to establish that the controllability and editability of pretrained text-to-music models can be improved by adding lightweight editing layers on top of existing generators rather than retraining from scratch. It presents three systems that build on each other: Loop Copilot, an LLM-coordinated agent with a Global Attribute Table for iterative music generation; MusicMagus, a zero-shot editing method that moves a diffusion model's latent representation along a learned editing direction; and Instruct-MusicGen, an instruction-tuned MusicGen with text and audio fusion modules. The central claim is that Instruct-MusicGen can add, remove, and extract individual instrument stems following plain-language instructions, with better instruction adherence and audio quality than the baselines considered, using the smallest trainable parameter budget and only 5,000 training steps. If true, this would make natural-language stem editing practical on a modest compute budget, a step toward iterative AI-assisted music production.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the dual-modality fusion built on top of a frozen MusicGen backbone. A text fusion module inserts low-rank adapters into the cross-attention layers so the decoder can read the editing instruction, such as "Add piano," while an audio fusion module—a duplicated encoder—embeds the input audio and feeds it into the same decoder; the text encoder stays frozen. Training uses synthetic instruction triples: source audio built by mixing stems, target audio built by adding, removing, or extracting one stem, and a templated instruction describing that operation. Around this core, the earlier chapters contribute two supporting mechanisms: the Global Attribute Table, a blackboard-style data structure that keeps musical attributes consistent during iterative editing, and the MusicMagus editing-direction vector in a diffusion latent space, a zero-shot alternative that motivated the instruction-tuned solution.

What would settle it

Collect a set of open-ended editing requests written by musicians in their own words, none of which appear in the training templates, then run the trained model on each request and measure stem-level accuracy against a ground-truth mix; if instruction adherence on those requests falls to the level of the baselines, the synthetic-triple assumption is the point of failure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery on the paper's own terms is that instruction tuning turns a pretrained music language model into a precise stem editor. Instruct-MusicGen freezes MusicGen's text encoder and most of its decoder, inserts a text fusion module that modifies the cross-attention layers, and adds an audio fusion module built from a duplicated encoder that embeds the input audio, so the decoder attends to both the instruction text and the source audio at the same time. Supervised fine-tuning on synthetic triples—an instruction, a source stem mixture, and the corresponding target mixture—teaches the model to add, remove, or extract instruments. On the Slakh and MoisesDB benchmarks, the resulting model reports higher instruction-adherence and audio-quality scores than baselines including AUDIT, InstructME, and DITTO, while using the smallest parameter budget and only 5,000 training steps. A secondary claim is that MusicMagus can change timbre and style zero-shot while preserving musical structure, but that it falls short on complex real-world stem-level editing, which motivates the instruction-tuned approach.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that synthetic instruction triples built from stem mixtures—"Add piano" paired with the audio made by mixing stems—capture both the wording and the musical intent of real-world editing requests.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A music language model can be turned into an editing tool with modest compute—5,000 training steps—rather than training a dedicated editor from scratch.
  • Stem-level operations of adding, removing, and extracting instruments suffice to cover a broad class of text instructions, and template-generated instruction data can train an accurate editor.
  • Instruction adherence and audio quality improve together relative to zero-shot diffusion editing and inference-time optimization baselines.
  • Fusing text and audio conditions into a frozen backbone is parameter-efficient: the smallest trainable budget yields the best reported editing accuracy among the compared systems.
  • The instruction-tuned model extends the applicability of music language models from one-shot generation to iterative production workflows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference — the same recipe of a frozen backbone plus text and audio fusion plus synthetic triples likely transfers to other audio domains, such as sound effects or dialogue, wherever stem-like edits are well defined.
  • Editorial inference — template-generated instructions probably under-cover real user phrasing; a testable extension is to augment the training triples with LLM-paraphrased instructions and measure whether adherence on open-ended commands closes the gap.
  • Editorial inference — the thesis does not fully separate how much of the gain comes from the fusion architecture versus the synthetic mixture targets; an ablation that replaces the fusion with simpler audio conditioning would identify the active ingredient.
  • Editorial inference — because the method edits by regenerating stem mixtures conditioned on audio, it is naturally limited to edits representable as stem operations; requests like "make the snare punchier" or "change the mix balance" would need a different formulation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This PhD thesis addresses controllability and editability of pretrained text-to-music generation models through three progressively built systems. Loop Copilot is an LLM-orchestrated multi-model system that supports iterative music generation and editing via a conversational interface, using a Global Attribute Table to preserve musical coherence. MusicMagus is a zero-shot editing approach that manipulates the latent space of a pretrained diffusion model to change attributes such as timbre or genre while preserving structure. Instruct-MusicGen applies instruction tuning to MusicGen, adding a text fusion module and an audio fusion module so that the model can perform stem-level edits (add, remove, extract, replace) from natural-language instructions. The central claim is that Instruct-MusicGen achieves precise text-based stem editing with better instruction adherence and audio quality than existing baselines, while using the smallest trainable parameter budget and only 5,000 training steps (Table 5.1, Section 5.4).

Significance. If the central claims hold, the thesis makes a useful contribution to the under-explored area of text-guided editing for music foundation models. The Instruct-MusicGen design is parameter-efficient and builds on a standard backbone (MusicGen), and the thesis reports objective evaluations on common benchmarks (Slakh, MoisesDB) and subjective ratings against baselines. The release of code and use of reproducible datasets are strengths. However, the significance is currently conditional: the evaluations are conducted almost entirely on synthetic stem-mixture data constructed with template instructions, and the claimed subjective superiority lacks statistical verification. The thesis itself acknowledges key limitations in Sections 6.2.1 and 6.2.2, and these limitations directly affect the strength of the conclusions that generalize to 'complex and dynamic production environments.'

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.4.2, Table 5.4] The subjective evaluation table reports that the model shows 'significant improvements' on both Instruction Adherence (IA) and Audio Quality (AQ) over baselines, but no confidence intervals, significance tests, rater counts, or inter-rater agreement statistics are provided. Without such statistical support, the reader cannot verify that these improvements are reliable rather than due to chance or rater variability. Since this table is a load-bearing piece of evidence for the central claim of superiority over baselines, please either add the missing statistical analysis or temper the claim to state that the model receives higher mean ratings.
  2. [Sections 5.3.1, 5.4.1, and 6.2.2] The central claim that Instruct-MusicGen performs precise text-based editing is established only within the synthetic data distribution used for training and evaluation. Training triplets are constructed by deterministically mixing or removing a small set of instrument stems, with instructions generated from template commands (similar to those in Table 2.3), and the test sets (Slakh, MoisesDB) are the same type of stem-mixture data. The thesis acknowledges in Section 6.2.2 'Dependence on Paired Data' and in Section 6.2.1 'Precision in Music Editing,' yet the conclusion in Chapter 6 generalizes to 'complex and dynamic production environments.' No evaluation on real recordings with human-typed, open-ended instructions is reported. Please either add an out-of-distribution evaluation with real user instructions or explicitly restrict the conclusions to the synthetic, stem-level editing setting.
  3. [Tables 5.2 and 5.3, Section 2.6.3] The objective metrics used for editing evaluation, particularly SI-SDR and the instruction-accuracy metric, measure how well the model reconstructs a deterministic ground-truth mixture (the exact stem mix used to construct the triplet), rather than whether the edit is musically valid or matches the user's broader intent. For example, a high SI-SDR on the 'Add piano' task essentially measures fidelity to a specific synthesized mixture, not the quality of the musical addition. The thesis would be strengthened by complementing these metrics with a human evaluation on more open-ended editing requests, or at least by explicitly acknowledging that SI-SDR and the current IA metric capture reconstruction accuracy rather than musical edit quality.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 5.1] The caption says 'param count numbers are the number of trainable parameters and total parameters respectively,' but the table likely has two numeric columns without clear headers. Please use explicit column headings such as 'Trainable params' and 'Total params' to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Section 2.2.1, Table 2.1] The sample-rate column contains inconsistent notation, e.g., '16KHz' for Stable Audio but '16kHz' for other models. Please standardize the units.
  3. [Equations (2.31) and (2.32)] The same equation numbers are reused for the VQ-VAE section and later for the EnCodec section, with identical equation text. This is confusing; please renumber the later equations or merge the descriptions.
  4. [Section 3.4.4] The heading reads 'Quantitive Results'; this should be 'Quantitative Results.'
  5. [Section 2.6.3 and Section 5.4] The acronym 'IA' is used both for 'instruction accuracy' (in the metrics section) and for 'instruction adherence' (in the subjective evaluation). This ambiguity should be resolved by using distinct terms or defining each occurrence explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the thesis’s central claims rest on external baselines, independent metrics, and transparently stated limitations, not on self-referential fits or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. Loop Copilot is an LLM-orchestrated system whose contribution (Global Attribute Table, multi-model chaining) is evaluated through a user study; no result is defined in terms of its output. MusicMagus computes an editing direction as the difference between text-embedding means, which is a methodological construction rather than a prediction fitted to the evaluation metrics; its evaluations use human ratings and external baseline comparisons. Instruct-MusicGen is trained on synthetic instruction triples built from stem mixtures and evaluated on Slakh and MoisesDB, which are datasets of the same general kind. This is a supervised learning setup on a matched distribution; it raises an external-validity concern, not a tautology, because the objective metrics (SI-SDR, CLAP score) and subjective Instruction Adherence / Audio Quality ratings are not fitted parameters of the model and the ground-truth mixtures are not reproduced by construction. The thesis itself flags the relevant limitations in §5.5, §6.2.1 (“Precision in Music Editing”) and §6.2.2 (“Dependence on Paired Data”), which further confirms that the gap between synthetic training/evaluation and real-world edits is acknowledged as a validity risk rather than hidden by a self-referential argument. Self-citations are present, notably the Coco-mulla precursor work in Chapter 5, but the thesis describes the architecture in the text and does not use those citations as load-bearing proof; the comparisons to external baselines and independent metrics carry the central claims. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-smuggling citation, or fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction step was found. Therefore the paper is self-contained with respect to its own derivation chain, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The thesis pulls heavily from pretrained models and its own prior publications. The main free parameters are typical hyperparameters for editing or guidance strength; they are not fit to the evaluation data in a way that would make the result circular. The domain assumptions concern the transferability of synthetic training data and embedding-space semantics, which are acknowledged limitations in Chapter 6.2.

free parameters (3)
  • Editing direction scale (lambda) in MusicMagus = not reported
    Controls the magnitude of the latent edit; chosen empirically to balance edit strength and structure preservation. Appears in Section 4.2.1.
  • Classifier-free guidance scale = not reported
    Used in MusicGen and diffusion backbones; set by prior work or tuned per task. Appears in Chapter 2 background.
  • LoRA rank for Instruct-MusicGen text fusion = not reported
    Rank of low-rank adaptation matrices in cross-attention; chosen based on validation. Implied in Section 5.3.1.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Pretrained backbone models (MusicGen, EnCodec, T5, CLAP) are used as fixed feature extractors and generators without modification.
    The methods rely on the quality and alignment of these pretrained models; if the backbones are weak or biased, the editing results are compromised.
  • domain assumption The instruction dataset for Instruct-MusicGen, constructed from stem mixtures and template texts, represents the distribution of real editing requests.
    Section 5.3.1 and 5.4.1. If real user instructions differ in wording or intent, the text fusion module may not generalize.
  • domain assumption Linear interpolation in the CLAP/text embedding space corresponds to semantically meaningful musical attribute changes.
    MusicMagus computes editing direction as the mean difference between two sets of captions (Section 4.2.1). This assumes that the embedding space is semantically linear for the target attributes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Improving Controllability and Editability for Pretrained Text-to-Music Generation Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKQFP6NQ

@misc{pith2026241112641,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Improving Controllability and Editability for Pretrained Text-to-Music Generation Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKQFP6NQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12641}
}
read the original abstract

The field of AI-assisted music creation has made significant strides, yet existing systems often struggle to meet the demands of iterative and nuanced music production. These challenges include providing sufficient control over the generated content and allowing for flexible, precise edits. This thesis tackles these issues by introducing a series of advancements that progressively build upon each other, enhancing the controllability and editability of text-to-music generation models. First, we introduce Loop Copilot, a system that tries to address the need for iterative refinement in music creation. Loop Copilot leverages a large language model (LLM) to coordinate multiple specialised AI models, enabling users to generate and refine music interactively through a conversational interface. Central to this system is the Global Attribute Table, which records and maintains key musical attributes throughout the iterative process, ensuring that modifications at any stage preserve the overall coherence of the music. While Loop Copilot excels in orchestrating the music creation process, it does not directly address the need for detailed edits to the generated content. To overcome this limitation, MusicMagus is presented as a further solution for editing AI-generated music. MusicMagus introduces a zero-shot text-to-music editing approach that allows for the modification of specific musical attributes, such as genre, mood, and instrumentation, without the need for retraining. By manipulating the latent space within pre-trained diffusion models, MusicMagus ensures that these edits are stylistically coherent and that non-targeted attributes remain unchanged. This system is particularly effective in maintaining the structural integrity of the music during edits, but it encounters challenges with more complex and real-world audio scenarios. ...

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12641 by the authors.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. The forward and backward process of the diffusion model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. The diagram of DDIM models. The reverse process in the latent space predicts the previous latent variable zt−1 from the current latent variable zt, using learned functions µθ and Σθ. The objective remains to minimise the difference between the forward and reverse processes, but this time in the latent space: L = Eq "X T t=1 DKL(q(zt−1|zt, z0)|pθ(zt−1|zt))# . (2.14) The training objective is to minimise the Kullback-… view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. A simplified diagram of an audio language model. The encoder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (22 more)
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: Diagram of the Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) algorithm. LoRA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_2_4.png]
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5. Figure 2.5: The diagram of Llama-adapter architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_2_5.png]
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.6. Figure 2.6: Screenshot of Suno [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_2_6.png]
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.7. Figure 2.7: Screenshot of Udio. 77 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_2_7.png]
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: A conceptual illustration of interaction with Loop Copilot. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_3_1.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the working mechanism of COSMIC during a single-round [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_3.png]
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: A diagram of COSMIC’s handling of a single round of dialogue. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p091_3_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the workflow of our proposed system. Loop Copilot com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_3.png]
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Loop Copilot’s workflow. Once the user inputs the request, firstly, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p093_3_3.png]
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: GAT’s significance can be further expounded upon through its multifaceted functionalities: 1. State Continuity: The GAT ensures that users experience a seamless dialogue with the Loop Copilot by persistently tracking musical attributes and evolving based on both user…
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: 4 3.4.1 Participants I recruited 8 volunteers (N=8) who were interested in AI-based music produc￾tion, and work in the field of music and audio technology or production, though not necessarily professional-level musicians. Participants provided informed con￾sent, and…
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Caption 2. Experience in Music Performance: 2 starters (0-2 years), 2 intermediate (2-5 years), 4 experts (>5 years). 3. Age: 4 (18-35 years), 2 (35-45 years), 2 (>45 years). 3.4.2 Measures I measure the following constructs: 1. Usability. Usability serves as a criti…
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: The box plot depicting SUS score results with an average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p100_3_5.png]
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6: Box plot of the TAM score results. Perceived Usefulness (PU) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_3_6.png]
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Text-to-music editing with MusicMagus. The edit from “piano” to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p109_4_1.png]
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: The pipeline of finding the editing direction ∆. I first use In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p111_4_2.png]
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: The workflow of the MusicMagus model. To constrain the diffusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p112_4_3.png]
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: The diagram of the real music audio editing pipeline using Music [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p119_4_4.png]
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Comparison between MusicGen and Instruct-MusicGen. Instruct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p124_5_1.png]
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: The fusion mechanism inside the Transformer module of Instruct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p129_5_2.png]
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: The comparison of L2 loss curve between the original Instruct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p139_5_3.png]
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Audio samples. Fig (a-c): Extracting a stem. Instruction: “Ex￾tract drum.”; Fig (d-f): Adding a stem. Instruction: “Add piano.”; Fig (g-i): Removing a stem. Instruction: “Remove bass”; automation in music composition. Instruct-MusicGen represents a significant contri…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    MusicLM: Generating music from text

    Andrea Agostinelli, Timo I Denk, Zal´ an Borsos, Jesse Engel, Mauro Verzetti, Antoine Caillon, Qingqing Huang, Aren Jansen, Adam Roberts, Marco Tagliasacchi, et al. MusicLM: Generating music from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11325,

    arXiv

  2. [6]

    Look, listen, and learn more: Design choices for deep audio embeddings

    Aurora Linh Cramer, Ho-Hsiang Wu, Justin Salamon, and Juan Pablo Bello. Look, listen, and learn more: Design choices for deep audio embeddings. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 3852–3856. IEEE,

    work page 2019

  3. [7]

    BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 ,

    arXiv

  4. [10]

    LP-MusicCaps: LLM-based pseudo music captioning

    SeungHeon Doh, Keunwoo Choi, Jongpil Lee, and Juhan Nam. LP-MusicCaps: LLM-based pseudo music captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16372,

    arXiv

  5. [11]

    Singsong: Generating musical accompaniments from singing

    Chris Donahue, Antoine Caillon, Adam Roberts, Ethan Manilow, Philippe Es- ling, Andrea Agostinelli, Mauro Verzetti, Ian Simon, Olivier Pietquin, Neil 164 Zeghidour, et al. Singsong: Generating musical accompaniments from singing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12662 ,

    arXiv

  6. [12]

    Joint music and language attention models for zero-shot music tagging

    Xingjian Du, Zhesong Yu, Jiaju Lin, Bilei Zhu, and Qiuqiang Kong. Joint music and language attention models for zero-shot music tagging. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1126–1130. IEEE,

    work page 2024

  7. [13]

    Fast timing-conditioned latent audio diffusion

    Zach Evans, CJ Carr, Josiah Taylor, Scott H Hawley, and Jordi Pons. Fast timing-conditioned latent audio diffusion. In Forty-first International Con- ference on Machine Learning , 2024a. Zach Evans, Julian D Parker, CJ Carr, Zack Zukowski, Josiah Taylor, and Jordi Pons. Long-form music generation with latent diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10301, 202...

    arXiv

  8. [14]

    Hugo Flores Garcia, Prem Seetharaman, Rithesh Kumar, and Bryan Pardo

    URL https://riffusion.com/about. Hugo Flores Garcia, Prem Seetharaman, Rithesh Kumar, and Bryan Pardo. VampNet: Music generation via masked acoustic token modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04686,

    arXiv

Show all 71 references
  1. [15]

    Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events

    Jort F Gemmeke, Daniel PW Ellis, Dylan Freedman, Aren Jansen, Wade Lawrence, R Channing Moore, Manoj Plakal, and Marvin Ritter. Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events. In 2017 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (...

    2017

  2. [16]

    Compa: Addressing the gap in compositional reasoning in audio-language models

    Sreyan Ghosh, Ashish Seth, Sonal Kumar, Utkarsh Tyagi, Chandra Kiran Evuru, S Ramaneswaran, S Sakshi, Oriol Nieto, Ramani Duraiswami, and Dinesh Manocha. Compa: Addressing the gap in compositional reasoning in audio-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08753 ,

    arXiv

  3. [17]

    Instructme: An instruction guided music edit and remix framework with latent diffusion models

    Bing Han, Junyu Dai, Xuchen Song, Weituo Hao, Xinyan He, Dong Guo, Jitong Chen, Yuxuan Wang, and Yanmin Qian. Instructme: An instruction guided music edit and remix framework with latent diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14360,

    arXiv

  4. [19]

    Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang, Tim Cooijmans, Adam Roberts, Aaron Courville, and Douglas Eck

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2106.09685. Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang, Tim Cooijmans, Adam Roberts, Aaron Courville, and Douglas Eck. Counterpoint by convolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.07227,

    1903 arXiv

  5. [21]

    M 2ugen: Multi-modal music understanding and generation with the power of large language models

    Atin Sakkeer Hussain, Shansong Liu, Chenshuo Sun, and Ying Shan. M 2ugen: Multi-modal music understanding and generation with the power of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11255 ,

    arXiv

  6. [22]

    Yusuf Ziya Isik, Jonathan Le Roux, Zhuo Chen, Shinji Watanabe, and John R. Hershey. Single-channel multi-speaker separation using deep clus- tering. In Nelson Morgan, editor, Interspeech 2016, 17th Annual Con- ference of the International Speech Communication Association, San ...

    2016

  7. [24]

    Re- trieval augmented generation of symbolic music with llms

    Nicolas Jonason, Luca Casini, Carl Thom´ e, and Bob LT Sturm. Re- trieval augmented generation of symbolic music with llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10384,

    arXiv

  8. [25]

    Fr\’echet audio distance: A metric for evaluating music enhancement algo- rithms

    Kevin Kilgour, Mauricio Zuluaga, Dominik Roblek, and Matthew Sharifi. Fr\’echet audio distance: A metric for evaluating music enhancement algo- rithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08466 ,

    arXiv

  9. [27]

    Auto-encoding variational Bayes

    167 Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114,

    arXiv

  10. [29]

    Smitin: Self-monitored inference-time intervention for generative music transformers

    Junghyun Koo, Gordon Wichern, Francois G Germain, Sameer Khurana, and Jonathan Le Roux. Smitin: Self-monitored inference-time intervention for generative music transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02252 ,

    arXiv

  11. [30]

    Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout

    Khaled Koutini, Jan Schl¨ uter, Hamid Eghbal-Zadeh, and Gerhard Widmer. Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05069,

    arXiv

  12. [31]

    Peike Li, Boyu Chen, Yao Yao, Yikai Wang, Allen Wang, and Alex Wang

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2410.02060. Peike Li, Boyu Chen, Yao Yao, Yikai Wang, Allen Wang, and Alex Wang. Jen-1: Text-guided universal music generation with omnidirectional diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04729 ,

    arXiv

  13. [32]

    Content-based controls for music large language modeling

    Liwei Lin, Gus Xia, Junyan Jiang, and Yixiao Zhang. Content-based controls for music large language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17162 ,

    arXiv

  14. [33]

    Arrange, inpaint, and refine: Steerable long-term music audio generation and editing via content- based controls

    Liwei Lin, Gus Xia, Yixiao Zhang, and Junyan Jiang. Arrange, inpaint, and refine: Steerable long-term music audio generation and editing via content- based controls. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09508 ,

    arXiv

  15. [34]

    Audioldm: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models

    Haohe Liu, Zehua Chen, Yi Yuan, Xinhao Mei, Xubo Liu, Danilo Mandic, Wenwu Wang, and Mark D Plumbley. Audioldm: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12503 ,

    arXiv

  16. [35]

    Audi- oldm 2: Learning holistic audio generation with self-supervised pretraining

    168 Haohe Liu, Yi Yuan, Xubo Liu, Xinhao Mei, Qiuqiang Kong, Qiao Tian, Yup- ing Wang, Wenwu Wang, Yuxuan Wang, and Mark D Plumbley. Audi- oldm 2: Learning holistic audio generation with self-supervised pretraining. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processi...

    2024 arXiv

  17. [36]

    Novice-AI music co-creation via AI-steering tools for deep generative models

    Ryan Louie, Andy Coenen, Cheng Zhi Huang, Michael Terry, and Carrie J Cai. Novice-AI music co-creation via AI-steering tools for deep generative models. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13,

    2020

  18. [37]

    MuseCoco: Generating symbolic music from text

    Peiling Lu, Xin Xu, Chenfei Kang, Botao Yu, Chengyi Xing, Xu Tan, and Jiang Bian. MuseCoco: Generating symbolic music from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00110,

    arXiv

  19. [38]

    Learning disentangled repre- sentations of timbre and pitch for musical instrument sounds using gaussian mixture variational autoencoders

    Yin-Jyun Luo, Kat Agres, and Dorien Herremans. Learning disentangled repre- sentations of timbre and pitch for musical instrument sounds using gaussian mixture variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08152 ,

    1906 arXiv

  20. [39]

    The Song Describer Dataset: A corpus of audio captions for music-and- language evaluation

    Ilaria Manco, Benno Weck, Seungheon Doh, Minz Won, Yixiao Zhang, Dmitry Bodganov, Yusong Wu, Ke Chen, Philip Tovstogan, Emmanouil Benetos, et al. The Song Describer Dataset: A corpus of audio captions for music-and- language evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10057 ,

    arXiv

  21. [40]

    Cutting music source separation some Slakh: A dataset to study the impact of training data quality and quantity

    Ethan Manilow, Gordon Wichern, Prem Seetharaman, and Jonathan Le Roux. Cutting music source separation some Slakh: A dataset to study the impact of training data quality and quantity. In 2019 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, WASPAA 201...

    2019

  22. [41]

    2019.8937170

    doi: 10.1109/W ASPAA. 2019.8937170. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/WASPAA.2019.8937170. Hila Manor and Tomer Michaeli. Zero-shot unsupervised and text-based audio editing using ddpm inversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10009 ,

    2019

  23. [44]

    Stem- gen: A music generation model that listens

    Julian D Parker, Janne Spijkervet, Katerina Kosta, Furkan Yesiler, Boris Kuznetsov, Ju-Chiang Wang, Matt Avent, Jitong Chen, and Duc Le. Stem- gen: A music generation model that listens. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proces...

    2024

  24. [45]

    Zero-shot image-to-image translation

    170 Gaurav Parmar, Krishna Kumar Singh, Richard Zhang, Yijun Li, Jingwan Lu, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Zero-shot image-to-image translation. In ACM SIG- GRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings, pages 1–11,

    2023

  25. [46]

    Glove: Global vectors for word representation

    Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), pages 1532–1543,

    2014

  26. [49]

    Karol J Piczak

    URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1802.05365. Karol J Piczak. Esc: Dataset for environmental sound classification. In Proceed- ings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia , pages 1015– 1018,

    arXiv

  27. [50]

    Generalized multi-source inference for text conditioned music diffusion models

    Emilian Postolache, Giorgio Mariani, Luca Cosmo, Emmanouil Benetos, and Emanuele Rodol` a. Generalized multi-source inference for text conditioned music diffusion models. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), p...

    2024

  28. [51]

    Paguri: a user experience study of creative interaction with text-to-music models

    Francesca Ronchini, Luca Comanducci, Gabriele Perego, and Fabio Antonacci. Paguri: a user experience study of creative interaction with text-to-music models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04333 ,

  29. [52]

    Audio conditioning for music generation via discrete bottleneck features

    Simon Rouard, Yossi Adi, Jade Copet, Axel Roebel, and Alexandre D´ efossez. Audio conditioning for music generation via discrete bottleneck features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12563 ,

    arXiv

  30. [53]

    Jonathan Le Roux, Scott Wisdom, Hakan Erdogan, and John R. Hershey. SDR - half-baked or well done? In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2019, Brighton, United Kingdom, May 12-17, 2019, pages 626–630. IEEE,

    2019

  31. [54]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683855

    doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683855. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683855. Flavio Schneider, Zhijing Jin, and Bernhard Sch¨ olkopf. M¨ ousai: Text- to-music generation with long-context latent diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11757,

    2019

  32. [55]

    Joint audio and sym- bolic conditioning for temporally controlled text-to-music generation

    172 Or Tal, Alon Ziv, Itai Gat, Felix Kreuk, and Yossi Adi. Joint audio and sym- bolic conditioning for temporally controlled text-to-music generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10970,

    arXiv

  33. [56]

    Music FaderNets: Controllable music generation based on high-level features via low-level feature modelling

    Hao Hao Tan and Dorien Herremans. Music FaderNets: Controllable music generation based on high-level features via low-level feature modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.15474,

    2007 arXiv

  34. [57]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models

    Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timoth´ ee Lacroix, Baptiste Rozi` ere, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 ,

    arXiv

  35. [58]

    Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation

    Narek Tumanyan, Michal Geyer, Shai Bagon, and Tali Dekel. Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1921–1930,

    1921

  36. [59]

    Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio

    Aaron Van Den Oord, Sander Dieleman, Heiga Zen, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, Nal Kalchbrenner, Andrew Senior, Koray Kavukcuoglu, et al. Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499, 12,

    arXiv

  37. [61]

    Shiqi Wei, Gus Xia, Yixiao Zhang, Liwei Lin, and Weiguo Gao

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1804.03209. Shiqi Wei, Gus Xia, Yixiao Zhang, Liwei Lin, and Weiguo Gao. Music phrase inpainting using long-term representation and contrastive loss. InIEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pages 186–190. IEEE,

    arXiv

  38. [62]

    Exploring the efficacy of pre-trained checkpoints in text-to-music generation task

    Shangda Wu and Maosong Sun. Exploring the efficacy of pre-trained checkpoints in text-to-music generation task. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11216 ,

    arXiv

  39. [63]

    Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation

    Yusong Wu, Ke Chen, Tianyu Zhang, Yuchen Hui, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Shlomo Dubnov. Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation. In ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Sign...

    2023 arXiv

  40. [64]

    Iteratta: An interface for exploring both text prompts and audio priors in generating music with text-to-audio models

    174 Hiromu Yakura and Masataka Goto. Iteratta: An interface for exploring both text prompts and audio priors in generating music with text-to-audio models. In Ismir 2023 Hybrid Conference ,

    2023

  41. [65]

    UniAudio: An audio foundation model to- ward universal audio generation.CoRR, abs/2310.00704,

    Dongchao Yang, Jinchuan Tian, Xu Tan, Rongjie Huang, Songxiang Liu, Xu- ankai Chang, Jiatong Shi, Sheng Zhao, Jiang Bian, Xixin Wu, Zhou Zhao, Shinji Watanabe, and Helen Meng. UniAudio: An audio foundation model to- ward universal audio generation.CoRR, abs/2310.00704,

    arXiv

  42. [66]

    URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2310.00704

    doi: 10.48550/ arxiv.2310.00704. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2310.00704. Yao-Yuan Yang, Moto Hira, Zhaoheng Ni, Anjali Chourdia, Artyom Astafurov, Caroline Chen, Ching-Feng Yeh, Christian Puhrsch, David Pollack, Dmitriy Genzel, Donny Greenberg, Edward Z. Yang, Jason Lia...

    doi arXiv

  43. [67]

    Jen-1 composer: A uni- fied framework for high-fidelity multi-track music generation

    Yao Yao, Peike Li, Boyu Chen, and Alex Wang. Jen-1 composer: A uni- fied framework for high-fidelity multi-track music generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19180,

    arXiv

  44. [68]

    Chatmusician: Understanding and generating music intrinsically with llm

    Ruibin Yuan, Hanfeng Lin, Yi Wang, Zeyue Tian, Shangda Wu, Tianhao Shen, Ge Zhang, Yuhang Wu, Cong Liu, Ziya Zhou, et al. Chatmusician: Understanding and generating music intrinsically with llm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16153, 2024a. Yi Yuan, Zhuo Chen, Xubo Liu, Haohe Liu, X...

    2024 arXiv

  45. [69]

    LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient fine- tuning of language models with zero-init attention

    Renrui Zhang, Jiaming Han, Aojun Zhou, Xiangfei Hu, Shilin Yan, Pan Lu, Hongsheng Li, Peng Gao, and Yu Qiao. LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient fine- tuning of language models with zero-init attention. CoRR, abs/2303.16199, 2023a. doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.16199. URL https://doi.org/10.4...

    doi arXiv

  46. [70]

    Cosmic: A conversational interface for human-ai music co-creation

    Yixiao Zhang, Gus Xia, Mark Levy, and Simon Dixon. Cosmic: A conversational interface for human-ai music co-creation. In NIME 2021 . PubPub,

    2021

  47. [71]

    Interpreting song lyrics with an audio-informed pre-trained language model

    Yixiao Zhang, Junyan Jiang, Gus Xia, and Simon Dixon. Interpreting song lyrics with an audio-informed pre-trained language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.11671, 2022b. Yixiao Zhang, Akira Maezawa, Gus Xia, Kazuhiko Yamamoto, and Simon Dixon. Loop copilot: Conducting ai ensem...

    arXiv

  48. [72]

    Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, et al

    URL https://archives.ismir.net/ ismir2021/paper/000104.pdf. Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, et al. A survey of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223 ,

    arXiv

  49. [73]

    Masked audio generation using a single non-autoregressive transformer

    Alon Ziv, Itai Gat, Gael Le Lan, Tal Remez, Felix Kreuk, Alexandre D´ efossez, Jade Copet, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Yossi Adi. Masked audio generation using a single non-autoregressive transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04577 ,

    arXiv

  50. [1986]

    Diff-a-riff: Musical accompaniment co-creation via latent diffusion models

    Javier Nistal, Marco Pasini, Cyran Aouameur, Maarten Grachten, and Stefan Lattner. Diff-a-riff: Musical accompaniment co-creation via latent diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08384 ,

    arXiv

  51. [1996]

    Exploring xai for the arts: Explaining latent space in generative music

    Nick Bryan-Kinns, Berker Banar, Corey Ford, Courtney N Reed, Yixiao Zhang, Simon Colton, and Jack Armitage. Exploring xai for the arts: Explaining latent space in generative music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05496 ,

    arXiv

  52. [2004]

    2003.819861

    doi: 10.1109/TIP. 2003.819861. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861. Ziyu Wang, Ke Chen, Junyan Jiang, Yiyi Zhang, Maoran Xu, Shuqi Dai, and Gus Xia. POP909: A pop-song dataset for music arrangement generation. In Julie Cumming, Jin Ha Lee, Brian McFee, Markus Schedl, J...

    2003

  53. [2013]

    Improving text- to-audio models with synthetic captions

    Zhifeng Kong, Sang-gil Lee, Deepanway Ghosal, Navonil Majumder, Ambuj Mehrish, Rafael Valle, Soujanya Poria, and Bryan Catanzaro. Improving text- to-audio models with synthetic captions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15487 ,

    arXiv

  54. [2014]

    MoisesDB: A dataset for source separation beyond 4-stems

    Igor Pereira, Felipe Ara´ ujo, Filip Korzeniowski, and Richard Vogl. MoisesDB: A dataset for source separation beyond 4-stems. In Augusto Sarti, Fabio Antonacci, Mark Sandler, Paolo Bestagini, Simon Dixon, Beici Liang, Ga¨ el Richard, and Johan Pauwels, editors, Proceedings of...

    2023

  55. [2015]

    Mustango: Toward controllable text-to- music generation

    Jan Melechovsky, Zixun Guo, Deepanway Ghosal, Navonil Majumder, Dorien Herremans, and Soujanya Poria. Mustango: Toward controllable text-to- music generation. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics...

    2024 arXiv

  56. [2016]

    URL https://doi.org/10.21437/ Interspeech.2016-1176

    doi: 10.21437/INTERSPEECH.2016-1176. URL https://doi.org/10.21437/ Interspeech.2016-1176. Shulei Ji, Jing Luo, and Xinyu Yang. A comprehensive survey on deep music generation: Multi-level representations, algorithms, evaluations, and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:201...

    2016 arXiv

  57. [2018]

    Au- diocaps: Generating captions for audios in the wild

    Chris Dongjoo Kim, Byeongchang Kim, Hyunmin Lee, and Gunhee Kim. Au- diocaps: Generating captions for audios in the wild. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume...

    2019

  58. [2019]

    Masked autoencoders that listen

    Po-Yao Huang, Hu Xu, Juncheng Li, Alexei Baevski, Michael Auli, Wojciech Galuba, Florian Metze, and Christoph Feichtenhofer. Masked autoencoders that listen. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:28708– 28720, 2022a. Qingqing Huang, Aren Jansen, Joonseok Lee, ...

    arXiv

  59. [2020]

    Songcomposer: A large language model for lyric and melody composition in song generation

    Shuangrui Ding, Zihan Liu, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Rui Qian, Conghui He, Dahua Lin, and Jiaqi Wang. Songcomposer: A large language model for lyric and melody composition in song generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17645,

    arXiv

  60. [2021]

    Jukebox: A generative model for music

    Prafulla Dhariwal, Heewoo Jun, Christine Payne, Jong Wook Kim, Alec Rad- ford, and Ilya Sutskever. Jukebox: A generative model for music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00341,

    2005 arXiv

  61. [2022]

    Musicldm: Enhancing novelty in text- to-music generation using beat-synchronous mixup strategies

    Ke Chen, Yusong Wu, Haohe Liu, Marianna Nezhurina, Taylor Berg- Kirkpatrick, and Shlomo Dubnov. Musicldm: Enhancing novelty in text- to-music generation using beat-synchronous mixup strategies. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal P...

    2024

  62. [2023]

    Hts-at: A hierarchical token-semantic audio transformer for sound classification and detection

    Ke Chen, Xingjian Du, Bilei Zhu, Zejun Ma, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Shlomo Dubnov. Hts-at: A hierarchical token-semantic audio transformer for sound classification and detection. In ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (...

    2022

  63. [2024]

    W2v-bert: Combining contrastive learning and masked language modeling for self-supervised speech pre-training

    Yu-An Chung, Yu Zhang, Wei Han, Chung-Cheng Chiu, James Qin, Ruom- ing Pang, and Yonghui Wu. W2v-bert: Combining contrastive learning and masked language modeling for self-supervised speech pre-training. In 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASR...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.