Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Eisenstein Series on Metaplectic Covers and Multiple Dirichlet Series

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For root data whose metaplectic dual is adjoint, the paper proves that the first Whittaker coefficient of a torus-induced metaplectic Eisenstein series is exactly a Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series, confirming the Eisenstein conjecture.

desk verdict A serious proof of the Eisenstein conjecture under an adjoint-type assumption, but the written proof has a sign error in the key gluing comparison that must be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13143 v2 pith:LVVKTYDH submitted 2024-11-20 math.NT math.RT

Yanze Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NTmath.RT MSC 11F7011M4122E50
keywords metaplecticEisensteinseriesWhittakercoefficientsWeylgroupmultipleDirichlettwistedmultiplicativityrootdataunramifiedprincipalGausssumsconjecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves the Eisenstein conjecture: for a number field containing all $2n$-th roots of unity, the first Whittaker coefficient of a global metaplectic Eisenstein series induced from the torus is exactly a Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series attached to the same root datum and degree $n$. The equality is stated as Theorem 5.3.3 under the hypothesis that the metaplectic dual root datum $D^\vee_{(Q,n)}$ is of adjoint type. A sympathetic reader should care because this replaces case-by-case verifications for individual root systems with one local-to-global mechanism, and it ties the analytic theory of metaplectic Eisenstein series to the arithmetic of twisted-multiplicative Dirichlet coefficients.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the total Whittaker functional, the sum of all local Whittaker functionals indexed by $\Lambda^\vee/\Lambda^\vee_0$; its value on the normalized spherical vector is a generating series for the local $\nu$-part coefficients of the WMDS. The identity is proved through a Weyl-group averaging action on Laurent polynomials in $\Lambda^\vee$, which produces the coefficients $H(\pi^{k_1}_\nu,\dots,\pi^{k_r}_\nu)$, and through a global comparison of two gluing processes: the cocycle $D(C;\nu)$ that arises when lifting a factorization of torus elements to the metaplectic torus, and the cocycle $D(C_1,\dots,C_r)$ from twisted multiplicativity. Lemma 5.3.7 identifies the two cocycles, reducing the global equality to the local one.

What would settle it

Compute the first Whittaker coefficient directly for the threefold cover of $\mathrm{SL}_2$ over $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_6)$ and compare term-by-term with the cubic Gauss-sum Dirichlet series predicted by (5.11); a mismatch in any coefficient would disprove the theorem, and a match for an even-degree type $B_r$ cover, where the adjoint hypothesis fails, would show the assumption is removable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the first Whittaker coefficient $W(\lambda,1)$ of the metaplectic Eisenstein series induced from the torus equals $[T_{oS}:T_{0,oS}]\,Z_\Psi(s_1,\dots,s_r)$, where $s_i=\langle \rho-\lambda,\alpha_i^\vee\rangle$. Here $Z_\Psi$ is the Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series with coefficients built from the metaplectic local formula for the total Whittaker functional, and $\Psi$ absorbs the contribution of the finitely many places in $S$. The proof establishes this by showing that the global sum over $T_k/T_{0,k}$ of local Whittaker integrals glues together by the same twisted-multiplicativity cocycle that assembles local $\nu$-parts into the global Dirichlet series; once the two gluing processes are identified, the theorem reduces to the local identity relating the total Whittaker functional to the $\nu$-part.

Load-bearing premise

The argument needs the metaplectic dual root datum $D^\vee_{(Q,n)}$ to be of adjoint type, meaning the lattice $\Lambda^\vee_0$ is exactly spanned by $n_i\alpha^\vee_i$; this makes the section of the metaplectic torus multiplicative on $T_0$, and it fails for covers such as type $B_r$ with even $n$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Eisenstein conjecture holds uniformly for all semisimple simply-connected root data whose metaplectic dual is adjoint, over number fields containing all $2n$-th roots of unity.
  • The Whittaker coefficient inherits meromorphic continuation and Weyl-group functional equations from the Eisenstein series, giving a new proof of the analytic properties of the corresponding multiple Dirichlet series.
  • Earlier type-by-type results for low-rank root systems become special cases of one local-to-global identity.
  • Covers such as type $B_r$ with even degree are outside the theorem, so the boundary of the conjecture under this hypothesis is explicit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the adjoint-type assumption is probably technical: it is used only to make the torus section multiplicative on $T_0$, so a more refined cocycle computation may extend the equality to all covers, including even-degree type $B_r$.
  • Inference: the same two-step strategy should apply to Eisenstein series induced from maximal parabolics; matching a parabolic total Whittaker functional with a p-part would define parabolic multiple Dirichlet series.
  • Inference: because the local identities hold away from wild places, a function-field version likely holds with $S$ enlarged to include wild and ramified places; the number-field statement in Theorem 5.3.3 is narrower than the abstract's 'global fields' wording.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves a global identity between the first Whittaker coefficient of a metaplectic Eisenstein series on a split simply-connected group and a Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series (WMDS). Under the hypothesis that the metaplectic dual root datum D^∨_{(Q,n)} is of adjoint type, Theorem 5.3.3 states that W(λ,1) equals [T_{oS}:T_{0,oS}] Z_Ψ(s_1,...,s_r) with s_i = ⟨ρ−λ, α_i^∨⟩. The strategy is to unfold the Eisenstein series, sum over T_k/T_{0,k}, regroup both sides by the finite quotient ⊕_{ν∉S} Λ^∨/Λ^∨_0, and identify each sub-sum using the local Patnaik–Puskás total Whittaker function theorem and the Chinta–Gunnells construction of the p-parts of the WMDS.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this gives a uniform confirmation of the Brubaker–Bump–Friedberg Eisenstein conjecture for split simply-connected groups subject to the adjoint-type condition on the metaplectic dual. The main novelty is conceptual: the paper replaces the crystal/pattern combinatorics of earlier type-by-type proofs by a local-to-global gluing argument built from the total Whittaker functional and the Chinta–Gunnells averaging construction. The exposition is mostly clear, and the precise statement of Theorem 5.3.3 is a definite falsifiable claim. However, the paper relies on the imported local theorem of Patnaik–Puskás for the central local identity, and the proof as written contains a sign inconsistency in the fiber decomposition that affects the key gluing comparison; this must be repaired before the result can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3.5, Lemma 5.3.8, Lemma 5.4.3] There is a sign inconsistency in the definition of the fibers supp(Z; λ^∨). Equation (3.20) sets supp(Z; λ^∨) = {C : log_ν C ≡ −λ^∨_ν (mod Λ^∨_0)}. Lemma 5.3.8 then claims that for C in this fiber one has I_ν(i_ν(η_ν(C))) = I_ν(i_ν(π^{λ^∨})), and its proof writes η_k(C) = π^{λ^∨} η′. This is only correct if log_ν C ≡ +λ^∨_ν (mod Λ^∨_0). In the proof of Lemma 5.4.3 the quantity λ^∨_ν is then set equal to log_ν η_ν(C), so equation (5.41) evaluates the local integral at π^{log_ν C}, i.e. at π^{−λ^∨_ν} relative to the original fiber parameter. Since I_ν(i_ν(π^{μ^∨})) is not invariant under μ^∨ ↦ −μ^∨, the sub-summation comparison (5.35) and the equality (5.37) fail as written. The natural repair is to replace −λ^∨_ν by +λ^∨_ν in (3.20); because λ^∨ ranges over all classes in ⊕_{ν∉S} Λ^∨/Λ^∨_0, the total sum (3.22) is unchanged, so this is a proof repair rather than a change of theorem.
  2. [§1.1, §1.2.3, Theorem 5.3.3] The statement of the main result in the introduction and the local identity (1.4) use s_i = −⟨λ, α_i^∨⟩, whereas Theorem 5.3.3 defines s_i := ⟨ρ−λ, α_i^∨⟩ = 1 − ⟨λ, α_i^∨⟩, and the proof of Lemma 5.4.3 in equation (5.41) requires the latter. These two definitions differ by 1 for every simple coroot, so the equality announced in §1.1 is not the equality that is proved in Theorem 5.3.3. The introduction and §1.2.3 should be corrected to match the precise theorem, or the difference in convention should be explained explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract, §1.1, §5] The abstract and §1.1 state the result for global fields, while §5 and Theorem 5.3.3 restrict to number fields containing all 2n-th roots of unity (and hence totally imaginary). The scope of the theorem should be stated consistently in the abstract and introduction.
  2. [§1.1.1] The sentence 'Our approach to the Eisenstein conjecture works uniformly for all types of root systems' is stronger than the hypothesis of Theorem 5.3.3, which requires the metaplectic dual root datum to be of adjoint type; this condition excludes, for example, type B_r covers with even n (see §3.1.5). The claim should be qualified accordingly.
  3. [§1.1.4, §1.3] There are several typos: 'conputation' should be 'computation', 'affin Weyl group' should be 'affine Weyl group', 'Einsenstein' should be 'Eisenstein', and 'Eisenstein seires' in the abstract should be 'Eisenstein series'.
  4. [Theorem 5.3.3] In the statement of Theorem 5.3.3 the notation D^∨_{(sQ,n)} contains a stray 's'; it should read D^∨_{(Q,n)}.
  5. [Lemma 5.3.8] After the sign correction in (3.20), the proof of Lemma 5.3.8 should explicitly state that η_k(C) = π^{λ^∨} η′ holds because log_ν C ≡ λ^∨_ν modulo Λ^∨_0 for every ν outside S; as currently written the proof is inconsistent with (3.20).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the global Whittaker-coefficient formula is derived from independent local theorems and a non-tautological gluing comparison.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The WMDS coefficients H are fixed in §3.3.3 from the Chinta–Gunnells/Casselman–Shalika generating function fCS(0), not from the global Whittaker coefficient being computed. The local input used in Step 3 is the Patnaik–Puskás/McNamara theorem (Theorem 4.5.2 and Corollary 4.5.3): W(π^{λ∨}) = fCS(λ∨), an externally published local result whose assumptions do not include the target global equality. Although the paper acknowledges that the project started jointly with M. Patnaik, [37] is not authored by Chen and is not an unverified assertion; it is a published theorem, so the citation is real evidence and does not raise the circularity score. The global argument then unfolds the Eisenstein series, regroups by λ∨ ∈ ⊕ Λ∨/Λ∨0, identifies the S-part with Ψ, and proves that the two gluing factors coincide (Lemma 5.3.7 and Step 3). These comparisons could fail and are not identities by definition; the equality is not built into the definition of H. The sign issue in (3.20) versus Lemma 5.3.8 and the number-field/global-field discrepancy are correctness/scope concerns, not circularity. Verdict: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on local results from the literature (McNamara's Casselman-Shalika formula, Patnaik-Puskás total Whittaker function theorem, Gindikin-Karpelevich formula) and on the adjoint-type hypothesis on the metaplectic dual root datum. No free parameters or invented entities are used. The main axiom to watch is the adjoint-type condition, which does not hold universally and is the principal restriction of the theorem.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Patnaik-Puskás total Whittaker function theorem: W(π^{λ∨}) = fCS(λ∨) for λ∨ in Λ∨+
    Imported from [37]; this local identity equates the total Whittaker functional with the Chinta-Gunnells Casselman-Shalika polynomial, and is the core local input (Theorem 4.5.2 and Corollary 4.5.2). It is not reproved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The metaplectic dual root datum D∨(Q,n) is of adjoint type, i.e. Λ∨0 = ⊕ Z n_i α∨i
    Used in Corollary 4.2.8 to prove the section i is multiplicative on T0, which underpins Lemma 5.3.6 and Lemma 5.3.8. Restricts the theorem; fails for example for type B_r with even n.
  • domain assumption Moeglin-Waldspurger analytic continuation and functional equations apply to metaplectic Eisenstein series
    Invoked in §1.1.4 and §5.2 to justify meromorphic continuation; standard but external.
  • domain assumption k is a number field containing all 2n-th roots of unity and S satisfies conditions of §2.1.5
    Sets the global field context; the theorem is not proved for function fields despite the abstract's 'global field' wording.
  • standard math Chinta-Gunnells action extends to a W-action (Theorem 3.2.2)
    Cited from [37]; needed for the definition of fCS(0) and the H coefficients.
  • domain assumption Gindikin-Karpelevich formula for metaplectic groups (Proposition 4.3.5)
    Cited from [31], used in the proof of Theorems 4.7 and Appendix A.
  • domain assumption McNamara's metaplectic Casselman-Shalika formula
    Cited from [33]; relates local Whittaker functions to ν-parts of WMDS, used in §1.2.3 and Corollary 4.5.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Eisenstein Series on Metaplectic Covers and Multiple Dirichlet Series." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LVVKTYDH

@misc{pith2026241113143,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Eisenstein Series on Metaplectic Covers and Multiple Dirichlet Series},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LVVKTYDH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13143}
}
read the original abstract

We computed the first Whittaker coefficient of an Eisenstein series on a global metaplectic group induced from the torus and related the result with a Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series attached to the (dual) root system of the group under a mild assumption on the root system and the degree of the metaplectic cover. This confirms a conjecture of Brubaker-Bump-Friedberg.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A decomposition of Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series for symmetrizable Kac-Moody root systems

    math.NT 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Invariant functions under twisted Chinta-Gunnells actions on Kac-Moody root systems admit unique expansions into shifted averages indexed by dominant weights of the twisting module.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2, 153–178

    William Banks, Daniel Bump, and Daniel Lieman, Whittaker–fourier coefficients of metaplectic eisen- stein series, Compositio Mathematica 135 (2003/01/01), no. 2, 153–178

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Daniel Bump Benjamin Brubaker and Solomon Friedberg., Eisenstein series, crystals, and ice, Notices of the American Mathematical Society (2011), 1563–1571

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    [electronic resource]., Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics: v

    Armand Borel and Bill Casselman, Automorphic forms, representations, and l-functions. [electronic resource]., Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics: v. 33.1, American Mathematical Society, 1979

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Ben Brubaker, Valentin Buciumas, Daniel Bump, and Henrik P. A. Gustafsson, Metaplectic iwahori whittaker functions and supersymmetric lattice models (2024), available at arXiv:2012.15778

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Reine Angew

    Ben Brubaker and Daniel Bump, On kubota’s Dirichlet series, J. Reine Angew. Math.598 (2006), 159–

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Gunnells, Metaplectic ice (2012), 65–92

    Ben Brubaker, Daniel Bump, Gautam Chinta, Solomon Friedberg, and Paul E. Gunnells, Metaplectic ice (2012), 65–92

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    2, 325–355

    Ben Brubaker, Daniel Bump, and Solomon Friedberg, Weyl group multiple dirichlet series ii: The stable case, Inventiones mathematicae 165 (2006), no. 2, 325–355

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    , Annals of mathematics studies: no

    , Weyl group multiple dirichlet series : type a combinatorial theory. , Annals of mathematics studies: no. 175, Princeton University Press, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    , Weyl group multiple dirichlet series, eisenstein series and crystal bases, Annals of mathematics (2011), 1081–1120

    2011

  2. [10]

    Ben Brubaker, Daniel Bump, Solomon Friedberg, and Jeffrey Hoffstein, Weyl group multiple dirichlet series iii: Eisenstein series and twisted unstable, Annals of Mathematics (2007), 293–316

    2007

  3. [11]

    Benjamin Brubaker, Daniel Bump, Gautam Chinta, Solomon Friedberg, and Jeffrey Hoffstein, Weyl group multiple dirichlet series i , Multiple dirichlet series, automorphic forms, and analytic number theory, 2006, pp. 91–114

    2006

  4. [12]

    4, 1180–1239

    Benjamin Brubaker and Solomon Friedberg, Whittaker coefficients of metaplectic eisenstein series, Ge- ometric and Functional Analysis 25 (2015/07/01), no. 4, 1180–1239

    2015

  5. [13]

    Gunnells, Constructing Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series, J

    Gautam Chinta and Paul E. Gunnells, Constructing Weyl group multiple Dirichlet series, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), no. 1, 189–215. MR2552251

    2010

  6. [14]

    Deligne, Sommes de gauss cubiques et revetements de sl(2), Seminaire Bourbaki21 (Unknown Month 1978), 244–277 (fre)

    P. Deligne, Sommes de gauss cubiques et revetements de sl(2), Seminaire Bourbaki21 (Unknown Month 1978), 244–277 (fre)

    1978

  7. [15]

    3, 297–360

    Adrian Diaconu, Dorian Goldfeld, and Jeffrey Hoffstein, Multiple dirichlet series and moments of zeta and l-functions, Compositio Mathematica 139 (2003), no. 3, 297–360

    2003

  8. [16]

    Adrian Diaconu and Vicentiu Pasol, Moduli of hyperelliptic curves and multiple dirichlet series(2018), available at arXiv:1808.09667

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Popa, Quadratic weyl group multiple dirichlet series of type d (1) 4 (2023), available at arXiv:2111.11062

    Adrian Diaconu, Vicentiu Pasol, and Alexandru A. Popa, Quadratic weyl group multiple dirichlet series of type d (1) 4 (2023), available at arXiv:2111.11062

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    4, 953–1011

    Solomon Friedberg and Lei Zhang, Eisenstein series on covers of odd orthogonal groups , American Journal of Mathematics 137 (2015), no. 4, 953–1011

    2015

  11. [19]

    Fan Gao, Freydoon Shahidi, and Dani Szpruch, Local coefficients and gamma factors for principal series of covering groups, arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.02686 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    i , Algebraic groups and homogeneous spaces, 2007, pp

    Howard Garland, Eisenstein series on loop groups: Maass-selberg relations. i , Algebraic groups and homogeneous spaces, 2007, pp. 275–300. 42

    2007

  13. [21]

    3, 723–784

    , Eisenstein series on loop groups: Maass-selberg relations ii, American Journal of Mathematics 129 (2007), no. 3, 723–784

    2007

  14. [22]

    5, 1277–1353

    , Eisenstein series on loop groups: Maass-selberg relations iii, American Journal of Mathemat- ics 129 (2007), no. 5, 1277–1353

    2007

  15. [23]

    , Eisenstein series on loop groups: Maass-selberg relations. iv. , Lie algebras, vertex operator algebras and their applications, 2007, pp. 115–158

    2007

  16. [24]

    Thomas J Haines, Robert E Kottwitz, and Amritanshu Prasad, Iwahori-hecke algebras , arXiv:math0309168 (2003)

    2003

  17. [25]

    Jeffrey Hoffstein and Dorian Goldfeld, Eisenstein series of 1/2-integral weight and the mean value of real dirichlet l-series., Inventiones mathematicae 80 (1985), 185–208

    1985

  18. [26]

    D. A. Kazhdan and S. J. Patterson, Metaplectic forms, Publications Mathématiques de l’Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques 59 (1984/12/01), no. 1, 35–142

    1984

  19. [27]

    1, 114–121

    Tomio Kubota, Topological covering of sl (2) over a local field, Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan 19 (1967), no. 1, 114–121

    1967

  20. [28]

    , On automorphic functijons and reciprocity laws in a number field, Kyoto University, Kinoku- niya book store, 1969

    1969

  21. [29]

    , Some results concerning reciprocity law and real analytic automorphic functions, 1969 number theory institute, 1971, pp. 382–395

    1969

  22. [30]

    Hideya Matsumoto, Sur les sous-groupes arithmétiques des groupes semi-simples déployés , Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 2 (1969), no. 4, 1–62

    1969

  23. [31]

    McNamara, Metaplectic Whittaker functions and crystal bases, Duke Mathematical Journal156 (2011), no

    Peter J. McNamara, Metaplectic Whittaker functions and crystal bases, Duke Mathematical Journal156 (2011), no. 1, 1 –31

    2011

  24. [32]

    , Principal series representations of metaplectic groups over local fields(2012), 299–327

    2012

  25. [33]

    4, 2913–2937

    , The metaplectic casselman-shalika formula, Transactions of the American Mathematical So- ciety 368 (2016), no. 4, 2913–2937

    2016

  26. [34]

    Moeglin and J

    C. Moeglin and J. L. Waldspurger, Spectral decomposition and eisenstein series: A paraphrase of the scriptures (LeilaTranslator Schneps, ed.), Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  27. [35]

    Moore, Group extensions ofp-adic and adelic linear groups, Publications Mathématiques de l’Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques 35 (1968/12/01), no

    Calvin C. Moore, Group extensions ofp-adic and adelic linear groups, Publications Mathématiques de l’Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques 35 (1968/12/01), no. 1, 5–70

    1968

  28. [36]

    Jürgen Neukirch, Algebraic number theory., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, A Series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics: 322, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999

    1999

  29. [37]

    Manish Patnaik and Anna Puskás, On iwahori-whittaker functions for metaplectic groups, Advances in Mathematics 313 (2017), 875–914

    2017

  30. [38]

    Patnaik and Anna Puskás, Metaplectic covers of Kac–Moody groups and Whittaker func- tions, Duke Mathematical Journal 168 (2019), no

    Manish M. Patnaik and Anna Puskás, Metaplectic covers of Kac–Moody groups and Whittaker func- tions, Duke Mathematical Journal 168 (2019), no. 4, 553 –653

    2019

  31. [39]

    566, 111–134

    Gordan Savin, On unramified representations of covering groups, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 2004 (2004), no. 566, 111–134

    2004

  32. [40]

    Will Sawin, General multiple dirichlet series from perverse sheaves(2024), available atarXiv:2209. 13072

    2024

  33. [41]

    66, American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 2016

    Robert Steinberg, Lectures on chevalley groups, University Lecture Series, vol. 66, American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 2016

    2016

  34. [42]

    Andre Weil, Adeles and algebraic groups, Progress in mathematics, Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 1982

    1982

  35. [43]

    Weissman, Metaplectic tori over local fields

    M.H. Weissman, Metaplectic tori over local fields. , Pacific Journal of Mathematics 241 (2009), no. 1, 169–200

    2009

  36. [44]

    Ian Whitehead, Multiple dirichlet series for affine weyl groups (2014), available at arXiv:1406. 0573

    2014

  37. [45]

    12, 2503–2523

    , Affine weyl group multiple dirichlet series: typeeA, Compositio Mathematica152 (2016), no. 12, 2503–2523. YANZE CHEN, Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G1, Canada • E-mail : yanze4@ualberta.ca 43

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.