Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Single-Mode Wave Decay

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Beam-plasma wave decay can be described by a single fitted mode rather than two distinct waves.

desk verdict Single-mode decay idea is worth a look, but the three-wave term likely vanishes under the physical branch symmetry, so the central result may be an artifact. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12883 v2 pith:YEJQYOTN submitted 2024-11-19 physics.plasm-ph

Guilherme T. Irumé , Joel Pavan , Rudi Gaelzer This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords beam-plasmasystemweakturbulencetheorysingle-modeapproachdispersionrelationLangmuirwavesion-soundwavedecayquasilinearplateau
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that weak-turbulence wave decay in an intense electron beam-plasma system can be described with a single wave mode instead of the usual pair, the Langmuir and ion-sound modes. Numerical solutions of the Vlasov-Poisson dispersion relation show that as the beam becomes more intense, the growing branch detaches from the Langmuir-like branch and follows a distinct beam mode. The authors fit that branch with a rational dispersion relation and derive the kinetic equations for electrons and wave intensities for this single mode. Simulations with the single mode reproduce the hallmark quasilinear plateau and the backscattered wave peak that the two-mode approach produces, because the one dispersion curve contains both a low-frequency acoustic-like part and a high-frequency Langmuir-like part.

What carries the argument

The central object is the fitted dispersion relation $\omega_B(k) = a v_b k / (1 + b v_b k)$ (Eq. 4), which approximates the numerically obtained growing branch for strong beams. Its algebraic form lets the authors evaluate the resonance delta functions for wave-particle and wave-wave interactions analytically, producing closed expressions for the quasilinear diffusion, spontaneous emission, and three-wave decay of mode B. The initial wave intensity is set by the quasi-thermal electrostatic noise evaluated along the B-mode curve, Eq. (8), replacing the usual Langmuir and ion-sound thermal levels.

What would settle it

Run a one-dimensional electrostatic particle-in-cell simulation for the parameters of Figure 6 ($v_b/v_{te}=8$, $n_b/n_0=10^{-3}$, $T_b/T_e=1$) and compare the electron distribution and wave spectrum with the single-mode kinetic result; if the backscattered peak is absent or occurs at a different wavenumber, or if the plateau shape differs qualitatively, the fixed-dispersion assumption is falsified. A second check is to recompute the Vlasov-Poisson dispersion relation at late times during the relaxation and verify whether the branch that was fit by Eq. (4) is still present as a distinct mode.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the high-intensity regime, the two-mode weak-turbulence description can be replaced by one fitted beam mode B with dispersion relation $\omega_B(k) = a v_b k / (1 + b v_b k)$, where $a$ and $b$ are fitting parameters. This single mode exhibits both low- and high-frequency regions as a function of wavenumber, so its self-decay reproduces the combined roles of ion-sound and Langmuir waves. The paper demonstrates this by solving the dispersion relation numerically, identifying the topological transition of the growing mode, and then solving the single-mode kinetic equations seeded with quasi-thermal noise. The result is a qualitative match with the standard two-mode evolution: plateau formation in the electron distribution, growth of forward waves, and a subsequent backscattered decay peak.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that mode B maintains the same fixed dispersion relation throughout the entire evolution, even while the beam relaxes and the true dispersion relations shift; if the growing branch changes topology or ceases to be a distinct eigenmode during plateau formation, the single-mode equations and their thermal seed no longer describe the actual system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Intense beam-plasma systems can be modeled with a single wave kinetic equation instead of two coupled equations, reducing the complexity of weak-turbulence simulations.
  • The validity of weak-turbulence theory is extended to beams whose density or drift velocity makes the standard Bohm-Gross and ion-sound dispersion relations invalid.
  • The apparent separation into Langmuir and ion-sound modes is recast as two frequency ranges of one dispersion branch, changing how decay channels are enumerated.
  • The model gives quantitative predictions for the timing and wavenumber of backscattered waves from intense beams, which can be tested in particle-in-cell simulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, the single-mode picture implies that 'mode' is not a fixed physical identity but depends on the topology of the dispersion relation, so other unstable wiggler or beam branches could receive the same treatment.
  • The fixed-shape dispersion relation is the most fragile piece; a time-dependent extension where parameters $a$ and $b$ evolve with the beam's relaxation would show whether the backscattered decay persists in a self-consistent run.
  • A natural next test is to compare the B-mode kinetic equations against a particle-in-cell simulation for the same parameters, using the predicted backscattered peak amplitude and plateau slope as quantitative discriminants.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a single-mode weak-turbulence description for intense beam-plasma systems. The authors solve the Vlasov-Poisson dispersion relation numerically, identify a regime where the growing mode transfers from the modified-Langmuir branch to a beam branch, and fit that branch with the algebraic dispersion relation ω_B(k)=a v_b k/(1+b v_b k), Eq. (4). They then write quasilinear wave-particle equations and a three-wave decay equation for this B mode, initialize the wave spectrum using the quasi-thermal noise evaluated along the fitted dispersion, and compare the resulting particle and wave evolution with the standard two-mode (Langmuir + ion-sound) weak-turbulence results. The central claim, stated in the abstract and Section IV, is that the single fitted mode, which has both low- and high-frequency portions, can reproduce the basic features of the two-mode approach, including plateau formation and backscattered wave decay.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would offer a significant simplification of weak-turbulence modeling for intense beams, and the numerical dispersion study alone is a useful contribution because it documents the topological change of the growing branch as a function of beam velocity and density. The paper is clearly written and the authors are explicit about the main limitation (fixed dispersion relation). The numerical dispersion roots in Figs. 1 and 2 are independent evidence of the transition. However, the kinetic demonstration is conditional on a fitted dispersion with two arbitrary parameters, and the three-wave decay process, which is the paper's central nonlinear ingredient, hinges on an unjustified extension of the fitted dispersion to negative wavenumbers. The comparison with the two-mode benchmark is not made at the same plasma parameters, which weakens the claimed qualitative agreement.

major comments (4)
  1. [III C, Eq. (10), Appendix A4] The three-wave decay term for the single B mode relies on the signed continuation ω_B(k)=a v_b k/(1+b v_b k) for negative k. For k>0 this dispersion is strictly subadditive (ω_B(k1+k2)<ω_B(k1)+ω_B(k2)), so if backward waves are represented in the standard symmetric way (ω_B(-k)=ω_B(k)>0 with σ=±1 labeling propagation direction), the resonance condition in Eq. (10) has no solution and the 3-wave term vanishes identically. The backscattered peak in Fig. 6 then must be produced either by quasilinear terms alone or by the antisymmetric negative-k continuation used in Appendix A4. That continuation is an arbitrary extension that is not derived from Eq. (2) and is not tested against numerical roots for k<0. The authors must either (i) provide numerical dispersion solutions for k<0 and show that Eq. (4) actually describes the physical negative-k branch, or (ii) explicitly demonstrate that the 3-wave term contributes to the backscattered peak, or (iii) remove the wave-decay interpretation of the secondary peak.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (4); Section III C] The B-mode dispersion is fitted to the unstable branch with two arbitrary parameters a and b, and then the kinetic equations, the wave-particle coupling, the three-wave matrix element, and the initial thermal level in Eq. (8) are all evaluated on that fitted curve. The paper acknowledges that keeping the dispersion fixed is a shortcoming, but the more fundamental issue is that the entire numerical evolution in Fig. 6 is conditioned on the fitted model; the only independent evidence is the numerical roots in Figs. 1 and 2. The authors should state this conditional status explicitly and report a sensitivity test with respect to a and b, since the qualitative outcome of the simulation could in principle depend on the particular fit.
  3. [III A, Fig. 4 vs. III C, Fig. 6] The two-mode benchmark in Fig. 4 is computed for vb/vte=4, nb/n0=10^-2 (P≈0.86), while the single-mode B-case in Fig. 6 uses vb/vte=8, nb/n0=10^-3 (P=1.00). These are different beam parameters and different instability regimes, so the claimed qualitative similarity is not a controlled comparison. The authors should perform both approaches at the same parameters (ideally in a regime where the two-mode approximation is still reliable) or provide a clear justification for why comparing across different regimes supports the single-mode claim.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A3)] The second-order susceptibility used in the 3-wave decay term is derived under the fast-wave condition ω≫k v_ta for all species. The B mode, by construction, contains a low-frequency ion-sound-like region where the phase velocity is much smaller than the electron thermal speed, so the fast-wave condition fails for the thermal electrons in exactly the frequency range that is supposed to play the role of ion-sound waves. The use of Eq. (A3) in that region needs justification, or the coupling coefficient must be derived with the appropriate slow-wave susceptibilities, otherwise the low-frequency decay contribution to Eq. (10) is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, Fig. 3] The fitting parameters a=1 and b=0.4 are described as being in arbitrary units; please specify their units and give the physical values used for the simulation in Fig. 6.
  2. [Section III A, Eqs. (6)-(7), Fig. 4] The text says 'only the decay terms in Eqs. (6) and (7) were included', but the caption of Fig. 4 says 'including quasilinear and 3-wave decay terms'; please reconcile this discrepancy.
  3. [Eq. (7)] In the first line of Eq. (7), the induced term contains σ ω^L_k I^σS_k; this should presumably be σ ω^S_k I^σS_k, matching the mode under consideration.
  4. [Appendix A4] The expression for k∗ is typeset incorrectly: 'k∗ = σvb − v / vbvb' is not readable. Please rewrite the reduction of the delta functions with unambiguous parentheses.
  5. [Overall] There are several typographical errors, e.g. 'belived' in the Introduction and inconsistent notation for ω^L_k versus ω^S_k; a careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the B-mode dispersion is explicitly fitted, and the target nonlinear phenomena are simulated independently from that fit.

full rationale

The paper's only fitted element is the analytic B-mode dispersion relation, Eq. (4), which the authors transparently describe as 'a fitting analytical expression ... with a and b as fitting parameters,' explicitly contrasting it with a rigorous derivation from Eq. (2). This fit is an input to the kinetic equations and the initial thermal level, not an output claimed as a prediction. The reported results—plateau formation in the electron distribution and a backscattered wave peak—are obtained by time-integrating the quasilinear and three-wave kinetic equations; they are not constructed from the fitted dispersion values or from the two-mode benchmark by least-squares inversion. The numerical roots of Eq. (2) independently support the existence of a single unstable beam mode, and the plateau/backscatter dynamics are not encoded in the two fitting parameters. Author self-citations appear in the literature survey and as references for standard weak-turbulence equations, but the equations themselves are standard and cited to Yoon's book and Davidson's formalism, so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The skeptics' concern that the symmetric positive-k branch is subadditive, making the three-wave resonance vanish without a negative-k continuation, is a physical-consistency or correctness issue, not a circular-input/output reduction; the paper openly acknowledges the fixed-dispersion assumption as a shortcoming. No step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Hence the paper is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model rests on one fitted dispersion relation with two free parameters and five background assumptions. It does not introduce new physics beyond the fitted mode, but the fixed-dispersion and fast-wave assumptions are load-bearing and are only partly acknowledged by the authors.

free parameters (2)
  • a = 1 (Fig. 3, arbitrary units); not specified for Fig. 6 simulation
    Fitting parameter in Eq. (4) controlling the slope of the B-mode dispersion at small k; chosen to match the numerically obtained growing mode, not derived.
  • b = 0.4 (Fig. 3, arbitrary units); 0.6/omega_pe in Fig. 5; redefined as b/a in Appendix A
    Fitting parameter in Eq. (4) controlling curvature and saturation of the B-mode dispersion; chosen ad hoc to reproduce the numerical roots.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Vlasov-Poisson dispersion relation, Eq. (2), with shifted Maxwellian distributions describes the normal modes of the beam-plasma system.
    Standard kinetic plasma model; used for all numerical root solutions in Section II.
  • domain assumption The weak-turbulence kinetic equations (Eqs. 5-7 and A1-A2) remain valid for a single fitted mode B.
    The paper adapts the standard Yoon weak-turbulence formalism to mode B without re-deriving its validity conditions.
  • ad hoc to paper The fast-wave condition used for the second-order susceptibility in Eq. (A3) holds for the B mode.
    The B mode's low-frequency, ion-sound-like region may violate omega >> k v_t, yet the 3-wave coupling coefficient in Eq. (10) is derived under this approximation.
  • ad hoc to paper The B-mode dispersion relation remains fixed at Eq. (4) throughout the entire dynamical evolution.
    Explicitly acknowledged in Section III C as a shortcoming; distributions and dispersion relations actually change during plateau formation.
  • domain assumption Cairns' criterion P classifies the instability and identifies when the growing mode is the beam mode.
    Used in Section II to locate the topological transition; accepted from Ref. 45.
invented entities (1)
  • B mode (single fitted beam mode)
    purpose: Serves as the sole normal mode in the kinetic equations, replacing separate Langmuir and ion-sound modes for high-intensity beams.
    The dispersion relation omega_B(k) is a fitted algebraic expression with parameters a and b chosen to match numerical roots; no external prediction such as a particle-in-cell spectrum is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single-Mode Wave Decay." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YEJQYOTN

@misc{pith2026241112883,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single-Mode Wave Decay},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YEJQYOTN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12883}
}
read the original abstract

The usual approach on electrostatic wave decay process for a weak beam-plasma system considers two different wave modes interplaying, the Langmuir and ion-sound mode. In the present paper, a single-mode approach is shown to be feasible for conditions where the respective dispersion relations undergo topological changes. Numerical solutions for the dispersion relation of a beam-plasma system are presented, supporting the modeling of an analytic dispersion relation of a single wave mode. This wave mode is accounted for in the kinetic equations for particles and waves, which rule the evolution of the system. The results are compared against the two-wave mode approach using Langmuir and ion-sound waves, within the context of weak turbulence theory. It is found that the single-mode approach can account for the basic features of particles and waves, since the single mode exhibits both low and high frequency regions, which ultimately play the roles of ion-sound and Langmuir modes, respectively.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12883 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Dispersion relations (top panels) and the respective growth/damping rates (bottom panels). For different velocities (left to right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dispersion relations (top panels) and the respective growth/damping rates (bottom panels). For different densities (left to right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. illustrates the pertinence of using Eq. (4) to de￾scribe the growing mode for high energy beams. Along with the numerical solution and the fitting expression for the grow￾ing mode, it is displayed the dispersion relations for Lang￾muir, ion-sound and beam modes, for comparison. At this point, it must be emphasized that the model disper￾sion relation ω B (k) is only valid for regions in the parameter space where the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temporal evolution of the beam-plasma system for several [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Top panel: Contour plots of the quasi-thermal emission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of particles (top panel), spectral intensity of mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hudson ,\ 10.1007/s11214-010-9721-4 journal journal Space Sci

    author author H. Hudson ,\ 10.1007/s11214-010-9721-4 journal journal Space Sci. Rev. \ volume 158 ,\ pages 5–41 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9721-4 2011

  2. [2]

    author author S. M. \ White , author A. O. \ Benz , author S. Christe , author F. Fárník , author M. R. \ Kundu , author G. Mann , author Z. Ning , author J.-P. \ Raulin , author A. V. R. \ Silva-Válio , author P. Saint-Hilaire , author N. Vilmer , \ and\ author A. Warmuth ,\ 10.1007/s11214-010-9708-1 journal journal Space Sci. Rev. \ volume 159 ,\ pages ...

    doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9708-1

  3. [3]

    Chen , author T

    author author B. Chen , author T. S. \ Bastian , author S. M. \ White , author D. E. \ Gary , author R. Perley , author M. Rupen , \ and\ author B. Carlson ,\ 10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/L21 journal journal Astrophys. J. Lett. \ volume 763 ,\ pages L21 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/l21

  4. [4]

    author author H. A. S. \ Reid \ and\ author H. Ratcliffe ,\ 10.1088/1674-4527/14/7/003 journal journal Res. Astron. Astrop. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 773–804 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/14/7/003 2014

  5. [5]

    author author H. A. S. \ Reid \ and\ author E. P. \ Kontar ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201732298 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 614 ( year 2018 ),\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201732298 NoStop

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732298 2018

  6. [6]

    author author S. T. \ Badman , author E. Carley , author L. A. \ Cañizares , author N. Dresing , author L. K. \ Jian , author D. Lario , author P. T. \ Gallagher , author J. C. \ Martínez Oliveros , author M. Pulupa , \ and\ author S. D. \ Bale ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ac90c2 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 938 ,\ pages 95 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac90c2

  7. [7]

    author author C. Y. \ Lorfing \ and\ author H. A. S. \ Reid ,\ 10.1007/s11207-023-02145-2 journal journal Solar Phys. \ volume 298 ,\ pages 52 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-023-02145-2 2023

  8. [8]

    author author C. Y. \ Lorfing , author H. A. S. \ Reid , author R. Gómez-Herrero , author M. Maksimovic , author G. Nicolaou , author C. J. \ Owen , author J. Rodriguez-Pacheco , author D. F. \ Ryan , author D. Trotta , \ and\ author D. Verscharen ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0be3 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 959 ,\ pages 128 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0be3

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    author author L. Y. \ Khoo , author B. Sánchez-Cano , author C. O. \ Lee , author L. Rodríguez-García , author A. Kouloumvakos , author E. Palmerio , author F. Carcaboso , author D. Lario , author N. Dresing , author C. M. S. \ Cohen , author D. J. \ McComas , author B. J. \ L...

  2. [10]

    Soucek , author D

    author author J. Soucek , author D. Píša , \ and\ author O. Santolík ,\ 10.1029/2019JA026470 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 2380–2392 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Akbari , author J

    author author H. Akbari , author J. W. \ LaBelle , \ and\ author D. L. \ Newman ,\ 10.3389/fspas.2020.617792 journal journal Front. Astron. Space Sci. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 617792 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2020

  4. [12]

    author author H. A. S. \ Reid \ and\ author E. P. \ Kontar ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201629697 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 598 ,\ eid A44 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Sauer , author K

    author author K. Sauer , author K. Baumgärtel , author R. Sydora , \ and\ author D. Winterhalter ,\ 10.1029/2018JA025887 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 68–89 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    author author J. D. \ Menietti , author P. H. \ Yoon , author Sheng-Yi Ye , author B. Cecconi , \ and\ author A. M. \ Rymer ,\ 10.5194/angeo-28-1013-2010 journal journal Ann. Geophys. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 1013–1021 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  7. [15]

    author author R. L. \ Mutel , author J. D. \ Menietti , author D. A. \ Gurnett , author W. Kurth , author P. Schippers , author C. Lynch , author L. Lamy , author C. Arridge , \ and\ author B. Cecconi ,\ 10.1029/2010GL044940 journal journal Geophys. Res. Lett. \ volume 37 ,\ p...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Vorgul , author B

    author author I. Vorgul , author B. J. \ Kellett , author R. A. \ Cairns , author R. Bingham , author K. Ronald , author D. C. \ Speirs , author S. L. \ McConville , author K. M. \ Gillespie , \ and\ author A. D. R. \ Phelps ,\ 10.1063/1.3567420 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \...

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author Menietti J. D. , author Mutel R. L. , author Schippers P. , author Ye S.-Y. , author Gurnett D. A. , \ and\ author Lamy L. ,\ 10.1029/2011JA017056 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 116 ,\ pages A12222 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author D. B. \ Melrose ,\ 10.1007/s41614-017-0007-0 journal journal Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 5 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    author author R. L. \ Lysak ,\ 10.1007/s41614-022-00111-2 journal journal Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 6 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Soucek , author V

    author author J. Soucek , author V. Krasnoselskikh , author T. Dudok de Wit , author J. Pickett , \ and\ author C. Kletzing ,\ 10.1029/2004JA010977 journal journal jgr \ volume 110 ( year 2005 ),\ 10.1029/2004JA010977 NoStop

    2005 doi

  13. [21]

    Píša , author O

    author author D. Píša , author O. Santolík , author G. B. \ Hospodarsky , author W. S. \ Kurth , author D. A. \ Gurnett , \ and\ author J. Souček ,\ 10.1002/2016JA022912 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 7771–7784 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Gómez-Herrero , author D

    author author R. Gómez-Herrero , author D. Pacheco , author A. Kollhoff , author F. Espinosa Lara , author J. L. \ Freiherr von Forstner , author N. Dresing , author D. Lario , author L. Balmaceda , author V. Krupar , author O. E. \ Malandraki , author A. Aran , author R. Bučí...

  15. [23]

    Sauer , author D

    author author K. Sauer , author D. M. \ Malaspina , author M. Pulupa , \ and\ author C. S. \ Salem ,\ 10.1002/2017JA024258 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 7005–7020 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    author author A. G. \ Sitenko ,\ @noop title Fluctuations & Non-Linear Wave Interactions in Plasmas ,\ series International Series in Natural Philosophy \ No.\ number 107 \ ( publisher Pergamon Press ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 1982 )\ note 278 pp. Stop

    1982

  17. [25]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon ,\ 10.1017/9781316771259 title Classical Kinetic Theory of Weakly Turbulent Nonlinear Plasma Processes \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 2019 )\ note 352 + xii pp. Stop

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon ,\ 10.1063/1.1318358 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 7 ,\ pages 4858–4871 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000 doi

  19. [27]

    author author L. F. \ Ziebell , author R. Gaelzer , \ and\ author P. H. \ Yoon ,\ 10.1063/1.1389863 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 8 ,\ pages 3982–3995 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  20. [28]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon \ and\ author R. Gaelzer ,\ 10.1063/1.1506926 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 9 ,\ pages 4166–4173 ( year 2002 a ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  21. [29]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon \ and\ author R. Gaelzer ,\ 10.1063/1.1511514 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 9 ,\ pages 4520–4524 ( year 2002 b ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  22. [30]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon , author R. Gaelzer , author T. Umeda , author Y. Omura , \ and\ author H. Matsumoto ,\ 10.1063/1.1537238 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 10 ,\ pages 364–372 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    Gaelzer , author P

    author author R. Gaelzer , author P. H. \ Yoon , author T. Umeda , author Y. Omura , \ and\ author H. Matsumoto ,\ 10.1063/1.1537239 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 10 ,\ pages 373–381 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    Umeda , author Y

    author author T. Umeda , author Y. Omura , author P. H. \ Yoon , author R. Gaelzer , \ and\ author H. Matsumoto ,\ 10.1063/1.1537240 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 10 ,\ pages 382–391 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  25. [33]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon ,\ 10.1063/1.1864073 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 12 ,\ eid 042306 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  26. [34]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon , author T. Rhee , \ and\ author C.-M. \ Ryu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.215003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 95 ,\ eid 215003 ( year 2005 a ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  27. [35]

    author author L. F. \ Ziebell , author R. Gaelzer , \ and\ author P. H. \ Yoon ,\ 10.1063/1.2844740 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 15 ,\ eid 032303 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    Gaelzer , author L

    author author R. Gaelzer , author L. F. \ Ziebell , author A. F. \ Viñas , author P. H. \ Yoon , \ and\ author C. M. \ Ryu ,\ 10.1086/527430 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 677 ,\ pages 676–682 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon ,\ 10.1063/1.3517101 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 17 ,\ eid 112316 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  30. [38]

    Pavan , author P

    author author J. Pavan , author P. H. \ Yoon , \ and\ author T. Umeda ,\ 10.1063/1.3574359 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 18 ,\ eid 042307 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  31. [39]

    author author L. F. \ Ziebell , author P. H. \ Yoon , author L. T. \ Petruzzellis , author R. Gaelzer , \ and\ author J. Pavan ,\ 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/237 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 806 ,\ pages 237 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author L. F. \ Ziebell , author L. T. \ Petruzzellis , author P. H. \ Yoon , author R. Gaelzer , \ and\ author J. Pavan ,\ 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/61 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 818 ,\ pages 61 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    Krafft \ and\ author A

    author author C. Krafft \ and\ author A. S. \ Volokitin ,\ 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/99 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 821 ,\ pages 99 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    \ Lee , author L

    author author S.-Y. \ Lee , author L. F. \ Ziebell , author P. H. \ Yoon , author R. Gaelzer , \ and\ author E. S. \ Lee ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf476 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 871 ,\ pages 74 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    Henri , author A

    author author P. Henri , author A. Sgattoni , author C. Briand , author F. Amiranoff , \ and\ author C. Riconda ,\ 10.1029/2018JA025707 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 1475–1490 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    Chen , author Z

    author author Y. Chen , author Z. Zhang , author S. Ni , author C. Li , author H. Ning , \ and\ author X. Kong ,\ 10.3847/2041-8213/ac47fa journal journal Astrophys. J. Lett. \ volume 924 ,\ pages L34 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    author author I. H. \ Cairns ,\ 10.1063/1.859088 journal journal Phys. Fluids B \ volume 1 ,\ pages 204 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    1989 doi

  38. [46]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon , author T. Rhee , \ and\ author C. M. \ Ryu ,\ 10.1063/1.1925618 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 12 ,\ eid 062310 ( year 2005 b ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  39. [47]

    author author R. C. \ Davidson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.176.344 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 176 ,\ pages 344 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968 doi

  40. [48]

    author author R. C. \ Davidson ,\ 10.1063/1.1692258 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 12 ,\ pages 149 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    1969 doi

  41. [49]

    author author V. S. \ L vov , author Y. L vov , author A. C. \ Newell , \ and\ author V. Zakharov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.390 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 56 ,\ pages 390 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  42. [50]

    author author D. A. \ Gurnett , author G. B. \ Hospodarsky , author W. S. \ Kurth , author D. J. \ Williams , \ and\ author S. J. \ Bolton ,\ 10.1029/92JA02838 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 5631 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [51]

    author author D. B. \ Melrose ,\ @noop title Instabilities in space and laboratory plasmas. \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  44. [52]

    Bohm \ and\ author E

    author author D. Bohm \ and\ author E. P. \ Gross ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.75.1851 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 75 ,\ pages 1851 ( year 1949 ) NoStop

    1949 doi

  45. [53]

    author author R. J. \ Briggs ,\ @noop title Electron-stream interaction with plasmas. \ ( publisher MIT Press ,\ year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964

  46. [54]

    Zhou , author P

    author author X. Zhou , author P. A. \ Mu \ n oz , author J. B \"u chner , \ and\ author S. Liu ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a0d journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 891 ,\ pages 92 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    Sun , author J

    author author H. Sun , author J. Chen , author I. D. \ Kaganovich , author A. Khrabrov , \ and\ author D. Sydorenko ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.035203 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 106 ,\ pages 035203 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  48. [56]

    Del Zanna , author M

    author author L. Del Zanna , author M. Velli , \ and\ author P. Londrillo ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361:20000455 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 367 ,\ pages 705 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  49. [57]

    Del Zanna ,\ 10.1029/2001GL012911 journal journal Geophys

    author author L. Del Zanna ,\ 10.1029/2001GL012911 journal journal Geophys. Res. Lett. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 2585 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  50. [58]

    Matteini , author S

    author author L. Matteini , author S. Landi , author L. Del Zanna , author M. Velli , \ and\ author P. Hellinger ,\ 10.1029/2010GL044806 journal journal Geophys. Res. Lett. \ volume 37 ( year 2010 ),\ 10.1029/2010GL044806 NoStop

    2010 doi

  51. [59]

    author author Y. M. \ Voitenko ,\ 10.1017/S0022377898007090 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 497 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  52. [60]

    author author Y. M. \ Voitenko \ and\ author M. Goossens ,\ 10.1029/2004JA010874 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 110 ( year 2005 ),\ 10.1029/2004JA010874 NoStop

    2005 doi

  53. [61]

    author author T. M. \ O'Neil \ and\ author J. H. \ Malmberg ,\ 10.1063/1.1692190 \ volume 11 ,\ pages 1754 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968 doi

  54. [62]

    author author J. O. \ Thurgood \ and\ author D. Tsiklauri ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201527079 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 584 ,\ pages A83 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  55. [63]

    author author I. H. \ Cairns \ and\ author S. F. \ Fung ,\ 10.1029/JA093iA07p07307 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 7307 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988 doi

  56. [64]

    Kainer , author J

    author author S. Kainer , author J. Dawson , \ and\ author T. Coffey ,\ 10.1063/1.1693886 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 15 ,\ pages 2419 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  57. [65]

    author author P. A. \ Robinson ,\ 10.1063/1.528528 journal journal J. Math. Phys. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 2484 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    1989 doi

  58. [66]

    author author S. P. \ Gary \ and\ author R. L. \ Tokar ,\ 10.1063/1.865250 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 28 ,\ pages 2439–2441 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985 doi

  59. [67]

    author author S. P. \ Gary ,\ 10.1063/1.866040 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 30 ,\ pages 2745–2749 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  60. [68]

    Pavan , author L

    author author J. Pavan , author L. F. \ Ziebell , author P. H. \ Yoon , \ and\ author R. Gaelzer ,\ 10.1029/2009JA014448 journal journal J. Geophys. Res. \ volume 115 ,\ pages A02310 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  61. [69]

    author author P. H. \ Yoon ,\ 10.1063/1.2741388 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 14 ,\ eid 064504 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  62. [70]

    author author R. C. \ Davidson ,\ 10.1063/1.1762349 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1707 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    1967 doi

  63. [71]

    author author M. E. \ Caponi \ and\ author R. C. \ Davidson ,\ 10.1063/1.1693630 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1463 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    1971 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.