Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Twisted fibre: a photonic topological insulator

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A helically twisted multicore optical fibre realizes a photonic Chern insulator, with robust edge-localized supermodes protected against fabrication disorder.

desk verdict Solid theory-plus-simulation package with a real fabricated fibre, but the experimental evidence stops at edge-localised intensity—the topological and robustness claims rest on numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13064 v1 pith:H6KPLF5X submitted 2024-11-20 physics.optics

Nathan Roberts , Brook Salter , Jack Binysh , Peter J. Mosley , Anton Souslov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.81.Qb42.70.Qs42.25.Bs
keywords photonicCherninsulatortwistedmulticorefibrepseudo-magneticfieldLandaulevelsreal-spacemarkertopologicaledgemodescoupledmodetheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a helically twisted multicore optical fibre realizes a photonic Chern insulator without any magnetic material: the twist induces an effective vector potential that breaks time-reversal symmetry and opens two topological band gaps with Chern numbers +1 and −1 around a zeroth Landau level. The authors fabricate the fibre by spinning it during drawing, observe edge-localized chiral supermodes, and compute a real-space Chern marker to map the parameter region where the topological invariant survives. If correct, this gives a scalable, fibre-compatible way to protect light against fabrication disorder, with implications for robust transport, quantum signals, and topological fibre lasers.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the co-rotating (helicoidal) frame transformation that converts the z-dependent twisted fibre into a z-independent problem: the paraxial Schrödinger-like equation in this frame contains the effective vector potential $A = \alpha\beta(y, -x)$ and the competing parabolic potential $\alpha^2\beta r^2/2$. This vector potential is encoded into the coupled-mode equations as a Peierls phase multiplying the inter-core coupling, and the topological invariant is computed by the Kitaev sum, a real-space Chern marker that works even though the parabolic term destroys translational symmetry.

What would settle it

Fabricate a fibre with the same cross-section but reverse the twist direction and check that the chiral edge transport reverses direction; the model predicts it must. Alternatively, fabricate a fibre at twist rate 1700 m⁻¹ and coupling 4135 m⁻¹, where the phase diagram gives C = 0, and check for the predicted ring-localized (non-topological) modes instead of edge modes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a uniform twist in a honeycomb-lattice multicore fibre acts as a pseudo-magnetic field for guided light. In the co-rotating frame, the twist produces a vector potential $A = \alpha\beta(y, -x)$ and a parabolic scalar potential $\alpha^2\beta r^2/2$; the vector potential opens two topological band gaps characterized by Chern numbers +1 and −1 around the zeroth Landau level, while the scalar potential tends to destroy topology. The paper identifies a 'Goldilocks zone' of high twist rate and high inter-core coupling where the Chern invariant remains C = 1, and shows experimentally and numerically that edge-localized supermodes live in these gaps and remain delocalized around the perimeter under on-site disorder up to the coupling strength C.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the fabricated fibre matches the co-rotating-frame model: uniform twist rate, unchanged core geometry, and the paraxial Hamiltonian of Eq. (4) with vector potential $A = \alpha\beta(y, -x)$ and parabolic potential $\alpha^2\beta r^2/2$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Edge-guided light in the fibre stays delocalized around the perimeter under fabrication disorder up to the inter-core coupling strength, so signal routing in fibre networks could become disorder-tolerant.
  • The two band gaps carry Chern numbers +1 and −1, giving counter-propagating edge modes that can be selectively excited; this provides a fibre-compatible platform for chiral quantum or classical transport.
  • Because the fibre is made by standard stack-and-draw with an added spin, the topology can be scaled to arbitrarily long lengths and reproduced in gain-doped versions for topological fibre lasers.
  • The real-space Chern marker calculation shows the method works in finite, inhomogeneous, non-periodic systems, so the same analysis can classify other drawn or fabricated photonic lattices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the twist rate varies along the fibre's length, the topological protection should degrade; a cutback experiment measuring edge-mode intensity as a function of twist uniformity would test this.
  • The same co-rotating-frame mechanism might realize higher Landau levels or different Chern numbers in other core lattices (e.g., kagome), which the paper does not explore.
  • The Goldilocks bound, where the scalar-potential magnitude at the edge stays below the coupling strength, suggests a general trade-off between pseudo-magnetic-field strength and the parabolic confinement it induces, which may apply to other twisted or rotating photonic platforms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives an effective Schrödinger-like paraxial equation for a helically twisted multicore fibre, Eq. (4), in which the twist introduces a synthetic vector potential and a competing parabolic scalar potential. It computes a real-space Chern marker using a Kitaev sum, maps out a topological region in the twist-rate/coupling-strength phase diagram, and reports output intensity images from fabricated fibres showing edge localisation. The central claim is that the fabricated fibre is a scalable photonic Chern insulator supporting robust, chiral, edge-localised supermodes, with two band gaps of Chern number ±1 around a zeroth Landau level.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a substantial advance: a drawn-fibre platform for Chern-type photonic topology, with a derivation of the effective Hamiltonian from Maxwell's equations in helicoidal coordinates, cross-validated tight-binding and finite-element simulations, and a concrete phase diagram with a falsifiable Goldilocks boundary. The real-space Kitaev-marker computation and the comparison between nontrivial and trivial fibre models are genuine strengths. However, the experimental section currently establishes only edge-localised intensity; chirality and robustness are demonstrated numerically, so the strongest experimental conclusions in the abstract and conclusion are not yet supported by the data.

major comments (4)
  1. [Experimental results (Figs. 1d, 2a, 2d, S6); Conclusion] The central claim that the fabricated fibre 'supports the propagation of robust, edge-localised supermodes' is not established by the measurements. The experimental evidence consists of output intensity images after roughly 24 mm of propagation; there is no measurement of the azimuthal direction of energy flow, output phase, orbital angular momentum, or transmission around a controlled defect. The chiral transport shown in Fig. S7 is obtained from tight-binding and finite-element propagation, and the robustness shown in Fig. 5 is entirely numerical. Edge-localised intensity is also consistent with trivial ring-localised supermodes at high twist, which the authors themselves identify in Fig. S4b,d. Please either add a direct experimental probe of chirality or robustness, or revise the abstract and conclusion to state that the experiments observe edge localisation consistent with, but not yet proving, topological Chern character.
  2. [Abstract; Fig. 4] The abstract states that the pseudo-magnetic field is 'observed via photonic Landau levels,' but no spectral or propagation-constant measurement of Landau-level quantisation is presented. Fig. 4 and Fig. S10 are numerical band-structure calculations from the tight-binding and finite-element models, and the experimental Fig. S6 shows only intensity localisation with increasing twist. To support the Landau-level claim, the authors would need, for example, spectrally resolved transmission measurements, a measured density of states, or interferometric phase measurements; absent such data, the wording should be changed to say that the numerical model predicts Landau-level-like band gaps whose signatures are consistent with the observed edge localisation.
  3. [Abstract; Fig. 5 and SI Section III] The claim of topological protection 'against fabrication-induced disorder of any symmetry class' is broader than what is computed. The disorder model in Fig. 5 and SI Section III adds random on-site (diagonal) terms to the coupling matrix, modelling core-size or core-shape fluctuations drawn from a uniform distribution. Off-diagonal coupling disorder, positional disorder, correlated disorder, and disorder strengths above the coupling scale C are not treated. Please either test these additional disorder classes or qualify the statement to refer to the on-site disorder class actually simulated.
  4. [Materials and Methods; Fig. 2a,b and Fig. 3b] The comparison between experiment and simulation assumes that the fabricated fibre is faithfully described by a uniform twist rate α = 837 rad/m and the ideal honeycomb core geometry entering Eq. (4). The manuscript does not report a measurement of twist uniformity along the 24 mm sample or of strain-induced index changes introduced during drawing. If the local twist rate varies or the core geometry is distorted, the effective vector potential and parabolic potential are not those assumed, and the computed C = 1 region in Fig. 3b may not describe the actual sample. A characterisation of the twist rate along the fibre (for example, polarimetric or Bragg-grating measurements) or an explicit statement of this limitation would be needed for the fabricated-device claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5)] The phrase 'rmj is the position vector between them-th and j-th cores' contains a typo; it should read 'between the m-th and j-th cores.'
  2. [References] References [46] and [50] are the same work (Lado et al., Synthetic Metals 210, 56–67 (2015)) and should be cited once.
  3. [Fig. 1d caption] The abbreviation 'c.f.' should be 'cf.' in the caption of Fig. 1d.
  4. [Fig. 3b] The axis descriptions in Fig. 3b would be clearer with explicit numerical labels and units on the axes, rather than only 'thousands per metre' and 'hundreds of radians per metre' in the text.
  5. [Fig. 5c and SI Section III] In Fig. 5c, the legend labels are red/green/blue but the figure description in the main text refers to left/middle/right panels; please make the correspondence explicit in the figure and caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective magnetic-field model, Chern-marker phase diagram, and FEM comparisons are derived or computed from independent inputs rather than fitted to the claimed topological result.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The effective Hamiltonian (Eq. 4) is derived in the SI from Maxwell's equations via the helicoidal coordinate transform (Eqs. S10-S22); the vector potential A = alpha*beta*(y,-x) and the parabolic scalar potential alpha^2*beta*r^2/2 appear as algebraic terms from completing the square (Eq. S21), not as parameters fitted to reproduce a target Chern number. The tight-binding model (Eq. 5) follows from a Peierls substitution, and the real-space Chern marker is computed from the eigenstates of this Hamiltonian using the Kitaev sum (Eq. S40), with the resulting C = +/-1 plateaus emerging from the numerics. The FEM simulations provide an independent computational route (Eqs. S2-S3, Refs. [34,52]) and agree with the tight-binding results. Experimental parameters (twist rate 837 rad/m, coupling 4135/m, index contrast) are measured or computed from the fabricated fibre and wavelength, not fitted to force the topological conclusion; the observed edge localisation is compared with these independent predictions. Self-citations [31,32] are contextual statements about previous topological fibre work and are not used as evidence for the present derivation. Overclaims about experimental chirality and Landau-level observation are concerns about evidence strength, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The pseudo-magnetic field and parabolic potential are effective terms derived from the coordinate transformation, not new physical entities; no new particles, forces, conserved quantities, or dimensions are introduced. The free parameters listed are measured or engineered inputs to the model, not fitted to force the topological result.

free parameters (2)
  • Nearest-neighbour coupling strength C = 4135 m^-1
    Calculated for the fabricated fibre geometry at around 1 micrometre wavelength; used as the energy scale in the tight-binding and Chern-marker calculations. It is an input, not fitted to produce the target Chern number.
  • Twist rate alpha = 837 rad/m
    Set by the fibre drawing spinner and used as the experimental operating point in the Goldilocks phase diagram. It is a measured/engineered parameter, not fitted to the topological claim.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Paraxial and weak-guidance approximations for light in fibre (SVEA, divergence-free E, beta approx k n0) are valid for the fabricated fibre.
    Used in SI Section I.A to derive Eq. (4); standard for optical fibre but restricts validity to small index contrast and slowly varying envelopes.
  • domain assumption Twist effects can be represented by a coordinate transform with vector potential A = alpha beta (y, -x) and scalar potential alpha^2 beta r^2 / 2, with torsion tau approx alpha constant.
    SI Sections I.B and I.C and Eq. (S21); relies on Refs. [22,34,52] and on small alpha*r; central to the model.
  • domain assumption Nearest-neighbour tight-binding with Peierls phases and on-site D_m captures the supermodes of the multicore fibre.
    Eq. (5) and SI Section I.D; validated against finite-element simulations in Fig. S5; assumes coupling to farther cores is negligible.
  • standard math The Kitaev real-space Chern marker is a valid topological invariant for finite, non-periodic systems.
    SI Section II, following Refs. [44,45]; used to compute the C = 1 phase diagram.
  • domain assumption Fabrication disorder can be modelled as random on-site diagonal terms, and topological protection persists up to disorder strength comparable to C.
    Fig. 5 and SI Section III; only diagonal on-site disorder is simulated, not all possible symmetry classes.
  • domain assumption The circular polarisation components decouple into identical scalar equations up to a constant +/- tau shift.
    SI Section I.B, Eq. (S25), and Fig. S8b; required to reduce the vector problem to the scalar Eq. (4).
  • domain assumption Effective time-reversal is defined by z goes to -z and i goes to -i, so that reversing propagation with fixed twist is equivalent to reversing the twist sign.
    SI Section I.C; this is a modelling analogy that defines the broken symmetry, not an experimentally verified symmetry operation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twisted fibre: a photonic topological insulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H6KPLF5X

@misc{pith2026241113064,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twisted fibre: a photonic topological insulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H6KPLF5X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13064}
}
read the original abstract

The breaking and enforcing of symmetries is a crucial ingredient in designing topologically robust materials. While magnetic fields can break time-reversal symmetry to create Chern insulators in electronic and microwave systems, at optical frequencies natural materials cannot respond to magnetic fields, which presents a challenge for the scalable exploitation of topologically enhanced devices. Here, we leverage the natural geometry of fibre to build a scalable photonic Chern insulator by twisting the fibre during fabrication. The twist inside optical fibre breaks an effective time-reversal symmetry and induces a pseudo-magnetic field, which we observe via photonic Landau levels. Unavoidably, this twist introduces a competing topology-destroying effect through a parabolic profile in the effective refractive index. Using simulations to guide experimental materials design, we discover the Goldilocks regime where the real-space Chern invariant survives, guaranteeing topological protection against fabrication-induced disorder of any symmetry class.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13064 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Twisted optical fibre overview [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Edge localisation of intensity in topological fibre. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Numerical characterisation of topology in fibre. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Topological band structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Topological protection against disorder in fibre. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    von Klitzing, Rev

    K. von Klitzing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 519 (1986)

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    A. H. MacDonald and P. Stˇ reda, Phys. Rev. B29, 1616 (1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Z. Wang, Y. D. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and 23 M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013905 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  7. [7]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    A. B. Khanikaev, S. H. Mousavi, W.-k. Tse, M. Kargar- ian, A. H. Macdonald, and G. Shvets, Nat. Mater. 12, 233 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Hafezi, E

    M. Hafezi, E. A. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and J. M. Taylor, Nature Physics 7, 907–912 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    R. O. Umucal ılar and I. Carusotto, Phys. Rev. A 84, 043804 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. M. Taylor, Nat. Photonics 7, 1001 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    M. I. Shalaev, W. Walasik, A. Tsukernik, Y. Xu, and N. M. Litchinitser, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 31 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Ma and G

    T. Ma and G. Shvets, New Journal of Physics 18, 025012 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Dong, X.-D

    J.-W. Dong, X.-D. Chen, H. Zhu, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Nature Materials 16, 298–302 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Chen, F.-L

    X.-D. Chen, F.-L. Zhao, M. Chen, and J.-W. Dong, Phys. Rev. B 96, 020202 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    C. A. Rosiek, G. Arregui, A. Vladimirova, M. Albrecht- sen, B. Vosoughi Lahijani, R. E. Christiansen, and S. Stobbe, Nature Photonics 17, 386–392 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    M. C. Rechtsman, Nature Photonics 17, 383–384 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Blanco-Redondo, B

    A. Blanco-Redondo, B. Bell, D. Oren, B. J. Eggleton, and M. Segev, Science 362, 568 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    M. Wang, C. Doyle, B. Bell, M. J. Collins, E. Magi, B. J. Eggleton, M. Segev, and A. Blanco-Redondo, Nanopho- tonics 8, 1327 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. B 82, 235114 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Nature Physics 7, 490–495 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Szameit, Nature 496, 196 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    J¨ org, F

    C. J¨ org, F. Letscher, M. Fleischhauer, and G. von Frey- mann, New Journal of Physics 19, 083003 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Z. Yang, E. Lustig, Y. Lumer, and M. Segev, Light: Science & Applications 9, 10.1038/s41377-020-00354-z (2020)

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    Huang, Z.-Y

    H. Huang, Z.-Y. Ning, T. Kariyado, T. Amemiya, and X. Hu, Opt. Express 31, 27006 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    L. Lu, H. Gao, and Z. Wang, Nat. Commun. 9, 5384 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Lin and L

    H. Lin and L. Lu, Light Sci. Appl. 9, 202 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Pilozzi, D

    L. Pilozzi, D. Leykam, Z. Chen, and C. Conti, Opt. Lett. 45, 1415 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    R. Gong, M. Zhang, H. Li, and Z. Lan, Opt. Lett. 46, 3849 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Makwana, R

    M. Makwana, R. Wiltshaw, S. Guenneau, and R. Cras- ter, Opt. Express 28, 30871 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Roberts, G

    N. Roberts, G. Baardink, J. Nunn, P. J. Mosley, and A. Souslov, Sci. Adv. 8 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Roberts, G

    N. Roberts, G. Baardink, A. Souslov, and P. J. Mosley, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022010 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Ross, Optical and Quantum electronics 16, 455 (1984)

    J. Ross, Optical and Quantum electronics 16, 455 (1984)

    1984

  26. [34]

    P. S. Russell, R. Beravat, and G. K. Wong, Philosoph- ical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathemati- cal, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375, 20150440 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    K. Y. Bliokh, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 11, 094009 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    Cooper, Advances in Physics 57, 539–616 (2008)

    N. Cooper, Advances in Physics 57, 539–616 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    L. O. Baksmaty, S. J. Woo, M. Banks, S. Choi, and N. P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. A 72, 063615 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    R. Bhat, M. Kr¨ amer, J. Cooper, and M. J. Holland, Phys. Rev. A 76, 043601 (2007)

    2007

  32. [40]

    R. A. Williams, S. Al-Assam, and C. J. Foot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 050404 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Wang, P.-G

    Y.-T. Wang, P.-G. Luan, and S. Zhang, New Journal of Physics 17, 073031 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Kariyado and Y

    T. Kariyado and Y. Hatsugai, Scientific Reports 5, 10.1038/srep18107 (2015)

    2015 doi

  35. [43]

    N. P. Mitchell, A. M. Turner, and W. T. M. Irvine, Phys. Rev. E 104, 025007 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    2006

  37. [45]

    N. P. Mitchell, L. M. Nash, D. Hexner, A. M. Turner, and W. T. Irvine, Nature Physics 14, 380–385 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Zhang, Y.-W

    Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Na- ture 438, 201–204 (2005)

    2005

  39. [48]

    A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, Adv. Opt. Photon. 3, 161 (2011)

    2011

  40. [49]

    X. M. Xi, T. Weiss, G. K. L. Wong, F. Biancalana, S. M. Barnett, M. J. Padgett, and P. St. J. Russell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 143903 (2013)

    2013

  41. [50]

    J. Lado, N. Garc ´ ıa-Mart ´ ınez, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Synthetic Metals 210, 56–67 (2015)

    2015

  42. [51]

    Souslov, K

    A. Souslov, K. Dasbiswas, M. Fruchart, S. Vaikun- tanathan, and V. Vitelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 128001 (2019)

    2019

  43. [52]

    Nicolet, F

    A. Nicolet, F. Zolla, Y. Ould Agha, and S. Guenneau, COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering 27, 806–819 (2008)

    2008

  44. [53]

    J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Ben- jamin/Cummings, 1994)

    1994

  45. [54]

    Kishi and E

    N. Kishi and E. Yamashita, in 1988., IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest(1988) pp. 739–742 vol.2

    1988

  46. [55]

    Peierls, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik80, 763–791 (1933)

    R. Peierls, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik80, 763–791 (1933)

    1933

  47. [56]

    J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev. 84, 814 (1951)

    1951

  48. [57]

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Nature Photonics 6, 782–787 (2012)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.