Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 70 references

Modelling carbon chain and complex organic molecules in the DR21(OH) clump

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The DR21(OH) clump's methanol requires non-thermal desorption, while H2CO and CH3CCH can form thermally.

desk verdict Worth reviewing for the component decomposition and maps; the methanol non-thermal claim is real but rests on fixed excitation temperatures and a tuned shock. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12916 v1 pith:JMEDQISC submitted 2024-11-19 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

P. Freeman , S. Bottinelli , R. Plume , E. Caux , B. Mookerjea This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords astrochemistryhigh-massstarformationDR21(OH)methanolcomplexorganicmoleculescarbon-chaingas-grainchemicalmodellingLTE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using wide-band single-dish spectra of CH3CCH, CH3OH, and H2CO toward the high-mass star-forming clump DR21(OH), the paper disentangles multiple gas components at clump scale: warm components of roughly 20 to 80 K toward the dusty cores MM1 and MM2, cooler extended envelopes, and a broad blue-shifted outflow. It then feeds the observed column densities into a gas-grain chemical model to ask which formation routes reproduce them. The central finding is that grain-surface chemistry plus thermal desorption can reproduce H2CO and CH3CCH, but CH3OH requires an extra non-thermal desorption mechanism, simulated as a shock, to reach its observed abundance. A sympathetic reader would take this as evidence that clump-scale observations, modelled component by component, can connect core-scale chemistry to parent-cloud structure.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a multi-component local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) model that fits every observed line of each species as a sum of Gaussian components, producing a column density, excitation temperature, line width, and velocity for each component; the methanol fits are checked against a non-LTE radiative transfer calculation. The component column densities are converted to fractional abundances using an H2 column density map and then fed into a three-phase gas-grain chemical model that evolves the gas, grain surface, and grain mantle under cold-cloud, warm-up, and simulated-shock stages. The load-bearing comparison is between the model-predicted and observed abundances at matched temperature and density conditions.

What would settle it

Measure the methanol excitation temperature independently in each component, for example with interferometric observations of a ladder of CH3OH lines that resolve MM1 and MM2; if the fitted temperatures differ from the fixed values enough to bring the thermal warm-up model into agreement with the observed abundances, the need for non-thermal desorption would be overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that in DR21(OH) the observed methanol cannot be made by warm gas alone: a gas-grain model with a cold cloud, a warm-up phase, and a shock-like burst of non-thermal desorption reproduces all five methanol components, while a plain warm-up model fails. For H2CO the same warm-up model succeeds in about 100 to over 1000 years depending on the component, and for CH3CCH it succeeds only in a low-extinction, cloud-edge environment with visual extinction around 1 to 5 magnitudes, where grain-surface hydrogenation dominates rather than warm carbon chain chemistry. The LTE decomposition that underlies these abundances finds roughly 80 K inner-core components and roughly 20 to 40 K envelope components near MM1 and MM2, plus cold 6 to 15 K gas toward the neighbouring clumps N40, N36, N41, N38, and N48.

Load-bearing premise

The methanol temperatures used to calculate how much methanol is present were set by hand rather than measured, and the methanol abundance the chemical model must match shifts directly if those temperatures are wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In this source, methanol emission from clump scales should be interpreted as shock- or outflow-liberated grain-surface ice, not as a thermal hot-core product.
  • CH3CCH is not a reliable tracer of warm carbon chain chemistry here; its abundance is set by grain-surface hydrogenation in a low-extinction envelope.
  • The component decomposition shows that single-dish clump-scale spectra can separate core, envelope, and outflow gas when a multi-component LTE fit is used.
  • H2CO can be used as a thermal probe of warm gas near the embedded protostars, since its production is reproduced by thermal mechanisms.
  • The inferred outflow age of about 1.6 times 10^4 years is shorter than the chemical post-shock timescale, so the model requires the methanol to have been liberated recently.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A sharper test would be to map CH3OH with an interferometer and fit excitation temperatures per core; if methanol's true excitation temperatures are lower than the fixed values, the required abundance would drop and thermal routes might suffice.
  • The same LTE-plus-chemical-model approach could be applied to other clumps in the region, with each LTE component compared against interferometric maps to see whether it corresponds to a spatially distinct structure.
  • If non-thermal desorption is required, methanol column densities should be enhanced where outflow shocks interact with dense gas, so a targeted map of CH3OH against shock tracers could test this prediction.
  • The model's success for CH3CCH only at low extinction implies the molecule traces the cloud edge; higher-resolution observations of CH3CCH emission morphology could confirm that it is limb-brightened.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a multi-line, single-dish study of the high-mass star-forming clump DR21(OH)/N44 using IRAM 30-m and GBT observations of CH3CCH, CH3OH, and H2CO. A multi-component LTE model is used to decompose the spectra toward N44 and the neighboring clumps N40/N36/N41, N38, and N48, identifying warm (20-80 K), cold (6-15 K), and broad outflow components. RADEX is used to test non-LTE effects in CH3OH at two positions. The NAUTILUS gas-grain chemical code is then run in two-phase (cold-cloud plus warm-up) and three-phase (cold-cloud plus shock plus post-shock) configurations to reproduce the observed abundances. The central conclusion is that thermal (warm-up) chemistry can produce the observed H2CO and CH3CCH abundances, while CH3OH requires non-thermal desorption, modelled as a C-type shock. The paper also maps the spatial distribution of the components and argues for grain-surface formation of CH3CCH and CH3OH.

Significance. The paper's qualitative component decomposition is a useful contribution: it connects single-dish clump-scale observations with interferometric core-scale results and identifies multiple temperature/velocity components in a generally careful way. The RADEX follow-up for CH3OH is a reasonable check on LTE assumptions, and the extensive appendix material (model spectra for every component, production/destruction route figures) is transparent and helpful. The chemical modelling addresses a current question - whether WCCC or grain-surface chemistry dominates in high-mass clumps - and the conclusion that H2CO and CH3CCH can be made by thermal mechanisms is consistent with previous work. However, the quantitative claim that CH3OH needs non-thermal desorption is fragile: the CH3OH excitation temperatures are all fixed, the RADEX column densities are not reconciled with the LTE totals, and the fiducial shock model cannot match the outflow age derived in the same paper. These issues need to be resolved before the abstract's strong statement can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Table 2] All CH3OH excitation temperatures in Table 2 are fixed to integer values (82, 75, 22, 15, 25, 30, 6, 6, 30, 8, 8, 20, 8 K) and the table caption states that values without errors were fixed in the model. The LTE column densities, and therefore the observed fractional abundances used in §4, depend on these assumed temperatures; for an optically thin transition the column density scales roughly as exp(E_up/T_ex) once the partition function is accounted for, so a change from 15 K to 25 K can alter the column density by a factor of order two. The paper does not present a sensitivity test over T_ex for any CH3OH component. Because the central conclusion that CH3OH requires non-thermal desorption is based on these abundances, I request a grid over T_ex (or a fit where the lines permit) and a discussion of how the chemical-model conclusion would change if the RADEX-derived column densities of Table 3 were used instead.
  2. [§3.1.1, Table 3] The RADEX column densities in Table 3 are explicitly labelled as A-CH3OH only, while the LTE model does not differentiate A and E forms (Sect. 3). The paper never states the A/E ratio used to convert the RADEX values to total CH3OH column densities. In the centre pixel, the LTE totals are a factor of 1.4-3.1 larger than the RADEX A-only values (e.g., N44 4: 2.08e15 vs 7.84e14). Without a specified conversion, the quantitative comparison between LTE and RADEX is ambiguous, and the claim in §3.1.1 that CH3OH is 'near LTE' is not backed by a well-defined column-density comparison. Please provide total RADEX column densities or an explicit A/E ratio, and clarify how the non-LTE column densities would modify the input abundances to the chemical model.
  3. [§4, Fig. 10] The paper derives an outflow dynamical age of 1.6e4 yr from the outflow component's 15 km/s width and 10 arcsec extent, and then states that this age is less than the time needed for the fiducial shock model to match the observed CH3OH abundances in the post-shock stage. The only model variant that matches on a timescale of a few 1e3 yr uses the RADEX densities, but this variant is rejected because it requires an unexplained density jump between the shock and post-shock phases. Thus the fiducial model that supports the conclusion 'CH3OH needs some form of non-thermal desorption' is not dynamically consistent with the source's own outflow age. Either adopt the RADEX-density model and justify the density evolution, or explicitly present the conclusion as conditional on an unresolved timescale discrepancy.
  4. [§4, CH3CCH] The CH3CCH model invokes a cloud-edge environment with A_V = 1, and the text acknowledges 'we do not know if the extent of CH3CCH is truly on the envelope edge' (Sect. 4). The paper also states that A_V = 50 requires a shock to reproduce the CH3CCH abundances. Therefore the conclusion that CH3CCH can be produced by thermal mechanisms depends on an unverified geometrical assumption. The abstract's statement that thermal mechanisms are adequate for CH3CCH should be qualified unless independent evidence for the low-A_V location is provided, or the model should be presented as one of two admissible scenarios.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4 (chemical modelling)] In the description of the post-shock phase, 'set the density at 10^5 cm^-2' should read '10^5 cm^-3'; earlier in the same paragraph, 'stimulates the abundances over time' should be 'simulates'. These typos should be corrected.
  2. [§2.1] The 135 GHz IRAM data are stated to be excluded from the analysis, yet their channel width, beam size, and pixel size are given in detail. Consider moving this information to a footnote or removing it, to avoid confusing the reader about which data are used.
  3. [§1] The statement that DR21(OH) was the first HMSFR found with evidence for WCCC (citing Mookerjea et al. 2012) should be accompanied by a brief description of what constitutes WCCC and a reference to the original WCCC papers (e.g., Sakai et al. 2008; Aikawa et al. 2008), which are currently cited later but not in this context.
  4. [Fig. 10 caption] The caption says components are shown by 'dotted, dashed, or solid lines' but does not identify which component has which line style. A legend or explicit mapping from line style to component (C1-C5) would make the figure interpretable.
  5. [Abstract] The sentence 'the chemical and physical environments of star-forming regions is revealed' has a subject-verb agreement error ('environments ... is'); it should be 'are revealed.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chemical model is tested against, not used to define, the LTE-derived abundances.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is not circular. The LTE fits in Section 3 convert observed line intensities into per-component column densities and excitation temperatures; the RADEX runs (Table 3) provide an independent non-LTE check and do not silently reproduce the LTE values. In Section 4 the NAUTILUS model takes those column-density ratios as targets and evolves an independent gas-grain chemical network; it does not fit the target abundances but asks whether specified physical mechanisms (thermal warm-up, low-AV photodissociation region, shock-induced non-thermal desorption) can reach them. The conclusion that CH3OH requires non-thermal desorption follows from the reported failure of the warm-up model, quoted as 'the warm-up model, with any value of AV or np−H2, did not reproduce the abundances', not from an equation that defines the observed abundance in terms of the model. The shock stage is parameterized from external papers (Palau et al. 2017; Jiménez-Serra et al. 2008); the self-citation to Freeman et al. (2023) supplies only the modeling approach, not the physics or a uniqueness result. The fixed-CH3OH-Tex assumption is a genuine systematic uncertainty, but the RADEX column densities differ by modest factors and the cold-component conclusion does not depend on Tex being exactly 6 K because thermal desorption of methanol is negligible at all fitted temperatures. The paper also explicitly flags unresolved timescale and density-jump caveats ('we have no explanation', 'We can only conclude that CH3OH need some form of non-thermal desorption'), which reinforces that the inference is conditional on stated model choices rather than constructed by definition. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 11 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on a chain of inputs: a literature distance and H2 column density map, an assumed LTE conversion between excitation and kinetic temperature (with a two-pixel RADEX check for CH3OH only), a public spectral-line catalog, and the NAUTILUS reaction network. The least secure inputs are the fixed LTE temperatures and the borrowed shock profile, both of which directly shape the final chemistry conclusions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (11)
  • LTE component column densities Ntot = Values in Table 2, e.g., CH3CCH N44 1 = 1.04e15 cm^-2
    Fitted for most components; these Ntot values become the 'observed abundances' the chemical model is tuned to match.
  • Fixed CH3OH LTE component temperatures = 82, 75, 22, 15, 25, 30, 6, 6, 30, 8, 8, 20, 8 K (Table 2)
    All CH3OH excitation temperatures are fixed in the fit with no uncertainties, imposing the warm/cold component classification and directly setting the derived column densities.
  • Fixed CH3CCH LTE component temperatures = 30 K, 25 K (components N 1, N 2)
    Two CH3CCH components in the northern region have temperatures fixed by the modeler rather than fitted.
  • Fixed H2CO outflow component temperature = 80 K (N44 3)
    The broad outflow component in H2CO is fixed at 80 K, even though the corresponding CH3OH component is fixed at 25 K.
  • Fixed line widths (FWHM) = 2.8, 4.0, 15.0, 3.6, 3.2, 1.2 km/s etc. (Table 2)
    Many line widths, including the broad outflow at 15 km/s, are fixed rather than fitted, shaping the outflow identification.
  • Fixed component velocities = -8.0 km/s for broad outflow; other velocities tied to first component
    The outflow component centroid is fixed at -8 km/s based on CO and SiO maps from the literature, and several northern components have velocities fixed to other components.
  • RADEX kinetic temperatures and densities = e.g., centre N44 1: Tkin=78 K, np-H2=6e7 cm^-3; outflow N44 5: Tkin=23.8 K, n=6e6 cm^-3 (Table 3)
    Non-LTE model parameters are fitted at only two pixels and some are fixed; these densities are later used to compare with chemical model inputs.
  • Chemical model timescales = Cold cloud 1e5 yr; warm-up/post-shock 1e6 yr; shock duration 1e4 yr
    Chosen by hand; the match time for CH3OH exceeds the inferred outflow age of 1.6e4 yr, showing the timescale choice is not independently constrained.
  • Shock parameters for CH3OH model = 40 km/s C-type shock, pre-shock density 1e4 cm^-3, dust T=80 K
    Taken from Palau et al. (2017) for IRAS 20126 and applied to DR21(OH) without direct evidence that such a shock exists in this source.
  • UV field scaling factor S = 1 (interstellar radiation field)
    Assumed standard ISRF; authors note it could be higher but claim shielding makes it irrelevant.
  • N_H2 to A_V conversion factor = 2e21 cm^-2 mag^-1
    Averaged between literature values of 1.9e21 and 2.1e21; used to set visual extinction in the chemical models.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The distance to DR21(OH) is 1.5 kpc (Rygl et al. 2012)
    Used to convert angular scales to physical sizes and to estimate the outflow dynamical age; if the distance is wrong, physical quantities shift.
  • domain assumption Local thermodynamic equilibrium holds for the analyzed lines, so the excitation temperature equals the gas kinetic temperature
    Section 3 states 'In LTE, we assume the excitation temperature represents the gas temperature'; deviations from LTE are only checked for CH3OH with RADEX at two pixels.
  • standard math CDMS catalog line parameters (frequencies, Einstein A coefficients, upper state energies) are accurate
    Used in the LTE and RADEX models; line identification is done with CASSIS using CDMS; errors in the catalog would propagate to the fit.
  • domain assumption The H2 column density map of Cao et al. (2022), derived from Herschel/PACS and SCUBA-2, is accurate on the 10 arcsec scale
    Section 4 re-grids and smooths this map to the beam; derived abundances are ratios to this H2 column density.
  • domain assumption Cosmic ray ionization rate of 1.3e-17 s^-1 represents the local rate
    Used in NAUTILUS; this is a standard value, but the actual rate in a high-mass star-forming region could differ.
  • domain assumption The NAUTILUS reaction network (489 species, over 10,000 reactions) is complete enough to capture CH3CCH, CH3OH, and H2CO formation
    The production-route analysis depends on the network; missing grain-surface or gas-phase routes would change the conclusions.
  • ad hoc to paper The CH3CCH emission arises in a low-AV (about 1) cloud-edge environment
    Section 4 states 'we do not know if the extent of CH3CCH is truly on the envelope edge'; the low-AV scenario is adopted because higher AV fails to reproduce abundances, making this assumption load-bearing for the CH3CCH chemistry conclusion.
  • ad hoc to paper The Palau et al. (2017) C-type shock temperature and density evolution applies to DR21(OH)
    Section 4: the shock stage 'evolve[s] as in Palau et al. (2017) for IRAS 20126'; no shock speed or density diagnostic from DR21(OH) is used to set these parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modelling carbon chain and complex organic molecules in the DR21(OH) clump." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JMEDQISC

@misc{pith2026241112916,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modelling carbon chain and complex organic molecules in the DR21(OH) clump},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JMEDQISC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12916}
}
abstract

Star-forming regions host a large and evolving suite of molecular species. Molecular transition lines, particularly of complex molecules, can reveal the physical and dynamical environment of star formation. We aim to study the large-scale structure and environment of high-mass star formation through single-dish observations of CH$_3$CCH, CH$_3$OH, and H$_2$CO. We have conducted a wide-band spectral survey with the IRAM 30-m telescope and the 100-m GBT towards the high-mass star-forming region DR21(OH)/N44. We use a multi-component local thermodynamic equilibrium model to determine the large-scale physical environment near DR21(OH) and the surrounding dense clumps. We follow up with a radiative transfer code for CH$_3$OH to look at non-LTE behaviour. We then use a gas-grain chemical model to understand the formation routes of these molecules in their observed environments. We disentangle multiple components of DR21(OH) in each of the three molecules. We find a warm and cold component each towards the dusty condensations MM1 and MM2, and a fifth broad, outflow component. We also reveal warm and cold components towards other dense clumps in our maps: N40, N36, N41, N38, and N48. We find thermal mechanisms are adequate to produce the observed abundances of H$_2$CO and CH$_3$CCH while non-thermal mechanisms are needed to produce CH$_3$OH. Through a combination of wide-band mapping observations, LTE and non-LTE model analysis, and chemical modelling, we disentangle the different velocity and temperature components within our clump-scale beam, a scale that links a star-forming core to its parent cloud. We find numerous warm, 20-80 K components corresponding to known cores and outflows in the region. We determine the production routes of these species to be dominated by grain chemistry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12916 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Integrated intensity maps for select transition lines of CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The regions isolated for LTE modelling near and in DR21(OH), marked in white boxes over an integrated intensity map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Column density maps for all species (rows) in components (columns) of N44. The cores SMA 7 in MM1 and SMA 3 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The RADEX model spectrum for certain lines of CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Column density maps for all species in components of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The two-stage model for H2CO (top) and CH3CCH (bottom). The 10 K cold cloud stage (left) is followed by a warm up stage where the LTE components are separated based on the temperatures and densities observed. The time axis represents the age of each component independe…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The three-stage model for CH3OH, simulating a shock. The 10 K cold cloud stage (left) is followed by a sharp increase in density and temperature to simulate a shock (middle) and then a post-shock stage (right), where the gas settles to the LTE conditions observed. The…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T., & Herbst, E

    Aikawa, Y ., Wakelam, V ., Garrod, R. T., & Herbst, E. 2008, ApJ, 674, 984

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    2018, MNRAS, 481, 5651

    Andron, I., Gratier, P., Majumdar, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 5651

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    D., Kurtz, S., Hofner, P., & Linz, H

    Araya, E. D., Kurtz, S., Hofner, P., & Linz, H. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1321

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    L., Reid, M

    Argon, A. L., Reid, M. J., & Menten, K. M. 2000, ApJS, 129, 159

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Askne, J., Hoglund, B., Hjalmarson, A., & Irvine, W. M. 1984, A&A, 130, 311

    1984

  6. [6]

    W., Broten, N

    Avery, L. W., Broten, N. W., MacLeod, J. M., Oka, T., & Kroto, H. W. 1976, ApJL, 205, L173

    work page 1976

  7. [7]

    A., Gottlieb, C

    Ball, J. A., Gottlieb, C. A., Lilley, A. E., & Radford, H. E. 1970, ApJ, 162, L203

    work page 1970

  8. [8]

    & Menten, K

    Batrla, W. & Menten, K. M. 1988, ApJ, 329, L117

    work page 1988

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    A., Goldsmith, P

    Bergin, E. A., Goldsmith, P. F., Snell, R. L., & Ungerechts, H. 1994, ApJ, 431, 674

    1994

  2. [10]

    A., Sutton, E

    Blake, G. A., Sutton, E. C., Masson, C. R., & Phillips, T. G. 1987, ApJ, 315, 621

    1987

  3. [11]

    C., Savage, B

    Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132

    1978

  4. [12]

    2010, A&A, 524, A18

    Bontemps, S., Motte, F., Csengeri, T., & Schneider, N. 2010, A&A, 524, A18

    2010

  5. [13]

    W., Oka, T., Avery, L

    Broten, N. W., Oka, T., Avery, L. W., MacLeod, J. M., & Kroto, H. W. 1978, ApJL, 223, L105

    1978

  6. [14]

    R., Jørgensen, J

    Calcutt, H., Willis, E. R., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A137

    2019

  7. [15]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 106

    Cao, Y ., Qiu, K., Zhang, Q., & Li, G.-X. 2022, ApJ, 927, 106

    2022

  8. [16]

    2019, ApJS, 241, 1

    Cao, Y ., Qiu, K., Zhang, Q., et al. 2019, ApJS, 241, 1

    2019

  9. [17]

    I., & Herbst, E

    Caselli, P., Hasegawa, T. I., & Herbst, E. 1993, ApJ, 408, 548

    1993

  10. [18]

    Cazaux, S., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, L51 Article number, page 12 of 21 P. Freeman et al.: Modelling carbon chain and complex organic molecules in the DR21(OH) clump

    2003

  11. [19]

    2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Ceccarelli, C. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 323, Star Formation in the Interstellar Medium: In Honor of David Hol- lenbach, ed. D. Johnstone, F. C. Adams, D. N. C. Lin, D. A. Neufeeld, & E. C. Ostriker, 195

    2004

  12. [20]

    J., Gear, W

    Chandler, C. J., Gear, W. K., & Chini, R. 1993, MNRAS, 260, 337

    1993

  13. [21]

    B., Tielens, A

    Charnley, S. B., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Rodgers, S. D. 1997, ApJ, 482, L203

    1997

  14. [22]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.09584

    Freeman, P., Bottinelli, S., Plume, R., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.09584

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Garrod, R. T. & Widicus Weaver, S. L. 2013, Chemical Reviews, 113, 8939

    2013

  16. [24]

    2017, A&A, 603, A33

    Giannetti, A., Leurini, S., Wyrowski, F., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A33

    2017

  17. [25]

    M., Frau, P., Zhang, Q., et al

    Girart, J. M., Frau, P., Zhang, Q., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 69

    2013

  18. [26]

    2012, A&A, 543, L3

    Hennemann, M., Motte, F., Schneider, N., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, L3

    2012

  19. [27]

    & van Dishoeck, E

    Herbst, E. & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427

    2009

  20. [28]

    M., Wakelam, V ., & Loison, J.-C

    Hickson, K. M., Wakelam, V ., & Loison, J.-C. 2016, Molecular Astrophysics, 3-4, 1

    2016

  21. [29]

    M., Hoglund, B., Friberg, P., Askne, J., & Ellder, J

    Irvine, W. M., Hoglund, B., Friberg, P., Askne, J., & Ellder, J. 1981, ApJ, 248, L113

    1981

  22. [30]

    A., Viti, S., Holdship, J., & Jiménez-Serra, I

    James, T. A., Viti, S., Holdship, J., & Jiménez-Serra, I. 2020, A&A, 634, A17 Jiménez-Serra, I., Caselli, P., Martín-Pintado, J., & Hartquist, T. W. 2008, A&A, 482, 549 Kalv¯ans, J. 2021, ApJ, 910, 54

    2020

  23. [31]

    & Slysh, V

    Kogan, L. & Slysh, V . 1998, ApJ, 497, 800

    1998

  24. [32]

    W., Kirby, C., Walton, D

    Kroto, H. W., Kirby, C., Walton, D. R. M., et al. 1978, ApJL, 219, L133

    1978

  25. [33]

    Kuiper, T. B. H., Kuiper, E. N. R., Dickinson, D. F., Turner, B. E., & Zuckerman, B. 1984, ApJ, 276, 211

    1984

  26. [34]

    Kurtz, S., Hofner, P., & Álvarez, C. V . 2004, ApJS, 155, 149

    2004

  27. [35]

    A., Bayandina, O

    Ladeyschikov, D. A., Bayandina, O. S., & Sobolev, A. M. 2019, AJ, 158, 233

    2019

  28. [36]

    M., & Crutcher, R

    Lai, S.-P., Girart, J. M., & Crutcher, R. M. 2003, ApJ, 598, 392

    2003

  29. [37]

    & Walmsley, C

    Liechti, S. & Walmsley, C. M. 1997, A&A, 321, 625

    1997

  30. [38]

    T., MacDonald, G

    Little, L. T., MacDonald, G. H., Riley, P. W., & Matheson, D. N. 1978, MNRAS, 183, 45P

    1978

  31. [39]

    J., Johnson, D

    Lovas, F. J., Johnson, D. R., Buhl, D., & Snyder, L. E. 1976, ApJ, 209, 770

    1976

  32. [40]

    G., Wootten, A., & Mundy, L

    Mangum, J. G., Wootten, A., & Mundy, L. G. 1991, ApJ, 378, 576

    1991

  33. [41]

    G., Wootten, A., & Mundy, L

    Mangum, J. G., Wootten, A., & Mundy, L. G. 1992, ApJ, 388, 467

    1992

  34. [42]

    C., Chen, H.-R., Su, Y .-N., & Liu, S.-Y

    Minh, Y . C., Chen, H.-R., Su, Y .-N., & Liu, S.-Y . 2012, JKAS, 45, 157

    2012

  35. [43]

    C., Liu, S

    Minh, Y . C., Liu, S. Y ., Chen, H. R., & Su, Y . N. 2011, ApJ, 737, L25

    2011

  36. [44]

    E., Gerin, M., et al

    Mookerjea, B., Hassel, G. E., Gerin, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 546, A75

    2012

  37. [45]

    2007, A&A, 476, 1243 Müller, H

    Motte, F., Bontemps, S., Schilke, P., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 1243 Müller, H. S., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, J. Mol. Struct., 742, 215

    2007

  38. [46]

    T., Hernández-Gómez, A., & Zapata, L

    Orozco-Aguilera, M. T., Hernández-Gómez, A., & Zapata, L. A. 2018, AJ, 157, 20

    2018

  39. [47]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 2723

    Palau, A., Walsh, C., Sánchez-Monge, Á., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2723

    2017

  40. [48]

    M., Walsh, C., & Cuppen, H

    Penteado, E. M., Walsh, C., & Cuppen, H. M. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 844, 71

    2017

  41. [49]

    Plambeck, R. L. & Menten, K. M. 1990, ApJ, 364, 555

    1990

  42. [50]

    L., Snow, T

    Rachford, B. L., Snow, T. P., Destree, J. D., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 125

    2009

  43. [51]

    J., Sandell, G., Cunningham, C

    Richardson, K. J., Sandell, G., Cunningham, C. T., & Davies, S. R. 1994, A&A, 286, 555

    1994

  44. [52]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, 3756

    Ruaud, M., Wakelam, V ., & Hersant, F. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3756

    2016

  45. [53]

    Rygl, K. L. J., Brunthaler, A., Sanna, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, A79

    2012

  46. [54]

    2008, ApJ, 672, 371

    Sakai, N., Sakai, T., Hirota, T., & Yamamoto, S. 2008, ApJ, 672, 371

    2008

  47. [55]

    2010, ApJL, 718, L49

    Sakai, N., Shiino, T., Hirota, T., Sakai, T., & Yamamoto, S. 2010, ApJL, 718, L49

    2010

  48. [56]

    & Yamamoto, S

    Sakai, N. & Yamamoto, S. 2013, Chem. Rev., 113, 8981

    2013

  49. [57]

    C., Bronfman, L., Mendoza, E., et al

    Santos, J. C., Bronfman, L., Mendoza, E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 3

    2022

  50. [58]

    2010, A&A, 520, A49

    Schneider, N., Csengeri, T., Bontemps, S., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, A49

    2010

  51. [59]

    I., Kalenskii, S

    Slysh, V . I., Kalenskii, S. V ., Val’tts, I. E., & Golubev, V . V . 1997, ApJ, 478, L37

    1997

  52. [60]

    Snyder, L. E. & Buhl, D. 1973, Nat. Phys., 243, 45

    1973

  53. [61]

    E., Buhl, D., Zuckerman, B., & Palmer, P

    Snyder, L. E., Buhl, D., Zuckerman, B., & Palmer, P. 1969, PRL, 22, 679

    1969

  54. [62]

    2016, A&A, 592, L11

    Spezzano, S., Bizzocchi, L., Caselli, P., Harju, J., & Brünken, S. 2016, A&A, 592, L11

    2016

  55. [63]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 150 Vallée, J

    Taniguchi, K., Saito, M., Majumdar, L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 150 Vallée, J. P. & Fiege, J. D. 2006, ApJ, 636, 332 van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schöier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627

    2018

  56. [64]

    M., & Boiziot, M

    Vastel, C., Bottinelli, S., Caux, E., Glorian, J. M., & Boiziot, M. 2015, in SF2A- 2015: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 313–316

    2015

  57. [65]

    Weaver, S. L. W., Laas, J. C., Zou, L., et al. 2017, ApJS, 232, 3

    2017

  58. [66]

    Whittet, D. C. B. 1981, MNRAS, 196, 469

    1981

  59. [67]

    P., Scott, S

    Woody, D. P., Scott, S. L., Scoville, N. Z., et al. 1989, ApJ, 337, L41

    1989

  60. [68]

    A., Loinard, L., Su, Y

    Zapata, L. A., Loinard, L., Su, Y . N., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 86

    2012

  61. [69]

    D., Henkel, C., et al

    Zhao, X., Tang, X. D., Henkel, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A207

    2024

  62. [70]

    2017, MNRAS, 471, 3494 Article number, page 13 of 21 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Zhu, H., Tian, W., Li, A., & Zhang, M. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3494 Article number, page 13 of 21 A&A proofs: manuscript no. main Appendix A: Model spectral line fits Fig. A.1: The LTE model spectrum for each of the three species in the central pixel of N44. The data is in solid bla...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.