REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 references
Study of Group III-V Waveguides on Sapphire Platform for Photonic Integrated Circuits
T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper predicts GaAs, InP, and GaSb rib waveguides on sapphire can reach 0.32–0.70 dB/cm propagation loss, comparable to III-V on silicon.
desk verdict Useful mode-map design study for III-V-on-sapphire waveguides, but the headline loss numbers are not trustworthy as written because of a bad k-conversion formula and an internal 10 dB/cm inconsistency. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing design is the rib waveguide: a III-V core layer (GaAs, InP, or GaSb) on a 40 nm wetting layer (AlAs, GaP, or AlSb) deposited on sapphire, surrounded by air. The paper uses a commercial mode solver based on the effective-index method to map fundamental TE and TM modes as functions of width and wavelength, extract power confinement factors, and identify single-mode, multi-mode, and cut-off regions. Loss is modeled as the sum of material absorption (negligible for free-carrier densities below 1e15 $cm^{-3}$), sidewall scattering (assumed 0.05 dB/cm for ribs and 0.25 dB/cm for strips), and scattering from dislocations at the wet-layer/sapphire interface, converted to an attenuation index through $k = 4.3(\lambda\alpha/4\pi)$.
What would settle it
Fabricate a GaAs/AlAs rib waveguide on sapphire with the simulated dimensions, measure propagation loss at 1550 nm by the cut-back method or from a ring-resonator Q factor, and compare with the predicted 0.32 dB/cm; a measured loss above about 1 dB/cm would show the assumed scattering constants do not transfer to this platform.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that group III-V straight rib waveguides on sapphire are low-loss passive elements for photonic integrated circuits, with estimated losses of 0.32 dB/cm (GaAs at 1330 nm), 0.67 dB/cm (InP at 1550 nm), and 0.70 dB/cm (GaSb at 2000 nm). Strip waveguides show larger losses because their stronger horizontal confinement pushes optical field into the substrate. Over the simulated range from 800 nm to 3500 nm, TE polarization loses less than TM, and rib waveguides lose less than strips. These values are obtained by adding material absorption, sidewall-roughness scattering, and scattering from dislocations at the wetting-layer/sapphire interface, and they are comparable to reported III-V waveguide losses on silicon wafers.
Load-bearing premise
The headline loss figures depend on assumed values for sidewall roughness scattering (0.05 dB/cm for ribs) and for scattering at dislocations in the wetting-layer/sapphire interface that are taken from other waveguide systems rather than measured in III-V layers on sapphire; if the real epitaxial interface is more defective, measured propagation loss will be far higher than the estimated 0.3–0.7 dB/cm.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Straight-waveguide results give a starting point for designing bends, splitters, couplers, and ring resonators on the sapphire platform.
- Active III-V devices such as lasers, modulators, and detectors grown on the same sapphire substrate can be monolithically integrated with the low-loss passive waveguides.
- Operating near 1550 nm avoids the strong two-photon absorption that limits silicon photonics, extending usable power levels.
- Because silicon-on-sapphire wafers are available, the photonic layer can be combined with CMOS control electronics on one substrate.
- The broad single-mode wavelength range, from visible to shortwave infrared depending on material, supports multi-wavelength photonic integrated circuits.
Reading between the lines
- If the assumed sidewall and interface scattering values are too optimistic for actual epitaxial III-V on sapphire, measured losses could be several dB/cm; a fabricated ring-resonator Q measurement at 1550 nm would settle this.
- The same simulation approach could be extended to bends and directional couplers by adding radius-of-curvature and gap parameters, giving a more complete passive-component library for the sapphire platform.
- Because GaSb has the highest index contrast with sapphire and the smallest single-mode widths, it may be the best choice for compact mid-infrared circuits, an implication the paper does not draw explicitly.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports a simulation study of group III-V (GaAs, InP, GaSb) rib and strip waveguides on sapphire substrates, with AlAs, GaP, and AlSb wetting layers. Using Lumerical Mode simulations, the authors map guided TE/TM modes, identify single-mode, multimode, and cutoff regions, and compute power confinement factors for various aspect ratios. The paper's central quantitative claim is that propagation losses for the GaAs, InP, and GaSb rib waveguides at 1330 nm, 1550 nm, and 2000 nm are 0.32, 0.67, and 0.70 dB/cm, respectively, and that these values are acceptable for photonic integrated circuits on a sapphire platform.
Significance. If the loss estimates were reliable, the study would provide useful design rules for a monolithic III-V-on-sapphire PIC platform, complementing the authors' broader program on sapphire-based photonics. The systematic mode-confinement and single-mode-condition analysis is a genuine contribution and appears internally consistent with the stated refractive-index data. However, the headline loss numbers are not independently derived: they are dominated by assumed sidewall and interface scattering constants taken from other material systems, and the conversion formula used to turn those constants into simulation inputs contains a large numerical error. The lack of any measured III-V-on-sapphire propagation-loss data further limits the strength of the 'acceptable for PICs' conclusion. The paper's value would be much higher if the loss model were corrected, the assumed constants were clearly separated from computed results, and a sensitivity analysis were provided.
major comments (4)
- [§4, Loss analysis] The conversion relation k = 4.3(λα/4π), where α is given in dB/cm, is dimensionally inconsistent and numerically wrong by a large factor. For an attenuation constant α_dB in dB/cm, the power attenuation coefficient is α_dB = 4.343 × (4πk/λ), so the correct conversion is k = α_dB λ / (4π × 4.343) ≈ α_dB λ / 54.6. The printed expression gives k ≈ 0.342 α_dB λ, which is about 18.7 times too large. Because the imaginary index k is used as the input to the Lumerical Mode simulation for sidewall roughness and interface defects, the resulting propagation-loss values scale with this erroneous k. The headline numbers 0.32, 0.67, and 0.70 dB/cm therefore cannot be trusted as computed predictions.
- [§4, Loss analysis] The paper states that 'loss due to dislocations at nanoscale wet layer/substrate interface was 10 dB/cm' while simultaneously reporting total losses of 0.32 to 0.70 dB/cm. A 10 dB/cm interface-loss contribution cannot be consistent with sub-dB/cm totals unless it is either a typo (likely 0.10 dB/cm) or the loss mechanism is not actually included in the reported totals. This inconsistency must be resolved and the corrected value re-simulated, since this assumed constant directly sets the final loss numbers.
- [§4 and Conclusions] The three loss constants used as simulation inputs — 0.05 dB/cm sidewall roughness for rib waveguides, 0.25 dB/cm for strip waveguides, and the 10 dB/cm interface-defect loss — are taken from references on other waveguide material systems and are not measured for III-V-on-sapphire. Since material absorption is stated to be negligible (≤0.01 dB/cm), the reported propagation losses are essentially the assumed scattering constants propagated through the mode solver. The conclusion that the waveguides are 'acceptable for PICs' is therefore circular unless these constants are validated or the results are presented as a scenario-dependent estimate with a sensitivity analysis. The authors should either supply measured loss data or explicitly reframe the claim as conditional on the assumed defect densities.
- [§3, Figures 2-4] The paper states that 'the single-mode condition in the plot corresponds to a power confinement factor close to or above 80%.' This conflates a threshold on power confinement with the existence of a single guided mode. The single-mode boundary should be determined by counting guided modes, not by a confinement-factor criterion. If the maps in Figures 2 and 3 are based on actual mode counting, the text should say so; if the 80% PCF value is an additional design preference, it should be presented as such.
minor comments (5)
- [Abstract] The word 'systemically' should be 'systematically', and the phrase 'we proposed to use sapphire a s a high-performance PIC platform' contains a spacing typo that should be corrected.
- [Introduction, Table 1] The enumerated rationale in the introduction uses 'i)' twice; the list should be re-lettered or renumbered.
- [§2, Simulation Methods] The text says the effective index method was used with 'Ansys Lumerical Mode's tool', but Lumerical Mode is a full-vectorial mode solver, not an effective-index-method implementation. The wording should be corrected to avoid an inaccurate description of the simulation method.
- [§4] Figure 5 plots propagation losses over a broad wavelength range, but the text does not specify whether the plotted quantity is the total loss or a sum of the modeled components, nor does it define the symbols or line styles used for the different polarizations and waveguide types. The figure caption and text should be expanded for reproducibility.
- [References] Reference [28] is listed as IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 2020, 32, 1–13; the volume and year appear inconsistent with a 1990s-era GaAs waveguide paper. The bibliographic details should be checked and corrected.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the loss estimates are a forward simulation from literature-based loss constants rather than a re-labeling of fitted outputs; the few self-citations are not load-bearing.
full rationale
Passing the derivation chain in Sections 2-4, the waveguide mode, single-mode condition, and power confinement are obtained directly from Lumerical Mode simulations using published refractive-index data, so those results are self-contained and not circular. The Section 4 propagation loss is a forward model: the authors assume sidewall-scattering constants (0.05 and 0.25 dB/cm for rib and strip) and an interface-defect loss (stated as 10 dB/cm, which is internally inconsistent with every reported total below 1 dB/cm and appears to be a decimal typo) from references [31,32], convert them to imaginary indices, and simulate the modal loss. The reported headline values of 0.32, 0.67, and 0.70 dB/cm are not identical to the input constants; they are wavelength- and material-dependent simulation outputs, so the calculation does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The model is assumption-limited because no measured III-V-on-sapphire data are provided, and the k = 4.3(lambda*alpha/4*pi) conversion appears dimensionally incorrect, but these are correctness risks rather than circularity. Self-citations (references [9], [19], [23], and [30]) are peripheral: they support qualitative trend statements, prior growth work, or general loss mechanisms, not the central loss prediction. Hence no circular step is exhibited; score 2 reflects minor non-load-bearing self-citations.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (4)
- Rib sidewall roughness loss =
0.05 dB/cm
- Strip sidewall roughness loss =
0.25 dB/cm
- Dislocation-induced loss at wet layer/sapphire interface =
10 dB/cm (as printed; likely intended 0.10 dB/cm)
- Wetting layer thickness h =
40 nm
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption Complex refractive indices of GaAs, InP, GaSb, AlAs, GaP, AlSb, and sapphire are taken from Refs [20-22] and are accurate for the simulated wavelengths and growth conditions.
- domain assumption The scattering and interface-defect loss constants used in the loss model apply to III-V-on-sapphire waveguides, despite being derived from other material systems.
- domain assumption The wetting layers (AlAs, GaP, AlSb) are 40 nm thick, uniform, and have bulk optical properties with the assumed low interface defect density.
- standard math The effective index method in Lumerical Mode accurately captures the guided modes and radiation leakage for these high-index-contrast rib and strip structures.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Study of Group III-V Waveguides on Sapphire Platform for Photonic Integrated Circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7C6JUQG2
@misc{pith2026241113035,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Study of Group III-V Waveguides on Sapphire Platform for Photonic Integrated Circuits},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7C6JUQG2}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13035}
}
read the original abstract
Photonic integrated circuits (PICs) have been acknowledged as the promising platforms for the applications in data communication, Lidar in autonomous driving vehicles, innovative sensor technology, etc. Since the demonstration of optical components individually, integration of both electronics and photonics for functional devices on a common platform has been a key technology driver enhancing the stability and scalability of integrated photonic technologies. Recently, we proposed to use sapphire as a high-performance PIC platform, which enables a fully integrated solution to include a complete set of components with light source, modulator, light detection, passive devices, silicon on sapphire control circuit all-in-one sapphire platform to achieve high-performance low-cost mixed-signal optical links. In parallel to developing ac-tive components such as group III-V lasers on sapphire, in this work, the performance of group III-V straight waveguides on sapphire was systemically studied. The refractive indices contrast between GaAs, InP, GaSb, and sapphire are sufficiently high to achieve low loss over a broad optical wavelength. The calculated loss at wavelengths of 1330 nm, 1550 nm, and 2000 nm for the GaAs, InP, and GaSb rib waveguides are 0.32 dB/cm, 0.67 dB/cm, and 0.70 dB/cm, re-spectively. Since the fundamental element to construct all passive building blocks is the straight waveguide, results from this work would allow us to assess other basic passive building blocks.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Smit M. et al. An introduction to InP -based generic integration technology. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2014, 29, 083001
work page 2014
-
[2]
Integrated microwave photonics
Marpaung D.; Roeloffzen C.; Heideman R.; Leinse A.; Sales S.; Capmany J. Integrated microwave photonics. Laser & Photonics Review 2012, 0, 1– 30
work page 2012
-
[3]
Silicon nitride microwave pho- tonic circuits
Roeloffzen C.G.H.; Zhuang L.; Taddei C.; Leinse A.; Heideman R.G.; Dijk P.W.L.V.; Oldenbeuving R.M.; Marpaung D.A.I.; Burla M.; Boller K.J. Silicon nitride microwave pho- tonic circuits. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 22937–22961
work page 2013
-
[4]
III-V-on-Si photonic integrated cirucits using micro -transfer-printing
Zhang J.; Muliuk G.; Juvert J.; Kumari S.; Goyvaerts J.; Haq B.; Beeck C.O.D; Kuyken B.; Morthier G.; Thourhout D.V.; Baets R.; Lepage G.; Verheyen P.; Campenhout J.V.; Go- calinska A.; Callaghan J.O’.; Pelucchi E.; Thomas K.; Corbett B.; Trindade A.J.; Roelkens G. III-V-on-Si photonic integrated cirucits using micro -transfer-printing. APL Photon. 2019, ...
work page 2019
-
[5]
Constants L.; Combrié S.; Checoury X.; Beaudoin G.; Raineri F.; Rossi A.D. III -V/Sili- con Hybrid Non -linear Nanophotonics in the Context of On -Chip Optical Signal Processing and Analog Computing. Front. Phys 2019, 7, 1–14
work page 2019
-
[6]
III-V/silicon pho- tonic for on-chip and intra-chip optical interconnects
Roelkens G.; Liu L.; Liang D.; Jones R.; Fang A.; Koch B.; Bowers J. III-V/silicon pho- tonic for on-chip and intra-chip optical interconnects. Laser & Photon. Rev 2010, 4, 751–799
work page 2010
-
[7]
Toward On -Chip Mid-Infrared Sensors
Sieger M.; Mizaikoff B. Toward On -Chip Mid-Infrared Sensors. Anal. Chem 2016. 88, 5562–5573
work page 2016
-
[8]
System-on-Chip Photonic integrated circuits
Kish F.; Lal V.; Evans P.; Corzine S.W.; Ziari M.; Butrie T.; Reffle M.; Tsai H.S.; Dentai A.; Pleumeekers J.; Missey M.; Fisher M.; Murthy S.; Salvatore R.; Samra P.; Demars S.; Kim N.; James A.; Hosseini A.; Studenkov P.; Lauermann M.; Going R.; Lu M.; Zhang J.; Tang J.; Bostak J.; Vallaitis T.; Kuntz M.; Pavi nski D.; Karanicolas A.; Behnia B.; Engel D...
work page 2018
Show all 32 references
-
[9]
The past, present, and future of silicon photonics
Soref R.A. The past, present, and future of silicon photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron 2010, 12, 1678–1687
2010
-
[10]
III-V nanowires and nanowires optoelectronic de- vices
Zhang Y.; Wu J.; Aagesen M.; Liu H. III-V nanowires and nanowires optoelectronic de- vices. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2015, 48, 463001
2015
-
[11]
Integration of GaAs waveguides on a silicon substrate for quantum photonic circuits
Shadmani A.; Thomas R.A.; Liu Z.; Papon C.; Heck M.J.R.; Volet N.; Sholz S.; Wieck A.D.; Ludwig A.; Lodahl P.; Midolo L. Integration of GaAs waveguides on a silicon substrate for quantum photonic circuits. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 37595–37602
2022
-
[12]
Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integra- tion
Smit M.; Williams K.; Tol J.V.D. Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integra- tion. APL Photonics 2019, 4, 050901
2019
-
[13]
O’.; Morrissey P.; Zhang H.Y.; Thomas K.; Gocalinska A.; Pelucchi E.; Gunning F.C.G.; Roycroft B.; Peters F.H.; Corbett B
Sadiq M.U.; Gleeson M.R.; Ye N.; Callaghan J. O’.; Morrissey P.; Zhang H.Y.; Thomas K.; Gocalinska A.; Pelucchi E.; Gunning F.C.G.; Roycroft B.; Peters F.H.; Corbett B. 10 Gb/s InP-based Mach-Zehnder modulator for operation at 2 μm wavelengths. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 10905–10913
2015
-
[14]
A monolithic InP/SOI platform for integrated photonics
Yan Z.; Han Y.; Lin L.; Xue Y.; Ma C.; Ng W.K.; Wong K.S.; Lau K.M. A monolithic InP/SOI platform for integrated photonics. Light: Science & Applications 2021, 10, 1–10
2021
-
[15]
Continuous-wave operation above room temperature of GaSb-based laser diodes grown on Si
Reboul J.R.; Cerutti L.; Rodriguez J.B.; Grech P.; Tournié E. Continuous-wave operation above room temperature of GaSb-based laser diodes grown on Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 121113
2011
-
[16]
Growth and fabrication issues of GaSb-based detectors
Mohammedy F.M.; Deen M.J. Growth and fabrication issues of GaSb-based detectors. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 2009, 20, 1039–1058
2009
-
[17]
Kish F. et al. Current Status of Large-Scale InP Photonic Integrated Circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electronics 2011, 17, 1470 –1489
2011
-
[18]
Nonlinear absorption and Raman scattering in silicon-on-insula- tor optical waveguides
Liang T.K.; Tsang H.K. Nonlinear absorption and Raman scattering in silicon-on-insula- tor optical waveguides. IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2004, 10, 1149-1153
2004
-
[19]
Crystalline GaAs Thin Film Growth on a c -Plane Sapphire Substrate
Saha S.K.; Kumar R.; Kuchuk A.; Alavijeh M.Z.; Maidaniuk Y.; Mazur Y.I.; Yu S.Q.; Salamo G.J. Crystalline GaAs Thin Film Growth on a c -Plane Sapphire Substrate. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 5088-5096. 14 of 15
2019
-
[20]
Refractive Index and Birefringence of Synthetic Sapphire,” J
Malitson I.H.; Dodge M.J. Refractive Index and Birefringence of Synthetic Sapphire,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1972, 62, 1405
1972
-
[21]
Optical dispersion relations for GaP, GaAs, GaSb, InP, InAs, InSb, AlxGa1−xAs, and In1−xGaxAsyP1−y
Adachi S. Optical dispersion relations for GaP, GaAs, GaSb, InP, InAs, InSb, AlxGa1−xAs, and In1−xGaxAsyP1−y. J. Appl. Phys. 1989, 66, 6030
1989
-
[22]
Modeling the optical dielectric function of GaAs and AlAs: Extension of Adachi’s model
Rakić A.D.; Majewski M.L. Modeling the optical dielectric function of GaAs and AlAs: Extension of Adachi’s model. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 80, 5909-5914
1996
-
[23]
AlGaN/AlN integrated photonics platform for the ultraviolet and visible spectral range
Soltani M.; Soref R.; Palacios T.; Englund D. AlGaN/AlN integrated photonics platform for the ultraviolet and visible spectral range. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 25415-25423
2016
-
[24]
Waveguide sub-wavelength structures: a review of principles and applications
Halir R.; Bock P.J.; Cheben P.; Monux A.O.; Ramos C.A.; Schmid J.H.; Lapointe J.; Xu D.X.; W-Perez J.G.; Fernandez I.M.; Janz S. Waveguide sub-wavelength structures: a review of principles and applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 2015, 9, 25–49
2015
-
[25]
Low-Loss III-V Semiconductor Optical Waveguides
Deri R.J.; Kapon E. Low-Loss III-V Semiconductor Optical Waveguides. IEEE J. Quan- tum Electron. 1991, 27, 626–640
1991
-
[26]
Single -mode GaAs/AlGaAs W waveguides with a low propagation loss
Byun Y.T.; Park K.H.; Kim S.H.; Lim T.K. Single -mode GaAs/AlGaAs W waveguides with a low propagation loss. Appl. Opt. 1996, 35, 928-933
1996
-
[27]
Low propagation loss of 0.76 dB/mm in GaAs -based single-line-defect two-dimensional photonic crystal slab wave- guides up to 1 cm in length,” Opt
Sugimoto Y.; Tanaka Y.; Ikeda N.; Nakamura Y.; Asakawa K. Low propagation loss of 0.76 dB/mm in GaAs -based single-line-defect two-dimensional photonic crystal slab wave- guides up to 1 cm in length,” Opt. Express 2004, 12, 1090–1096
2004
-
[28]
Low loss GaAs optical wave- guides
Inoue H.; Hiruma K.; Ishida K.; Asai T.; Matsumura H. Low loss GaAs optical wave- guides. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 2020, 32, 1–13
2020
-
[29]
Low Loss, Compact Waveguides in GaAs/Ox- idized AlGaAs Layers Directly Grown on Silicon
Bhasker P.; Shang C.; Bowers J.; Dagli N. Low Loss, Compact Waveguides in GaAs/Ox- idized AlGaAs Layers Directly Grown on Silicon. in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optica Publishing Group, 2019), paper STh3N.7
2019
-
[30]
Silicon-On-Sapphire Waveguides
Albares D.J.; Soref R.A. Silicon-On-Sapphire Waveguides. In Proceedings of SPIE 0704, Integrated Optical Circuit Engineering IV 1987
1987
-
[31]
Estimation of Propagation Losses for Narrow Strip and Rib Waveguides
Lindecrantz S.M.; Hellesø O.G. Estimation of Propagation Losses for Narrow Strip and Rib Waveguides. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 1836–1839. 15 of 15
2014
-
[32]
Study of crystalline defect induced optical scattering loss inside photonic waveguides in UV – visible spectral wavelengths using volume current method
Chen H.; Fu H.; Zhou J.; Huang X.; Yang T.H.; Fu K.; Yang C.; Montes J.A.; Zhao Y. Study of crystalline defect induced optical scattering loss inside photonic waveguides in UV – visible spectral wavelengths using volume current method. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 17262 – 17273
2019
Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.